Empty array on React state - ruby-on-rails

I'm using a backend on ruby-on-rails, when my API calls for 'transactions' it returns a JSON, which works fine when tested via insomnia, but my mapping does not work. Here's my react page:
interface Transaction {
id: number;
title: string;
transaction_type: string;
description: string;
value: number;
}
const Index: React.FC = () => {
const [transactions, setTransactions] = useState<Transaction[]>([]);
useEffect(() => {
api.get('transactions').then((response) => {
setTransactions(response.data);
// console.log(response.data, transactions)
});
}, []);
return (
<React.Fragment>
<h1>Transactions</h1>
{transactions.map((transaction) => {
<div>{transaction.title}</div>;
})}
</React.Fragment>
);
};
export default Index;
On the backend side its simply returns a JSON with my database result:
#transactions_controller.rb
def index
render json: #transactions = Transaction.all
end
My routes are pointing to path: '/api/'.
When the console.log shows the response.data it is correct, but when showing the transactions state its empty.

You are missing the return in the map.
{transactions.map(transaction => {
return (<div>{transaction.title}</div>)
})}
Or you can remove the curly braces { from you map and it will return imlicitly.
{transactions.map(transaction => <div>{transaction.title}</div> )}

setState() does not always immediately update the component. It may
batch or defer the update until later. This makes reading this.state
right after calling setState() a potential pitfall.
https://reactjs.org/docs/react-component.html#setstate
That's why your console.log doesn't work, and as pointed in a previous answer you're missing the return in the map that's why you are probably not seeing results in the screen

That is because ajax calls are asynchronous, so by the time the component accesses the transactions, it will still be an empty array, best way will be to check if the transactions have been loaded before
using the snippet below solves the issue
interface Transaction {
id: number;
title: string;
transaction_type: string;
description: string;
value: number;
}
const Index : React.FC = () => {
const [transactions, setTransactions] = useState<Transaction[]>([]);
useEffect(() => {
api.get('transactions').then(response => {
setTransactions(response.data);
// console.log(response.data, transactions)
});
}, []);
return (
<React.Fragment>
<h1>Transactions</h1>
{transactions.length && transactions.map(transaction =>
<div>{transaction.title}</div>
)}
</React.Fragment>
);
}
export default Index
NB: transactions.length act as a boolean flag which returns false if it is 0

Related

Set a form value using react-hook-form within React-Admin

In my React-Admin app, I'd like to leverage react-hook-form's useFormContext for various things, such as, for example, setting the default pre-selected choice in this custom input field:
...
import {
Create, SimpleForm, SelectInput
} from 'react-admin';
import { useFormContext } from 'react-hook-form';
const MyInput = () => {
const formContext = useFormContext();
formContext.setValue('category', 'tech');
return (
<SelectInput source="category" choices={[
{ id: 'tech', name: 'Tech' },
{ id: 'people', name: 'People' },
]}
/>
);
};
...
const ItemCreate = () => {
return (
<Create>
<SimpleForm>
<MyInput />
</SimpleForm>
</Create>
);
};
...
This sets the pre-selected value of the field, just as intended. But it throws a warning: Cannot update a component ("Form") while rendering a different component ("MyInput")...
Is there some way to achieve this without getting the warning?
Note: The only reason I'm using a custom input field here is because when I put useFormContext() directly into the component that contains SimpleForm it returns null (similarly described here).
The warning is related to the fact that the entire body of the MyInput() function is executed during each render, you need to call the setValue() function inside the useEffect hook.
Got this working by moving formContext.setValue into a useEffect hook:
...
import {
Create, SimpleForm, SelectInput
} from 'react-admin';
import { useFormContext } from 'react-hook-form';
const MyInput = () => {
const formContext = useFormContext();
// moved the setValue into a useEffect
useEffect(() => {
formContext.setValue('category', 'tech');
});
return (
<SelectInput source="category" choices={[
{ id: 'tech', name: 'Tech' },
{ id: 'people', name: 'People' },
]}
/>
);
};
...
const ItemCreate = () => {
return (
<Create>
<SimpleForm>
<MyInput />
</SimpleForm>
</Create>
);
};
...

