seems like accuracy of the user location is somewhat of when cellular data is not available?
Can I adjust how often user location is updated? Is there an example of user location adjustment to streets/roads/driveways? As you can see below line is way off the road.
.
Is geolocation accuracy affected when cellular data is not available?
Sometimes. The GPS source specifically does not depend on cellular, but positions are ultimately provided by the OS, which may use cell towers and nearby wi-fi when available to refine the location.
I don't know the scale of your map apart from using the cars/trucks on the pictured main road as references, but the distances involved appear large enough that the absence of cellular should not cause large jumps (but probably noisier lines).
Can I adjust how often user location is updated?
Indirectly, but yes. You can play with the desiredAccuracy, distanceFilter and activityType properties of the MGLLocationManager (accessible as the locationManager property of your MGLMapView).
The idea is to reduce the desired accuracy and distance filter so that you get noisier but more frequent positions. Setting activityType to CLActivityType.fitness might help as well.
Is there an example of user location adjustment to streets/roads/driveways?
You can check out Mapbox's Map Matching API, which is powered by the matching service of the OSRM (Open Source Routing Machine) engine.
Related
I found this Sample Code at Apple's Developer Site:
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/samplecode/footprint/Introduction/Intro.html
The discription says:
Use Core Location to take a Latitude/Longitude position and project it
onto a flat floorplan. Demonstrates how to do the conversions between
a Geographic coordinate system (Latitude/Longitude), a floorplan PDF
coordinate system (x, y), and MapKit.
I have tried it and it works really well.
Basically, you provide a map image for a building and specify two coordinates manually. Then, using CoreLocation, it is converting latitude/longitute into (x,y) position.
My question is - how is it possible to grab latitude/longitude while indoors?
I have watched some Apple's videos and they said they vastly improved CoreLocation, but how is my iPhone getting a correct informations?
TL;DR: It works. I am just wondering how.
Big companies, especially map providers such as Apple, Google, etc. gather information about all Wi-Fi access points (AP). They use so-called crowdsourcing technology in order to estimate position of AP by combining GPS coordinates with recieved signal strength (RSS) from all visible APs.
Once user requests a fix on their location, they send to server a list of all the MAC (media access control) addresses associated with wireless hot spots available within range to be checked against a database of those addresses. Then trilateration technique is used, that is fused with positional data provided by smartphone internal sensors (accelerometer, gyros, magnetometer, barometer). But this approach still suffer from lack of accuracy that is 7-20 meters so far depending from number of visible APs and quality of the sensors.
Learm more here, or here.
In order to have 1-5 meters accuracy, it's required to have additional correcting information. State of the art is to use bluetooth beacons. Given their coordinates it is possible to estimate user's position. Nowadays there are plenty of companies who develop this technology e.g. Navigine, indoors, nextome.
CoreLocation uses GPS when outdoors, and WiFi access points (APs) when indoors (when mapped, otherwise you're getting GPS which isn't very good when indoors). CoreLocation uses iBeacons for proximity positioning, not for giving you a lat/lon. That is, you can use CoreLocation to say "When I get close to this iBeacon let me know". For WiFi positioning to work, you must upload floor plans to Apple, get them converted to their IMDF format, then use a surveying tool to fingerprint your indoor location. Only then will CoreLocation actually leverage the WiFi APs to give you an accurate indoor location (3-5 meter accuracy).
I know that iPhone/iPad could use GPS and GLONASS, but does they use they in the same time?
I didn't find that info in documentation. GPS demand 4 satellites for proper work, (3 without altitude). Same thing with GLONASS. So, if we use just GPS we get 4 satellites and get's our standard GPS accuracy, and it's tolerance about 10-20 meters in open sky. I didn't find specified accuracy on wiki GPS page, maybe I just missed, but anyway my numbers is close. As said wikipedia, GLONASS accuracy for civilian usage is very slightly less accurate than GPS, but on high latitudes (north or south), GLONASS' accuracy is better than that of GPS due to the orbital position of the satellites. GLONASS
So, if we use both systems simultaneously, we have a great accuracy improvement because we have 8+ satellites from both systems. My question is: does iPhone/iPad use both systems and their location coordinates still sometimes very inaccurate? Is there a way to turn on/off one of the systems?
iOS locates the current location with all available services. That means GPS, mobile telephony transmitters (mobile cells), WLAN, and the newer iPhone with GLONASS. We have no way to decide programmatically which system exactly we want to use, but there are different ways to use the iOS location services. The desired accuracy and other parameters can be set via the CoreLocation Framework classes.
