docker-compose.yml
version: '3.3'
services:
apps:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: ./Dockerfile
ports:
- "3000:3000"
restart: always
Dockerfile
FROM node:latest
RUN mkdir -p /usr/src/app
COPY . /usr/src/app
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
EXPOSE 3000
RUN npm install
RUN npm start
Only port expose is seen here but the internal port 3000 is not made public
Versions:
Docker version 18.09.2, build 6247962
docker-compose version 1.23.2, build 1110ad01
I don't get it! You used docker-compose and created apps service, but your container has a random name crancky villani!!!
go into the path your docker-compose.yml placed and run this command:
docker-compose down; docker-compose up -d --build
Then check the results again.
Docker image was not properly built since the last step to start node is defined incorrectly.
it is supposed to be like this,
CMD ["npm", "start"]
Related
I am new in docker. I've built an application with VueJs2 that interacts with an external API. I would like to run the application on docker.
Here is my docker-compose.yml file
version: '3'
services:
ew_cp:
image: vuejs_img
container_name: ew_cp
build:
context: .
dockerfile: Dockerfile
volumes:
- '.:/app'
- '/app/node_modules'
ports:
- '8080:8080'
Here is my Dockerfile:
FROM node:14.17.0-alpine as develop-stage
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm install
RUN yarn install
COPY . .
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["node"]
Here is the building command I run to build my image an container.
docker-compose up -d
The image and container is building without error but when I run the container it stops immediately. So the container is not running.
Are the DockerFile and compose files set correctly?
First of all you run npm install and yarn install, which is doing the same thing, just using different package managers. Secondly you are using CMD ["node"] which does not start your vue application, so there is no job running and docker is shutting down.
For vue applicaton you normally want to build the app with static assets and then run a simple http server to serve the static content.
FROM node:lts-alpine
# install simple http server for serving static content
RUN npm install -g http-server
# make the 'app' folder the current working directory
WORKDIR /app
# copy 'package.json' to install dependencies
COPY package*.json ./
# install dependencies
RUN npm install
# copy files and folders to the current working directory (i.e. 'app' folder)
COPY . .
# build app for production with minification
RUN npm run build
EXPOSE 8080
CMD [ "http-server", "dist" ]
Your docker-compose file could be as simple as
version: "3.7"
services:
vue-app:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: Dockerfile
container_name: vue-app
restart: always
ports:
- "8080:8080"
networks:
- vue-network
networks:
vue-network:
driver: bridge
to run the service from docker-compose use command property in you docker-compose.yml.
services:
vue-app:
command: >
sh -c "yarn serve"
I'm not sure about the problem but by using command: tail -f /dev/null in your docker-compose file , it will keep up your container so you could track the error within it and find its problem. You could do that by running docker exec -it <CONTAINER-NAME> bash and track the error logs in your container.
version: '3'
services:
ew_cp:
image: vuejs_img
container_name: ew_cp
build:
context: .
dockerfile: Dockerfile
volumes:
- '.:/app'
- '/app/node_modules'
command: tail -f /dev/null
ports:
- '8080:8080'
In your Dockerfile you have to start your application e.g. npm run start or any other scripts that you are using for running your application in your package.json.
I made a typo in my source code and I noticed it after i run docker-compose up in my cli. I tried rebuilding the project but didn't change my index.js cached code.
This is my Dockerfile
FROM node:alpine
WORKDIR '/app'
COPY package.json .
RUN npm install
COPY . .
CMD [ "npm","start" ]
docker-compose.yml
version: '3'
services:
redis-server:
image: 'redis'
node-app:
build: .
ports:
- "4001:8081"
I recreated the image
$ sudo docker build -t phillalexakis/visits:latest .
and run
docker-composer up
It didn't change the source code at all, what have I completely missed? (I'm new with docker)
Docker-compose is looking for an image named [folder_name]_node-app, but the image you've built is tagged phillalexakis/visits.
Change your node-app service in docker-compose.yml file :
node-app:
build: .
image: node-app
And use docker-compose to build the images:
docker-compose build or docker-compose up --build
I am able to run my application with the following command:
docker run --rm -p 4000:4000 myapp:latest python3.8 -m pipenv run flask run -h 0.0.0.0
I am trying to write a docker-compose file so that I can bringup the app using
docker-compose up. This is not working. How do "add" the docker run params to the docker-compose file?
version: '3'
services:
web:
build: .
ports:
- "4000:4000"
volumes:
- .:/code
You need to use command to specify this.
version: '3'
services:
web:
build: .
ports:
- '4000: 4000'
image: myapp:latest
command: 'python3.8 -m pipenv run flask run -h 0.0.0.0'
volumes:
- .:/code
You should use CMD in your Dockerfile to specify this. Since you'll want to specify this every time you run a container based on the image, there's no reason to want to specify it manually when you run the image.
CMD python3.8 -m pipenv run flask run -h 0.0.0.0
Within the context of a Docker container, it's typical to install packages into the "system" Python: it's already isolated from the host Python by virtue of being in a Docker container, and the setup to use a virtual environment is a little bit tricky. That gets rid of the need to run pipenv run.
FROM python:3.8
WORKDIR /code
COPY Pipfile Pipfile.lock .
RUN pipenv install --deploy --system
COPY . .
CMD flask run -h 0.0.0.0
Since the /code directory is already in your image, you can actually make your docker-compose.yml shorter by removing the unnecessary bind mount
version: '3'
services:
web:
build: .
ports:
- "4000:4000"
# no volumes:
I am starting to work with Docker for Windows, but I can't make volumes to work with docker-compose.
First, I've created a simple Dockerfile:
FROM node:latest
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
COPY . /usr/src/app
RUN npm install nodemon -g
Then, a docker-compose.yml:
version: '3'
services:
nodeServer:
build: .
volumes:
- './:/usr/src/app'
command: bash -c "npm run start"
When a volume is declared in the `docker-compose.yml´, it doesn't work.
But, when I try to bind a volume through the command line like this:
docker build .
docker run -it -v ${PWD}:/usr/src/app d0d9397e9194 bash
It works. I can't understand the difference between these two approaches.
I've checked more than once my configurations:
I have set up a docker-compose.yml file that runs a web service along with postgres.
It works nicely when I run it with docker-compose up.
docker-compose.yml:
version: '3'
services:
db:
image: postgres
web:
build: .
command: python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:8000
volumes:
- .:/code
ports:
- "8000:8000"
depends_on:
- db
Dockerfile:
FROM python:3
RUN mkdir /code
WORKDIR /code
ADD requirements.txt /code/
RUN pip install -r requirements.txt
ADD . /code/
CMD ["python", "manage.py", "runserver"]
Is there any way to construct an image out of the services?
I tried it with docker-compose build, but running the created image simply freezes the terminal.
Thanks!
docker-compose is a container orchestration tool, albeit a simple one , and not a bundler of multiple images and preferences into one. In fact, such a thing does not even exists.
What happens when you run docker-compose up is that it effectively runs docker-compose build for those images that need to be built, web in your example, and then effectively replaces the build: . with image: web and executes the configuration as defined by the compose file.
So if you were to run docker-compose build manually and wanted to run the same configuration you have in the compose file manually, you would need to something along the lines of (in order)
run docker-compose build or docker build -t web . to build the web image
run docker run --name db postgres
run docker run --name web -v .:/code -p 8000:8000 web python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:8000