My App.xaml.cs
I send only one notification but method working twice on ios (the method working one times on android)
CrossFirebasePushNotification.Current.OnNotificationReceived += (s, p) =>
{
// go twice inside of this method on IOS
};
I have an iOS app where I use only local notifications.
One of the features for this app is that I can create several notifications at once (the number of notifications can be from 1 to 20). Notification trigger is time stamp only.
I always add an attachment to each notification - a picture that is always being presented in the application database.
When a certain time comes, the notification trigger is triggered and this notification is shown to the user, usually once a day.
Sometimes (about 20% of cases) a picture is not displayed in the notification (does not matter if the screen is locked or not). This behavior is present in iOS12 - iOS14.
I did the following checks, which were successful:
no errors occurred while creating and adding an notification to UNUserNotificationCenter
check if a temporary URL image exists before creating UNNotificationAttachment
check if the picture exceeds 10Mb
check if an attachment exists for each pending Notification Requests that has already been added to the notification center
check if there is an access to the attachment of each pending Notification Requests that has already been added to the notification center
I've investigated an interesting case on iOS 13, after restarting the device, no one previously generated notification will show pictures. The debug shows that all UNNotificationAttachments in pending Notification Requests are present, but I do not have access to them. Obviously, not only I but also the OS do not have access. Very strange undocumented behavior.
I assume that over time the OS loses access to the UNNotificationAttachment files, but how to understand this? OS is not coping with its own security?
// how I check access for files in attachments
private func checkSavedAttachments() {
UNUserNotificationCenter.current().getPendingNotificationRequests {
(allScheduled) in
let attachments = allScheduled.map{ $0.content.attachments }.reduce([], +)
var accessDeniedCount = 0
attachments.forEach {
(attach) in
if attach.url.startAccessingSecurityScopedResource() {
print(attach.url)
}
else {
accessDeniedCount += 1
}
attach.url.stopAccessingSecurityScopedResource()
}
if accessDeniedCount > 0 {
fatalError()
}
}
}
Thanks for any help!
Issue: Different Behavior In 3 Different Contexts
Ok so Ok, in iOS it seems three different things can happen regarding Push Notifications:
When a Push Notification is received when the app is not in the foreground
something shows up in Notification Center
if the app is opened by tapping the notification, either AppDelegate.DidReceiveRemoteNotification(...) or AppDelegate.ReceivedRemoteNotification(...) is called, apparently depending on which one is implemented (??).
if the app is opened without tapping the notification, only AppDelegate.WillEnterForeground(...), is called, without any explicit mention of the notification, and nothing else happens to acknowledge that a notification was received.
When a Push Notification is received when the app is in the foreground it causes the UNUserNotificationCenterDelegate, if there is one, to execute UNUserNotificationCenterDelegate.WillPresentNotification(...).
Approach: Routing To One Method From All Contexts
So to cover all bases with Push I need to implement something in all three methods: AppDelegate.DidReceiveRemoteNotification(...) / AppDelegate.ReceivedRemoteNotification(...), AppDelegate.WillEnterForeground(...), and UNUserNotificationCenterDelegate .WillPresentNotification(...).
Here are some stubs to show my approach to all this.
First, I created a custom UNUserNotificationCenterDelegate, with a Shared static member:
public class IncomingNotificationHandler : UNUserNotificationCenterDelegate
{
public static IncomingNotificationHandler Shared = new IncomingNotificationHandler();
...
}
Second, inside that class I made a handler that I can route to in every case (again, this is just a stub for debugging purposes):
//sets all parameters to null by default, so it can be called from methods
//that don't know anything about notifications:
public void HandleNotificationsIfAny(UIApplication application = null,
NSDictionary userInfo = null,
Action<UIBackgroundFetchResult> completionHandler = null)
{
//checks if userInfo is null, and logs its conclusions about that:
if (userInfo == null)
{
//In the null case, we can get pending notifications from
//UNUserNotificationCenter:
UNNotification[] pendingNotifications = new UNNotification[] { };
UNUserNotificationCenter.Current.GetDeliveredNotifications(returnedValue => pendingNotifications = returnedValue);
//Then we log the number of pending notifications:
Debug.WriteLine("IncomingNotificationHandler: HandleNotificationsIfAny(...): delivered notification count: " + pendingNotifications.Length);
//And make note of where this was probably called from:
Debug.WriteLine("IncomingNotificationHandler: HandleNotificationsIfAny(...): may have been called from this.WillPresentNotification(...) OR AppDelegate.WillEnterForeground(...)");
return;
});
}
else
{
//In the non-null case, we log the userInfo
Debug.WriteLine("IncomingNotificationHandler: HandleNotificationsIfAny(...): just got info: " + userInfo);
//And make note of where this was probably called from:
Debug.WriteLine("IncomingNotificationHandler: HandleNotificationsIfAny(...): may have been called from AppDelegate.DidReceiveRemoteNotification(...)");
}
}
Third, inside the same class, I implemented the single method that's required by UNUserNotificationCenterDelegate, and I routed to the handler from it:
public override void WillPresentNotification(UNUserNotificationCenter center, UNNotification notification, Action<UNNotificationPresentationOptions> completionHandler)
{
HandleNotificationsIfAny();
}
Fourth, and last, inside AppDelegate, I routed to the same handler from both relevant methods:
//I prefer using DidReceiveRemoteNotification because in my experience
//the other one is sometimes not reliable:
public override void DidReceiveRemoteNotification(UIApplication application,
NSDictionary userInfo,
Action<UIBackgroundFetchResult> completionHandler)
{
//Simply passing on all the parameters called in this method:
IncomingNotificationHandler.Shared.HandleNotificationsIfAny(application, userInfo, completionHandler);
}
//WillEnterForeground also calls the handler without any parameters
//because it doesn't automatically know anything about notifications:
public override void WillEnterForeground(UIApplication application)
{
IncomingNotificationHandler.Shared.HandleNotificationsIfAny();
}
With that, as it stands, I think I'm handling a notification event in the same way no matter how my app is alerted about it, and even when it's not alerted at all.
