I have a working version of my project in eclipse.
I exported the project as a runnable jar.
Extracted (after converting to .zip)and tried to compile a particular java file from the command prompt
(Doing it this way since I have a project requirement, where input parameter inside that particular file can be modified and recompiled/run by users who wont have Eclipse)
I have used some external libraries( for Eg:json-simple,gson etc).They arent getting recognized , during compilation.
But if I run the class file(from the Eclipse compiled version), it gets executed properly
a)Tried to compile from root folder(using package name)
javac packageName.javaFileName.java
b) and went inside the package and compiled directly.
javac javaFileName.java
The a)part didnt compile at all saying classNotFound. The b)part started compiling but threw an error where none of the external libraries got recognized.(Getting --> error: cannot find symbol for places wherever the code/import of the external lib is used)
a)Tried to compile from root folder(using package name) javac
packageName.javaFileName.java b) and went inside the package and
compiled directly. javac javaFileName.java
The a)part didnt compile at all saying classNotFound.
Yes. javac requires you to specify a filesystem path to the (first) source(s) to compile. You appear instead to have tacked .java onto the end of the desired fully-qualified class name. Probably you want to compile from the root of the unpacked jar, specifying a correct path:
javac [options] package/name/className.java
for class package.name.className. (You can also compile from a different working directory if you specify an appropriate option, as discussed below.)
The b)part
started compiling but threw an error where none of the external
libraries got recognized.(Getting --> error: cannot find symbol for
places wherever the code/import of the external lib is used)
If the class you're compiling depends on others that also need to be compiled then javac would likely make a similar complaint about them. Either compile from the root (as in (a)), or specify the path to the source root via the -sourcepath option. Either way, there's no reason to descend into the source tree to compile.
But the external libs are actually a separate, albeit related, question. You don't need to compile these, but you do need to tell javac to use them as sources of classes. You would do that via the -classpath option, which you can abbreviate to -cp. If those were packaged in the jar itself (i.e. a "fat jar") then that should be fairly easy, something along these lines:
javac -cp .:lib/dependency1.jar:lib/dependency2.jar package/name/className.java
The "lib" part may vary, and the separator definitely differs depending on OS (on Windows it is ;, whereas on Mac / Linux / Solaris is is :, as shown).
If the external libs were not packaged into the main jar then the procedure is the same, but you might have a bigger challenge finding the needed jars. Also, such a jar is probably not runnable if you move it to a different machine. Nevertheless, you should probably look in META_INF/MANIFEST.MF, as it should contain the needed information.
Related
Background, I currently use Izpack for my Windows installer, I bundle a java runtime and use winrun4j as a wrapper both for the installation and the actual program once installed. It worked for a long time but there are a number of problems with the installer that I have not been able to solve and have been looking to replace it.
Oracle now provide the JPackage installer so it seems like a sensible choice. But the folder structure created by the installer is different to what I currently have, I have a number of config and non java files and I have not been able to get the .exe that JPackage creates to do anything.
So is it possible to use JPackage to create the installer but in a strcuture better matching my existing structure, and use continue to use WInRun4j to actyally run my application
Existing Folder Structure
ROOT
---App.exe
---Config Files
---lib
-------jar files
---JVM64
------- Java runtime
---help
JPackage structure
ROOT
---App.exe
---Runtime Dlls
---app
----- jar files
Config files
--runtime
------Java runtime
------Runtime Dlls (again)
The structure of directories generated by jpackage is mainly set up for you and does not seem possible to change, and makes installation of Java app dependencies very easy with self contained JRE. The basic structure for Windows is as you say:
ROOT
---App.exe (for --main-class parameter)
---xyz.exe (for each --add-launcher parameter)
---Runtime Dlls (these appear to be unused except for applauncher.dll, see SO 62607300)
---app/
------App.cfg (for --main-class)
------xyz.cfg (for per --add-launcher)
---runtime/
------Java runtime
------Runtime Dlls
With --input and --main-jar params you are free to setup additional directory structure under app/ folder for anything else you want for your application. So if you used lib/myappjar.jar it would add:
---app/
-------lib/
----------myappjar.jar
If you used --input build\mypath it would copy the entire tree of files under that folder, so if build\mypath dir contained
bin/
---Scripts
---xyz.properties
README.txt
Then app would also contain:
---app/
------bin/
---------Scripts
---------xyz.properties
------README.txt
By the way the Runtime DLLs placed at top level appear to be copies of some of the DLLs under runtime/bin
[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62607300/why-is-java-jpackage-installing-windows-dll-files-in-two-places]
I've started to really get into using Lua, and a few months ago I've figured out on how to turn .lua files into executables.