Relay Modern updater ConnectionHandler.getConnection() returns undefined when parent record is root

Debugging update:
So, we went a bit further in debugging this and it seems like 'client:root' cannot access the connection at all by itself.
To debug the complete store, we added this line in the updater function after exporting the store variable from the relay/environment.
console.log(relayEnvStore.getSource().toJSON())
If I use .get() with the specific string client:root:__ItemList_items_connection, I can access the records I have been looking for but it's definitely not pretty.
const testStore = store.get('client:root:__ItemList_items_connection')
console.log(testStore.getLinkedRecords('edges'))
Original:
I'm using Relay Modern and trying to update the cache after the updateItem mutation is completed with the updater. The call to ConnectionHandler.getConnection('client:root', 'ItemList_items') returns undefined.
I'm not sure if it's because I'm trying to use 'client:root' as my parent record or if there's a problem with my code. Has anyone found themselves with a similar issue?
Here's the paginationContainer:
const ItemListPaginationContainer = createPaginationContainer(
ItemList,
{
node: graphql`
fragment ItemList_node on Query
#argumentDefinitions(count: { type: "Int", defaultValue: 3 }, cursor: { type: "String" }) {
items(first: $count, after: $cursor) #connection(key: "ItemList_items") {
edges {
cursor
node {
id
name
}
}
pageInfo {
hasNextPage
hasPreviousPage
startCursor
endCursor
}
}
}
`
},
{
direction: 'forward',
getConnectionFromProps: props => props.node && props.node.items,
getVariables(props, { count, cursor }) {
return {
count,
cursor
}
},
query: graphql`
query ItemListQuery($count: Int!, $cursor: String) {
...ItemList_node #arguments(count: $count, cursor: $cursor)
}
`
}
)
Here's the mutation:
const mutation = graphql`
mutation UpdateItemMutation($id: ID!, $name: String) {
updateItem(id: $id, name: $name) {
id
name
}
}
`
Here's the updater:
updater: (store) => {
const root = store.getRoot()
const conn = ConnectionHandler.getConnection(
root, // parent record
'ItemList_items' // connection key
)
console.log(conn)
},
Turns out that I was setting my environment incorrectly. The store would reset itself every time I would make a query or a mutation, hence why I couldn't access any of the connections. I initially had the following:
export default server => {
return new Environment({
network: network(server),
store: new Store(new RecordSource())
})
}
All connections are accessible with this change:
const storeObject = new Store(new RecordSource())
export default server => {
return new Environment({
network: network(server),
store: storeObject
})
}

Ngrx-effect doesn't sending payload in action on iOS

For some time I have been trying to find a solution to my problem, however, nothing has worked so far. I'm working on Ionic 4 application with Angular 8 and Ngrx. I created #Effect that calling a service which calling http service and then I need to dispatch two actions. One of them have a payload also.
Everything working fine in development (browsers). I've tried on Chrome, Firefox, Safari. Problem is appearing when I'm trying on the iPhone. On the iPhone payload sending to action is empty object {} instead of object with proper fields.
I've tried to build in non-production mode, disabling aot, build-optimizer, optimization.
Store init:
StoreModule.forFeature('rental', reducer),
EffectsModule.forFeature([RentalServiceEffect]),
Store:
export interface Contract {
address: string;
identity: string;
endRentSignature?: string;
}
export interface RentalStoreState {
status: RentStatus;
contract?: Contract;
metadata?: RentalMetadata;
summary?: RentalSummary;
carState?: CarState;
}
export const initialState: RentalStoreState = {
status: RentStatus.NOT_STARTED,
contract: {
address: null,
identity: null,
endRentSignature: null,
},
};
Action:
export const rentVerified = createAction(
'[RENTAL] RENT_VERIFIED',
(payload: Contract) => ({ payload })
);
Reducer:
const rentalReducer = createReducer(
initialState,
on(RentActions.rentVerified, (state, { payload }) => ({
...state,
contract: payload,
status: RentStatus.RENT_VERIFIED
})));
export function reducer(state: RentalStoreState | undefined, action: Action) {
return rentalReducer(state, action);
}
Method from a service:
public startRentalProcedure(
vehicle: Vehicle,
loading: any
): Observable<IRentalStartResponse> {
loading.present();
return new Observable(observe => {
const id = '';
const key = this.walletService.getActiveAccountId();
this.fleetNodeSrv
.startRent(id, key, vehicle.id)
.subscribe(
res => {
loading.dismiss();
observe.next(res);
observe.complete();
},
err => {
loading.dismiss();
observe.error(err);
observe.complete();
}
);
});
}
Problematic effect:
#Effect()
public startRentalProcedure$ = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType(RentalActions.startRentVerifying),
switchMap(action => {
return this.rentalSrv
.startRentalProcedure(action.vehicle, action.loading)
.pipe(
mergeMap(response => {
return [
RentalActions.rentVerified({
address: response.address,
identity: response.identity
}),
MainActions.rentalProcedureStarted()
];
}),
catchError(err => {
this.showConfirmationError(err);
return of({ type: '[RENTAL] START_RENTAL_FAILED' });
})
);
})
);

