The memory is giving null("") after the task is completed.
can i access the autopilot collected answer again back in studio ?
i just have a task which asks the app date and the im trying to sent the interpreted value to HTTP in studio
{
"collected_data": {
"status": "complete",
"answers": {
"answer": "2020-01-22",
"filled": true,
"attempts": 1,
"validate_attempts": 1,
"confirm_attempts": 0,
"confirmed": false
}
}
}
}
},
but the memory shows empty
is this for Voice?
Check in the Autopilot payload if the variable is directly under the widget i.e. instead of widget.memory.VARIABLE_NAME, if you can find it as widget.VARIABLE_NAME
Related
Trying to troubleshoot an error message my app gets after sending a batchUpdate request to Google Slides API
Invalid requests[19].updateTableCellProperties: Invalid field: table_cell_properties
The 19th request in the batch is the only updateTableCellProperties request I have. If I removing the 19th request from the batch, everything works fine.
Other requests which I run in this batchUpdate with no issues are are insertTableRows, deleteTableRow, insertText, updateParagraphStyle, updateTextStyle, updateTableColumnProperties. They all work on the same table, so I use the same objectId, but depending on the request I have to specify it as tableObjectId instead of objectId.
Unsure if I am generating a wrong request for the only updateTableCellProperties request I have, or if there is a problem in the Google Slides ruby gem itself, I tried sending just this updateTableCellProperties request from the Google Slides API explorer which has some validation on the request structure. So I sent this updateTableCellProperties batchUpdate request
{
"requests": [
{
"updateTableCellProperties": {
"objectId": "gf9d8fea71f_22_1",
"tableRange": {
"location": {
"columnIndex": 0,
"rowIndex": 1
}
},
"fields": "tableCellProperties",
"tableCellProperties": {
"tableCellBackgroundFill": {
"solidFill": {
"color": {
"themeColor": "LIGHT1"
}
}
}
}
}
}
]
}
And I got this error:
{
"error": {
"code": 400,
"message": "Invalid requests[0].updateTableCellProperties: Invalid field: table_cell_properties",
"status": "INVALID_ARGUMENT"
}
}
Why is this updateTableCellProperties request reported as invalid? I am also confused by the output of the error message as it mentions table_cell_properties in snake case, while the documentation only mentions tableCellProperties in camel case, and my request also only mentions tableCellProperties in camel case. I am only aware of the ruby gems translating between snake case and camel case, but this is not relevant to the API Explorer.
The error Invalid field: table_cell_properties originates from the erroneously specified fields property
See documentation:
fields
At least one field must be specified. The root tableCellProperties is implied and should not be specified. A single "*" can be used as short-hand for listing every field.
So you need to modify fields
from
"fields": "tableCellProperties"
to
"fields": "tableCellBackgroundFill.solidFill.color"
or to
"fields": "*"
There is a second problem with your request:
When specifying the table range, it is required to set the properties rowSpan and columnSpan.
A complete, correct request would be:
{
"requests": [
{
"updateTableCellProperties": {
"objectId": "gf9d8fea71f_22_1",
"tableRange": {
"location": {
"columnIndex": 0,
"rowIndex": 1
},
"rowSpan": 1,
"columnSpan": 1
},
"fields": "tableCellBackgroundFill.solidFill.color",
"tableCellProperties": {
"tableCellBackgroundFill": {
"solidFill": {
"color": {
"themeColor": "LIGHT1"
}
}
}
}
}
}
]
}
I'm not a programmer so please forgive me. But I've spent hours and hours of research on the topic of collecting information with Twilio AutoPilot and posted that data to Airtable, which I will then have Zapier do some things with that data. I finally had a breakthrough today and am now able to post data from a call or text to Airtable. The only way I got the ending to work was to send the call or text to Studio to finish up the call. Everything seems to work from the end user standpoint, but I'm getting an error 90100 from Twilio. I'm sure I'm just missing one line of code for this to work, and I'm at the end of my rope.
{
"actions": [
{
"say": "Okay lets get you a new appointment. I just need you to answer a few questions."
},
{
"collect": {
"name": "member",
"questions": [
{
"question": "Please tell me your first name.",
"name": "name",
"type": "Twilio.FIRST_NAME"
},
{
"question": "Thanks, and what is your email address?",
"name": "email",
"type": "Twilio.EMAIL"
}
],
"on_complete": {
"redirect": "task://complete_booking"
}
}
}
]
}
Then i have another task setup to redirect to the Twilio Function. This is probably overkill, but it's what I found in research.
