I am trying use Vuejs's vue-truncate-collapsed property to add the read more and read less button. A Worker can have multiple services. Something like this. Services are stored as array.
<li v-for="item in worker.service_names">
{{ item}}
</li>
this works perfectly fine. But now what I want to do is display default 5 values(not sure how to add the length of 5) and if a worker has more than 5 services then read more button appear. I am not able to implement this on an array. Please help me figure out the issue. I am new to Vuejs.
<truncate
action-class="action"
clamp="..."
:length="5"
less="read less"
:text="<li>worker.service_names</li>"
type="html"
>
</truncate>
You could iterate over a computed list. If it is a short list the computed value will return a shortened list otherwise the full list.
var vm = new Vue({
el: '#app',
data: {
workers: ['A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H'],
showNum: 4,
short: true
},
computed: {
visibleWorkers(){
if(this.short){
return this.workers.slice(0,this.showNum)
}else{
return this.workers
}
}
},
methods: {
showMore(){
this.short=!this.short;
}
}
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/vue/2.5.17/vue.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/vue#2.6.11/dist/vue.js"></script>
<div id="app">
<div>
<ol>
<li v-for="item in visibleWorkers">
{{item}}
</li>
</ol>
<button #click="showMore">{{short?'show more':'hide'}}</button>
</div>
</div>
Related
I've read all the documentation and stackoverflow I can find, but still am having issues with this.
I'm building a Trello clone with Vue and Rails.
I have many draggable lists.
Each list has draggable cards.
When I drag a card from one list to a second list, how do I persist this to my ajax rails endpoint?
I've tried using the #end method and the :move prop, but have had zero luck.
#app.vue
<template>
<draggable v-model="lists" group='lists' class="row dragArea" #end="listMoved">
<div v-for="(list, index) in lists" class="col-3">
<h6>{{ list.name }}</h6>
<hr />
<draggable v-model="list.cards" group='cards' class="dragArea" :move="cardMoved">
<div v-for="(card, index) in list.cards" class="card card-body mb-3">
{{ card.name }}
</div>
</draggable>
<div class="card card-body">
<input v-model="messages[list.id]" class="form-control" ></input>
<button v-on:click="submitMessages(list.id)" class="btn btn-secondary">Add</button>
</div>
</div>
</draggable>
</template>
<script>
import draggable from 'vuedraggable'
export default {
components: { draggable },
props: ["original_lists"],
data: function() {
return {
messages: {},
lists: this.original_lists
}
},
methods: {
cardMoved: function(event) {
console.log(event)
var data = new FormData
data.append("card[list_id]", WHERE_DO_I_FIND_THIS_ID)
data.append("card[position]", event.draggedContext.element.id)
Rails.ajax({
url: `/cards/${event.draggedContext.element.id}/move`,
type: "PATCH",
data: data,
datatype: "json"
})
},
}
}
</script>
Use the change event that contains all the dnd information you need and is called only once the drag operation is ended.
As suggested by #sovalina you need to pass extra infomation linked to the list:
:change="changed(list.id, $event)"
Also your div should be keyed:
<div v-for="(card, index) in list.cards" :key="card.name" class="card card-body mb-3">
Is it possible to select multiple values from angular ui bootstrap typeahead?
http://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/#/typeahead
Hi without changing the codebase probably not - you could try https://github.com/rayshan/ui-multiselect
I recently had the same requirement and was able to solve it by overriding the internal bootstrap implementation via an alternate popup-template. I created a new directive (multi-select-typeahead) to encapsulate the change.
The template uses an ng-init to pass the scope reference (of the typeahead popup directive) to the multi-select-typeahead directive. There the directive overrides the parent's scope. $scope.$parent in this case is the bootstrap typeahead directive itself. The custom directive provides a new implementation of select() which is called internally by angular bootstrap. The new implementation prevents the popup from closing and removes selected items from the list.
The alternate popup I provided is almost entirely the same as the default angular bootstrap typeahead template "uib/template/typeahead/typeahead-popup.html". The only modification was the addition of the ng-init which passes its scope to the multi-select-typeahead directive.
I'm sure if you are clever enough you could render the angular bootstrap default template by reference and inject the ng-init part, removing the duplicated bootstrap code. This would make the solution a bit more resilient to future angular bootstrap changes. That being said, the solution is already quite a hack and is prone to breaking in future major releases.
