I totally agree the CNN has been used as the basic structure of R-CNN, Fact R-CNN, and YOLO.
My question is that if we have big enough data, is it still good to use DNN? If not so, what is the negative side of using DNN?
How about object recognition in the case of small image datasets? Do you prefer to use DNN or CNN?
Related
I am learning to use gabor filters to extract orientation and scale related features from images. On the other hand, Convolution Neural Network can also extract features including orientation and scale, is there any evidence that filters in CNN performs a similar function as gabor filters? Or pros and cons of both of them.
In my personal experience, in a traditional deep learning architecture (such as AlexNet) , when the layers near the beginning are visualized, they resemble gabor filters a lot.
Take this visualization of the first two layers of a pretrained AlexNet (taken from Andrej Karpathy's cs231n.github.io ). Some of the learnt filters look exactly like the Gabor Filters. So yes, there is evidence that CNN works (partly) the same way as Gabor Filters.
One possible explanation is that since the layers towards the beginning of a deep CNN are used to extract low level features (such as changes in texture), they perform the same functions as Gabor Filters. Features such as those detecting changes in frequency are so fundamental that they are present irrespective of the type of dataset the model is trained on. (Part of the reason why transfer learning is possible) .
But if you have more more data, you could possibly make a deep CNN learn much more high-level features than Gabor Filters, which might be more useful for the task you're extracting these features for (such as classification). I hope this provides some clarification.
How can I understand what features is the Google Inception V3 model using to classify a set of images, what features or pixels of the images are more significant for classifying them?
For instance, if the classifier were to distinguish between a Cheetah and a Leopard, it would probably do so by judging based on their spots. How can I determine what aspects of my images the classifier values most?
Your question is not easily answerable, Neural nets in general compose of hierarchical features where in the initial layers the neural net may learn to detect edges and blobs and in the deeper layers it learn more abstract features, so in a n class classification problems, where n might be a large number it is notoriously difficult to interpret what exactly the network learns and uses to classify images. Having said that Obviously work has been done,But i will refer you to https://distill.pub/2017/feature-visualization/, this should help you a bit
I worked with Support Vector Machine for classification with skicit-learn library several time previously. But I only interacted with data contain text and number in ".csv" format. Currently, I am wanting to use Support Vector Machine for image classification. Can you help me how to convert image to type like ".csv" format in order to classification.
I would be very appreciated with any help. Thank you.
Sure, in general, one would define a so-called Feature Vector. It's a vector which contains numeric representations of certain, usually hand-crafted features. In the case of image classification this heavily depends on what you want to classify. Usually, the features in image classification systems are extracted by image processing algorithms such as HOG and SIFT.
But honestly, I wouldn't use SVMs in image classification task because it's usually a lot of work to define and combine features to get a good classifier. Try Convolutional Neural Networks instead. Those learn the necessary feature by them selfs. If you spend months of feature engineering for a good SVM classifier, a CNN could easily outperform your work after the first training.
There are two ways to implement SVM for image classification.
Extract hand crafted features like SIFT,HOG or similar for each image and store them in csv. Finally, apply svm over them.
Use deep learning, extract features before soft max classifier. Store those features in .csv and apply svm over it.
Is it possible to feed image features, say SIFT features, to a convolutional neural network model in Tensorflow? I am trying a tensorflow implementation of this project in which a grayscale image is coloured. Will image features be a better choice than feeding the images as is to the model?
PS. I am a novice to machine learning and is not familiar with creating neural n/w models
You can feed tensorflow neural net almost anything.
If you have extra features for each pixel, then instead of using one channel (intensity) you would use multiple channels.
If you have extra features, which are about whole image, you can make separate input a merge features at some upper layer.
As for the better performance, you should try both approaches.
General intuition is that, extra features help if you don't have many samples and their effect is diminishing if you have many samples and network can learn features by itself.
Also one more point: If you are novice, I strongly recommend using higher level framework like keras.io (which is layer over tensorflow) instead of tensorflow.
Does it make any sense to perform feature extraction on images using, e.g., OpenCV, then use Caffe for classification of those features?
I am asking this as opposed to the traditional way of passing the images directly to Caffe, and letting Caffe do the extraction and classification procedures.
Yes, it does make sense, but it may not be the first thing you want to try:
If you have already extracted hand-crafted features that are suitable for your domain, there is a good chance you'll get satisfactory results by using an easier-to-use machine learning tool (e.g. libsvm).
Caffe can be used in many different ways with your features. If they are low-level features (e.g. Histogram of Gradients), then several convolutional layers may be able to extract the appropriate mid-level features for your problem. You may also use caffe as an alternative non-linear classifier (instead of SVM). You have the freedom to try (too) many things, but my advice is to first try a machine learning method with a smaller meta-parameter space, especially if you're new to neural nets and caffe.
Caffe is a tool for training and evaluating deep neural networks. It is quite a versatile tool allowing for both deep convolutional nets as well as other architectures.
Of course it can be used to process pre-computed image features.