Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I am curious about the logic behind machine learning term. As my understanding, Q Learning is a machine learning. Because it learns a concept. It learns states.
But when it comes to genetic algorithms, i don't see them as machine learning. To me, these algorithms are just a way of optimizing a specific problem. If environment changes(states), precalculated genetic algorithm based solution will be useless. You have to run it again.
So the question is, Is Genetic Algorithm a Machine Learning Method?
All the replies will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Most of the AI/ML classification are quite clear and see Genetic Algorithms as an ML method. Deepdive in AIML venture landscape By Ajit Nazre Rahul Garg
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
My question is given a particular dataset and a binary classification task, is there a way we can choose a particular type of model that is likely to work best? e.g. consider the titanic dataset on kaggle here: https://www.kaggle.com/c/titanic. Just by analyzing graphs and plots, are there any general rules of thumb to pick Random Forest vs KNNs vs Neural Nets or do I just need to test them out and then pick the best performing one?
Note: I'm not talking about image data since CNNs are obv best for those.
No, you need to test different models to see how they perform.
The top algorithms based on the papers and kaggle seem to be boosting algorithms, XGBoost, LightGBM, AdaBoost, stack of all of those together, or just Random Forests in general. But there are instances where Logistic Regression can outperform them.
So just try them all. If the dataset is >100k, you're not gonna lose that much time, and you might learn something valuable about your data.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
One of anomaly detection algorithms is to use multivariate Gaussian to construct a probability density, according to Andrew Ng's coursera lecture.
What if data show cluster structures (not a single chunk)? In this case do we resort to unsupervised clustering to construct the density? If yes, how to do it? Are there other systematic ways to discover if such a case exists?
You can just use regular GMM and use a threshold on the likelihood to identify outliers. Points that don't fit the model well are outliers.
This works okay as long as your data really is composed of Gaussians.
Furthermore, clustering is fairly expensive. Usually it will be faster to directly use a nonparametric outlier model like KNN or LOF or LOOP.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
As per Pedro Domingos in his famous paper "A Few Useful Things to Know about Machine Learning" he writes Machine learning systems automatically learn programs from data.
But from my experience we r giving algorithms like ANN or SVM etc.
My question is how it is automating automation?
Could someone put some light with example.
When you develop a machine learning algorithm, with ANN or SVM or whatever, you don't say to your programming how to solve your problem, you are telling him how to learn to solve the problem.
SVM or ANN are ways to learn a solution to a problem, but not how to solve a problem.
So when people say "Machine learning systems automatically learn programs from data", they are saying that you never programmed a solution to your problem, but rather letting the computer learning to do so.
To quote wikipedia : "Machine learning is a field of computer science that gives computers the ability to learn without being explicitly programmed"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_learning
[Edit]
For example let's take one of the most simple machine learning algorithm, the linear regression in a 2D space.
The aim of this algorithm is to learn a linear function given a dataset of (x,y), so when you given your system a new x you get an approximation of what the real y would be.
But when you code a linear regression you never specify the linear function y = ax+b. What you code is a way for the program to deduce it from the dataset.
The linear function y=ax+b is the solution to your problem, the linear regression code is the way you are going to learn that solution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_regression
Machine Learning development helps to improve business operations as well as improve business scalability. A number of ML algorithms and artificial intelligence tools have gained tremendous popularity in the community of business analytics. There has been a rise in machine learning market due to faster and cheaper computational processing, easy availability of data as well as affordable data storage.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
(homework problem)
Which of the following problems are best suited for the learning approach?
Classifying numbers into primes and non-primes.
Detecting potential fraud in credit card charges.
Determining the time it would take a falling object to hit the ground.
Determining the optimal cycle for trafic lights in a busy intersection
I'm trying to answer your question without doing your homework.
Basically you can think of machine learning as a way to extract patterns from data where all other approaches fail.
So first clue here: If there is an analytic way to solve the problem then don't use machine learning! The analytic algorithm will likely be faster, more efficient, and 100% correct.
Second clue is: There has to be a pattern in the data. If you as a human see a pattern, machine learning can find it too. If lots of smart humans who are experts of the respective domain don't see a pattern then machine learning will most likely fail. Chaos can not be learned, i.e. classified/predicted.
That should answer your question. Make sure to also read the summary on wikipedia to get an idea whether a problem can be solved using supervised, unsupervised, or reinforcement learning.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking for code must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Include attempted solutions, why they didn't work, and the expected results. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a question about Reinforcement learning. If we use a mechanism to find the response of the environment in an unsupervised method to improve its performance, is the method still unsupervised?
In other word, using the response of the environment, is a method supervised or we can do it in an unsupervised manner? If so, how?
I have to disagree with #phs. Reinforcment learning is treated in the literature either as:
completely separate, third method of training -- so it is not supervised or unsupervised, it is simply reinforcment
it is sometimes marked as supervised due to its much stronger similarities to this paradigm
So, if the algorithm is trained in the reinforcment fashion and unsupervised, you can call it a unsupervised-reinforcment hybrid or something similar, but no longer "unsupervised", as reinforcment learning requires some additional knowledge about the world, than the one encoded in the data representation (feedbacks are not stored in data representation, they are much more like "true labels").
Unsupervised learning describes a class of problems where the model is not provided "answers" during its training phase, whatever that might mean in the current context.
Clustering is a canonical example. In a clustering problem one is only looking for inherent structure or grouping in the training data, and not seeking to distinguish "right" data points from "wrong" ones.
Your question is vague, but I believe you are asking whether we can call a training method unsupervised even if we have a proscribed algorithm for performing the training. The answer is yes; the word is just a word. All learning algorithms have inherent proscribed structure (the algorithm) and so are in some sense "supervised".