I am using SwiftUI and want to do something when toggle state changes but I cannot find a solution for this.
How can I call a function or do whatever when toggle state changes ?
#State var condition = false
Toggle(isOn: $condition) {
Text("Toggle text here")
}
If you want to do something whenever the toggle state change, you may use didSet.
struct ContentView: View {
#State var condition = false{
didSet{
print("condition changed to \(condition)")
}
}
var body: some View {
let bind = Binding<Bool>(
get:{self.condition},
set:{self.condition = $0}
)
return Toggle(isOn: bind){
Text("Toggle text here")
}
}
}
When we say #State var condition = true, it's type is State<Bool> and not Bool.
when we use binding in toggle ($condition in this case), toggle directly changes the stored value. Meaning it never changes the #State, so didSet will never be triggered.
So here we create and assign to let bind an instance of Binding<Value> struct, and use that Binding struct directly in toggle. Than when we set self.condition = $0, it will trigger didSet.
You can use the .onChange modifier like in the first example below.
However, keep in mind that in most cases we don't need it.
In case of a view setting, you bind to a #State bool value, then you use this bool to modify the view hierarchy, as in the first example.
In case of a change in your model, you bind the toggle to a #Published value in your model or model controller. In this case, the model or model controller receive the change from the switch, do whatever is requested, and the view is rerendered. It must have an #ObservedObject reference to your model.
I show how to use the .onChange modifier in the first example. It simply logs the state.
Remember there should be as few logic as possible in SwiftUI views.
By the way that was already true far before the invention of SwiftUI ;)
Example 1 - #State value. ( Local UI settings )
import SwiftUI
struct ToggleDetailView: View {
#State var isDetailVisible: Bool = true
var body: some View {
VStack {
Toggle("Display Detail", isOn: $isDetailVisible)
.onChange(of: self.isDetailVisible, perform: { value in
print("Value has changed : \(value)")
})
if isDetailVisible {
Text("Detail is visible!")
}
}
.padding(10)
.frame(width: 300, height: 150, alignment: .top)
}
}
struct ToggleDetailView_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
ToggleDetailView()
}
}
Example 2 - #ObservedObject value. ( Action on model )
import SwiftUI
class MyModel: ObservableObject {
#Published var isSolid: Bool = false
var string: String {
isSolid ? "This is solid" : "This is fragile"
}
}
struct ToggleModelView: View {
#ObservedObject var model: MyModel
var body: some View {
VStack {
Toggle("Solid Model", isOn: $model.isSolid)
Text(model.string)
}
.padding(10)
.frame(width: 300, height: 150, alignment: .top)
}
}
struct ToggleModelView_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
ToggleModelView(model: MyModel())
}
}
Try
struct ContentView: View {
#State var condition = false
var body: some View {
if condition {
callMe()
}
else {
print("off")
}
return Toggle(isOn: $condition) {
Text("Toggle text here")
}
}
func callMe() {
}
}
Karen please check
#State var isChecked: Bool = true
#State var index: Int = 0
Toggle(isOn: self.$isChecked) {
Text("This is a Switch")
if (self.isChecked) {
Text("\(self.toggleAction(state: "Checked", index: index))")
} else {
CustomAlertView()
Text("\(self.toggleAction(state: "Unchecked", index: index))")
}
}
Add function like this
func toggleAction(state: String, index: Int) -> String {
print("The switch no. \(index) is \(state)")
return ""
}
I tend to use:
Toggle(isOn: $condition, label: {
Text("Power: \(condition ? "On" : "Off")")
})
.padding(.horizontal, 10.0)
.frame(width: 225, height: 50, alignment: .center)
Related
Hello i have an issue with the refresh of my view when i toggle a boolean.
Here is the code
class MyItem: Identifiable {
#Published var isActive: Bool
}
struct myView: View {
#Binding var item: MyItem
var body: some View {
HStack {
Toggle("", isOn: $item.isActive)
Spacer()
TextField("", text: item.isActive ? $text : .constant("")) { isFocused in
guard !isFocused && text.count == 0 else { return }
item.isActive.toggle
}
.background(item.isActive ? Color.white : Color.clear)
}
}
}
when i lose my focus and run item.isActive.toggle it change correctly his value, but my Toggle and my TextField doesn't update their UI (the Toggle is still active and the background of the TextField is still white)
Any idea of what i am missing ?
