What package has the "statistical mean" function in Python.
I import scipy and numpy but get an error *"mean" does not exist in scipy *
Both scipy and numpy have mean functions. Assuming you have both numpy and scipy properly installed on your machine and Python environment, it can be called like so:
import numpy
import scipy
items = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
numpy_answer = numpy.mean( items )
scipy_answer = scipy.mean( items )
print( numpy_answer )
print( scipy_answer )
Related
I tried running my Machine Learning LinearRegression code, but it is not working. Here is the code:
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv(r'C:\Users\SVISHWANATH\Downloads\datasets\GGP_data.csv')
df["OHLC"] = (df.open+df.high+df.low+df.close)/4
df['HLC'] = (df.high+df.low+df.close)/3
df.index = df.index+1
reg = LinearRegression()
reg.fit(df.index, df.OHLC)
Basically, I just imported a few libraries, used the read_csv function, and called the LinearRegression() function, and this is the error:
ValueError: Expected 2D array, got 1D array instead:
array=[ 1 2 3 ... 1257 1258 1259].
Reshape your data either using array.reshape(-1, 1) if your data has a single feature or
array.reshape(1, -1) if it contains a single sample
Thanks!
As mentioned in the error message, you need to give the fit method a 2D array.
df.index is a 1D array. You can do it this way:
reg.fit(df.index.values.reshape(-1, 1), df.OHLC)
I'm working with datashader and dask but I'm having problems when trying to plot with a cluster running. To make it more concrete, I have the following example (embedded in a bokeh plot):
import holoviews as hv
import pandas as pd
import dask.dataframe as dd
import numpy as np
from holoviews.operation.datashader import datashade
import datashader.transfer_functions as tf
#initialize the client/cluster
cluster = LocalCluster(n_workers=4, threads_per_worker=1)
dask_client = Client(cluster)
def datashade_plot():
hv.extension('bokeh')
#create some random data (in the actual code this is a parquet file with millions of rows, this is just an example)
delta = 1/1000
x = np.arange(0, 1, delta)
y = np.cumsum(np.sqrt(delta)*np.random.normal(size=len(x)))
df = pd.DataFrame({'X':x, 'Y':y})
#create dask dataframe
points_dd = dd.from_pandas(df, npartitions=3)
#create plot
points = hv.Curve(points_dd)
return hd.datashade(points)
dask_client.submit(datashade_plot,).result()
This raises a:
TypeError: can't pickle weakref objects
I have the theory that this happens because you can't distribute the datashade operations in the cluster. Sorry if this is a noob question, I'd be very grateful for any advice you could give me.
I think you want to go the other way. That is, pass datashader a dask dataframe instead of a pandas dataframe:
>>> from dask import dataframe as dd
>>> import multiprocessing as mp
>>> dask_df = dd.from_pandas(df, npartitions=mp.cpu_count())
>>> dask_df.persist()
...
>>> cvs = datashader.Canvas(...)
>>> agg = cvs.points(dask_df, ...)
XREF: https://datashader.org/user_guide/Performance.html
Is there a way to view the images that tensorflow object detection api trains on after all preprocessing/augmentation.
I'd like to verify that things look correctly. I was able to verify the resizing my looking at the graph post resize in inference but I obviously can't do that for augmentation options.
TIA
I answered a similar question here.
You can utilize the test script provided by the api and make some changes to fit your need.
I wrote a little test script called augmentation_test.py. It borrowed some code from input_test.py
from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import division
from __future__ import print_function
import functools
import os
from absl.testing import parameterized
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
from scipy.misc import imsave, imread
from object_detection import inputs
from object_detection.core import preprocessor
from object_detection.core import standard_fields as fields
from object_detection.utils import config_util
from object_detection.utils import test_case
FLAGS = tf.flags.FLAGS
class DataAugmentationFnTest(test_case.TestCase):
def test_apply_image_and_box_augmentation(self):
data_augmentation_options = [
(preprocessor.random_horizontal_flip, {
})
]
data_augmentation_fn = functools.partial(
inputs.augment_input_data,
data_augmentation_options=data_augmentation_options)
tensor_dict = {
fields.InputDataFields.image:
tf.constant(imread('lena.jpeg').astype(np.float32)),
fields.InputDataFields.groundtruth_boxes:
tf.constant(np.array([[.5, .5, 1., 1.]], np.float32))
}
augmented_tensor_dict =
data_augmentation_fn(tensor_dict=tensor_dict)
with self.test_session() as sess:
augmented_tensor_dict_out = sess.run(augmented_tensor_dict)
imsave('lena_out.jpeg',augmented_tensor_dict_out[fields.InputDataFields.image])
if __name__ == '__main__':
tf.test.main()
You can put this script under models/research/object_detection/ and simply run it with python augmentation_test.py (Of course you need to install the API first). To successfully run it you should provide any image name 'lena.jpeg' and the output image after augmentation would be saved as 'lena_out.jpeg'.
I ran it with the 'lena' image and here is the result before augmentation and after augmentation.
.