Hope this is useful to someone!
angular.module('typeahead.demo', [
'ngAnimate',
'ngSanitize',
'ui.bootstrap'
]);
angular
.module('typeahead.demo')
.controller('TypeaheadDemo', TypeaheadDemo);
function TypeaheadDemo($scope) {
$scope.addItem = addItem;
$scope.itemApi = itemApi;
$scope.items = [];
function addItem(item) {
$scope.items.push(item);
}
function itemApi() {
return [
{ name: 'apple' },
{ name: 'orange' },
{ name: 'grape' }
];
}
}
angular
.module('typeahead.demo')
.directive('multiSelectTypeahead', multiSelectTypeahead);
function multiSelectTypeahead() {
return {
templateUrl: 'multi-select-typeahead.html',
scope: {
searchApi: '&',
displayNameField: '#',
onSelect: '&',
inputPlaceholder: '#?'
},
link: function ($scope) {
var uibTypeaheadScope;
$scope.initializeScope = initializeScope;
$scope.$watch('isOpen', function (newValue) {
if (!newValue) {
$scope.searchTerm = '';
}
});
function initializeScope(typeaheadPopupScope) {
uibTypeaheadScope = typeaheadPopupScope.$parent;
uibTypeaheadScope.select = selectItem;
}
function selectItem(index, event) {
var selectedItem = uibTypeaheadScope.matches[index].model;
event.stopPropagation();
if (event.type === 'click') {
event.target.blur();
}
uibTypeaheadScope.matches.splice(index, 1);
$scope.onSelect({ item: selectedItem });
}
}
};
}
<!doctype html>
<html ng-app="typeahead.demo">
<head>
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.6.1/angular.js"></script>
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.6.1/angular-animate.js"></script>
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.6.1/angular-sanitize.js"></script>
<script src="//angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/ui-bootstrap-tpls-2.5.0.js"></script>
<link href="//netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.7/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
</head>
<script type="text/ng-template" id="typeahead-search-results.html">
<ul ng-init="$parent.$parent.initializeScope(this)"
class="dropdown-menu"
ng-show="isOpen() && !moveInProgress"
ng-style="{ top: position().top + 'px', left: position().left + 'px' }"
role="listbox"
aria-hidden="{{ !isOpen() }}">
<li class="uib-typeahead-match"
ng-repeat="match in matches track by $index"
ng-class="{ active: isActive($index) }"
ng-mouseenter="selectActive($index)"
ng-click="selectMatch($index, $event)"
role="option"
id="{{ ::match.id }}">
<div uib-typeahead-match
index="$index"
match="match"
query="query"
template-url="templateUrl"></div>
</li>
</ul>
</script>
<script type="text/ng-template" id="multi-select-typeahead.html">
<input type="text"
placeholder="{{::inputPlaceholder}}"
ng-model="searchTerm"
ng-model-options="{debounce: 500}"
uib-typeahead="result as result[displayNameField] for result in searchApi({ searchText: $viewValue })"
typeahead-is-open="isOpen"
class="form-control"
typeahead-popup-template-url="typeahead-search-results.html" />
</script>
<body>
<div ng-controller="TypeaheadDemo" style="padding-top: 15px;">
<multi-select-typeahead class="col-xs-6"
search-api="itemApi(searchText)"
display-name-field="name"
on-select="addItem(item)"
input-placeholder="Search Items...">
</multi-select-typeahead>
<div class="col-xs-6">
<ul class="list-group">
<li class="list-group-item" ng-repeat="item in items">
{{ item.name }}
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
I'm trying to dynamically create and filter a jquery mobile control group containing checkboxes using knockout binding. The basic idea is that the user selects an option which filters the list of checkboxes in the control group. I've seen similar questions on here but they all seem to be a one-time binding where once bound by ko and enhanced by jqm they remain unchanged. I have that behavior working, the issue occurs when the underlying viewModel changes and ko updates the list of checkboxes in the control group. A full demo of the behavior can be found on jsfiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/hkrauss2/JAvLk/15/
I can see that the issue is due to jqm creating a wrapper div when enhancing the control group. Ko then puts new elements above the wrapper div when updating the DOM. Basically I'm asking if anyone has solved this issue and also if anyone thinks I'm asking for trouble by integrating these two libraries? Thanks to everyone in advance.
