I have some problems following the tutorial "http://wiki.ros.org/Industrial/Tutori...". I have installed ROS Melodic and i want to use an slave ethercat like the "IO rack: EtherCAT Couper, 8 DI, & 8DO (all Beckhoff)" but different brand (Omron), and when i try to follow the step 1: Install OROCOS toolchain for ROS it return a error when i follow the tutorial "http://wiki.ros.org/orocos_toolchain" and execute the command "rosdep install orocos_toolchain" the error is the next: ERROR: Rosdep cannot find all required resources to answer your query Missing resource orocos_toolchain.
I use ROS 1 Distro: melodic SO: Ubuntu 18:04
Someone can i help me, please. I was searching another ways to install OROCOS toolchain but i didn't have success.
Most of the readily available documentation for installing / using Orocos is out of date. For example, that page you were at is (at timeof writing) 6 years old, for an end-of-life distro.
The up-to-date info is on their github and website (The website, for you right now, is probably less useful, but this page still is). Respectively, you should now install that fat stack as sudo apt install ros-melodic-rtt-ros-integration, aka install from binary sources. Make sure to pay careful attention to Building ROS-Based Orocos Components, because they have their own system which changes the CMake process. There's also other packages that they/others keep from other stacks, you can see the whole list by trying to autocomplete apt install ros-melodic-rtt-
Related
I tried following this guide to install ROS, but even after adding ROS source.list and its key
sudo apt install ros-melodic-desktop-full
gave error.
E: Unable to locate package ros-melodic-desktop-full
Then I ran this command
sudo apt search ros
to see if any such package exists. I couldn't find ros-melodic-desktop-full but I found another similar package ros-desktop-full.
So I installed it instead. The installation went smooth without giving any errors.
Next step in the guide is to set-up ROS environment variable, but I have no such directory
/opt/ros
So how do I setup the environment variable?
P.S.
I also installed some tools and dependencies with this command
sudo apt install python3-rosdep python3-rosinstall python3-rosinstall-generator python3-wstool build-essential
and initialized rosdep
sudo rosdep init
rosdep update
The ros-desktop-full package you installed is part of the official Ubuntu release.
ROS Melodic (and in the future, Noetic) is published by the OSRF in a separate repository (packages.ros.org). These packages install to /opt/ros/. However, some ROS packages have also been ported to Debian, which is how they found their way to Ubuntu (which derives from Debian).
The Debian packages are fully functional, but they do not install to /opt/ros. Instead, everything is integrated in the operating system itself. This means that you need to set up your personal workspace slightly differently.
Given that most tutorials assume that you use the OSRF packages, I suggest you either wait for the Noetic release (scheduled for the end of May 2020), then install ros-noetic-desktop-full, or downgrade to Ubuntu 18.04 LTS to use ROS Melodic.
From the documentation here, melodic is only supported on Ubuntu 18.04. The ROS version targeting Focal (20.04) is Noetic, but that one has not been released yet (see Distributions). I'm not sure what ROS version Ubuntu packages (the ros-desktop-full one you installed), but I was not successful in using it.
If you really do want to use Ubuntu 20.04, then I think your best option currently is to compile from source. Last time I checked the precompiled debs for Noetic are not yet available at http://packages.ros.org/ros/ubuntu (you can track release progress at github issue 21513). No idea if compiling Noetic from source is easy or hard, but I was able to compile ROS2 foxy from source without too much trouble though.
So I've been searching everywhere and I'm completely stuck right now. Initially I just installed the binaries which came with luarocks.exe and luarocks_admin.exe but with that there was no config file so when I go to install the luarocks-mysql module, luarocks was unable to find the lua library and said I needed to set the LUA_LIBDIR variable in the config. I can't make changes to the luarocks config though because it either doesn't exist or I can't find it.
After getting this problem I went back to install the luarocks all in one package but I'm unable to follow the instructions because I can't find the install.bat file that they were talking about. Sorry if this is a lot but I'm just running into a bunch of problems right now.
EDIT: Just use Ubuntu, it's 100 times easier.
