How do you use a zap to remove data from an existing field? For example, the fields "Name" and "Email" have data, but I need a zap that will just set those values as blank/null/empty.
The zap I'm using is for a Checklist in Process Street. There are several fields (i.e., email, name, etc.) that are already populated with data in the Checklist, and I want to remove those data. Of course if you just leave the fields blank in the zap, Zapier ignores them in the update. I've tried looking up environment variables but can't find anything, and blind guessing with inserting a space, "", {{NULL}}, " ", doesn't work. Thank you for your assistance!
The empty string will work in many cases, but if it's acting up, you could try adding a Formatter step and replacing the existing contents of the field (using the field you want to clear from an earlier step as the "find" part of find/replace) with the empty string (the replace part of find/replace). You can see this document for how the Formatter by Zapier app can be used:
https://zapier.com/apps/formatter/help#reformatting-text
This is a bit quirky, so if that doesn't work, you might try reaching out to customer service. They'll definitely have more specific advice for your Zap.
https://zapier.com/app/contact-us
Related
For a blog model I'm saving an RSS field as text under Blog.rss, problem is, some of this is rather long and each one prints when I'm working in the rails console, ie: Blog.last(10).
Is there a way to hide output unless I call someblog.rss specifically?
I had a similar problem and received some solutions in another forum, which were:
Use select to get just the columns you need
If you have a very long column (I had JSON data structure from a webhook cluttering the console), consider whether you really need it, and if you don't , don't store it in the table
Or, consider storing it in an associated table
if you need the whole object but just want to change how it's represented in console/log output, you can redefine inspect
yourobject.as_json(except: :unwanted_column)
Also
You could look into: https://github.com/awesome-print/awesome_print
I am having a drupal 7 node about software releases. The title field of the release is
"Release v6-05-01"
I need to construct a URL based on this title that goes like this http://example.com/html605/Class.html
I know hot to construct the URL but the "605" bit is tricky because I have no token for it.
I thought that maybe I could take the characters from the title one by one? Is this possible in Drupal 7?
One solution could be to add a new field (eg "version number", text field) to your content type to hold the "605" string, and then use this token (typically : [node:field_version_number]) to construct your URL. But you'll have one more field to manage when creating new nodes, and maybe a lot of work to process existing nodes.
Depending on how this number is constructed from the node title, you could try using Computed Field or Dynamic Field, and create a PHP computed field. In PHP you could build the version number with some substr logic based on the node title (its value is available in the PHP snippet). This way you don't have to fill the new field for each new node and existing nodes should be automatically updated.
Good luck
I have a FIX application which is connected to several price providers. It distributes the data it received to our inner applications. When it is sending the received messages from the price providers to the target applications, it modifies the SendingTime(52) field in FIX header which is not acceptable. The inner applications want to get the original SendingTime value. How can I say to the QuickFIXJ engine not to assign a timestamp value?
Thanks
What you desire... is kind of wrong. Header fields are to be used by the engine, and for application data (which is what this relayed SendingTime kind of is on the second leg). Your inner FIX connection should not be clobbering the SendingTime field. You might need the actual SendingTime field if you are diagnosing problems with your inner connection!
What you really need is a second SendingTime field. You should edit the DD of your inner FIX applications to add another field for which to store the old SendingTime value. Tell your inner target apps to refer to that field.
NOTE: You probably don't want to use OrigSendingTime (tag 122) for this. That field has a very specific usage already. Name your new field something else.
FIX Market Data messages (35=W, 35=X) usually have MDEntryDate (#272) and MDEntryTime (#273) fields to represent the timestamp of the market data price. If it is related to Quote/trade messages, you may have the TransactTime (#60) field.
It worth keep the SendingTime (#52) and MDEntryDate MDEntryTime/TransactTime separated, you can compare the difference between the price's timestamp and the counter party's infra structure timestamp (sending time). It would help to identify delay between the systems.
If the message you are handling does not have any Application DateTime field, you can pick one. which its value would be the SendingTime for the original FIX message you've received.
You can either select and use an existent field (http://www.onixs.biz/fix-dictionary/4.4/fields_by_name.html) or you can create your own user defined field.
Once you decided to create your own field, it is a good practice to check the oficial Global Technical Committee user defined fields list at https://www.fixtrading.org/standards/user-defined-fields/ and using the user defined fields range.
Sites
Fields by message: https://www.onixs.biz/fix-dictionary.html
User defined fields: https://www.fixtrading.org/standards/user-defined-fields/
I have a custom list. Each item in the list has 39 fields/columns that need to be filled out and a 40th field that gets filled out by a separate workflow.
I have another workflow that I need to trigger if any of the fields change EXCEPT for one.
Why? Because that field has a custom ID# in it and that field gets populated AFTER the form is submitted. Therefore, there will ALWAYS be a change in the list item. Thus, I need a workflow to trigger when any fields change EXCEPT the one w/ the custom ID#.
Any ideas? Thank you.
No one has been able to answer this but I figured it out myself.
I'm including the answer here in case anyone else ever comes across this and finds it helpful:
Create a new field that you will hide from the your SP list and from NewForm.aspx, EditForm.aspx, and DispForm.aspx.
Using jQuery, populate that hidden field as such: $(":input[Title='fieldName']").val("1");
The using an SPD workflow, check to see if that field = 1. If so, run the workflow. AND at the end of that workflow set the field to 0 - that's important.
I'm sure this is an easy fix but I can't seem to find it. I just have a form, that will be a subform of another, that needs to display the results of a query.
The query is simple enough, just displays all fields of records that fall between specified dates. The query works great, but when I attach it to the form as its record source it doesn't display the data. I can see the correct amount of record selectors so I know its understanding the query but its as if all fields are hidden!
I have also tried building a query to the forms record source that was simply Select query.* From query. Oddly I have had this working before but I had to specify every field. What I mean is:
Select title From query
Select type From query
Select date From query
...
And so on for all the fields but this seems foolish, can anyone think of what I may be doing wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Edit, forgot to mention I also tried the foolish solution that I mentioned above and it didn't work so its definitely some issue that I'm not seeing, some property that's probably not appropriately set
#sshekhar well its not really code at the moment I'm using Access 2010. I have a form that needs to display a subform that executes this query of displaying records that have a data field that fall between dates specified by the user. The query works and displays the correct records, but the form that it is attached to only shows the record selectors and all the fields appear to be "hidden." I thought it may be one of the form's properties set incorrectly but I checked on the test form from another database that I used and each have what appears to be identical settings. So I'm at a loss!
So it turns out even though I using a query that holds all the fields it will not display the content unless you go to the Add Existing Fields and add all the the fields you want to see. This seems really silly especially when the results in the query but at least its working now.
I had this problem and discovered that having the property DataEntry set to YES will only display new records. From Microsoft Help:
You can use the DataEntry property to specify whether a bound form
opens to allow data entry only. The Data Entry property doesn't
determine whether records can be added; it only determines whether
existing records are displayed. Read/write Boolean.