I have below app.json setup to create review apps in Heroku.
{
"name": "Small Sharp Tool",
"description": "This app does one little thing, and does it well.",
"keywords": [
"rails",
"ruby",
"angular"
],
"scripts": {
"postdeploy": "bash script/bootstrap.sh"
},
"env": {
"SECRET_TOKEN": {
"description": "A secret key for verifying the integrity of signed cookies.",
"generator": "secret"
},
"WEB_CONCURRENCY": {
"description": "The number of processes to run.",
"value": "5"
},
"LANG": {
"value": "en_US.UTF-8"
},
"RAILS_LOG_TO_STDOUT": {
"value": "enabled"
},
"S3_KEY": {
"required": true
},
"S3_SECRET": {
"required": true
},
"RAILS_SERVE_STATIC_FILES": {
"value": "true"
}
},
"formation": {
"web": {
"quantity": 1
},
"sidekiq": {
"quantity": 1
}
},
"addons": [
{
"plan": "heroku-redis:hobby-dev",
"as": "Redis"
},
{
"plan": "heroku-postgresql:hobby-dev",
"as": "postgresql",
"options": {
"version": "12"
}
}
],
"buildpacks": [
{
"url": "heroku/ruby"
},
{
"url": "heroku/nodejs"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/simplefractal/heroku-buildpack-wkhtmltopdf.git"
}
],
"environments": {
"test": {
"scripts": {
"test": "bundle exec rake test"
}
}
},
"stack": "heroku-16"
}
and bootstrap.sh file has for now only pg_restore command and it seems the restore went fine as per the log.
shell script file has:
#!/bin/bash
echo $HEROKU_APP_NAME
curl https://s3-bucket-url | pg_restore --verbose --clean --no-acl --no-owner --dbname $POSTGRESQL_URL
But I am getting error as Could not create review app. Postdeploy exit code was not 0. . What is that I am missing here?
I had the same issue and found another solution: I used pre-made interface, and that solved the problem for me. However if you want a different database management system (eg i wanted PostgreSQL)or any other add-on, you will have to customize the code. Here is mine, but beware, it has still the issue you were complaining about - if you found, why my code isn´t working I ll be very glad if you let me know.
Related
I try to migrate my manifest from v2 to v3 and fail with background scripts. I get an error unexpected token. I think my syntax is correct. What I'm doing wrong? How can I migrate this setup with multiple background scripts?
manifest v2
{
"description": "Tooltip Dictionary",
"manifest_version": 2,
"name": "Tooltip Dictionary",
"permissions": [ "https://www.example.com/*", "storage" ],
"version": "1.0.0",
"icons":{
"16":"icon16.png",
"32":"icon32.png",
"48":"icon48.png",
"128":"icon128.png"
},
"browser_action":{
"default_icon": "icon32.png"
},
"content_scripts":[{
"matches":["<all_urls>"],
"js":["jquery.min.js", "tooltip.css.js", "cs.js"]
}],
"background":{
"scripts":[ "jquery.min.js","bg.js" ]
},
"commands":{
"run-script": {
"suggested_key": {
"default": "Alt+1",
"windows": "Alt+1",
"mac": "Command+E"
},
"description": "Run"
}
}
}
manifest v3
{
"description": "Tooltip Dictionary",
"manifest_version": 3,
"name": "Tooltip Dictionary",
"host_permissions": ["https://www.example.com/*"],
"permissions": ["storage"],
"version": "1.0.0",
"icons":{
"16":"icon16.png",
"32":"icon32.png",
"48":"icon48.png",
"128":"icon128.png"
},
"action":{
"default_icon": "icon32.png"
},
"content_scripts":[{
"matches":["<all_urls>"],
"js":["jquery.min.js", "tooltip.css.js", "cs.js"]
}],
"background": {
"service_worker": ["jquery.min.js", "bg.js"]
},
"commands":{
"run-script": {
"suggested_key": {
"default": "Alt+1",
"windows": "Alt+1",
"mac": "Command+E"
},
"description": "Run"
}
}
}
If I try to use a single background file, it can't be registered too, like on screenshot:
I have 2 tasks in visual studio code to run 2 different images into containers. Only the last docker run task is recognized by vscode.
