I am trying to test 270 Eligibility Request for BCBS Texas through Availity but it always returns AAA*N79*C~** error after NM*PR line. I am really new to this and have no idea what could be wrong with the 270 request. I tried to search AAA error and it seems that PayerID in NM1 line is not identified by Availity and maybe incorrect but I tried different insurance companies(Aetna FL and United Healthcare Oxford Navigate) and they are also returned with same error at exact same line(they have different PayerID in their 270 file).
Any help would be appreciated on this issue, I know I am messing up something in 270 request for sure but don't know exactly what is messed up.
270 Request:
ISA*00* *00* *ZZ*AV09311993 *01*123456789 *200110*0818*^*00501*000000193*1*P*:~
GS*HS*AV01101957*123456789*20200110*0818*000000193*X*005010X279A1~
ST*270*0001*005010X279A1~
BHT*0022*13*244579*20200110*0818~
HL*1**20*1~
NM1*PR*2*BCBSTX*****PI*84980~
HL*2*1*21*1~
NM1*1P*2*Provider Name*****SV*1234567890~
NM1*40*2*AVAIL*****46*030240928~
HL*3*2*22*0~
TRN*1*00012*1234567890~
NM1*IL*1******MI*ABC1234567~
DTP*291*RD8*20100101-20200110~
EQ*30~
SE*13*0001~
GE*1*000000193~
IEA*1*000000193~
271 Response:
ISA*00* *00* *01*123456789 *ZZ*AV09311993 *200112*0816*^*00501*220190332*0*P*:~
GS*HB*123456789*AV01101957*20200112*0816*123456789*X*005010X279A1~
ST*271*1001*005010X279A1~
BHT*0022*11*244579*20200110*0818~
HL*1**20*1~
NM1*PR*2*BCBSTX*****PI*84980~
AAA*N**79*C~
HL*2*1*21*1~
NM1*1P*2*Provider Name*****SV*1234567890~
HL*3*2*22*0~
TRN*2*00012*1234567890~
NM1*IL*1******MI*ABC1234567~
DTP*291*RD8*20100101-20200110~
EB*V~
SE*13*1001~
GE*1*123456789~
IEA*1*220190332~
79 Invalid Participant Identification
Description: Use this code to indicate that the value in either GS02 or GS03 is invalid.
I am assuming you are using an incorrect payer ID. Try using the following:
Related
I'm trying to plot the confusion matrix for the predictions on my test set using my neural network model, but this error keeps on popping out. Can you please help me out. I tried to clicked the search on stackoverflow, but I didn't get a definitive answer. Can someone please help me out to resolve this error and pinpoint what error I have made? Also, if possible, what suggestions can you give? Thank you so much. Here is the picture of my code and this is my actual work
This is the code:
cm_plot_labels=['adobong baboy', 'arroz caldo','bagnet','balut','bicol express','biko' ,'binignit','bulalo','caldereta','camaro rebusado','champorado',
'chicharon','chicken inasal','cooked white rice','fish kinilaw','halo halo','liempo','maja blanca','pancit habhab', 'pandesal', 'pastillas de leche','pichi pichi',
'puto bumbong','puto rice cake','rellenong alimango','sinugno','sisig','suman','tapa','tinola','tuna panga','turon','ube halaya' ]
plot_confusion_matrix(cm=cm, classes=cm_plot_labels, title='Confusion Matrix')
As the error states, 'plt.cm.Blues' is not a valid value for the cmap argument of the plt.imshow function. The error suggests possible valid values that can be passed as the cmap value.
So, to solve your error you should be able to just set the default value of cmap in the plot_confusion_matrix function parameters to the string value 'Blues' instead of 'plt.cm.Blues'.