{
"actions": [
{
"redirect": {
"method": "POST",
"uri": "https://TWILIO_FUNCTION_URL/atable_post"
}
}
]
}
Then the function is as follows. Mind you, this is posting correctly to airtable.
exports.handler = function(context, event, callback) {
let memory = JSON.parse(event.Memory);
let name = memory.twilio.collected_data.member.answers.name.answer;
let email = memory.twilio.collected_data.member.answers.email.answer;
console.log(memory);
let member = {
name : memory.twilio.collected_data.member.answers.name.answer,
email : memory.twilio.collected_data.member.answers.email.answer,
date : Date.now()
};
var Airtable = require("airtable");
var base = new Airtable({apikey: context.AIRTABLE_API_KEY}).base("AIRTABLE_ID");
base("Members1").create(member, function(err, record) {
if (err) { console.error(err); return; }
console.log(record.getId());
callback(null, member);
});
};
The call hung up at this point, so I redirected it to a Studio Flow, which does work and the call finishes with the response I'm give it before ending the call. Again, everything is working fine, but I get the following error from twilio, and I have no idea how to resolve it.
Invalid Autopilot Actions JSON: Invalid Autopilot Action
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Nice work James! It looks the the issue is the redirect to your Twilio Function is not returning the expected JSON Action response to execute.
Autopilot - Redirect
https://www.twilio.com/docs/autopilot/actions/redirect
Redirecting to URLs When redirecting to a URL, Redirect will make an
HTTP callback to your application and will expect an Autopilot Actions
JSON as a response. The request will contain all the dialogue
information. This is an example of a dynamic Action since the JSON is
rendered dynamically with a URL or your own endpoint.
Can you modify the Twilio Function to return valid Action JSON to Autopilot which sets the returned data, if needed via the Remember action which you can access from Studio?
Problem:
I am unable to POST a transaction via the RESTful API generated by the composer-rest-server. I am receiving statusCode 422; the transaction instance is not valid. However, the same example works in the Playground.
Scenario:
I've set up a transaction called Offer in my .cto file which posts an offer to buy a house:
// Offer - Specifies an offer that a bidder places on a house listing with an associated price
transaction Offer {
o Double bidPrice
--> HouseListing listing
--> Person bidder
}
The composer-rest-server has generated an API with the following JSON string to post a transaction of type Offer:
{
"$class": "org.acme.purchasing.Offer",
"bidPrice": 0,
"listing": "string",
"bidder": "string",
"transactionId": "string",
"timestamp": "2017-07-21T13:37:09.460Z"
}
I've since replaced this with a sample transaction using the following JSON code derived from the above example:
{
"$class": "org.acme.purchasing.Offer",
"bidPrice": 1000,
"listing": "001",
"bidder": "RJOHNSON",
"transactionId": "1b9aa63c-dfad-4aad-a610-dfc80f2796b2",
"timestamp": "2017-07-21T13:37:09.460Z"
}
The response returned is error code 422:
{
"error": {
"statusCode": 422,
"name": "ValidationError",
"message": "The `Offer` instance is not valid. Details: `transactionId` can't be set (value: \"1b9aa63c-dfad-4aad-a610-d...6b2\").",
"details": {
"context": "Offer",
"codes": {
"transactionId": [
"absence"
]
},
"messages": {
"transactionId": [
"can't be set"
]
}
},
"stack": "ValidationError: The `Offer` instance is not valid. Details: `transactionId` can't be set (value: \"1b9aa63c-dfad-4aad-a610-d...6b2\").\n at /usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/dao.js:355:12\n at ModelConstructor.<anonymous> (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/validations.js:566:11)\n at ModelConstructor.next (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/hooks.js:93:12)\n at ModelConstructor.<anonymous> (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/validations.js:563:23)\n at ModelConstructor.trigger (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/hooks.js:83:12)\n at ModelConstructor.Validatable.isValid (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/validations.js:529:8)\n at /usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/dao.js:351:9\n at doNotify (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:155:49)\n at doNotify (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:155:49)\n at doNotify (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:155:49)\n at doNotify (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:155:49)\n at Function.ObserverMixin._notifyBaseObservers (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:178:5)\n at Function.ObserverMixin.notifyObserversOf (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:153:8)\n at Function.ObserverMixin._notifyBaseObservers (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:176:15)\n at Function.ObserverMixin.notifyObserversOf (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:153:8)\n at Function.ObserverMixin._notifyBaseObservers (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/loopback-datasource-juggler/lib/observer.js:176:15)"
}
}
Now the strange thing is that I've deployed the same BNA onto the Hyperledger Composer Playground and am able to execute transactions of type Offer successfully.