This is my tasks.json file
{
"version": "2.0.0",
"tasks": [
{
"label": "docker-build-1",
"type": "docker-build",
"platform": "python",
"dockerBuild": {
"tag": "image1:latest",
"dockerfile": "${workspaceFolder}/app1/dev.Dockerfile",
"context": "${workspaceFolder}/",
"pull": true
}
},
{
"label": "docker-build-2",
"type": "docker-build",
"platform": "python",
"dockerBuild": {
"tag": "image2:latest",
"dockerfile": "${workspaceFolder}/app2/dev.Dockerfile",
"context": "${workspaceFolder}/",
"pull": true
}
},
{
"label": "docker-run-1",
"type": "docker-run",
"dependsOn": [
"docker-build-1"
],
"python": {
"module": "app.main"
},
"dockerRun": {
"network": "mynetwork"
}
},
{
"label": "docker-run-2",
"type": "docker-run",
"dependsOn": [
"docker-build-2"
],
"python": {
"module": "app.main"
},
"dockerRun": {
"network": "mynetwork"
}
},
]
}
When vscode shows the menu for running task, only thask docker-run-2 is showing:
Actually, only the last docker run task in the tasks.json file is shown. If I change the order in the list of tasks, then vscode only recognize docker-run-1. I searched in the documentation and it doesn't says anything about this behaviour. Any idea why this is happening? The idea is to setup 2 debug configurations in vscode for the 2 apps, but running the debug config for the app that is not the last produce an error in vscode:
Came across this same issue today. Seems that the "dockerRun" attribute between the run tasks has to be different. In my case i just added a test environment variable to one of the tasks and then both started to appear in the task list.
I have a production keyvault that keeps a reference of secrets that projects can use, but only if deployed using ARM templates such secrets are not handled by people copy pasting them.
When a new project starts, as part of its deployment script, it will create its own keyvault.
I want to be able to run the templates/scripts as part of CI/CD. And this will today result in the same secret having a new version at each run, even though the value did not change.
How to make it only update the keyvault value when the master vault is updated.
In my deployment.sh script I use the following technique.
SendGridUriWithVersion=$((az group deployment create ... assume that the secret exists ... || az group deployment create ... assume that the secret exists ... ) | jq -r '.properties.outputs.secretUriWithVersion.value')
and it works because in the template there is a parameter, if set, that will retrieve the secret and compare it with the new value and only insert if difference. The original problem is that the deployment fails if the secret is not already set (this happens for the first deployment etc).
But then due to Unix ||, the same script is run again without the parameter set and it will use a condition to not try to get the old value and therefore run successful.
Here are the example in dept:
SecretName="Sendgrid"
SourceSecretName="Sendgrid"
SourceVaultName="io-board"
SourceResourceGroup="io-board"
SendGridUriWithVersion=$((az group deployment create -n ${SecretName}-secret -g $(prefix)-$(projectName)-$(projectEnv) --template-uri https://management.dotnetdevops.org/providers/DotNetDevOps.AzureTemplates/templates/KeyVaults/${keyVaultName}/secrets/${SecretName}?sourced=true --parameters sourceVault=${SourceVaultName} sourceResourceGroup=${SourceResourceGroup} sourceSecretName=${SourceSecretName} update=true || az group deployment create -n ${SecretName}-secret -g $(prefix)-$(projectName)-$(projectEnv) --template-uri https://management.dotnetdevops.org/providers/DotNetDevOps.AzureTemplates/templates/KeyVaults/${keyVaultName}/secrets/${SecretName}?sourced=true --parameters sourceVault=${SourceVaultName} sourceResourceGroup=${SourceResourceGroup} sourceSecretName=${SourceSecretName}) | jq -r '.properties.outputs.secretUriWithVersion.value')