Here is the documentation for the plt.imshow function which you are using. Here it gives details of what the parameters are (including cmap) and what valid values can be passed to them.
https://matplotlib.org/stable/api/_as_gen/matplotlib.pyplot.imshow.html
This is the code snippet at line 461 which is giving badarg error ,please help me solve this error guys.
ejabberd_odbc:escape(base64:encode(crypto:aes_cfb_128_encrypt(<<"abcdefghabcdefgh">>, <<"12345678abcdefgh">>, xml:element_to_binary(NewPacket)))),
Log:
bad argument in call to crypto:aes_cfb_128_crypt(<<"abcdefghabcdefgh">>, <<"12345678abcdefgh">>, <<">, true) in mod_offline:'-store_offline_msg/6-fun-2-'/2 line 225
One of the things I like about functional languages is that you generally have an easier time reproducing errors in a controlled environment. In your case, it seems like
base64:decode(XML)
is the call that's failing, so you should write
io:format("XML=~p~n", [XML]),
base64:decode(XML)
the first line will print out the contents of XML in Erlang syntax, and the second line will fail when you get to the bad input.
Once you see the string you're trying to decode, the problem will probably be obvious (it's not a string or it's not a base64 string). If it is a correctly-encoded base64 string, then you can post that problem as a StackOverflow question and get a more useful response.
A few people seem to have run into NSXMLParser error 111 before, but it's not defined in the constants. This answer seems to have mistaken 111 with 11: NSXMLParserErrorDomain 111
As far as I can tell, I have no illegal characters in my final xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><wsse:BinarySecurityToken wsu:Id="uuid:383b6148-1c27-45ab-963b-30e14af8154e" ValueType="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2009/11/swt-token-profile-1.0" EncodingType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0#Base64Binary" xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd">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</wsse:BinarySecurityToken>
I've also tried changing the encoding to utf-8, but it made no difference. What causes a parser to fail with error 111? Is the parser not set up correctly, or is the XML killing it?
In NSXMLParserError docs, it says:
The following error codes are defined by NSXMLParser. For error codes not listed here, see the <libxml/xmlerror.h> header file.
The number 111 isn't mentioned in this list, so we go to /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.11.sdk/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlerror.h, and find the value:
XML_ERR_USER_STOP, /* 111 */
There isn't a lot of documentation on XML_ERR_USER_STOP in libxml2, but from reading the changeset, it looks like it's a fast-fail when the parser sees an unexpected EOF.
Referred DebugCN and Internet.
Turns out I was simply passing in an entirely wrong string. The XML chunk came from a larger JSON structure, which I then processed down to get the only XML part; yet when inited the parser, I used the wrong string to create the NSData. So make sure you aren't mixing variables up. I'm still not sure why error 111 isn't defined in the documentation, though.
I'm stuck with the Lime tutorial "08 – Complex Physics Objects"
http://lime.outlawgametools.com/tutorials/08-complex-physics-objects/
everything works fine until i set the “pointA”, “pointB”, “pointC” than i get the following error in corona:
lime-object.lua: 495 bad argument #1 'newLine' (number expected, got string)
full error screenshot:
http://i48.fastpic.ru/big/2013/0620/f4/d72939cb162476a7361889f797e8f2f4.png
I did find this here:
http://forums.coronalabs.com/topic/34576-hextorgb-error/
If you follow the rest of the thread you will see the user has had the same issue and other uers have as well and had to change up their sprite stuff separately it looks like?
oh well might be worth giving it a look.
I am connecting to ADS through ODBC DSN. Everything works well until I tried
out my Save Routine. Data is saved quite alright but I get an error that
says - "Option value changed". What could this be? Can't find in the help
file.
The full error message is:
ODBC - 2169
[iAnywhere Solutions][Advantage ODBC Driver] Option Value Changed.
I sent an email in respect of this to advantage#extendsys.com since this
error
number falls between error numbers: 2168 - 2188 Internal Error that should
be reported.
I posted this question on the Newsgroup without a possitive response.
Best regards,
Fredrick Ughimi
support#ughimisoft.com
For ODBC, in general, "Option Value Changed" typically indicates that a request was made that was not valid or not supported by the driver so the driver substituted similar value. Typically this type of error is informational or in other words sql_success_with_info. I suggest looking into an ODBC trace as it may help uncover what was changed or at least narrow down what was occurring.
It may also be helpful to post information about your save routine.