Note that in the Playground, "transactionId" and "timestamp" are not specified as the Playground appears to take care of these values. For example, this is what Playground proposes to me initially:
{
"$class": "org.acme.purchasing.Offer",
"bidPrice": 0,
"listing": "resource:org.acme.purchasing.HouseListing#id:7965",
"bidder": "resource:org.acme.purchasing.Person#id:4441"
}
Can anyone advise why it's saying the Offer instance is not valid? My first thought was that it's not liking the string I'm placing in "transactionId" but another Stack Overflow post points out that the transactionId is just an arbitrary UUIDv4 string which I've generated already.
Update #1: Failing even with default demo
In order to ensure by BNA is error-free, I've deployed the default carauction-demo (resembles my example closely) onto my local Hyperledger Fabric instance and deployed the composer-rest-server. I've also deployed the same BNA into the Playground. All assets and participants were created identical in both from the Explorer (local instance) and Playground. When it comes time to submit an Offer transaction:
{
"$class": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.Offer",
"bidPrice": 800,
"listing": "resource:org.acme.vehicle.auction.VehicleListing#L001",
"member": "resource:org.acme.vehicle.auction.Member#member3#acme.org"
}
This JSON was generated by the Playground and succeeds there. Copy/paste/executing into the Explorer yields a status 500 error.
{
"error": {
"statusCode": 500,
"name": "Error",
"message": "error trying invoke chaincode. Error: chaincode error (status: 500, message: Error: Object with ID 'string' in collection with ID 'Asset:org.acme.vehicle.auction.VehicleListing' does not exist)",
"stack": "Error: error trying invoke chaincode. Error: chaincode error (status: 500, message: Error: Object with ID 'string' in collection with ID 'Asset:org.acme.vehicle.auction.VehicleListing' does not exist)\n at _initializeChannel.then.then.then.then.catch (/usr/lib/node_modules/composer-rest-server/node_modules/composer-connector-hlfv1/lib/hlfconnection.js:806:34)"
}
}
I'm still at a lost as to what is wrong here.
After much experimentation and some searching, I've concluded that the problem was that NPM was installed using sudo (as root). I redid the installation as non-root and the problem has now been solved. Everything is working as expected.
Composer updates the transactionId itself as its generated, you cannot do this in your JSON and hence why you get the error. This is a Loopback -> Swagger conversion issue as it should not appear in a /POST REST operation - captured here https://github.com/hyperledger/composer/issues/663
So I have successfully executed Offer transactions (/POST). I think the '500' error is because there is a missing field ('string' type), or relationship in your Offer transaction via REST.
Using the example of the Car Auction network https://github.com/hyperledger/composer-sample-networks/blob/master/packages/carauction-network/models/auction.cto
Either of these Offer transactions using /POST were successful in Explorer:
{
"$class": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.Offer",
"bidPrice": 20,
"listing": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.VehicleListing#100",
"member": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.Member#a#b.com"
}
OR
{
"$class": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.Offer",
"bidPrice": 20,
"listing": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.VehicleListing#100",
"member": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.Member#a#b.com",
"timestamp": "2017-07-28T14:07:02.558Z"
}
responded with a 200 (SUCCESS) and a transactionId in Explorer:
{
"$class": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.Offer",
"bidPrice": 20,
"listing": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.VehicleListing#100",
"member": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.Member#a#b.com",
"transactionId": "e75b9934-1f08-4daf-90db-702bbe4b8fa1"
}
This is my VehicleListing asset JSON for #100 above
{
"$class": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.VehicleListing",
"listingId": "100",
"reservePrice": 50,
"description": "string",
"state": "FOR_SALE",
"offers": [
{
"$class": "org.acme.vehicle.auction.Offer",
"bidPrice": 50,
"listing": "100",
"member": "resource:org.acme.vehicle.auction.Member#a#b.com",
"transactionId": "string123",
"timestamp": "2017-07-28T14:07:02.825Z"
}
],
"vehicle": "resource:org.acme.vehicle.auction.Vehicle#123"
}
And I created asset for Vehicle 123 as well as Member a#b.com
When using the youtube API to get the list of my subscriptions and all the related details I get a number of information from the snippet and contentDetails part of the response object.