Binding only updates the view when the wrapped value is updated. However, since your wrapped value is a class, not a struct, the view would only be updated if you replaced the instance with another one, not if you updated a property of the instance.
You need to make MyItem conform to ObservableObject and use #ObservedObject or #StateObject on your view, then it will be updated correctly.
class MyItem: ObservableObject {
#Published var isActive: Bool
}
struct myView: View {
#ObservedObject private var item: MyItem
init(item: MyItem) {
self.item = item
}
var body: some View {
HStack {
Toggle("", isOn: $item.isActive)
Spacer()
TextField("", text: item.isActive ? $text : .constant("")) { isFocused in
guard !isFocused && text.count == 0 else { return }
item.isActive.toggle
}
.background(item.isActive ? Color.white : Color.clear)
}
}
}
I am having property with #StateObject, I am trying to observe change in viewmodel, I am able to print correct result but can not able to show on screen as view is not refreshing.
Tried using binding but not worked because of #StateObject
import SwiftUI
struct AbcView: View {
#StateObject var abcViewModel: AbcViewModel
init(abcViewModel: AbcViewModel) {
self._abcViewModel = StateObject(wrappedValue: abcViewModel)
}
var body: some View {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
ZStack(alignment: .top) {
ScrollView {
Text("some txt")
}
.overlay(
VStack {
TopView(content: classViews(data: $abcViewModel.somedata, abcViewModel: abcViewModel))
Spacer()
}
)
}
}
}
}
func classViews(data: Binding<[SomeData]>, abcViewModel: AbcViewModel) -> [AnyView] {
var views: [AnyView] = []
for element in data {
views.append(
VStack(spacing: 0) {
HStack {
print("\(abcViewModel.title(Id: Int(element.dataId.wrappedValue ?? "")) )") // printing correct value
Text(abcViewModel.title(Id: Int(element.dataId.wrappedValue ?? ""))) // want to observe change here
}
}
.convertToAnyView())
}
return views
}
If you are injecting your AbcViewModel into AbcView you should use #ObserverdObject instead of #StateObject , full explanation here Also you should conform tour AbcViewModel to ObservableObject and make your desired property #Published if you want to trigger the change in View . Here is simplified code example:
Making AbcViewModel observable:
class AbcViewModel: ObservableObject {
#Published var dataID: String = "" //by changing the #Published proprty you trigger change in View using it
}
store AbcViewModel as #ObserverdObject:
struct AbcView: View {
#ObservedObject var abcViewModel: AbcViewModel
init(abcViewModel: AbcViewModel) {
self.abcViewModel = abcViewModel
}
var body: some View {
//...
}
}
If you now use your AbcViewModel dataID property anywhere in the project, and you change its value, the property will publish the change and your View (struct) will be rebuilded. Use the same pattern for creating TopView and assigning AbcViewModel to it the same way.
I am trying to follow the guidance in a WWDC video to use a #State struct to configure and present a child view. I would expect the struct to be able to present the view, however the config.show boolean value does not get updated when set by the button.
The code below has two buttons, each toggling a different boolean to show an overlay. Toggling showWelcome shows the overlay but toggling config.show does nothing. This seems to be working as intended, I just don't understand why SwiftUI behaves this way. Can someone explain why it's not functioning like I expect, and/or suggest a workaround?
https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2020/10040/ # 5:14
struct InformationOverlayConfig {
#State var show = false
#State var title: String?
}
struct InformationOverlay: View {
#Binding var config: InformationOverlayConfig
var body: some View {
if config.title != nil {
Text(config.title!)