Does anyone know if I now have it covered, or if there's some other cases I need to handle?
For the first scenario: AppDelegate.ReceivedRemoteNotification
It reflects the objective c method: application:didReceiveRemoteNotification:, but this event has been deprecated since iOS 10: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uiapplicationdelegate/1623117-application?language=objc. So I think there's no need to handle this event.
For the second scenario: AppDelegate.DidReceiveRemoteNotification
You can still utilize it to handle notifications now if you haven't implemented UNUserNotificationCenter and please notice it is only valid after iOS 7+. Moreover, this event will be triggered when app is on the foreground and if your app is on the background, this event only fires when the user clicks the notification to open your application. And there's no way to access the notification's information if the user clicks the icon to open the app.
I don't think handling AppDelegate.WillEnterForeground is a good approach, as it will be called each time the app resumes from background to foreground even though there are no notifications.
For the scenario: UNUserNotificationCenterDelegate
You could only use this feature after iOS 10. Once you have implemented it on the device iOS 10+, DidReceiveRemoteNotification and ReceivedRemoteNotification will never be triggered. WillPresentNotification will be called when app is on the foreground. DidReceiveNotificationResponse will be fired when the app is on the background and user clicks notifications to open it.
As a conclusion, if you want to easily handle the notification AppDelegate.DidReceiveRemoteNotification is enough. If you want to consume the new features of UNUserNotificationCenter, AppDelegate.DidReceiveRemoteNotification and UNUserNotificationCenter should be both involved. The prior one for the iOS 7+ devices and the later one for iOS 10+ devices.
Update:
For iOS 10+, you could use UNUserNotificationCenter.Current.GetDeliveredNotifications to obtain the notifications that are still displayed in Notification Center. And if you only want to support iOS version 10 and later. I think UNUserNotificationCenter is enough, there's no need to implement AppDelegate.DidReceiveRemoteNotification(...) or AppDelegate.ReceivedRemoteNotification(...).
If the app is on background / killed state and the user clicks notification to
open the app, DidReceiveNotificationResponse will be called.
If the
user clicks icon to open your app and the app is killed you should
place your logic code in FinishedLaunching.
If the user clicks icon
to open your app and app is on background, you can handle
WillEnterForeground as you did before.
If the app is on foreground,
handle WillPresentNotification.
How can I set local notifications with out forcing user to open app.
I need my app set a local notification for sunrise and sunset, but I don't want to ask people open app.
I know I can have up to 64 notifications via scheduleLocalNotification, but I need to set it for a year so I should be able to run app in background and set alarms for future sunrises and sunsets in background.
The simple answer is you can't. Your app can't run whenever it wants in the background; it can't schedule a timer to wake itself up to post more notifications when they are due.
The only way you could come close to something like this is by having a server which send a background push notification to your app as a wake-up call when a new batch of 64 notifications are coming close to needed to be posted.
However this would be relying on the fact the user doesn't terminate your app. If the user does then you'd have to send a non-background push notification to the user and hope they click on it to launch your app.
Android Awareness API has recently announced new features that provide a simple solution for your use-case (that avoids you having to explicitly manage location request or computing sunrise times). The way to achieve what you're trying to do is to create and register a TimeFence specified relative to sunrise/sunset.
For example:
// Create TimeFence
AwarenessFence sunriseFence =
TimeFence.aroundTimeInstant(TimeFence.TIME_INSTANT_SUNRISE,
0, 5 * ONE_MINUTE_MILLIS);
// Register fence with Awareness.
Awareness.FenceApi.updateFences(
mGoogleApiClient,
new FenceUpdateRequest.Builder()
.addFence("fenceKey", sunriseFence, myPendingIntent)
.build())
.setResultCallback(new ResultCallback<Status>() {
#Override
public void onResult(#NonNull Status status) {
if (status.isSuccess()) {
Log.i(TAG, "Fence was successfully registered.");
} else {
Log.e(TAG, "Fence could not be registered: " + status);
}
}
});
You will get callbacks when the fence evaluates to TRUE at sunrise, and when it evaluates back to FALSE at 5-min after sunrise.
Please check Fence API code snippets docs for how to add your custom app logic.
I am working on UIAutomation testing for my iPad app. There are APNS notifications received when one user shares files with other user. I need to look at what notifications are there and then tap on those notifications. I have done lot of research on this but I am unable to succeed. Is there any way to implement it ?
You can separate them by title property.
Example:
UIATarget.onAlert = function onAlert(alert) {
var title = alert.name();
//check by title, which alert is.
// test if your script should handle the alert, and if so, return true
// otherwise, return false to use the default handler
return false;
}