You should read the Location Awareness Programming Guide from Apple.
The main advantage of using GLONASS together with GPS is in situations with bad view to the sky, e.g., in urban canyons.
In that case, the additional GLONASS satellites may help.
In open sky situations, a combined GPS/GLONASS has no accuracy benefit to a GPS chip alone.
You cannot switch off any one of the GNSS systems in iOS. (iPhone 4S is the first iPhone that uses combined GPS/GLONASS).
What is the best (meaning least power consumption) way to use some location based service in an iOS application? E.g. checking the position in the background every x sec/min.
I've read about geofencing, but I'm not familiar with it in detail (how often it is updating location etc.).
Thanks for sharing any ideas
There is no best practice, it depends much on your application, which location accuracy it needs. How fast you need a position change, etc.
Either you need to be accurate to under 30m then you need GPS, which uses Power (8h of recording is possible at best location quality without using the phone otherwise)
Or you need much less accuracy, typically 1km, then it works with Cell Tower or Wifi location, which uses less power.
In between there is nothing reliable. (e.g 100m accuracy with low power, does not really exist, at least I would not trust such a setting, there are no published measurements how accurate an iphone really is in the lower accuracy settings).
I am very confused about the meaning of the core location constants. For example for my app I would like to get accuracy readings within 100 meters and it looks like kCLLocationAccuracyHundredMeters would be the appropriate choice. However with this settings I often get points with accuracy worse than +- one thousand meters and when I disable wifi. Are these core location constants only relevant when wifi is enabled or does it sound like I am doing something wrong? It seems weird that Apple wants developers to not have to worry about the underlying hardware (i.e. whether it is using gps, wifi, or cell towers) but have the accuracy totally depend on wifi being enabled.
Thanks for your help.
GPS readings depend on a LOT more than just your accuracy setting. For example if you are not using wifi and you try to take a reading from indoors I have seen GPS be several thousand meters off consistently until you go outside. If you are planning on making your app accurate for indoors I would not plan on relying on the typical GPS. If your major use case is outside than GPS is VERY accurate.
The accuracy constants are how you "request" a specific accuracy. What you actually get depends on what is available. CL will try to give you your requested accuracy (or better) but it will give you what it has even if it is worse accuracy while it is trying to get better accuracy location.
If you wait long enough (and ignore the locations that aren't good enough) then you will eventually get better accuracy location unless it can't be done (such as when GPS satellites aren't visible or there is no WiFi, etc).
Is there a way that I can determine a location of a laptop/phone connected to my router via a wireless network access point? (I do not want to use GPS... only the access point).
No. But let's examine why.
If you can get the metrics from the router, which might or might not be possible, you can get the signal strength. This will give you a circle. But, this is limited, as you also need to know how strong the WiFi card is to determine rough distance. But, you probably know the rough distance your router works under, or the max circle, so this is not very useful.
If you have more than one access point, however, you can use triangulation. With two, the information is limited; three or more will give you a more accurate distance and allow you to extrapolate the strength of the signal.
Nope. You might be able to estimate its distance away, but even that is not likely if you're inside a building. Various building materials attenuate the signal, so the response is non-linear. If your router has two separate antennas, and you can measure the signal strengh from each independently, then you might have a chance of getting a feel for the direction, but I doubt the signal resolution will be high enough to give you any meaningful data.
Yes. However you'll need more than one Access Point and some serious software.
There are a number of solutions available and in-development for Location Based Services in Wi-Fi Networks. As Gregory mentioned above a single AP is not enough to do anything but poor range estimation, however multiple APs do not typically use triangulation to determine the location solution, they use a trained Hidden Markov Model.