When I call the service from my script the contentDetails.newItemCount always return zero, this should indicate the number of new videos on the channel since last time I've opened the channel. The contentDetails.totalItemCount (total number of videos for the channel) is accurate instead.
In contrast if I run the same query through the google api explorer, the same variable contains the correct information and not zero.
The call I make from my PHP script is exactly the same as the one run on the google api explorer so I can't explain or understand why I'm getting different results. The code I use is roughly the following
$this->_youtube = new Google_Service_YouTube($this->_connector->_googleClient);
$params = array('mine' => true,'maxResults'=>25,'order'=>'alphabetical');
$part = 'snippet,contentDetails';
$response = $this->_youtube->subscriptions->listSubscriptions(
$part,
$params
);
foreach ($response['items'] as $item) {
$this->_mysubscriptions[] = array(
'channelId'=>$item['snippet']['resourceId']['channelId'],
'title'=>$item['snippet']['title'],
'description'=>$item['snippet']['description'],
'thumb_default'=>$item['snippet']['thumbnails']['default']['url'],
'thumb_medium'=>$item['snippet']['thumbnails']['medium']['url'],
'thumb_high'=>$item['snippet']['thumbnails']['high']['url'],
'subscribedOn'=>$this->cleanDate($item['snippet']['publishedAt']),
'totalVideos'=>$item['contentDetails']['totalItemCount'],
'newVideos'=>$item['contentDetails']['newItemCount']);
}
This is how the object returned looks like (just removed few IDs from the response) from the google API explorer, while when I run it through my code I get the same data but the newItemCount is zero.
{
"kind": "youtube#subscription",
"snippet": {
"publishedAt": "2016-09-14T12:48:00.000Z",
"title": "Muselk",
"description": "\"Memes win games\" - Youtube.com/mrmuselk",
"resourceId": {
"kind": "youtube#channel",
"channelId": "UCd534c_ehOvrLVL2v7Nl61w"
},
"thumbnails": {
"default": {
"url": "https://yt3.ggpht.com/-iWlz7dePNz0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/smtPKh-RLTU/s88-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg"
},
"medium": {
"url": "https://yt3.ggpht.com/-iWlz7dePNz0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/smtPKh-RLTU/s240-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg"
},
"high": {
"url": "https://yt3.ggpht.com/-iWlz7dePNz0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/smtPKh-RLTU/s240-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg"
}
}
},
"contentDetails": {
"totalItemCount": 792,
"newItemCount": 4,
"activityType": "all"
}
I've looked through the revision history but can't find any reference of modifications made to this specific property of the contentDetails object
There is a bug filed with google on this property but it refers to a different behaviour.
Wondering if this happens to other as well, or if somebody can give some hints on how this works or don't.
I use Firebase Database, I have a list of cards, I need to monitor some cards if they are deleted. I tried to do this with ref.observe (.childRemoved), but this is not appropriate for my case, since some data can be deleted by the cardholder, and then this block will fire several times, I need to watch if the entire card was deleted. How can I do that?
My reference
let ref = FIRDatabase.database().reference().child(MainGateways.cards.rawValue).child(card.id)
My cards structure
"cards": {
"-Khv9rUVwErNHBzXcruO": {
"additionalInfo": {
"note": ""
},
"dateProperties": {
"day": "Flex",
"isFlexDate": true,
"isFlexTime": true,
"iso8601": "",
"time": ""
},
"interestedUsers": {
"NfM26A2YcPUFz8rfYa23Kr3mjCO2": {
"isApproved": false,
"isNew": true,
"isoDate": "2017-04-17T13:08:41+04:00",
"userID": "NfM26A2YcPUFz8rfYa23Kr3mjCO2",
"userItchableName": "Alexsander K."
}
},
"isNewPendingRequest": true,
"isPrivateStatus": false,
"isTest": false,
"ownerID": "1Cix149ThIOG1ULPVjyy0LyTxbe2",
"peopleProperties": {
"availableSeats": 1,
"numberOfPeople": 1,
"numberOfPeopleDescription": "1 person"
},
"title": "Genius Lounge and Sake Bar",
"userName": "Tim C.",
"version": 1
},
I also tried to make such a link, but then this block works if any card was removed from the list.
guard let ref = FIRDatabase.database().reference().child(MainGateways.cards.rawValue).child(card.id).parent else { return }
Look into Cloud Functions for Firebase. Using that, you can write JavaScript code that acts in response to database changes at the path you specify. This allows you to write logic independent of the client app to react to changes in the database.