I'm wondering what is the best way to keep continuous deployment on IoT machines (connected to the internet), but without direct access to it. The codebase is in Go; is it better to write my own agent which will check some endpoint for a new code package/repository, or is there a software (or SaaS) that solves that kind of problem already?
PS. IoT machines runs under Debian 9.x.
Related
I need to develop one-to-one network communication applications between two or more applications. According to the network prototype, both nodes of the communication need to be on the same port. In a local (Linux) development environment, I can't map both applications to the same port. To solve the problem, I think of using Docker. I, however, don't know how to go about it. To get started, I try to build docker images of two applications. After building one of them, the second one can't be built due to the occupied port. I do some online search and don't see any helpful information. I use Spring Boot to build those applications and I know I need to use Kubernette for service discovery at some point later.
How shall I go about this?
I've asked this on Adobe's LR SDK forum, thought I'd ask here as well.
I want to create a plugin for Lightroom 6+ that allows two-way communication to take place between a LR plugin and an iOS app. The iOS device would be on the same local network.
What is the best method of accomplishing this? I was thinking about using LRSocket, this is the most direct method? I assume with this method the iOS app would need to act as the server and the LR plugin would be the connecting client? But, all the documentation and examples I’ve found, regarding general LRSocket usage, imply that localhost is used. This would make direct communication with an iOS device over WiFi impossible if it can only use localhost?
Any information would be appreciated.
I've just started out trying to do the same thing, albeit with an Android app, and run into the same (apparently insurmountable) issue that LrSocket.Bind only seems to be able to bind to the localhost interface.
The only way I can think to get around this is to have an intermediary port forwarder on the LR host OS that forwards traffic between localhost:port and ethernet/wifi:port
You could use ssh on a mac, I guess, and there are port-forwarding applications for Windows (ssh is allegedly coming soon). PassPort (an old application from the XP era still seems to work).
It's a bit....messy, though.
Another option would be to use LrHttp.get (and/or .post), but that's going to have to poll for information, and may be a bit laggy for some requirements.
I want to connect the PiCAN with my raspberry pi3 running windows IoT Core. I think I need a universal driver for the mcp2515 to work with the windows in Pi. I already tried using the instructions given in https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/iot/docs/driverdeployment to deploy the driver given in https://github.com/AustinWise/Mcp2515Can . But I got stuck in the instructions. I hope someone has already done this and maybe can help me with it? Did anyone successfully use this CAN board with Raspberry Pi (windows iot core)?
Thank you :)
Is a driver required in the first place?
Short answer is No.
Although a device driver is preferred, such work is not officially or community done yet.
The benefit you get from developing a device driver might include:
Native OS support for PiCAN board.
Create your create the custom IoT image, and deploy it to Microsoft store.
Possible performance improvements
others…
However, in order to develop an device driver, you need to follow the WDK framework. If you are comfortable with picking up new stuff, go ahead and try it out. You might need to refer to the linux source driver code for WDK driver developing.
If your purpose is to get the board working, you don’t need to get yourself into all these troubles.
In fact, you only need to get the SPI controller and GPIO controller, open the SPI device and initialize GPIO interrupt pin like Mcp2515Can does.
But, even after enabling the SPI, I couldn't receive anything on the
Raspberry Pi.
First, you can use Raspbian and turn on the CAN driver support to verify that you got all the wirings right. Here is the user guide you can reference.
If you can rule out the possibility of hardware failures, step into your C# code to troubleshoot the software.
Good luck.
I have looked on the internet but unable to find a solution that would fit my requirements and was wondering if someone could either direct me to a solution or guide me towards making a customized solution.
So here is the scenario, we have a machine that runs a screensaver. Occasionally we are required to update the file on the machine, the trouble is that a person has to go there physically to update the usb. is there a way to allow remote access (via the internet) to a usb storage device to update files?
It depends on the operating-system and network-conditions, but you should be able to connect to the machine via SSH and remotely access the USB-drive.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/50104/how-do-i-access-an-external-drive-mounted-on-a-machine-on-my-own-network
I hope that's enough to throw at Google combined with your specific environment.
I have an embedded device that can be controlled by JSON over UDP. I am currently performing this via an iOS App, and everything works great.
I am now wanting to be able to also control my device from a remote location. And am wanting to use Azure to perform this task. I envision that I will set up an Azure Website which will enable me to select options which then send the JSON to my device, which is behind a firewall.
My question is which of the Azure Services should I be looking into? Also, what is the best way to get the JSON packet to the device behind the firewall (I do not want to use port forwarding).
In general, to avoid an attack surface from outside your LAN (where you have your embedded device), the better solution is to open and output connection from embedded device to the cloud and to leave it open so that it can send and receive data/command.
In this case, on Azure you can use the Service Bus (queue, topic/subscription or event hub) to send/receive with AMQP protocol but it is strictly related to your device and capabilities.
Can you share more information on it ? How much it is a constrained device or a more power device with an high level OS (Linux, Windows, ...) ?
Paolo Patierno
About using Amqp on devices running android is very tedious. The java implementation in dalvik is missing a lot of required apis to be there.
By the way, do you know where we can find information about related path segments to use in amqp pure syntax in Azure, to interact with IoT-Hub end-points. Like for queue for example, we can have :
amqps://:#.servicebus.windows.net/
Thanks