I would like to know which model should I choose to forecast monthly sales. should I go for regression approaches or time-series methods for small 1.5-year data?
One of the first steps I would make is to clearly determine how many features you have.
In case of Univariate forecasting (observations in time of a single variable), you would most likely resort to even statistical approaches, such as ARIMA/SARIMA(I assume the concept of seasonality is known; if not, please read on properties of time series here : https://www.dummies.com/programming/big-data/data-science/key-properties-of-a-time-series-in-data-analysis/.
If you have multiple features(observations in time of multiple variables), you could first try with a VAR(vector autoregression).
Try these models at first, and only then proceed to more complicated ones such as LSTM/CNNs
Supporting #Nicolae Petridean's affirmation, the principle of Occam's Razor should always be applied: start with simple models and only after having tried several simpler ones should you progress to deep learning techniques.
Also, bear in mind that in the case of the latter, you will need much more data as compared to simpler statistical/mathematical models or even classical machine learning ones.
Depending on the data that you have either one or the other might work. Or other techniques. Try 2 simple models using each of the 2 techniques, and validate them against a common validation dataset. This way you will have your answer. Nobody can answer to your question unless has quite some good insights into the data that you have for training. Out of my belly I would probably start with a regression but in the end I assume you will end up using something else. It is always a good option to start with simple models first to better understand the problem and then progressively fine tune or do other tricks and more complicated models, depending on what the models you already have learn or not.
Have a look at this Kaggle competition : https://www.kaggle.com/c/competitive-data-science-predict-future-sales
Check several notebooks from there and maybe you will understand more on what works or does not work in this kind of prediction.
Link to notebooks : https://www.kaggle.com/c/competitive-data-science-predict-future-sales/notebooks
I am collecting the activities of a person in a day with time stamp data .Assume I am tracking 4 different activities that person is doing and an event occurring time in that day.event can occur multiple times also in a day. I am trying to predict the event occurring time in a day using the historical data to train a model.
My model should give an out put as a time having the maximum probability of that event to happen.
please suggest what should be the machine learning approach to this problem.
Thanks in advance for the help on this.
If you have a background in machine learning/statistics then You going to achieve your project within minimal time.
Here is a glimpse for you.
Machine learning has various algorithms to implement, depending on the kind of the problem you're solving.so,in this case your problem can be solved by predictive analysis model which is based on predicting time driven events effectively.And under the hood,you'd apply nor use regression algorithm.(linear/logistic)
It uses historical data to predict future events and still the historical data can be used to generate mathematical model which you can as well use to capture important events or trends.Then for predictive model,you can use it on current data to predict what time an event will happen.
For your information,there are software packages/libraries which can as well help you to implement the above algorithm effectively.
Hope this helps.
I am working on a personal project in which I log data of the bike rental service my city has in a MySQL database. A script runs every thirty minutes and logs data for every bike station and the free bikes each one has. Then, in my database I average the availability of each station for each day at that given time making it, as today, an approximate prediction with 2 months of data logging.
I've read a bit on machine learning and I'd like to learn a bit. Would it be possible to train a model with my data and make better predictions with ML in the future?
The answer is very likely yes.
The first step is to have some data, and it sounds like you do. You have a response (free bikes) and some features on which it varies (time, location). You have already applied a basic conditional means model by averaging values over factors.
You might augment the data you know about locations with some calendar events like holiday or local event flags.
Prepare a data set with one row per observation, and benchmark the accuracy of your current forecasting process for a period of time on a metric like Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Ensure your predictions (averages) for the validation period do not include any of the data within the validation period!
Use the data for this period to validate other models you try.
Split off part of the remaining data into a test set, and use the rest for training. If you have a lot of data, then a common training/test split is 70/30. If the data is small you might go down to 90/10.