The https://management.dotnetdevops.org/providers/DotNetDevOps.AzureTemplates/templates/KeyVaults/{keyvaultName}/secrets/{secretName}?sourced=true returns a template
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"keyVaultName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "io-board-data-ingest-dev"
},
"secretName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "Name of the secret to store in the vault"
},
"defaultValue": "DataStorage"
},
"sourceVaultSubscription": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "[subscription().subscriptionId]"
},
"sourceVault": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "[subscription().subscriptionId]"
},
"sourceResourceGroup": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "[resourceGroup().name]"
},
"sourceSecretName": {
"type": "string"
},
"update": {
"type": "bool",
"defaultValue": false
}
},
"variables": {
"empty": {
"value": ""
},
"test": {
"reference": {
"keyVault": {
"id": "[resourceId(subscription().subscriptionId, resourceGroup().name, 'Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults', parameters('keyVaultName'))]"
},
"secretName": "[parameters('secretName')]"
}
}
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2018-05-01",
"name": "AddLinkedSecret",
"type": "Microsoft.Resources/deployments",
"properties": {
"mode": "Incremental",
"templateLink": {
"uri": "[concat('https://management.dotnetdevops.org/providers/DotNetDevOps.AzureTemplates/templates/KeyVaults/',parameters('keyVaultName'),'/secrets/',parameters('secretName'))]",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0"
},
"parameters": {
"existingValue": "[if(parameters('update'),variables('test'),variables('empty'))]",
"secretValue": {
"reference": {
"keyVault": {
"id": "[resourceId(parameters('sourceVaultSubscription'), parameters('sourceResourceGroup'), 'Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults', parameters('sourceVault'))]"
},
"secretName": "[parameters('sourceSecretName')]"
}
}
}
}
}
],
"outputs": {
"secretUriWithVersion": {
"type": "string",
"value": "[reference('AddLinkedSecret').outputs.secretUriWithVersion.value]"
}
}
}
and that template has a nested call to https://management.dotnetdevops.org/providers/DotNetDevOps.AzureTemplates/templates/KeyVaults/{keyvaultName}/secrets/{secretName} which gives the one with the condition
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"keyVaultName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "io-board-data-ingest-dev",
"metadata": {
"description": "Name of the existing vault"
}
},
"secretName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "Name of the secret to store in the vault"
},
"defaultValue": "DataStorage"
},
"secretValue": {
"type": "securestring",
"metadata": {
"description": "Value of the secret to store in the vault"
}
},
"existingValue": {
"type": "securestring",
"defaultValue": ""
}
},
"variables": {},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/secrets",
"condition": "[not(equals(parameters('existingValue'),parameters('secretValue')))]",
"apiVersion": "2015-06-01",
"name": "[concat(parameters('keyVaultName'), '/', parameters('secretName'))]",
"properties": {
"value": "[parameters('secretValue')]"
}
}
],
"outputs": {
"secretUriWithVersion": {
"type": "string",
"value": "[reference(resourceId(resourceGroup().name, 'Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/secrets', parameters('keyVaultName'), parameters('secretName')), '2015-06-01').secretUriWithVersion]"
}
}
}
Is there any possibility for conversion from dwg to dgn using forge design automation api? If yes then what will be the best way to do that? Any suggestion would be helpful.
Yes, you can use the -DGNEXPORT command in your script to accomplish this.
I was trying to get a concrete codes for this question as it requires some tricks and support of seed file on Design Automation. By engineer team's help, now it is working.
Assume we test with Postman. If you are working with v2 of Design Automation, the scripts below demo the usage.
