I currently need to be able to allow a user to upload a file to Jenkins for the job to then use.
I understand that the File parameter can allow me to do so, but how about if the user needs to add 100 files?
Is there a way to either:
Allow multiple files to be uploaded at once?
Upload a folder instead and then use my script to loop through the folder?
As a side note, the filenames need to have the same name as they had before they are uploaded too. When uploading one file via the File parameter, I could work around fixing that. With 100 files, maybe less so...
Related
I'm currently using the file watchers features to generate a minified version of the file each time I modify a css file and I would like to be able to upload BOTH files at the same time.
Is there any way to link those files so I don't need to upload both of them manually ? I don't want them to be uploaded automatically though, only when I explicitly want it (upload to).
To be more specific, I need PhpStorm to upload
main.min.css
when I manually upload
main.css
I want to upload multiple Patch using patch file parameter in jenkins and also the no. of file to be uploaded is dynamic.
I want to make the same multiple file upload UI as its there while uploading files in gmail.
I want to add an attach a file button which will upload the file at that time only and another option for browsing next file comes up.
can somebody help?
I need to upload multiple files on my website.
But I need not just a form for uploading multiple files, I need to upload whole directories.
How's this possible for the minimalist?
Yours, Joern.
According to my somewhat limited knowledge this is not possible, only file transfer is possible, not directories.
Here are some workarounds, based on discussion on Velocity Reviews and another discussion:
upload a zip, which you unzip at the server side
upload directories over ftp (web page can be a front end to this)
upload files one by one
I would go either for zip or ftp. Note: someone might have produced a gem that enables uploading directories (I know nothing of such thing, but I will be happy to find out, if there is).
Adding another option to the list provided by Sorrow:
upload via REST/JSON
OK, this is a partial solution, but it does give you the opportunity to write a script that reads your directory and POSTS to your website.
I have a website that shows galleries. Users can upload their own content from the web (by entering a URL) or by uploading a picture from their computer.
I am storing the URL in the database which works fine for the first use case but I need to figure out where to store the actual images if a user does a upload from their computer.
Is there any recommendation here or best practice on where I should store these?
Should I save them in the appdata or content folders? Should they not be stored with the website at all because it's user content?
You should NOT store the user uploads anywhere they can be directly accessed by a known URL within your site structure. This is a security risk as users could upload .htm file and .js files. Even a file with the correct extension can contain malicious code that can be executed in the context of your site by an authenticated user allowing server-side or client-side attacks.
See for example http://www.acunetix.com/websitesecurity/upload-forms-threat.htm and What security issues appear when users can upload their own files? which mention some of the issues you need to be aware of before you allow users to upload files and then present them for download within your site.
Don't put the files within your normal web site directory structure
Don't use the original file name the user gave you. You can add a content disposition header with the original file name so they can download it again as the same file name but the path and file name on the server shouldn't be something the user can influence.
Don't trust image files - resize them and offer only the resized version for subsequent download
Don't trust mime types or file extensions, open the file and manipulate it to make sure it's what it claims to be.
Limit the upload size and time.
Depending on the resources you have to implement something like this, it is extremely beneficial to store all this stuff in Amazon S3.
Once you get the upload you simply push it over to Amazon and pop the URL in your database as you're doing with the other images. As mentioned above it would probably be wise to open up the image and resize it before sending it over. This both checks it is actually an image and makes sure you don't accidentally present a full camera resolution image to an end user.
Doing this now will make it much, much easier if you ever have to migrate/failover your site and don't want to sync gigabytes of image assets.
One way is to store the image in a database table with a varbinary field.
Another way would be to store the image in the App_Data folder, and create a subfolder for each user (~/App_Data/[userid]/myImage.png).
For both approaches you'd need to create a separate action method that makes it possible to access the images.
While uploading images you need to verify the content of the file before uploading it. The file extension method is not trustable.
Use magic number method to verify the file content which will be an easy way.
See the stackoverflow post and see the list of magic numbers
One way of saving the file is converting it to binary format and save in our database and next method is using App_Data folder.
The storage option is based on your requirement. See this post also
Set upload limit by setting maxRequestLength property to Web.Config like this, where the size of file is specified in KB
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="51200" executionTimeout="3600" />
You can save your trusted data just in parallel of htdocs/www folder so that any user can not access that folder. Also you can add .htaccess authentication on your trusted data (for .htaccess you should kept your .htpasswd file in parallel of htdocs/www folder) if you are using apache.
I sort of want to do the reverse of this.
Instead of unzipping and adding the collection files to S3 I want to
On user's request:
generate a bunch of xml files
zip the xml files with some images (pre-existing images hosted on s3)
download zip
Does anybody know agood way of doing this? I think I could manage this no problem on a normal machine but Heroku complicates things somewhat in that it has a read-only filesystem.
From the heroku documentation on the read-only filesystem:
There are two directories that are writeable: ./tmp and ./log (under your application root). If you wish to drop a file temporarily for the duration of the request, you can write to a filename like #{RAILS_ROOT}/tmp/myfile_#{Process.pid}. There is no guarantee that this file will be there on subsequent requests (although it might be), so this should not be used for any kind of permanent storage.
You should be able to pretty easily write your generated xml files to tmp/ and keep track of the names, download and write the s3 files to the same directory, and (maybe?) invoke a zip command as long as the output is in tmp/, then serve the file to the browser with the correct mime type to prompt a download. I would only be concerned with how big the filesize is and if heroku has an undocumented limit on what they'll allow in the tmp directory. Especially since you are only performing this action for a one-time download in the duration of a single request, I think you have a good chance of being able to do it.
Edit: Looking around a bit, you might be able to use something like RubyZip to create your zip file if you want to avoid calling system commands.