Learn one or more machine learning models on the training set, checking performance periodically on the test set to ensure generalization performance is still increasing. Many training algorithm implementations will manage this for you, and stop automatically when test performance starts to decrease due to overfitting. This a big benefit of machine learning over your current straight average, the ability to learn what generalizes and throw away what does not.
Validate each model by predicting over the validation set, computing the MAPE and compare the MAPE of the model to that of your original process on the same period. Good luck, and enjoy getting to know machine learning!
I have developed a ML model for a classification (0/1) NLP task and deployed it in production environment. The prediction of the model is displayed to users, and the users have the option to give a feedback (if the prediction was right/wrong).
How can I continuously incorporate this feedback in my model ? From a UX stand point you dont want a user to correct/teach the system more than twice/thrice for a specific input, system shld learn fast i.e. so the feedback shld be incorporated "fast". (Google priority inbox does this in a seamless way)
How does one build this "feedback loop" using which my system can improve ? I have searched a lot on net but could not find relevant material. any pointers will be of great help.
Pls dont say retrain the model from scratch by including new data points. Thats surely not how google and facebook build their smart systems
To further explain my question - think of google's spam detector or their priority inbox or their recent feature of "smart replies". Its a well known fact that they have the ability to learn / incorporate (fast) user feed.
All the while when it incorporates the user feedback fast (i.e. user has to teach the system correct output atmost 2-3 times per data point and the system start to give correct output for that data point) AND it also ensure it maintains old learnings and does not start to give wrong outputs on older data points (where it was giving right output earlier) while incorporating the learning from new data point.
I have not found any blog/literature/discussion w.r.t how to build such systems - An intelligent system that explains in detaieedback loop" in ML systems
Hope my question is little more clear now.
Update: Some related questions I found are:
Does the SVM in sklearn support incremental (online) learning?
https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/1073/libraries-for-online-machine-learning
http://mlwave.com/predicting-click-through-rates-with-online-machine-learning/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept_drift
Update: I still dont have a concrete answer but such a recipe does exists. Read the section "Learning from the feedback" in the following blog Machine Learning != Learning Machine. In this Jean talks about "adding a feedback ingestion loop to machine". Same in here, here, here4.
There could be couple of ways to do this:
1) You can incorporate the feedback that you get from the user to only train the last layer of your model, keeping the weights of all other layers intact. Intuitively, for example, in case of CNN this means you are extracting the features using your model but slightly adjusting the classifier to account for the peculiarities of your specific user.
2) Another way could be to have a global model ( which was trained on your large training set) and a simple logistic regression which is user specific. For final predictions, you can combine the results of the two predictions. See this paper by google on how they do it for their priority inbox.
Build a simple, light model(s) that can be updated per feedback. Online Machine learning gives a number of candidates for this
Most good online classifiers are linear. In which case we can have a couple of them and achieve non-linearity by combining them via a small shallow neural net
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/126546/nonlinear-dynamic-online-classification-looking-for-an-algorithm
Given a set of data very similar to the Motley Fool CAPS system, where individual users enter BUY and SELL recommendations on various equities. What I would like to do is show each recommendation and I guess some how rate (1-5) as to whether it was good predictor<5> (ie. correlation coefficient = 1) of the future stock price (or eps or whatever) or a horrible predictor (ie. correlation coefficient = -1) or somewhere in between.
Each recommendation is tagged to a particular user, so that can be tracked over time. I can also track market direction (bullish / bearish) based off of something like sp500 price. The components I think that would make sense in the model would be:
user
direction (long/short)
market direction
sector of stock
The thought is that some users are better in bull markets than bear (and vice versa), and some are better at shorts than longs- and then a combination the above. I can automatically tag the market direction and sector (based off the market at the time and the equity being recommended).
The thought is that I could present a series of screens and allow me to rank each individual recommendation by displaying available data absolute, market and sector out performance for a specific time period out. I would follow a detailed list for ranking the stocks so that the ranking is as objective as possible. My assumption is that a single user is right no more than 57% of the time - but who knows.