Here is the Html:
<div id="home" data-role="page">
<div data-role="header">
<h2>Knockout Test</h2>
</div>
<div data-role="content">
<ul id="parent-view" data-role="listview" data-inset="true" data-bind="foreach: parentCategories">
<li></li>
</ul>
<p>
To reproduce the issue select Restaurants, come back and select Nightlife or Bars
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="list" data-role="page">
<div data-role="header">
<h2>Knockout Test</h2>
<a data-rel="back" data-icon="carat-l" data-iconpos="notext">Back</a>
</div>
<div data-role="content">
<form>
<div id="child-view" data-role="controlgroup" data-bind="foreach: childCategories, jqmRefreshControlGroup: childCategories">
<input type="checkbox" name="checkbox-v-2a" data-bind="attr: {id: 'categoryId' + id}" />
<label data-bind="text: description, attr: {for: 'categoryId' + id}" />
</div>
</form>
</div>
</div>
And the basic javascript. Note there are two external js files not listed here. One sets $.mobile.autoInitializePage = false; on the mobileinit event. The other brings in data in the form of a JSON array which is used to initialize the Categories property in the AppViewModel.
// Custom binding to handle jqm refresh
ko.bindingHandlers.jqmRefreshControlGroup = {
update: function (element, valueAccessor) {
ko.utils.unwrapObservable(valueAccessor());
try {
$(element).controlgroup("refresh");
} catch (ex) { }
}
}
function GetView(name) {
return $(name).get(0);
}
// Define the AppViewModel
var AppViewModel = function () {
var self = this;
self.currentParentId = ko.observable(0);
self.Categories = ko.observableArray(Categories); // Categories comes from sampledata.js
self.parentCategories = ko.computed(function () {
return ko.utils.arrayFilter(self.Categories(), function (item) {
return item.parentId == 0;
});
});
self.childCategories = ko.computed(function () {
return ko.utils.arrayFilter(self.Categories(), function (item) {
return item.parentId == self.currentParentId();
});
});
self.OnClick = function (viewModel, $event) {
self.currentParentId(viewModel.id);
return true;
};
};
// Create the AppViewModel
var viewModel = new AppViewModel();
// Apply bindings and initialize jqm
$(function () {
ko.applyBindings(viewModel, GetView('#parent-view'));
ko.applyBindings(viewModel, GetView('#child-view'));
$.mobile.initializePage();
});
Update
My old solution wraps each element in a ui-controlgroup-controls div, which adds unnecessary markup. However, the enhancement part is essential.
$(element).enhanceWithin().controlgroup("refresh"); /* line 16 in fiddle */
The new solution is more dynamic to maintain clean markup with no additional wrappers:
First step: Once controlgroup is created controlgroupcreate (event), add data-bind to its' container .controlgroup("container")
Second step: Add checkbox consisted of input and label. At the same time, for each element, add data-bind
Third step: Apply bindings ko.applyBindings().
The static structure of the controlgroup should be basic, it shouldn't contain any elements statically. If a checkbox is added statically, each dynamically created checkbox will be wrapped in an additional .ui-checkbox div.
<div id="child-view" data-role="controlgroup">
<!-- nothing here -->
</div>
JS
$(document).on("controlgroupcreate", "#child-view", function (e) {
$(this)
.controlgroup("container")
.attr("data-bind", "foreach: childCategories, jqmRefreshControlGroup: childCategories")
.append($('<input type="checkbox" name="checkbox" />')
.attr("data-bind", "attr: {id: 'categoryId' + id}"))
.append($('<label />')
.attr("data-bind", "text: description, attr: {for: 'categoryId' + id}"));
ko.applyBindings(viewModel, GetView('#child-view'));
});
Demo
Old solution
As of of jQuery Mobile 1.4, items should be appended to .controlgroup("container") not directly to $("[data-role=controlgroup]").
First, you need to wrap inner elements of controlgroup in div with class ui-controlgroup-controls which acts as controlgroup container.
<div id="child-view" data-role="controlgroup" data-bind="foreach: childCategories, jqmRefreshControlGroup: childCategories">
<div class="ui-controlgroup-controls">
<input type="checkbox" name="checkbox-v-2a" data-bind="attr: {id: 'categoryId' + id}" />
<label data-bind="text: description, attr: {for: 'categoryId' + id}" />
</div>
</div>
Second step, you need to enhance elements inserted into controlgroup container, using .enhanceWithin().
