I am deploy the xxl-job application in Kubernetes(v1.15.2), now the application deploy success but registry client service failed.If deploy it in docker, it should look like this:
docker run -e PARAMS="--spring.datasource.url=jdbc:mysql://mysql-service.example.com/xxl-job?Unicode=true&characterEncoding=UTF-8 --spring.datasource.username=root --spring.datasource.password=<mysql-password>" -p 8180:8080 -v /tmp:/data/applogs --name xxl-job-admin -d xuxueli/xxl-job-admin:2.0.2
and when start application,the server side give me tips:
22:33:21.078 logback [http-nio-8080-exec-7] WARN o.s.web.servlet.PageNotFound - No mapping found for HTTP request with URI [/xxl-job-admin/api/registry] in DispatcherServlet with name 'dispatcherServlet'
I am searching from project issue and find the problem may be I could not pass the project name in docker to be part of it's url, so give me this tips.The client side give this error:
23:19:18.262 logback [xxl-job, executor ExecutorRegistryThread] INFO c.x.j.c.t.ExecutorRegistryThread - >>>>>>>>>>> xxl-job registry fail, registryParam:RegistryParam{registryGroup='EXECUTOR', registryKey='job-schedule-executor', registryValue='172.30.184.4:9997'}, registryResult:ReturnT [code=500, msg=xxl-rpc remoting fail, StatusCode(404) invalid. for url : http://xxl-job-service.dabai-fat.svc.cluster.local:8080/xxl-job-admin/api/registry, content=null]
so to solve the problem, I should execute command as possible as the same in kubernetes like execute with docker. The question is: How to pass the docker command --name to kubernetes environment? I have already tried this:
"env": [
{
"name": "name",
"value": "xxl-job-admin"
}
],
and also tried this:
"containers": [
{
"name": "xxl-job-admin",
"image": "xuxueli/xxl-job-admin:2.0.2",
}
]
Both did not work.
Related
I am trying to deploy Vault Docker image to work with Consul Docker image as its storage.
I have the following Json config file for the vault container:
{
"listener": [{
"tcp": {
"address": "0.0.0.0:8200",
"tls_disable" : 1
}
}],
"storage" :{
"consul" : {
"address" :"127.0.0.1:8500"
"path" :"vault/"
}
}
"max_lease_ttl": "10h",
"default_lease_ttl": "10h",
"ui": true,
}
Running consul container:
docker run -d -p 8501:8500 -it consul
and than running the vault container:
docker run -d -p 8200:8200 -v /root/vault:/vault --cap-add=IPC_LOCK vault server
Immediately after the vault container is up, it stop running, and when querying the logs I receive the following error:
Error detecting api address: Get http://127.0.0.1:8500/v1/agent/self: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:8500: connect: connection refused
Error initializing core: missing API address, please set in configuration or via environment
Any ideas why I am getting this error, and if I have any configuration problem?
Since you are running docker, the "127.0.0.1" address you are pointing to is going to be inside your docker, but consul isn't listening there, it's listening on your docker-servers localhost!
So I would recommend that you do a link (--link consul:consul) when you start vault docker, and set "address" :"consul:8500" in the config.
Or, change "address" :"127.0.0.1:8500" to "address" :"172.17.0.1:8500" to let it connect to your docker servers forwarded 8500. The IP is whatever is set on your docker0 interface. Not as nice though since it's not official and that it can be changed in the configuration, so I recommend linking.
I am deploying vault docker image on Ubuntu 16.04, I am successful initializing it from inside the image itself, but I cant get any Rest Responses, and even curl does not work.
I am doing the following:
Create config file local.json :
{
"listener": [{
"tcp": {
"address": "127.0.0.1:8200",
"tls_disable" : 1
}
}],
"storage" :{
"file" : {
"path" : "/vault/data"
}
}
"max_lease_ttl": "10h",
"default_lease_ttl": "10h",
}
under /vault/config directory
running the command to start the image
docker run -d -p 8200:8200 -v /home/vault:/vault --cap-add=IPC_LOCK vault server
entering bash terminal of the image :
docker exec -it containerId /bin/sh
Running inside the following command
export VAULT_ADDR='http://127.0.0.1:8200' and than vault init
It works fine, but when I am trying to send rest to check if vault initialized:
Get request to the following url : http://Ip-of-the-docker-host:8200/v1/sys/init
Getting No Response.
even curl command fails:
curl http://127.0.0.1:8200/v1/sys/init
curl: (56) Recv failure: Connection reset by peer
Didnt find anywhere online with a proper explanation what is the problem, or if I am doing something wrong.