I had similar problems. I didn't look for a solution and just installed wsl on windows 10.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install
Then execute the commands in the console:
sudo apt install lua5.3 liblua5.3-0 liblua5.3-dev
sudo apt install luarocks
I'm testing clickhouse. Finally I installed ClickHouse on my virtual machine. But I've got some problem to make it.
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: clickhouse-server-1.1.54236-4.el6.x86_64 (clickhouse)
Requires: libbfd-2.20.51.0.2-5.44.el6.so()(64bit)
But, I already have this "binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.47". (More recent version)
[root#node01 ~]# rpm -qa | grep "binutils"
binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.47.el6_9.1.x86_64
So, I removed binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.47 and install binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.44, it works well.
Is this common issue?
Thanks.
Chan.
The BFD libraries are only intended for internal use by binutils and related tools. There is no ABI stability even within the same release of CentOS (or Red Hat Enterprise Linux). This is why the library name can change from minor release to minor release, breaking RPM dependencies in this way.
You need to talk to whoever builds clickhouse. They need to bundle their own version of BFD if they truly need it, or use supported libraries such as libelf from elfutils if they need only a tiny subset.
I'm trying to use luagraph, a binding to the graphviz library:
http://luagraph.luaforge.net/index.html
To install, I'm using luarocks in Mac OS X. The following command is executed in bash:
luarocks install luagraph
The output is the following:
Installing https://luarocks.org/luagraph-1.0.4-1.src.rock... Using
https://luarocks.org/luagraph-1.0.4-1.src.rock... switching to 'build'
mode
Error: Could not find expected file graphviz/graph.h, or
graphviz/graph.h for GRAPHVIZ -- you may have to install GRAPHVIZ in
your system and/or pass GRAPHVIZ_DIR or GRAPHVIZ_INCDIR to the
luarocks command. Example: luarocks install luagraph
GRAPHVIZ_DIR=/usr/local
I have been installed graphviz using homebrew, but I can't figure out how to pass GRAPHVIZ_DIR or GRAPHVIZ_INCDIR properly.
How can I install luagraph?
I've updated LuaGRAPH a couple of weeks ago. It now supports the newest version of Graphviz based on the cgraph library instead of the old graph library.
There is one drawback: I couldn't get luagraph to run on Windows using mingw because of some runtime library issues (compiler and dll compatibility probably). Please look at the README file for more details.
I personally never produced a rockspec for this module. This was created by someone else based on a fork of my luagraph library.
Installation without Luarocks is simple. Download from
https://github.com/hleuwer/luagraph
and follow the instruction in the documentation and the README file. You need adopt a simple config file which is included by make.
Herbert
Well, luaGRAPH is still the top result when searching for lua and graph. So the question is still standing.
And, unfortunately, the answer is: luagraph is OLD, the last update happened before the ubuntu 14.04 was released. And there seem to be some notable changes in the system itself, the flags the error message show do not seem to work. On top of that, graphviz is now about 20 releases newer than the luarock recommends.
There now is a bare bone alternative lua package: graphviz
It is extremely basic, and documentation in not at all informative, but at least it works.
update: Luagraph may be working again, but not through rocks. See the other answer.
Z3's dependency on libgmp.so.3 is unresolved in the linux package, leaving the user to provide this library. However, this library is very old and is not readily available.
Does anyone know a method for getting around this issue? I am currently running x86_64 and cannot get around this missing dependency without a great deal of hassle.
Is it possible the linux packages could be fixed such they include the expected library in the distribution?
You can get GMP3 by executing sudo apt install libgmp3-dev.
I'm not a Linux expert, but this is the command I used to install GMP before I compiled Z3.
When I installed the virtual machine for running Linux 64, I think I didn't find a package for the more recent versions of GMP.
I will try again. If it doesn't work, I will download the most recent GMP tar ball and build it from scratch.
BTW, the Z3 for Linux 32 comes with two .so files. One of them has GMP statically linked.
The trick I used for building this .so file didn't work for the 64 bit version.
As I said, I'm not a Linux expert, any suggestions on how to build a better Z3 library for Linux x86_64 users are welcome.