I can create an FTP-server using docker according to this.
I wonder whether it works in the azure web app for containers.
If the answer is yes, how could make it works?
By the way, I've tried it, according to the steps from the link, I have to create users. but I don't know how to connect the container's linuxOS.
Generally, the FTP server should need to open multiple ports as the document you provided shows. But Azure Web App service only can open 80 and 443 port. And you would not be a whole controller for it. So, if you want to deploy an FTP server, the Azure Web App service is not a good choice. Even if it can run the FTP image. And the VM is recommended.
By the way, if you want to connect to the container's LinuxOS of Web App, you need to enable the SSH feature in the image before you deploy it into the Web App. You can follow the steps about How to enable the SSH in the Web App.
Related
I want to setup a local IMAP server within my home network for archiving emails. The server does not need to be accessable via the internet. Therefore I can pass on a secured access via SSL (If this makes it easier). I want to integrate the server in my current docker setup. So the server has to run within a docker container.
I already tried the following containers:
https://hub.docker.com/r/blackflysolutions/dovecot
https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot
https://hub.docker.com/r/mailu/dovecot
https://hub.docker.com/r/mailcow/dovecot
https://hub.docker.com/r/eilandert/dovecot
But i could not get any of them to run. At the same time none of them have a forum or anything where I can put a question. Two of them (mailu/dovecot and mailcow/dovecot) are part of a bigger mailserver package. Which I do not need, I only want a IMAP server to put some email locally. But I tried them anyway.
Does anyone know how to get any of those to run? Or suggest me another stable docker container solution.
I am using the e-signature Java SDK for the application that I developed.
The application will run on a docker container and the container on a Linux server.
There is a proxy configured on this server and I have been asked if there is anything that they have to configure regarding DocuSign integration.
This answer on GitHub says that SDK would automatically pick up the proxy settings of the system.
What happens on my case. Will it pick the server or the container settings. Should I manually set the proxy settings in code?
Unfortunately I do not have access to the system (or to any similar system) so it is not possible to test the application.
The answer you linked to (https://github.com/docusign/docusign-esign-java-client/issues/152#issuecomment-653926077) talked about an enhancement request that will enable a specific ApiClient with its own proxy for the Java SDK.
You do need to update the proxy settings in your code if you know what they are.
I am new using Live share in Visual Studio 2019 and I am working on a large project using ASP.NET MVC. I invited some collaborators to work on my project but the problem is that... they can only run the web app whenever I run my server locally(I configure the same port). I cannot leave the server running forever because they need to modify the C# code and server needs to restart and It is annoying that they asks me to restart the server every second. I want to know if there is a way that they can run my shared code using live share in their computers independently of mine?
Or... is Live share useless for remote working?
I cannot find solutions in google, there are zero information about it. I tried:
How to run live share server locally
Run live share server independently of host server
can guest run program or web app independently of host server live share
live share run program or web app locally
live share run web app without host server port
I'm creating a web application that has Angular for front end and Flask for back end. I already 'dockered' my applications but I'm not sure on how to get them in Heroku as the same application
I've been reading that some people has used a reverse proxy server (this means that both applications are in different heroku app and they connect them using a proxy like traeffik or haproxy). But I don't want to do this, I want them to be in the same application (Example: grupo-camporota.herokuapp.com)
I was thinking that I should push both images, one as web dyno (front) and the other one as a worker (backend) but I've read that the worked dyno it's not for this, but for EXTERNAL apis. I would like to upload both image into heroku and make them communicate between them.
I would like to know how to get this done (I'm pretty sure it's possible), since i'm kinda lost
Your backend can't be a worker dyno: only web dynos can receive traffic from the internet. And one app will only get a single port to listen on, so you can't run two services on a single app.
You could serve your front-end up from your back-end as static files, but I don't think that will work with Docker. Also, Flask doesn't like to serve static files itself, so that may not be a good fit either.
It also looks like you can't communicate between Docker containers using a private network on Heroku. You may just have to deploy two apps (or host your front-end on a more appropriate static host).
I want to allow others to access my website created through Netbeans but I don't know how to do so. Ive searched and I found that you had to buy webservers and domain names?
However, I only want to host the webpage using my own computer since it isn't really anything commercial. How can I publish the webpage using Netbeans or my own computer? Would using IIS of Windows be possible?
Thanks!
You can download or use (if you have installed) Apache-Tomcat to deploy your web-app on your local machine.
Text from the above mentioned link.
It is possible to deploy web applications to a running Tomcat server.
If the Host autoDeploy attribute is "true", the Host will attempt to
deploy and update web applications dynamically, as needed, for example
if a new .WAR is dropped into the appBase. For this to work, the Host
needs to have background processing enabled which is the default
configuration.