.padding()
.background(.ultraThinMaterial, in: RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 15))
}
}
}
struct TestView: View {
#State private var configWelcome = InformationOverlayConfig(title: "Title is here")
#State private var showWelcome = false
var body: some View {
VStack {
Text("hello world")
Spacer()
Button("Toggle struct parameter", action: {
configWelcome.show.toggle()
})
Button("Toggle boolean state", action: {
showWelcome.toggle()
})
}
.overlay(
VStack {
InformationOverlay(config: $configWelcome).opacity(configWelcome.show ? 1 : 0)
InformationOverlay(config: $configWelcome).opacity(showWelcome ? 1 : 0)
})
}
You "Config" is not a View. State variables only go in Views.
Also, do not use force unwrapping for config.title. Optional binding or map are the non-redundant solutions.
Lastly, there is no need for config to be a Binding if it actually functions as a constant for a particular view.
struct InformationOverlay: View {
struct Config {
var show = false
var title: String?
}
let config: Config
var body: some View {
VStack {
if let title = config.title {
Text(title)
.padding()
.background(.ultraThinMaterial, in: RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 15))
}
// or
config.title.map {
Text($0)
.padding()
.background(.ultraThinMaterial, in: RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 15))
}
}
}
}
struct TestView: View {
#State private var configWelcome = InformationOverlay.Config(title: "Title is here")
#State private var showWelcome = false
var body: some View {
VStack {
Text("hello world")
Spacer()
Button("Toggle struct parameter") {
configWelcome.show.toggle()
}
Button("Toggle boolean state") {
showWelcome.toggle()
}
}
.overlay(
VStack {
InformationOverlay(config: configWelcome).opacity(configWelcome.show ? 1 : 0)
InformationOverlay(config: configWelcome).opacity(showWelcome ? 1 : 0)
}
)
}
}
Here is a simple list view of "Topic" struct items. The goal is to present an editor view when a row of the list is tapped. In this code, tapping a row is expected to cause the selected topic to be stored as "tappedTopic" in an #State var and sets a Boolean #State var that causes the EditorV to be presented.
When the code as shown is run and a line is tapped, its topic name prints properly in the Print statement in the Button action, but then the app crashes because self.tappedTopic! finds tappedTopic to be nil in the EditTopicV(...) line.
If the line "tlVM.objectWillChange.send()" is uncommented, the code runs fine. Why is this needed?
And a second puzzle: in the case where the code runs fine, with the objectWillChange.send() uncommented, a print statement in the EditTopicV init() shows that it runs twice. Why?
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using Xcode 13.2.1 and my deployment target is set to iOS 15.1.
Topic.swift:
struct Topic: Identifiable {
var name: String = "Default"
var iconName: String = "circle"
var id: String { name }
}
TopicListV.swift:
struct TopicListV: View {
#ObservedObject var tlVM: TopicListVM
#State var tappedTopic: Topic? = nil
#State var doEditTappedTopic = false
var body: some View {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
List {
ForEach(tlVM.topics) { topic in
Button(action: {
tappedTopic = topic
// why is the following line needed?
tlVM.objectWillChange.send()
doEditTappedTopic = true
print("Tapped topic = \(tappedTopic!.name)")
}) {
Label(topic.name, systemImage: topic.iconName)
.padding(10)
}
}
}
Spacer()
}
.sheet(isPresented: $doEditTappedTopic) {
EditTopicV(tlVM: tlVM, originalTopic: self.tappedTopic!)
