I am using DDEv and Docker with Windows 10 pro to set up a localhost install of drupal 8.8 using Composer. I have set up and configured the local drupal installation (it is a fresh install) and it appears to be running correctly, but in the admin section of the drupal site I receive a warning to change write permissions of sites/default/settings.php.
I tried to change settings using Filezilla, but it appears that local files in Filezilla do not provide access to write permissions? When I right-click the file in Filezilla, no permissions option appears.
Following troubleshooting tips from ddev, I tried to access phpmyadmin at https://mysitename.ddev.site:8036
Instead of loading phpmyadmin, I got the following error message:
Secure Connection Failed
An error occurred during a connection to dmckimep.ddev.site:8036. SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length.
Error code: SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG
The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified.
Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.
I've been searching around for a couple of hours now and do not find a solution to this. I ran ddev describe and all seems fine with the installation. The drupal site in the container seems to run okay. There are no port conflicts present so far as I have found, so I am not sure why I cannot get access to phpmyadmin.
I am a relative newbie in terms of skills, but have successfully maintained drupal 4-7 on localhost with XAMPP and my web host. Now I am wrestling with the move to drupal 8/composer/docker/ddev. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thank you!
Update 2022-09-14: DDEV has had https support fpr PHPMyAdmin and MailHog for years now, ddev describe will show you the URL.
(Original answer) ddev's PHPMyAdmin connection doesn't support https, just http. You can find the links for both PHPMyAdmin and MailHog using ddev describe; both are http-only, as in your example, http://mysitename.ddev.site:8036. It would be possible to provide https URLs for PHPMyAdmin and MailHog, but nobody has ever asked for them, and there's no security reason to do so.
Note that the key reason for https on the actual project URL is because real projects run behind https and people need to see problems like mixed content during the development phase. But there's no such need for PHPMyAdmin. However, I'm sure if people ever want it, we'll do it, it's not hard to do.
Just as a general add on, after ddev start you can run ddev launch -p in order to open PHPMyAdmin for the current project database in the browser.
Related
I am a beginner in regards to ArangoDB and I am trying to deploy my first project using it. The website is PHP based - what I did is that I created an Arango Docker container on Digital Ocean so that I can access it from the browser with the ipv4 provided. Public access to port 8529 is enabled. Locally, I am able to modify the .config file in order to point to the corresponding ip and I can painlessly retrieve data.
As a hosting provider I am using one.com. When uploading the same files that I am able to run locally on my own domain I get the following error:
["_database":"ArangoDBClient\Connection":private]=> string(7) "_system" } ArangoDBClient\ConnectException: cannot connect to endpoint 'tcp://xxx.xx.xxx.xxx:8529/': Connection timed out
I want to mention that I have also tried out ArangoOasis. No luck with it - I get the same error. Been at it for quite a few weeks - I would very much use some guidance. Even what to do next as I am out of ideas and documentation to read.
I'm trying to deploy GridGain Web Console 2020.03.01 on RHEL7 x86_64 with Docker following documentation here.
However, there is 404 Not Found error on accessing http://localhost:3000/swagger-ui.html page which is used as healthcheck. Backend logs show no errors. The last version I'm able to get containers running with is 2019.12.02 (which in fact refuses to show a connected cluster, but that's another issue). Starting with 2020.01.00, all backend healthchecks fail. That looks suspicious considering that 2020.01.00 releasenotes include updates of io.springfox and swagger-ui-dist.
Besides that, 2020.03.01 releasenotes say that Console's default port is changed to 8008, but the server still starts on 3000.
Anyone had any luck deploying dockerized Web Console?
The Web Console consists of backend and frontend. The backend is started on port 3000 which is printed in log, while the frontend is started indeed on port 8008 - and you most probably want to use this.
The docker-compose.yml given on Documentation site maps container's 8008 port to host's 80 port, feel free to replace with any wanted.
Regarding the heathcheck, /health endpoint is now changed to this
The Swagger was removed in 2020.01.00 due to security concerns (same GG-26726 issue mentioned in the release notes). You are right to be suspicious, I'll ask right people to update release notes and the docs, sorry about the confusion and thanks for pointing the issue out. Swagger was supposed to be an internal feature for Web Console (WC) developer team only.
As you pointed out, starting with 2020.01.00 the Swagger-based health check won't work. Internally, the WC team uses dockerize to wait for backend to start, here's an example from our E2E test suite compose:
entrypoint: dockerize -wait http://backend:3000/health -timeout 2m -wait-retry-interval 5s node ./index.js --target=${TARGET:-on-premise}
This might work for you too, with some adaptation. You will most likely have to remove "healthcheck" sections from docker-compose.yml too, or modify these, if the "http://backend:3000/health" URL can indeed serve as a direct replacement for the old "http://localhost:3000/swagger-ui.html" URL, which I am not sure about.