access data from a rails service in react front end react-on-rails

Quite new to React on Rails apps, especially the React portion. I'm trying to access data in a nested hash that is given from a SQL query in a Rails service. First off, is this even possible?
In Rails Console, lets say user1 has already been found by id, LedgersService.transactions(user1).first returns all data in this format:
{:transactable=>{:type=>"Deposit",
:id=>"28cba04f-5b9d-4c9c-afca-b09a6e0e8739",
:user_id=>"72700244-e6b0-4baf-a381-c22bfe56b022",
:transacted_at=>"2019-03-12 19:04:48.715678", :amount_cents=>15,
:notes=>"none", :processor=>nil, :details=>nil},
:ledgers=>[{:entry_type=>"credit", :amount_cents=>15,
:transacted_at=>"2019-03-12 19:04:48.715678",
:user_id=>"72700244-e6b0-4baf-a381-c22bfe56b022",
:transactable_type=>"Deposit",
:transactable_id=>"28cba04f-5b9d-4c9c-afca-b09a6e0e8739"}]}
I am attempting to do something similar in my React component to try to get the data, however, I'm not quite sure how to set LedgersService.transactions portion. This is how I currently have it:
class LedgersIndex extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { ledgers_service: { transactions: [] }, paginator: { count: 0, page: 0, limit: 0 }, user: { id: this.props.match.params.user_id } };
My endpoint call:
componentDidMount() {
var user_id = this.state.user.id;
this.fetchData(user_id, 1);
}
fetchData = (user_id, page_number) => {
apiService.ledgersIndex(user_id, page_number)
.then(
paginated => {
this.setState({
ledgers_service: {
transactions: paginated.ledgers_service.transactions
},
paginator: {
limit: paginated.meta.limit,
count: paginated.meta.count,
page: paginated.meta.page -1
}
});
},
Further down in my render:
render() {
const { classes } = this.props;
const { ledgers_service, paginator } = this.state;
My fetch in apiService:
function locationsIndex(page_number) {
const requestOptions = {
method: 'GET',
headers: Object.assign({},
authorizationHeader(),
{ 'Content-Type': 'application/json' })
};
return fetch(`${process.env.API_SERVER}/api/v1/admin/locations?page=${page_number}`, requestOptions)
.then(handleResponse)
.then(paginated => {
return paginated;
});
}
When I console.log(ledgers_service.transactions(this.state.user.id)), I get the error that ledgers_service.transactions is not a function. console.log(paginator.count) however worked, is this because transactions is being set to an array?
What's the correct way to get that same endpoint in my React component that I got from my rails console?
Quite new to React on Rails apps, especially the React portion. I'm
trying to access data in a nested hash that is given from a SQL query
in a Rails service.
Yes, JS likes JSON so you should have a Rails action that responds with JSON. This is the correct way to exchange data between React and Rails:
# in your React app
fetch('/path/to/resource.json')
.then((returnedResource) => {
// do something with JSON
})
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));
# in your controller
respond_to do |format|
format.json { render json: LedgersService.transactions(user1).first }
end
From there, you can treat your returnedResource as a JSON object. In your case, this would be pagination

Apollo Subscription doesn't seem to get called on Mutation

New to Apollo, so I decided to take the most simple example I found and try to work it in a slightly different way. My code can be found here.
The problem I am having is that the Subscription doesn't seem to get called when I call the Mutation createTask(). The Mutation and Subscription are defined in schema.graphql as:
type Mutation {
createTask(
text: String!
): Task
}
type Subscription {
taskCreated: Task
}
And in resolvers.js as:
Mutation: {
createTask(_, { text }) {
const task = { id: nextTaskId(), text, isComplete: false };
tasks.push(task);
pubsub.publish('taskCreated', task);
return task;
},
},
Subscription: {
taskCreated(task) {
console.log(`Subscript called for new task ID ${task.id}`);
return task;
},
},
What I am expecting to happen is that I would get a console.log in the server every time I run the following in the client:
mutation Mutation($text: String!) {
createTask(text:$text) {
id
text
isComplete
}
}
But nothing happens. What am I missing?
The subscription resolver function is called when there is actually a subscription to the GraphQL Subscription.
As you did not add a client which uses subscriptions-transport-ws and the SubscriptionClient for subscribing to your websocket and the subscription it will not work.
What you could do is add the subscription Channel to the setupFunctions of the SubscriptionManager and therein you get the value that the pubsub.publish function delivers.
Could look like this:
...
const WS_PORT = 8080;
const websocketServer = createServer((request, response) => {
response.writeHead(404);
response.end();
});
websocketServer.listen(WS_PORT, () => console.log( // eslint-disable-line no-console
`Websocket Server is now running on http://localhost:${WS_PORT}`
));
const subscriptionManager = new SubscriptionManager({
schema: executableSchema,
pubsub: pubsub,
setupFunctions: testRunChanged: (options, args) => {
return {
taskCreated: {
filter: (task) => {
console.log(task); // sould be log when the pubsub is called
return true;
}
},
};
},
,
});
subscriptionServer = new SubscriptionServer({
subscriptionManager: subscriptionManager
}, {
server: websocketServer,
path: '/',
});
...

Resources