Any Ideas?
If a server running in a Docker container binds to 127.0.0.1, it's unreachable from anything outside that specific container (and since containers usually only run a single process, that means it's unreachable by anyone). Change the listener address to 0.0.0.0:8200; if you need to restrict access to the Vault server, bind it to a specific host address in the docker run -p option.
The docker integration has a weirdly proprietary config format and its very unpredictable and quite frustrating.
This is the command I want to run for my container:
docker run -p 9999:9999 mycontainer
Pretty much the simplest command. I can start my container with this command and see the ports open in kitmatic and access it from the host.
I tried to do this in the docker run config by clicking CLI and generated a json settings file (already wtf this is weird and convoluted)
It gave me this json:
{
"AttachStdin" : true,
"Tty" : true,
"OpenStdin" : true,
"Image" : "",
"Volumes" : { },
"ExposedPorts" : { },
"HostConfig" : {
"Binds" : [ ],
"PortBindings" : {
"9999/tcp" : [ {
"HostIp" : "",
"HostPort" : "9999"
} ]
}
},
"_comment" : ""
}
I then execute the run config and according to intellij the port is open (looking under the Port Bindings section of the docker tab). But its not open. its not accessible from host and kitmatic doesn't show it open either.
How do I get this working as a run config? How do I see what docker command intellij is actually running? Maybe its just using the API programatically.
It seems the intellij docker integration requires you to explicitly declare open ports with EXPOSE in the dockerfile.
I keep getting CORS error while using the Docker remote API.
As the Docker documentation mentions, I did set the flag:
"api-cors-header" : "*",
I still do not see the header Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * set on the response headers.
I am using Docker 1.13 experimental.
Docker-Experimental: true
Server: Docker/1.13.0-rc3 (linux)
Here is my API version:
{
"Version": "1.13.0-rc3",
"ApiVersion": "1.25",
"MinAPIVersion": "1.12",
"GitCommit": "4d92237",
"GoVersion": "go1.7.3",
"Os": "linux",
"Arch": "amd64",
"KernelVersion": "4.8.12-moby",
"Experimental": true,
"BuildTime": "2016-12-06T01:15:44.725283878+00:00"
}
Am I missing anything here?
Based on https://docs.browserless.io/docs/docker.html#enable-cors:
Enable CORS
You can enable cross-origin-resource-sharing with browserless by setting the ENABLE_CORS=true variable. This defaults to false:
$ docker run -e "ENABLE_CORS=true" -p 3000:3000 --restart always -d --name browserless browserless/chrome
It is also possible that problem is in another level, not the docker itself, for me I had a python flask application wrapped in a docker container. I found the solution here to the CORS.
....
from flask_cors import CORS
....
app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)
I have a docker container running a java process that I am trying to connect to rabbitmq running on my localhost.
