How do you find the default search path for include files for gfortran?
For gcc, a past Q&A showed this website:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/cpp/Search-Path.html#Search-Path
But,
I'm not sure if it applies to gfortran.
I don't think it always applies.
For example, on an Linux server, (for lack of any other method) I did this
strace gfortran try.f90 > tmp.txt 2>&1
and found this particular gfortran searches directories like
/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.2.181/linux/ipp/lib/intel64/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.7/finclude
and it does not search /usr/include . Apparently, this particular gfortran came with the Intel Fortran compiler and was customized.
So, my question is, is strace the only way to know what the default search paths are? (I need to know this, because I'm remotely helping a friend. I don't have direct access to his machine.)
Update: I should have mentioned the -print-search-dirs option. It doesn't include the "include" search path:
gfortran -print-search-dirs | grep --color include
The output of -print-search-dirs doesn't include the directories which strace indicates in the above experiment of mine.
Update2: I've just found that the gfortran on ubuntu searches only /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/finclude. I'm surprised that it doesn't even search /usr/include. So far, it seems we have to use -I/usr/include whereas we don't need -L/usr/lib . . . Does somebody know the reason for this asymmetry?
Update3: The answer below shows how to list include search paths:
echo | gfortran -E -Wp,-v -
Unfortunately, this one lists the paths only of the preprocessor (for #include), not for the INCLUDE statement of the Fortran language.
You can verify this by looking into one of the directories which the preprocessor does search. For example, I found cpuid.h in one of them. So, I compared
include 'cpuid.h'
with
#include "cpuid.h"
in a Fortran source program. Of course, either causes error, but the error messages make it clear that in the former case, the file isn't found and in the latter, the include file is found and inserted into the source code and that caused compile error.
Incidentally, this exercise showed that on my Linux server, gfortran searches /usr/lib/gcc/ . . . /finclude among other directories whereas its preprocessor searches /usr/lib/gcc/ . . . /include , which kind of makes sense.
For me
gfortran -print-search-dirs
does the trick.
My version
gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 5.3.0
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU Fortran comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
You may redistribute copies of GNU Fortran
under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING
I don't use it often and not a FORTRAN expert, so hope this helps.
Update
I looked back on some old notes and found this incantation:
echo | gfortran -E -Wp,-v -
Perhaps this is more useful?
Related
By "install packages" I mean to evaluate Nix build expressions (using nix-env, nix-shell -p, etc.) to build from source instead of using a substitute.
Also cross-posted to Unix& Linux because, as Charles Duffy pointed out, it is more on topic if it is about command-line tools or configuration. Still leaving this here because I assume forcing a package to always compile from source is possible by only using the Nix language, I just don't yet know how. (Or if it is in fact not possible, someone will point it out, and then this question does belong here.)
Either set the substitute option to false in nix.conf (the default is true) or use --option substitute false when invoking a Nix command.
nix-env --options substitute false -i hello
nix-shell --options substitute false -p hello
Might not be the droids you are looking for
As Robert Hensing (comment, chat), Henri Menke (comment), and Vladimír Čunát (comment) pointed out, this may not be the thing that you are really after.
To elaborate: I have been using the most basic Nix features confidently, but got to a point where I need to maintain and deploy a custom fork of a large application written in C, which is quite intimidating at the outset.
Tried to attack the problem the simplest way to just fetch my fork and re-build it with the new source, so I boiled it down to this question. Although, I suspect that the right direction for me is something along the lines of Nixpkgs/Create and debug packages in the NixOS Wiki.
Only re-build the package itself
Vladimír Čunát commented that "disabling substitutes makes you rebuild everything that's missing locally, even though I suspect that people asking such a question often only want to rebuild the specified package itself."
(This is probably achieved with nix-build or "just" overriding the original package but could be wrong. The latter is mention (maybe demonstrated even?) in the NixOS wiki article Development environment with nix-shell but haven't been able to read it thoroughly yet.)
Test for reproducibility
One might arrive to formulating this same question if they want to make sure that subsequent builds are deterministic. As Henri Menke comments, one should use nix-build --check for that.
The --check option is easy to miss; it's not documented in man nix-build or at nix-build in the Nix manual, but at nix-store --realize because (as man nix-build explains it):
nix-build is essentially a wrapper around nix-instantiate (to
translate a high-level Nix expression to a low-level store derivation)
and nix-store --realise (to build the store derivation) [and so] all
options not listed here are passed to nix-store --realise, except
for --arg and --attr / -A which are passed to nix-instantiate.