$(element).enhanceWithin().controlgroup("refresh"); /* line 16 in fiddle */
Demo
Omar's answer above works very well. As he mentions in the comments however it does wrap each input/label combination in their own div. This doesn't seem to affect anything visually or functionally but there is another way as outlined below. Basically it uses the containerless control flow syntax to bind the list.
New Html
<div id="child-view" data-role="controlgroup">
<!-- ko foreach: childCategories, jqmRefreshControlGroup: childCategories, forElement: '#child-view' -->
<input type="checkbox" name="checkbox-v-2a" data-bind="attr: {id: 'categoryId' + id}"></input>
<label data-bind="text: description, attr: {for: 'categoryId' + id}"></label>
<!-- /ko -->
</div>
Using the containerless syntax means that we lose the reference to the controlgroup div in the custom binding handler. To help get that back I added the id as '#child-view' in a custom binding named forElement. The magic still all happens in the custom binding handler and Omar's enhanceWithin suggestion remains the secret ingredient. Note: I needed to change the argument list to include all arguments passed by ko.
ko.bindingHandlers.jqmRefreshControlGroup = {
update: function (element, valueAccessor, allBindings, viewModel, bindingContext) {
ko.utils.unwrapObservable(valueAccessor());
try {
$(allBindings.get('forElement')).enhanceWithin().controlgroup("refresh");
} catch (ex) { }
}
}
Final note: To use a custom handler on a virtual element ko needs to be notified that it is ok. The following is the updated start up statements:
// Apply bindings and initialize jqm
$(function () {
ko.virtualElements.allowedBindings.jqmRefreshControlGroup = true; // This line added
ko.applyBindings(viewModel, GetView('#parent-view'));
ko.applyBindings(viewModel, GetView('#child-view'));
$.mobile.initializePage();
});
I'm trying to run up a little prototype in Ember.JS at the moment with a view to completely re-writing the UI of a web application as an Ember Application running against a WebAPI, but although I've managed to get Ember running OK, I cannot get jqueryui to initialise the tabs correctly.
It seems to work fine if within the view I put static data for tabs to be created from, but if I'm using dynamic data then it just doesn't work.
I have an Ember view template
<script type="text/x-handlebars" id="index">
<div id="tabs" class="ui-tabs">
<ul>
{{#each model}}
<li>
<span class="ui-icon ui-icon-person"></span>
<a {{bindAttr href="route"}} {{bindAttr title="tabTitle"}}><span>{{title}}</span></a>
</li>
{{/each}}
</ul>
{{#each model}}
<div {{bindAttr id="tabTitle"}}>
<p>
Retrieving Data - {{title}}
</p>
</div>
{{/each}}
</div>
</script>
and a view
App.IndexView = Ember.View.extend({
templateName: 'index',
didInsertElement: function () {
var tabs = $("#tabs").tabs();
}
});
and a model
App.Section = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
title: DS.attr('string'),
tabTitle: function () {
return 'tab-' + this.get('name');
}.property("name"),
route: function () {
return '#' + this.get('tabTitle');
}.property("tabTitle")
});
App.Section.FIXTURES = [
{
id: 1,
name: 'home',
title: 'Home'
},
{
id: 2,
name: 'users',
title: 'Users'
}
];
It appears to generate the HTML correctly (from checking in Firebug), but this does not work, where as if I replace the template with
<script type="text/x-handlebars" id="index">
<div id="tabs" class="ui-tabs">
<ul>
<li>
<span class="ui-icon ui-icon-person"></span>
<span>Home</span>
</li>
<li>
<span class="ui-icon ui-icon-person"></span>
<span>Users</span>
</li>
</ul>
<div id="tab-home">
<p>
Retrieving Data - Home
</p>
</div>
<div id="tab-users">
<p>
Retrieving Data - Users
</p>
</div>
</div>
</script>
it works perfectly.
I'm assuming that it's something to do with the DOM not being completely rendered by the time the tabs are initialised, but everything I can find says that didInsertElement is the place to do it, and I have had time to dig deeper yet.
I'd be grateful for any ideas.