I could load the system and say "Lets rank the recommendation as a predictor of stock value 90 days forward"; and that would represent a very explicit set of rankings.
NOW here is the crux - I want to create some sort of machine learning algorithm that can identify patterns over a series of time so that as recommendations stream into the application we maintain a ranking of that stock (ie. similar to correlation coefficient) as to the likelihood of that recommendation (in addition to the past series of recommendations ) will affect the price.
Now here is the super crux. I have never taken an AI class / read an AI book / never mind specific to machine learning. So I cam looking for guidance - sample or description of a similar system I could adapt. Place to look for info or any general help. Or even push me in the right direction to get started...
My hope is to implement this with F# and be able to impress my friends with a new skill set in F# with an implementation of machine learning and potentially something (application / source) I can include in a tech portfolio or blog space;
Thank you for any advice in advance.
I have an MBA, and teach data mining at a top grad school.
The term project this year was to predict stock price movements automatically from news reports. One team had 70% accuracy, on a reasonably small sample, which ain't bad.
Regarding your question, a lot of companies have made a lot of money on pair trading (find a pair of assets that normally correlate, and buy/sell pair when they diverge). See the writings of Ed Thorpe, of Beat the Dealer. He's accessible and kinda funny, if not curmudgeonly. He ran a good hedge fund for a long time.
There is probably some room in using data mining to predict companies that will default (be unable to make debt payments) and shorting†them, and use the proceeds to buy shares in companies less likely to default. Look into survival analysis. Search Google Scholar for "predict distress" etc in finance journals.
Also, predicting companies that will lose value after an IPO (and shorting them. edit: Facebook!). There are known biases, in academic literature, that can be exploited.
Also, look into capital structure arbitrage. This is when the value of the stocks in a company suggest one valuation, but the value of the bonds or options suggest another value. Buy the cheap asset, short the expensive one.
Techniques include survival analysis, sequence analysis (Hidden Markov Models, Conditional Random Fields, Sequential Association Rules), and classification/regression.
And for the love of God, please read Fooled By Randomness by Taleb.
†shorting a stock usually involves calling your broker (that you have a good relationship with) and borrowing some shares of a company. Then you sell them to some poor bastard. Wait a while, hopefully the price has gone down, you buy some more of the shares and give them back to your broker.
My Advice to You:
There are several Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence (ML/AI) branches out there:
http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai/node2.html
I have only tried genetic programming, but in the "learning from experience" branch you will find neural nets. GP/GA and neural nets seem to be the most commonly explored methodologies for the purpose of stock market predictions, but if you do some data mining on Predict Wall Street, you might be able to utilize a Naive Bayes classifier to do what you're interested in doing.
Spend some time learning about the various ML/AI techniques, get a small data set and try to implement some of those algorithms. Each one will have its strengths and weaknesses, so I would recommend that you try to combine them using Naive Bays classifier (or something similar).
My Experience:
I'm working on the problem for my Masters Thesis so I'll pitch my results using Genetic Programming: www.twitter.com/darwins_finches
I started live trading with real money in 09/09/09.. yes, it was a magical day! I post the GP's predictions before the market opens (i.e. the timestamps on twitter) and I also place the orders before the market opens. The profit for this period has been around 25%, we've consistently beat the Buy & Hold strategy and we're also outperforming the S&P 500 with stocks that are under-performing it.
Some Resources:
Here are some resources that you might want to look into:
Max Dama's blog: http://www.maxdama.com/search/label/Artificial%20Intelligence
My blog: http://mlai-lirik.blogspot.com/
AI Stock Market Forum: http://www.ai-stockmarketforum.com/
Weka is a data mining tool with a collection of ML/AI algorithms: http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/
The Chatter:
The general consensus amongst "financial people" is that Artificial Intelligence is a voodoo science, you can't make a computer predict stock prices and you're sure to loose your money if you try doing it. None-the-less, the same people will tell you that just about the only way to make money on the stock market is to build and improve on your own trading strategy and follow it closely.