See detailed examples in the Nix manual at 18.1. Spot-Checking Build Determinism and the next section right after it.
The relevant parts for the substitute configuration option under the nix.conf section from the Nix manual:
Name
nix.conf — Nix configuration file
Description
Nix reads settings from two configuration files:
The system-wide configuration file sysconfdir/nix/nix.conf (i.e. /etc/nix/nix.conf on most systems), or $NIX_CONF_DIR/nix.conf if NIX_CONF_DIR is set.
The user configuration file $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/nix/nix.conf, or ~/.config/nix/nix.conf if XDG_CONFIG_HOME is not set.
You can override settings on the command line using the --option flag,
e.g. --option keep-outputs false.
The following settings are currently available:
[..]
substitute
If set to true (default), Nix will use binary substitutes if available. This option can be disabled to force building from source.
(Formerly known as use-binary-caches.)
Notes
Setting substitute to false (either with --options or in nix.conf) won't recompile the package if the command issue multiple times. That is, hello above would be compiled from source the first time, and then it will access the already present store path if the command issued again.
This is where it gets fuzzy: it is clear that no recompilation takes place because unless the package's Nix build expression doesn't change, the store output hash won't change either, making the next compilation output equivalent to the previous one, hence the action would be superfluous.
So if one would do some light hacking on a package, and just wanted to try it out locally (e.g., with nix-shell) then one would have to use -I nixpkgs=a/local/nixpkgs/dir to pick up those changes - and eventually do a recompilation? Or should one use nix-build?
See also question How to nix-build again a built store path?
Good day,
I recently could install Lua 5.3 to /opt/lua53 on Centos 7
I also added the following line into /etc/bashrc
PATH=/opt/lua35/bin:$PATH
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/lua53/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export PATH LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export LUA_INCLUDE_DIR=/opt/lua53/include
My colleague also install a software and when I compile by doing
make
I got the following errors
[root#pc6 jixie]# make
-- Release Build
-- Could NOT find Lua (missing: LUA_INCLUDE_DIR) (Required is at least version "5.2")
-- Could NOT find ZEROMQPP (missing: ZEROMQPP_LIBRARIES ZEROMQPP_INCLUDE_DIRS)
-- Could NOT find OPENVDB (missing: OPENVDB_LIBRARIES OPENVDB_INCLUDE_DIRS)
-- Downloading/updating kdtree
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
I look into serveral thread but none of then could help me.
As I wrote, I added the following line
export LUA_INCLUDE_DIR=/opt/lua53/include
hoping it can provide the path to LUA_INCLUDE_DIR, but unfortunately I still get the same error.
Any idea how I can solve my problem? DO you need more information of my system?
NB: I am using cmake 3.10
PATH=/opt/lua35/bin:$PATH looks wrong: It should be /opt/lua53/bin.
You are re-inventing the wheel and making it square this time round...
If you have installed Lua development (package or from source) then there should be a package-config file named lua.pc placed at a location where cmake or configure can find it and enquire it as to what should the libs and cflags of any application requiring Lua include/libs. For my system, these files are usually located at /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/ and indeed lua.pc lives there with this content:
V= 5.3
R= 5.3.4
prefix= /usr
exec_prefix=${prefix}
libdir= /usr/lib64
includedir=${prefix}/include
Name: Lua
Description: An Extensible Extension Language
Version: ${R}
Requires:
Libs: -llua -lm -ldl
Cflags: -I${includedir}
The above file tells configure where the include dir is, and what's more important, what flags to use during compilation (-I... -L... -l...).
If you are on a system with a package manager (say yum, dnf, apt-get, etc.) then placing these pc files to their location is taken care of automatically if they exist in the package that is.
If you insist to do it the way you have done it above by hand-coding LUA_INCLUDE_DIR to your shell's environment, then make sure that LUA_INCLUDE_DIR points to an existing and valid location with valid content. Are you sure the include files required can be found in that dir? Maybe there is an extra dir in there?
I want to compile the GTK+ test program for the Vala programming language. I saved the code as main.vala and call the compiler with the command line
valac --pkg gtk+-3.0 main.vala
But this does not work. I get the error:
Package gobject-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gobject-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'gobject-2.0' found
error: pkg-config exited with status 1
Why can't pkg-config find that package? When I call
pkg-config --list-all | grep gobject-2.0
I do not get an error, but
gobject-2.0 GObject - GLib type, Object, Parameter and Signal library
So my question is, why doesn't the program compile?