Activity:
{
"HostApplication": "",
"RequiredEngineVersion": "23.1",
"Parameters": {
"InputParameters": [{
"Name": "HostDwg",
"LocalFileName": "$(HostDwg)"
}],
"OutputParameters": [{
"Name": "Result",
"LocalFileName": "result.dgn"
}]
},
"Instruction": {
"CommandLineParameters": null,
"Script":"(command \"_-DGNEXPORT\" \"_V8\" (strcat (getvar \"DWGPREFIX\")
\"result.dgn\") \"_Master\" \"Standard\" (strcat (getvar \"LOCALROOTPREFIX\")
\"Template\\\\V8-Imperial-Seed3D.dgn\"))\n"
},
"Version": 1,
"Id": "CreateActByLISP"
}
WorkItem:
{
"#odata.type": "#ACES.Models.WorkItem",
"Arguments": {
"InputArguments": [
{
"Resource": "http://forge-test.oss-cn-shanghai.aliyuncs.com/test.dwg",
"Name": "HostDwg",
"StorageProvider": "Generic"
}
],
"OutputArguments": [
{
"Name": "Result",
"StorageProvider": "Generic",
"HttpVerb": "POST",
"Resource": null
}
]
},
"ActivityId": "CreateActByLISP",
"Id": ""
}
If working with v3 of Design Automation, the script would be as below. Note: the engine needs 23.1 (Autodesk.AutoCAD+23_1)
Activity
{
"commandLine": [
"$(engine.path)\\accoreconsole.exe /i $(args[HostDwg].path) /s $(settings[script].path)"
],
"parameters": {
"HostDwg": {
"verb": "get",
"description": "Host drawing to be loaded into acad.",
"localName": "$(HostDwg)"
},
"Result": {
"verb": "post",
"description": "Results",
"localName": "result.dgn"
}
},
"engine": "Autodesk.AutoCAD+23_1",
"appbundles": [],
"settings": {
"script": {
"value": "(command \"_-DGNEXPORT\" \"_V8\" (strcat (getvar \"DWGPREFIX\") \"result.dgn\") \"_Master\" \"Standard\" (strcat (getvar \"LOCALROOTPREFIX\") \"Template\\\\V8-Imperial-Seed3D.dgn\"))\n"
}
},
"description": "PlotToPdf for all layouts.",
"id": "myexportdgn"
}
WorkItem:
{
"activityId": "{{your nick name}}.myexportdgn+{{activity alias}}",
"arguments": {
"HostDwg": {
"url": "http://forge-test.oss-cn-shanghai.aliyuncs.com/test.dwg"
},
"Result": {
"verb": "put",
"url": "<your upload url>"
}
}
}
I'm evaluating atlassian-connect-express and just created an app
boilerplate with "atlassian-connect new", and then deployed it via ngrok
to my Jira dev account.
That works fine, but when I try to use the file "credentials.json" with
my account data, the plug starts with the error message:
Failed to register with host https://michael%40...:[My
password]#connect-ace.atlassian.net (401)
Add-on not registered; no compatible hosts detected
I get a similar message when I go to the url connect-ace.atlassian.net
Here my atlassian-connect.json
{
"key": "my-add-on",
"name": "Ping Pong",
"description": "My very first add-on",
"vendor": {
"name": "Angry Nerds",
"url": "https://www.atlassian.com/angrynerds"
},
"baseUrl": "https://xxxxxxx.ngrok.io",
"links": {
"self": "https://xxxxxxxx.ngrok.io/atlassian-connect.json",
"homepage": "https://xxxxxxx.ngrok.io/atlassian-connect.json"
},
"authentication": {
"type": "jwt"
},
"lifecycle": {
"installed": "/installed"
},
"scopes": [
"READ"
],
"modules": {
"generalPages": [
{
"key": "hello-world-page-jira",
"location": "system.top.navigation.bar",
"name": {
"value": "Hello World"
},
"url": "/hello-world",
"conditions": [{
"condition": "user_is_logged_in"
}]
},
{
"key": "hello-world-page-confluence",
"location": "system.header/left",
"name": {
"value": "Hello World"
},
"url": "/hello-world",
"conditions": [{
"condition": "user_is_logged_in"
}]
}
]
}
}
and my credatials.json
{
"hosts": {
"connect-ace.atlassian.net": {
"product": "jira",
"username": "michael#---",
"password": "---password---"
}
}
}
How can I get my dev account working with connect-ace?
Two things to check:
1 - Check the if the credentials.json has correct values. host url should start with https://. Password is the api token generated from here.
{
"hosts": {
"https://<your atlassian site name>.atlassian.net": {
"product": "jira",
"username": "<jira user name>",
"password": "<Token created from https://id.atlassian.com/manage/api-tokens>"
}
}
}
2- Enable development mode at Settings -> Apps -> Manage Apps -> Settings. (This is required if the app is not published in marketplace)
This error is a default from atlas-connect
Print error image
In atlasssian-connect.json
replace this :
"lifecycle": {
"installed": "/installed"
},
for this:
"lifecycle": {
"installed": "installed"
},
Have you tried spawning your own cloud instance and testing it there? If not yet, try creating one here. Once successfully registered, in your credentials.json, change "connect-ace" with your baseUrl/sitename and with the right credentials, it should automatically install it for you.