It's been working great so far, until I started to compile lua scripts that use 'socket.http'. It seems to be missing some DLLs of some sort, and I don't know how I would be able to add them into the same folder.
Where would I find these such DLLs to add into the same folder of my executable, so that I could be able to run Lua executables using socket.http?
socket.http module doesn't come as DLL; it comes as a pure-lua module. Usually there is socket.lua and socket\http.lua files (as well as socket\core.dll), so you'd need to package all of them and make them available to your script to make it work.
You can find the Lua files in the luasocket repository, but make sure that they match the API for the binaries (socket/core.* files) you are using.
I am developing a BlackBerry Application with a number of class files in it; 16 java classes at the moment and they keep increasing as this App is complex with a lot of screen and features. I am working in Eclipse with the BlackBerry Java Plug-in. I am using BlackBerry JRE 6.0. I have recently started getting the following error:
Error: Cannot run program "jar": CreateProcess error=2, The system cannot find the file specified
I have Google for this error and many suggest this is caused by Java Environmental Variable path. However, I have checked and everything seems to be fine at my end regarding that. I have noticed that when the number of classes is increased or a class becomes more lengthy, this error occurs. I get rid of the error by reducing the number of classes in a project. I created separated projects dividing the classes between each and it compiled fine. So I can believe that there is no issue with the source code.
Can anyone guide how to overcome this error in a single project that contains several classes. Please help.
EDIT: I came across the following on BlackBerry Support Forums:
"I think the most common reason for this (assuming that you have the JDK installed) is a large number of files in the project, and/or a project directory that is very far from the root.
The issue is that the RAPC compiler calls the JAR utility, building a command line that consists of all the class files in the application. If the command line length exceeds the maximum length allowed by the system, you will get this error."
How to work around this IF this is whats causing it.
I was lucky to resolve this error. This link has been very helpful from BlackBerry Support Forums. For anyone else facing the same issue, the following steps resolved my issue:
Right Click My Computer. Go To Properties.
Click Advanced System Settings.
Click Environment Variable
Highlight PATH and click Edit. Add C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jdk1.6.0_26\bin; to the start of the PATH.
Step 4 adds the java jar file to the PATH variable and adds it closer to the root. Adding closer to the root is helpful when compiling a project with several classes.
As the error says Cannot run program "jar" under Windows that means it cannot find the jar.exe executable file.
The problem, at least in my case, was that JAVA_HOME was pointing to the JRE on my computer (where there is no jar.exe in its "bin" folder) and not to the JDK where the jar.exe resides under its "bin" folder.
The solution was very simple - changed JAVA_HOME to point to the JDK root folder - in my case that was "C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_15".
When managing a grails plugin in Intellij Idea (I'm using version 10.5.2 on OSX, if it matters), I can't get it to add the *GrailsPlugin.groovy file to the classpath in a way that it can be recognized by unit tests run from the IDE. The tests run fine from the command line using grails test-app; I just want IDEA to be able to run them too.
The problem is that the *GrailsPlugin.groovy file is at the top level directory in the plugin, which is not marked as a source directory in IDEA. I definitely don't want to make it a source folder, since that will screw up lots of things such as the package path to all of my regular source files (amongst many other issues).
I've tried adding *GrailsPlugin.groovy to my Settings->Compiler Resource Patterns, but to no avail. Since the file isn't in a source folder, it's ignored.
I tried creating a source folder that has a symlink to the *GrailsPlugin.groovy file, but that introduces all kinds of synchronization issues.
Anyone have any ideas?
The files A.java and B.class(Bytecode version of B.java) are in the current directory.
A.java uses B.java in the following way:
class A {
B b;
}
From what I have read the JDK tools first look in the directories where the Java standard libraries are installed. If the class is not found in the standard libraries, the tool searches in the class path. When no class path is defined, the default value of the class path is assumed to be the current directory. Then why is the following command not working:
C:\current> javac A.java
The package structure must match the directory structure, otherwise javac will fail.
http://kevinboone.net/classpath.html
Comment out or get rid of the package statements in the begin of your classes. Since you do keep both java classes in the directory where you compile, the compiler should be able to find the B.class without trouble.