I'm brand new to containers and am trying to set up a MediaWiki on a Synology NAS. The Synology comes with a package for MediaWiki but it is at 1.30 and they haven't updated in a year. I need a newer version so i can use LDAP with latest extensions.
So, i found this step-by-step guide on how to install the containers with docker. I'm trying it with MediaWiki 1.34.0 and it works fine up to the point that we test connection to the mysql database - 5) Input your MySQL container name and its root password.
When i click Continue i get this error: Cannot access the database: :real_connect(): (HY000/2054): The server requested authentication method unknown to the client. Check the host, username and password and try again. If using "localhost" as the database host, try using "127.0.0.1" instead (or vice versa).
It seems to be that the mediawiki container and the mediawiki-mysql containers aren't networked. I'm looking under network and it shows the following, so they should be able to communicate. I can ping a 172.26.0.2 and 172.26.0.3 address but can't figure how to get past step 5) in that go-by.
I've tried everything i can think of. Using older versions of MediaWiki (e.g. 1.31) and mysql but this connection problem is the sticking point each time. I've reached limit of my capabilities here.
It seems to be that the mediawiki container and the mediawiki-mysql containers aren't networked
Would be interesting where this assumption is coming from. From what I read from the error message, your containers can perfectly fine communicate to each other (they should, as they seem to be on the same network, given that the mediawiki-mysql container is also on a bridged network and in the same subnet).
Let's take a look at the interesting part of the error message:
The server requested authentication method unknown to the client
That looks, to me, as a misconfiguration of mysql. I assume you're using the latest version of the mysql docker container, which should be some version of mysql 8. If you now google for this, you'll find plenty of posts even on stackoverflow, like:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/53881212/3394281
php mysqli_connect: authentication method unknown to the client [caching_sha2_password]
To fix this with your current dataset, you could change the authentication plugin from socket to password:
Log in as root to mysql
Run this sql command:
ALTER USER 'root'#'localhost' IDENTIFIED WITH mysql_native_password
BY 'password';
Replace 'password' with your root password. In case your application does not log in to your database with the root user, replace the 'root' user in the above command with the user that your application uses.
Or, if you're using docker-compose or can change the executed command somehow else, you could follow this answer:
Add the following line to the command:
--default-authentication-plugin=mysql_native_password
Florian's answer put me on the right trail even though it didn't work as he initially suggested (I'm marking his as correct answer). I changed the root plugin (his item 2. above) but still did not work. So, I did the same on all of the users shown with the SELECT user, authentication_string,plugin,host FROM mysql.user;.
After, that i ran a FLUSH PRIVILEGES; and then was able to complete the MediaWiki 1.34.0 installation (via http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080).
I suspect that all i really needed to do was run that ALTER USER on the two root accounts (root#localhost and root#%) but it is working now so i'm leaving it as-is. Here is a good link that will help with these commands.
Today I download neo4j-community-3.2.0 in windows, when i start the server, i meet one problem in browser, i meet this problem in neo4j-community-3.1.2 and i had solved it by Ticking the "Do not use Bolt" option in settings solved the issue. But in neo4j-community-3.2.0 , i can't see "Do not use Bolt" option ,and i don't know how to do.
N/A: WebSocket connection failure. Due to security constraints in your web browser, the reason for the failure is not available to this Neo4j Driver. Please use your browsers development console to determine the root cause of the failure. Common reasons include the database being unavailable, using the wrong connection URL or temporary network problems. If you have enabled encryption, ensure your browser is configured to trust the certificate Neo4j is configured to use. WebSocket readyState is: 3
This happens because the browser is trying (under the hood) to also access the bolt port, which uses an unsigned certificate.
You probably allowed the browser to access the SSL 7474 port through allowing the unsigned certificate as an exception on your browser (and if you didn't, you should in order to make it work).
The url was:
https://[neo4j_host]:7474
Do the same for the bolt certificate, allow it as an exception for url:
https://[neo4j_host]:7687
I ran into the same problem trying to use Neo4j Community Edition on an AWS Ubuntu 16.04 instance. The key thing that solved it was to open port 7687 (the bolt port) in the AWS security group settings.