The idea of AI algorithms is not to build Chip and let him trade for you, but to automate the process of creating strategies.
Fun Facts:
RE: monkeys can pick better than most experts
Apparently rats are pretty good too!
I understand monkeys can pick better than most experts, so why not an AI? Just make it random and call it an "advanced simian Mersenne twister AI" or something.
Much more money is made by the sellers of "money-making" systems then by the users of those systems.
Instead of trying to predict the performance of companies over which you have no control, form a company yourself and fill some need by offering a product or service (yes, your product might be a stock-predicting program, but something a little less theoretical is probably a better idea). Work hard, and your company's own value will rise much quicker than any gambling you'd do on stocks. You'll also have plenty of opportunities to apply programming skills to the myriad of internal requirements your own company will have.
If you want to go down this long, dark, lonesome road of trying to pick stocks you may want to look into data mining techniques using advanced data mining software such as SPSS or SAS or one of the dozen others.
You'll probably want to use a combination or technical indicators and fundamental data. The data will more than likely be highly correlated so a feature reduction technique such as PCA will be needed to reduce the number of features.
Also keep in mind your data will constantly have to be updated, trimmed, shuffled around because market conditions will constantly be changing.
I've done research with this for a grad level class and basically I was somewhat successful at picking whether a stock would go up or down the next day but the number of stocks in my data set was fairly small (200) and it was over a very short time frame with consistent market conditions.
What I'm trying to say is what you want to code has been done in very advanced ways in software that already exists. You should be able to input your data into one of these programs and using either regression, or decision trees or clustering be able to do what you want to do.
I have been thinking of this for a few months.
I am thinking about Random Matrix Theory/Wigner's distribution.
I am also thinking of Kohonen self-learning maps.
These comments on speculation and past performance apply to you as well.
I recently completed my masters thesis on deep learning and stock price forecasting. Basically, the current approach seems to be LSTM and other deep learning models. There are also 10-12 technical indicators (TIs) based on moving average that have been shown to be highly predictive for stock prices, especially indexes such as SP500, NASDAQ, DJI, etc. In fact, there are libraries such as pandas_ta for computing various TIs.
I represent a group of academics that are trying to predict stocks in a general form that can also be applied to anything, even the rating of content.
Our algorithm, which we describe as truth seeking, works as follows.
Basically each participant has their own credence rating. This means that the higher your credence or credibility, then the more their vote counts. Credence is worked out by how close to the weighted credence each vote is. It's like you get a better credence value the closer you get to the average vote that has already been adjusted for credence.
For example, let's say that everyone is predicting that a stock's value will be at value X in 30 day's time (a future's option). People who predict on the average get a better credence. The key here is that the individual doesn't know what the average is, only the system. The system is tweaked further by weighting the guesses so that the target spot that generates the best credence is those votes that are already endowed with more credence. So the smartest people (historically accurate) project the sweet spot that will be used for further defining who gets more credence.
The system can be improved too to adjust over time. For example, when you find out the actual value, those people who guessed it can be rewarded with a higher credence. In cases where you can't know the future outcome, you can still account if the average weighted credence changes in the future. People can be rewarded even more if they spotted the trend early. The point is we don't need to even know the outcome in the future, just the fact that the weighted rating changed in the future is enough to reward people who betted early on the sweet spot.
Such a system can be used to rate anything from stock prices, currency exchange rates or even content itself.
One such implementation asks people to vote with two parameters. One is their actual vote and the other is an assurity percentage, which basically means how much a particular participant is assured or confident of their vote. In this way, a person with a high credence does not need to risk downgrading their credence when they are not sure of their bet, but at the same time, the bet can be incorporated, it just won't sway the sweet spot as much if a low assurity is used. In the same vein, if the guess is directly on the sweet spot, with a low assurity, they won't gain the benefits as they would have if they had used a high assurity.