We are building a proprietary Java application based on Docker. Right now, we are using local docker installation and development is in progress. When we want to share this application, hope this should be deployed in some docker registry. Docker registry is free and opensource? or how can I securely+freely allow my customers to access my application?.Basically, we want zero cost secure deployment option using docker.
If you're fine with putting your docker images public - you can use the docker hub.
If you want to keep it private - you can opt for one of the free private registries, e.g. treescale
See a longer list of free private registries here
Related
I need to block all registries and allow only one private registry for docker to pull images from , how can that be done natively in docker.
Using the RedHat options will not work on the upstream Docker CE or EE engine, RedHat had forked the docker engine and added their own features that are incompatible. You'll also find that /etc/sysconfig/docker is a RedHat only configuration file, designed to work with their version of the startup scripts. And I don't believe RedHat supports this old fork either, instead preferring their own podman and crio runtimes.
A hard limit on registry servers is not currently supported in the Linux Docker engine. The standard way to implement this for servers is with firewall rules on outbound connections, but that needs to only permit outbound connections to a known allow list. You still need to ensure that users don't import images from a tar file, or rebuild the otherwise blocked images from scratch (for example, all of official images on Docker Hub have the source available to rebuild them).
With Docker Desktop, the ability to restrict what registries a user can pull from has been added in their paid business tier with their image access management.
Previously I might have suggested using Notary and Docker Content Trust to ensure you only run trusted images, but that tooling has a variety of known issue, including the use of TOFU (trust on first use) that allows any image from a repo that hasn't been seen before to be signed by anyone and trusted to run. There are a few attempts to replace this, and the current leader is sigstore/cosign, but that isn't integrated directly into the docker engine. If you run in Kubernetes, this would be configured in your admission controller, like Gatekeeper or Kyverno.
Just found in redhat docs:
This can be done on docker daemon config:
/etc/sysconfig/docker
BLOCK_REGISTRY='--block-registry=all'
ADD_REGISTRY='--add-registry=registry.access.redhat.com'
and then do:
systemctl restart docker
with a new release of our product, we want to move to new technologies(kubernetes) so that we can take advantage of it services. we have a local kubernetes application running in our infra. we have made our applicatons dockerize and now we want to use the images to integrate it with kubernetes to make cluster --pods,
but we are stuck with docker registry as our customer do not want to have any public/private docker repository(registry) where we can upload this images. we have try with (docker save and docker load) but no luck(error: portal-66d9f557bb-dc6kq 0/1 ImagePullBackOff) Is it at all possible to have some filesystem where from we can access this images or any other alternative is welcome if that solves our problems(no private/public repository/registry).
A Docker registry of some sort is all but a requirement to run Kubernetes. Paid Docker Hub supports private images; Google and Amazon both have hosted registry products (GCR and ECR respectively); there are third-party registries; or you can deploy the official registry image locally.
There's an alternative path where you docker save every private image you reference in any Kubernetes pod spec, then docker load it on every single node. This has obvious scale and maintenance problems (whenever anybody updates any image you need to redeploy it by hand to every node). But if you really need to try this, make sure your pod specs specify ImagePullPolicy: Never to avoid trying to fetch things from registries. (If something isn't present on a node the pod will just fail to start up.)
The registry is "just" an open-source (Go) HTTP REST service that implements the Docker registry API, if that helps your deployment story.
I am trying to use Kubernetes and Jenkins for my deployment of micro services developed using Spring Boot. When I am exploring many YouTube videos and other documentation tutorials are using dockerhub.com as keeping published image as repository.
Can I deploy docker image in Kubernetes by using Jenkins docker image build without using this dockerhub.com ? Means I don't want to share client code in a public place. So can I use Jenkins without dockerhub.com?
You do need to use some registry- kubernetes needs a registry URL to be able to pull and instantiate a particular image as a container in a pod. To avoid having the images themselves be publicly accessible you have 2 options:
use a business account at a public registry. You can get one of these from Docker, or from other services like Google or Quay. When you push images using a business account, you get a private space in the public registry and only your account credentials can push and pull those images. In this case your Kubernetes- and your Jenkins- has to be configured with credentials derived from your account to be able to pull those private images into your cluster.
run a private registry in your cluster or on your non-cluster infrastructure There are many flavors of private registries, including Docker's, Atlassian's, and many others. This keeps your images entirely on your infrastructure. The tradeoff is that you have to configure and run this as a production service, and most private registries suitable for production use have a lot of moving parts for scalable image storage, indexing, backup, and so forth.
I just read the entire docs on securing a private Docker Registry. In addition to this, there seems to be a "Docker Trusted Registry", which is described as:
Docker Trusted Registry (DTR) lets you run and manage your own Docker image storage service, securely on your own infrastructure behind your company firewall.
Furthermore, the doc goes on to list a DTRs features:
An image registry to store, manage, and collaborate on Docker images
Pluggable storage drivers
Configuration options to let you run DTR in your particular enterprise environment.
Easy, transparent upgrades
Logging, usage and system health metrics
But doesn't the "normal" Docker Registry give me these as well?!?
Are these two things really the same, or is DTR some sort of commercialized offering of a Docker Registry? Or something else? I'm so confused!
New features in Docker Trusted Registry are:
Control access and permissions by user or organisation
Web UI to search and browse repos, manage users and setting
Integrate to CI and CD systems to automate workflows
LDAP/AD integration
Flexible storage
support User audit logs
Soft Delete image tags
Garbage collection
DTR is the paid support service for the registry - see https://hub.docker.com/enterprise/
Basically, they help you setup and will give you support down the road. It might have some niceties, otherwise you are left to your own to figure out how to run the registry.
What is currently the recommended way to mirror a Private Docker Registry?
Mirroring functionality is provided by official docker-registry image but only for the Public Registry.
See documentation:
"Beware that mirroring only works for the public registry. You can not create a mirror for a private registry."
My use-case:
A bigger development team that is working in an office with a limited network. They only pull docker images from registries. Pushing is occasional and handled by Jenkins box hosted in AWS. Most of the images they use resides in our password protected Private Registry (served over https). So it's only natural to mirror/cache the Registry on a machine in a local network. If not for https I would just go for HTTP_PROXY and local squid install.
I'm sure I'm not the only one solving docker dev bandwidth problem. What do you do?
It is now possible to do this with the "proxy" settings in the configuration for a V2 registry. Just put up another registry (on a different server/port from any other private registry you have) and on every docker engine, set the '--registry-mirror' flag to point to it.
Just watch out for accidental pushes - always retag your images to the private registry or a private repository if you wish to keep them private.
Right now, I would recommend using the (new) golang registry (https://github.com/docker/distribution) instead of the (v1) python one, and go with the proxy solution (using HTTP_PROXY + a reverse proxy cache - squid, or whatever else pleases your tastes - I would probably use varnish).
Native support for "mirroring" built into the registry itself will come eventually, and later more flexible transports.