Found this based on https://stackoverflow.com/a/45234105/1529646
Thus, full answer is:
Make sure to configure Neo4j correctly, ie. uncomment the line dbms.connectors.default_listen_address=0.0.0.0 AND the line dbms.connector.bolt.listen_address=:7687
Open ports 7474 AND 7687 in the AWS security group settings.
In the lower left corner of the browser gear, select do not use bolt.
Open your ${NEO4J_HOME}/conf/neo4j.conf file and edit the bolt settings. It is just about uncommenting this line dbms.connector.bolt.address=0.0.0.0:7687
Change the version of Neo4j
Check your JDK version, use JDK1.8
Adding another option, which worked for me. If your bolt's tls_level is set to REQUIRED, you need to change it to OPTIONAL, if you are not using it with SSL certificate; to get this working.
If you are using Neo4J Community Edition (ver 3.5.1 - in my case) from AWS Marketplace, you need to change the configuration in:
/etc/neo4j/pre-neo4j.sh
Change this line:
echo "dbms_connector_bolt_tls_level" "${dbms_connector_bolt_tls_level:=REQUIRED}"
to
echo "dbms_connector_bolt_tls_level" "${dbms_connector_bolt_tls_level:=OPTIONAL}"
You can find more about Neo4J connector configuration option here. Ideally as per docs, by default bolt.tls_level should have been OPTIONAL only. But I'm not really sure what exactly happened in my case, which got it changed to REQUIRED. Or if it came as is from AWS Marketplace.
Assuming you have valid certs and placed them under the correct certificates directory:
dbms.ssl.policy.bolt.client_auth=NONE
Version 4.0. Took it from this article.
I shared my full ssl config on this other answer.
I had the same error. New to Neo, so take this with a grain of salt, but my solution didn't match these above idea. But thanks as they did lead me to the right "water". So
I went into the conf file, noticed that there was the same port number (previously, the Neo desktop had been constantly telling me it'd needed to update the port numbers...I never checked to verity, but they'd be #, #+1 and #+2. But that didn't work yet that'd happened again and again...but now, after checking the conf file myself, I noticed that the number was the same for all three port requirements for BOLT. Tried that and it didn't work either...but maybe that was important in what did:
In the folder, where the specific database is housed, named "..neo4jdatabases/[GUID Value]" there were two directories titled "/installation-3.4.0" and "...1". I removed the ".0", restarted things and IT WORKED.
So, either there should NOT be two versions under the same database collection OR that's true AND you need the three ports to be the same.
Final add for any Neo4j experts who actually know what they're doing, I have three databases running, two without issue. This occurred AFTER I was messing around trying to see how PowerShell might be useful. Not sure if this is related, but the other databases have worked fine...but, this db is the original playground/sandbox I'd had since the beginning. Not 100% sure, I made the version update before or after, creating the other two databases. HTH.
Using a windows trial version on a Windows 10 machine. Current N4j version is 3.4.1.
Do love what I see so far with Neo BTW!!!
Please mention the correct bolt port under the Connect URL textbox.if you are using the service port the mention the service port in place of bolt port.
Then finally I resolve it by replacing the bolt port with service port inside k8s.
user: neo4j
password: neo4j
I resolve this error by replace the port 7687 with node port 30033 inside Neo4j
then it works fine.
I was facing the same issue with Neo4J version 4 installed on an Ubuntu 18 EC2 instance. Tthe workaround that did the trick for me was to replace the 0.0.0.0 entries in /etc/neo4j/neo4j.conf with the actual private IP of my instance.
Following are the lines where the replace happened:
dbms.default_listen_address=172.X.X.232
dbms.connector.bolt.address=172.X.X.232:7687
Post restart of the DB, the Connect URL when accessing from browser should also use the private IP instead of localhost.
Hello guys
i have installed wamp server Version 2.0 .. and i have tried some things and every thing ok ..
i have reboot my Desktop then some thing goes wrong when i am trying to open my local host
EMDAEMON
HTTP/1.1 404 , Not Found
should i consider re-installation ??
Reboot desktop? Open your local host? If you want to do web development you should get familiar with basic computer terminology, at least to a point when you are able to make questions that make a minimum sense.
I'll assume you have installed a bundle that includes the Apache web server and you want to configure a virtual host that's served when you load http://emdaemon in your web browser. The exact details to do so vary slightly depending on your platform. Being a newbie, I suggest you reuse the main site that's already configured and can be loaded through http://localhost. It's roughly explained at http://www.wampserver.com/en/presentation.php. Leave multiples sites for the future :)
Solved .... it seems that we have conflicts in ports ..change port in apache make it works