Note that I used preprocessor.random_horizontal_flip in the script. And the result showed exactly what the input image looks like after random_horizontal_flip. To test it with other augmentation options, you can replace the random_horizontal_flip with other methods (which are all defined in preprocessor.py), all you can append other options to the data_augmentation_options list, for example:
data_augmentation_options = [(preprocessor.resize_image, {
'new_height': 20,
'new_width': 20,
'method': tf.image.ResizeMethod.NEAREST_NEIGHBOR
}),(preprocessor.random_horizontal_flip, {
})]
I tried to train my model on Google Cloud ML using this sample code:
import keras
from keras import optimizers
from keras import losses
from keras import metrics
from keras.models import Model, Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, Lambda, RepeatVector, TimeDistributed
import numpy as np
def test():
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(2, input_shape=(3,)))
model.add(RepeatVector(3))
model.add(TimeDistributed(Dense(3)))
model.compile(loss=losses.MSE,
optimizer=optimizers.RMSprop(lr=0.0001),
metrics=[metrics.categorical_accuracy],
sample_weight_mode='temporal')
x = np.random.random((1, 3))
y = np.random.random((1, 3, 3))
model.train_on_batch(x, y)
if __name__ == '__main__':
test()
and i got this error:
The replica master 0 exited with a non-zero status of 245. Termination reason: Error.
Detailed error output is big, so i'm pasting it here in pastebin
Note this output:
Module raised an exception for failing to call a subprocess Command '['python', '-m', u'trainer.test', '--job-dir', u'gs://my_test_bucket_keras/s_27_100630']' returned non-zero exit status -11.
And I guess the google cloud will run your code with an extra parameter called --job-dir. So perhaps you can try add the following code in your example code?
import ...
import argparse
def test():
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(2, input_shape=(3,)))
model.add(RepeatVector(3))
model.add(TimeDistributed(Dense(3)))
model.compile(loss=losses.MSE,
optimizer=optimizers.RMSprop(lr=0.0001),
metrics=[metrics.categorical_accuracy],
sample_weight_mode='temporal')
x = np.random.random((1, 3))
y = np.random.random((1, 3, 3))
model.train_on_batch(x, y)
if __name__ == '__main__':
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
# Input Arguments
parser.add_argument(
'--job-dir',
help='GCS location to write checkpoints and export models',
required=True
)
args = parser.parse_args()
arguments = args.__dict__
test()
# test(**arguments) # or if you want to use this job_dir parameter in your code
Not 100% sure this will work but I think you can give it a try.
Also I have a post here to do something similar, perhaps you can take a look there as well.
Problem is resolved. All I had to do is use tensorflow 1.1.0 instead default 1.0.1
With a simple constructor for the LSTM, as given in the tutorial, and an input of dimension [,,1] one would expect to see an output of shape [,,num_units].
But regardless of the num_units passed during construction, the output has the same shape as the input.
Following is the min code to replicate this issue...
import lasagne
import theano
import theano.tensor as T
import numpy as np
num_batches= 20
sequence_length= 100
data_dim= 1
train_data_3= np.random.rand(num_batches,sequence_length,data_dim).astype(theano.config.floatX)
#As in the tutorial
forget_gate = lasagne.layers.Gate(b=lasagne.init.Constant(5.0))
l_lstm = lasagne.layers.LSTMLayer(
(num_batches,sequence_length, data_dim),
num_units=8,
forgetgate=forget_gate
)
lstm_in= T.tensor3(name='x', dtype=theano.config.floatX)
lstm_out = lasagne.layers.get_output(l_lstm, {l_lstm:lstm_in})
f = theano.function([lstm_in], lstm_out)
lstm_output_np= f(train_data_3)
lstm_output_np.shape
#= (20, 100, 1)
An unqualified LSTM (I mean in its default mode) should produce one output for each unit right?
The code was run on kaixhin's cuda lasagne docker image docker image
What gives?
Thanks !
You can fix that by using a lasagne.layers.InputLayer
import lasagne
import theano
import theano.tensor as T
import numpy as np
num_batches= 20
sequence_length= 100
data_dim= 1
train_data_3= np.random.rand(num_batches,sequence_length,data_dim).astype(theano.config.floatX)
#As in the tutorial
forget_gate = lasagne.layers.Gate(b=lasagne.init.Constant(5.0))
input_layer = lasagne.layers.InputLayer(shape=(num_batches, # <-- change
sequence_length, data_dim),) # <-- change
l_lstm = lasagne.layers.LSTMLayer(input_layer, # <-- change
num_units=8,
forgetgate=forget_gate
)
lstm_in= T.tensor3(name='x', dtype=theano.config.floatX)
lstm_out = lasagne.layers.get_output(l_lstm, lstm_in) # <-- change
f = theano.function([lstm_in], lstm_out)
lstm_output_np= f(train_data_3)
print lstm_output_np.shape
If you feed your input into the input_layer, it is not ambiguous anymore, so you do not even need to specify where the input is supposed to go. Directly specifying a shape and adding the tensor3 into the LSTM does not work.