It's hard to figure out what is going on based on the information you've provided—you're probably going to have to figure it out yourself. I'll try to include some pointers here. A good place to start would be to set the PKG_CONFIG_DEBUG_SPEW environment variable…
The most likely cause is that some environment variables and/or the pkg-config being invoked are different. It's hard to say exactly how they might be different, but all valac is doing is invoking pkg-config.
In order to determine which pkg-config to execute, valac first looks for the --pkg-config command line option or, if that isn't present, the PKG_CONFIG environment variable (see compiler/valacompiler.vala for the logic). If that isn't present, it will just invoke pkg-config (that part is in codegen/valaccodecompiler.vala, the Vala.CCodeCompier.compile method).
From there, pkg-config takes over. The pkg-config man page explains how it searches for files; basically the PKG_CONFIG_PATH. Again, enabling debug spew would probably be the best place to start.
Recently I'm learning openCV. I followed the tutorial on openCV website.
http://docs.opencv.org/doc/tutorials/core/how_to_scan_images/how_to_scan_images.html#howtoscanimagesopencv
However, when I compile my code using following command
g++ loadImage.cpp -o loadImage
the command line shows:
fatal error: 'opencv2/core/core.hpp' file not found
#include <opencv2/core/core.hpp>
^
I installed openCV with brew, I think it is OK. Then I use emacs to edit and g++ compile my code directly, is that the problem? I searched some similar problems but they refer to xCode environment. Thanks for your help!
You need to tell g++ where it can find the header files. I recommend you setup either eclipse or any other IDE that can handle that stuff for you (like Qt Creator or many others). You can follow the setup guides for OpenCV for instructions, if needed.
[edit: note that I know that emacs can also be setup to handle things like include and library paths, but I have no idea how, hence my recommendation for a full scale IDE]
You can also specify the path to the includes on the command line with -I, then it should also work. Example:
g++ -I/path/to/OpenCV-2.4.9/build/include loadImage.cpp -o loadImage
There are environment variables you can set so you don't have to specify this for every call (see this page for a complete list, specifically CPATH and it's variants might be of interest.
So I find an answer myself, using cmake! How did I miss that..
http://docs.opencv.org/doc/tutorials/introduction/linux_gcc_cmake/linux_gcc_cmake.html#linux-gcc-usage
Im using gnat4.6 on Ubuntu installed using apt-get. I need to know where to install downloaded libraries like APQ. What should I set my ADA_INCLUDE_PATH and ADA_OBJECTS_PATH to?
The beauty of Ada support in Debian (on which Ubuntu is based) is that you don't need to mess with ADA_INCLUDE_PATH and friends; supported libraries are installed where the GNAT Project Manager expects to find them. Say gnatls -v to see the default values.
To use the system as intended, you will find it much simpler to use the GNAT Project Manager; you'd say, in your my_project.gpr file,
with "apq";
project My_Project is
...
and build with
$ gnatmake -P my_project
There's online documentation for GPR, but I wouldn't call it particularly user-friendly. There's a set of Youtube videos (I haven't looked at them in any detail; their stated interest is large systems, but hang in there).
I use gnatmake to build; how do I cite my build paths in a correct way?
The relevant options are shown in 6.2 Switches for gnatmake: Source and library search path switches.
Addendum: The development package is libapq3.2.0-dev.
The manual is in /usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/manual.pdf.gz
An example and corresponding .gpr file are in /usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/examples. As #Simon suggested, the .gpr file begins:
with "apq.gpr";
project APQ.Samples is
The Ada include files are in /usr/share/ada/adainclude/apq.
The libraries are in /usr/lib.
$ dpkg -L libapq3.2.0-dev
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/ada
/usr/share/ada/adainclude
/usr/share/ada/adainclude/apq
/usr/share/ada/adainclude/apq/apq_helper.ads
/usr/share/ada/adainclude/apq/apq_helper.adb
/usr/share/ada/adainclude/apq/apq.adb
/usr/share/ada/adainclude/apq/apq.ads
/usr/share/ada/adainclude/apq.gpr
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev
/usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/manual.pdf.gz
/usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/examples
/usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/examples/apq-samples.adb
/usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/examples/apq-samples.ads
/usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/examples/apq-samples.gpr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/libapq.a
/usr/lib/ada
/usr/lib/ada/adalib
/usr/lib/ada/adalib/apq
/usr/lib/ada/adalib/apq/apq_helper.ali
/usr/lib/ada/adalib/apq/apq.ali
/usr/share/doc/libapq3.2.0-dev/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/lib/libapq.so