}
}
}
EditTopicV.swift (Editor View):
struct EditTopicV: View {
#ObservedObject var tlVM: TopicListVM
#Environment(\.presentationMode) var presentationMode
let originalTopic: Topic
#State private var editTopic: Topic
#State private var ic = "circle"
let iconList = ["circle", "leaf", "photo"]
init(tlVM: TopicListVM, originalTopic: Topic) {
print("DBG: EditTopicV: originalTopic = \(originalTopic)")
self.tlVM = tlVM
self.originalTopic = originalTopic
self._editTopic = .init(initialValue: originalTopic)
}
var body: some View {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
HStack {
Button("Cancel") {
presentationMode.wrappedValue.dismiss()
}
Spacer()
Button("Save") {
editTopic.iconName = editTopic.iconName.lowercased()
tlVM.change(topic: originalTopic, to: editTopic)
presentationMode.wrappedValue.dismiss()
}
}
HStack {
Text("Name:")
TextField("name", text: $editTopic.name)
Spacer()
}
Picker("Color Theme", selection: $editTopic.iconName) {
ForEach(iconList, id: \.self) { icon in
Text(icon).tag(icon)
}
}
.pickerStyle(.segmented)
Spacer()
}
.padding()
}
}
TopicListVM.swift (Observable Object View Model):
class TopicListVM: ObservableObject {
#Published var topics = [Topic]()
func append(topic: Topic) {
topics.append(topic)
}
func change(topic: Topic, to newTopic: Topic) {
if let index = topics.firstIndex(where: { $0.name == topic.name }) {
topics[index] = newTopic
}
}
static func ex1() -> TopicListVM {
let tvm = TopicListVM()
tvm.append(topic: Topic(name: "leaves", iconName: "leaf"))
tvm.append(topic: Topic(name: "photos", iconName: "photo"))
tvm.append(topic: Topic(name: "shapes", iconName: "circle"))
return tvm
}
}
Here's what the list looks like:
Using sheet(isPresented:) has the tendency to cause issues like this because SwiftUI calculates the destination view in a sequence that doesn't always seem to make sense. In your case, using objectWillSend on the view model, even though it shouldn't have any effect, seems to delay the calculation of your force-unwrapped variable and avoids the crash.
To solve this, use the sheet(item:) form:
.sheet(item: $tappedTopic) { item in
EditTopicV(tlVM: tlVM, originalTopic: item)
}
Then, your item gets passed in the closure safely and there's no reason for a force unwrap.
You can also capture tappedTopic for a similar result, but you still have to force unwrap it, which is generally something we want to avoid:
.sheet(isPresented: $doEditTappedTopic) { [tappedTopic] in
EditTopicV(tlVM: tlVM, originalTopic: tappedTopic!)
}
I have a ContentView and a NumericView. The selectedIndex is a #State in ContentView. What I want is that if selectedIndex changes, it should reset the answer field in NumericView from CoreData. Below is the code. "av" contains the value of the answer field from CoreData.
struct NumericEntry: View {
#EnvironmentObject var questionAnswerStore: QuestionAnswerStore
#State var answer: String
var questionIndex: Int
init(questionIndex: Int, av: String) {
self.questionIndex = questionIndex
_answer = State(initialValue: av)
}
var body: some View {
VStack {
TextField("Answer", text: $answer)
.textFieldStyle(CustomTextFieldStyle())
.onChange(of: answer) { newValue in
self.questionAnswerStore.getUserAttemptData(selectedIndex: questionIndex).answer = newValue
PersistenceController.shared.saveContext()
}
.keyboardType(.decimalPad)
.padding()
}
}
private struct CustomTextFieldStyle : TextFieldStyle {
public func _body(configuration: TextField<Self._Label>) -> some View {
configuration
.padding(10)
.background(
RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 5)
.strokeBorder(Color.secondary.opacity(0.5), lineWidth: 1))
}
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
#State var selectedIndex: Int = 0
#ObservedObject private var questionAnswerStore: QuestionAnswerStore = QuestionAnswerStore.sharedInstance
var body: some View {
NumericEntry(questionIndex: selectedIndex, av: self.questionAnswerStore.getUserAttemptData(selectedIndex: selectedIndex).answer ?? "")
// some code that keeps changing the value of selectedIndex
}
}
I read somewhere that _stateVariable = State(initialValue: "abcd") should set the state of #State stateVariable. In the above code the code
_answer = State(initialValue: av)
executes fine but when it reaches
TextField("Answer", text: $answer)
$answer is still "".
I would prefer a solution where I don't even have to send "av" from the parent component, just selectedIndex should check QuestionAnswerStore for the value of "answer". This could be solved using .onAppear but in my case, the NumericView appears only once and then its parent just keeps changing selectedIndex value, so onAppear doesn't get called again.
Of course, if that is not possible then what's the way out using "av" as above?