Here are the steps I've done so far:
On my Local machine (macbook running Docker version 1.13.0-rc3, build 4d92237 with firewall turned off)
I've updated my rabbitmq_env.conf file to remove RABBITMQ_NODE_IP_ADDRESS so I am not tied to connect via localhost and i have an admin rabbitmq user. (not trying with guest user)
I tested this via telnet on my local machine and have no issues telnet <local-ip> 5672
Inside my docker container
able to ping local-ip and curl rabbitmq admin api
curl -i -u username:password http://local-ip:15672/api/vhosts returns sucessfully
[{"name":"/","tracing":false}]
When i try to telnet from inside the container I get
"Connection closed by foreign host"
looking at the rabbitmq.logs
=ERROR REPORT====
closing AMQP connection <0.30526.1> (local-ip:53349 -> local-ip:5672):
{handshake_timeout,handshake}
My java stacktrace incase helpful
Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused (Connection >refused)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
at >java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:350)
at >java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.>java:206)
at >java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:188)
at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:392)
at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:589)
at >com.rabbitmq.client.impl.FrameHandlerFactory.create(FrameHandlerFactory.ja>va:32)
at >com.rabbitmq.client.impl.recovery.RecoveryAwareAMQConnectionFactory.newCon>nection(RecoveryAwareAMQConnectionFactory.java:35)
docker network inspect bridge
[
{
"Name": "bridge",
"Id": "716f935f19a107225650a95d06eb83d4c973b7943b1924815034d469164affe5",
"Created": "2016-12-11T15:34:41.950148125Z",
"Scope": "local",
"Driver": "bridge",
"EnableIPv6": false,
"IPAM": {
"Driver": "default",
"Options": null,
"Config": [
{
"Subnet": "172.17.0.0/16",
"Gateway": "172.17.0.1"
}
]
},
"Internal": false,
"Attachable": false,
"Containers": {
"9722a49c4e99ca5a7fabe56eb9e1c71b117a1e661e6c3e078d9fb54d7d276c6c": {
"Name": "testing",
"EndpointID": "eedf2822384a5ebc01e5a2066533f714b6045f661e24080a89d04574e654d841",
"MacAddress": "02:42:ac:11:00:02",
"IPv4Address": "172.17.0.2/16",
"IPv6Address": ""
}
},
"Options": {
"com.docker.network.bridge.default_bridge": "true",
"com.docker.network.bridge.enable_icc": "true",
"com.docker.network.bridge.enable_ip_masquerade": "true",
"com.docker.network.bridge.host_binding_ipv4": "0.0.0.0",
"com.docker.network.bridge.name": "docker0",
"com.docker.network.driver.mtu": "1500"
},
"Labels": {}
}
]
What am I missing?
for me this works fine!
I have been installed the image docker pull rabbitmq:3-management
and run
docker run -d --hostname haroldjcastillo --name rabbit-server -e RABBITMQ_DEFAULT_USER=admin -e RABBITMQ_DEFAULT_PASS=admin2017 -p 5672:5672 -p 15672:15672 rabbitmq:3-management
the most important is to add the connection and management ports -p 5672:5672 -p 15672:15672
See you host in docker
docker-machine ip
return in my case:
192.168.99.100
Go to management http://192.168.99.100:15672
For Spring Boot you can configure this or works good for another connections
spring.rabbitmq.host=192.168.99.100
spring.rabbitmq.username=admin
spring.rabbitmq.password=admin2017
spring.rabbitmq.port=5672
Best wishes
For anyone else searching for this error, I'm using spring boot and rabbitmq in docker container, starting them with docker compose. I kept getting org.springframework.amqp.AmqpConnectException: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused from the spring app.
The rabbitmq hostname was incorrect. To fix this, I'm using the container names in the spring app configuration. Either put spring.rabbitmq.host=my-rabbit in spring's application.properties (or yml file), or in docker-compose.yaml add environment: SPRING_RABBITMQ_HOST: my-rabbit to the spring service. Of course, "my-rabbit" is the rabbitmq container name described in the docker-compose.yaml
I am using docker with linux container with rabbitmq:3-management and have created a dotnet core based web api. While calling from We API action method I faced the same issue and changed the value to "host.docker.internal"
following scenario worked for me
"localhost" on IIS Express
"localhost" on Docker build from Visual Studio
"host.docker.internal" on Docker build from Visual Studio
"Messaging": {
"Hostname": "host.docker.internal",
"OrderQueue": "ProductQueue",
"UserName": "someuser",
"Password": "somepassword" },
But facing the same issue when, the container created via docker build command, but not when container created using Visual Studio F5 command.
Now find the solution there are two ways to do it:
by default all the containers get added into "bridge" network go through with these steps
Case1: If you have already containers (rabbitmq and api) in the docker
and running then first check their ip / hostname
docker network ls
docker network inspect bridge # from this step you'll get to know what containers are associated with this
find the rabbitmq container and internal IP, apply this container name or IP and then run your application it will work from Visual Studio and Docker build and run command
Case2: if you have no containers running then you may like to create
your network in docker then follow these steps:
docker network create givenetworknamehere
add your container while using "docker run" command or after
Step2.1: if using docker run command for your container then;
docker run --network givenetworknamehere -d -p yourport:80 --name givecontainername giveyourimagename
Step2.2 if adding newly created network after container creation then use below
command docker network connect givenetworknamehere givecontainername
with these step you bring your container in your newly created same network and they can communicate.
Note: by default "bridge" network type get created
After a restart, all was working. I don't think Rabbit was using respecting .config changes