Edit: I've managed to make this work in a fashion by doing the following:
App.IndexView = Ember.View.extend({
templateName: 'index',
didInsertElement: function () {
Ember.run.next(this, function () {
if (this.$('#tab-users').length > 0) {
var tabs = $('#tabs').tabs();
} else {
Ember.run.next(this.didInsertElement);
}
});
},
});
The problem with this is that 1) it requires me to know what one of the last elements that will be written to the view is called (and obviously with dynamic data I won't necessarily know that), so that I can keep checking for it, and 2) the inefficiency of this technique makes me want to scream!
In addition, we get a good old FoUC (Flash of Unstyled Content) after things have been rendered, but before we then get JQueryUI to style them correctly.
Any suggestions gratefully received.
It's still not nice... but this at least does work, and is reasonably efficient...
From Ember.js - Using a Handlebars helper to detect that a subview has rendered I discovered how to write a trigger, and because of the way that the run loop seems to work, inserting the trigger in the last loop on the page causes it to be called n times, but only after the loop is complete, so a quick state check "hasBeenTriggered" ensures that you only execute the delgate function once.
My code now looks like this:
<script type="text/x-handlebars" id="index">
<div id="tabs" class="ui-tabs">
<ul>
{{#each model}}
<li>
<span class="ui-icon ui-icon-person"></span>
<a {{bindAttr href="route"}} {{bindAttr title="tabTitle"}}><span>{{title}}</span></a>
</li>
{{/each}}
</ul>
{{#each model}}
<div {{bindAttr id="tabTitle"}}>
<p>
Retrieving Data - {{title}}
</p>
</div>
{{trigger "triggered"}}
{{/each}}
</div>
</script>
with the trigger
Ember.Handlebars.registerHelper('trigger', function (evtName, options) {
options = arguments[arguments.length - 1];
var hash = options.hash,
view = options.data.view,
target;
view = view.get('concreteView');
if (hash.target) {
target = Ember.Handlebars.get(this, hash.target, options);
} else {
target = view;
}
Ember.run.next(function () {
target.trigger(evtName);
});
});
and view
App.IndexView = Ember.View.extend({
templateName: 'index',
hasBeenTriggered: false,
triggered: function () {
if (!this.get("hasBeenTriggered")) {
var tabs = $('#tabs').tabs();
this.set("hasBeenTriggered", true);
}
}
});
I'd love to know if there's a better way of doing this, as this still doesn't get round the FOUC problem either (which again can be done with more JS hacks)... :(
I have a below custom directive in angularjs which uses model thats gets updated from server,
I have added a watch listener to watch the changes of that model,
var linkFn;
linkFn = function(scope, element, attrs) {
scope.$watch('$parent.photogallery', function(newValue, oldValue) {
if(angular.isUndefined(newValue)) {
return;
}
var $container = element;
alert($container.element);
$container.imagesLoaded(function() {
$container.masonry({
itemSelector : '.box'
});
});
});
};
return {
templateUrl:'templates/Photos_Masonry.htm',
replace: false,
transclude:true,
scope: {
photogallery: '=photoGallery',
},
restrict: 'A',
link: linkFn
However, when i debug in my watch directive, i still see that expressions in templates are still unresolved.i.e. photo.label, ng-src all are still unresolved. AFIK, $digest would be called only after $eval. Is this intended behavior?
My jQuery calls are not working due to this? Is there any other event where i get the result element with evaluated expressions?
Here is my template, which has ng-repeat in it,
<div id="container" class="clearfix">
<div class="box col2" ng-repeat="photo in photogallery">
<a ng-href="#/viewphotos?id={{photo.uniqueid}}&&galleryid={{galleryid}}"
title="{{photo.label}}"><img
ng-src="{{photo.thumbnail_url}}" alt="Stanley" class="fade_spot" /></a>
<h3>
<span style="border-bottom: 1px solid black;font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;">{{galleryname}}</span>
</h3>
<h3>
<span style="color:#20ACB8;font-weight:normal;font-size:17px;">{{photo.seasonname}}</span>
</h3>
</div>
</div>
photogallery is initialized in parent controller,
function MyCtrlCampaign($scope, srvgallery, mygallery) {
$scope.updatedata = function() {
$scope.photogallery = srvgallery.getphotos($routeParams);
};
$scope.getphotos = function() {
srvgallery.photos().success(function(data) {
$scope.updatedata();
}).error(function(data) {
});
};
Directive is used in below way,
<div masonry photo-gallery="photogallery" >
</div>
Kindly let me know your views on this.
Looks like this has been resolved in your Github issue (posted for the convenience of others).