How do you query on Ruby on Rails or translate this query on Ruby on Rails?
SELECT
orders.item_total,
orders.total,
payments.created_at,
payments.updated_at
FROM
public.payments,
public.orders,
public.line_items,
public.variants
WHERE
payments.order_id = orders.id AND
orders.id = line_items.order_id AND
This is working on Postgres but I'm new to RoR and it's giving me difficulty on querying this sample.
So far this is what I have.
Order.joins(:payments,:line_items,:variants).where(payments:{order_id: [Order.ids]}, orders:{id:LineItem.orders_id}).distinct.pluck(:email, :id, "payments.created_at", "payments.updated_at")
I have a lot of reference before asking a question here are the links.
How to combine two conditions in a where clause?
Rails PG::UndefinedTable: ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table
Rails ActiveRecord: Pluck from multiple tables with same column name
ActiveRecord find and only return selected columns
https://guides.rubyonrails.org/v5.2/active_record_querying.html
from all that link I produced this code that works for testing.
Spree::Order.joins(:payments,:line_items,:variants).where(id: [Spree::Payment.ids]).distinct.pluck(:email, :id)
but when I try to have multiple queries and pluck a specific column name from a different table it gives me an error.
Update
So I'm using Ransack to query I produced this code.
#search = Spree::Order.ransack(
orders_gt: params[:q][:created_at_gt],
orders_lt: params[:q][:created_at_lt],
payments_order_id_in: [Spree::Order.ids],
payments_state_eq: 'completed',
orders_id_in: [Spree::LineItem.all.pluck(:order_id)],
variants_id_in: [Spree::LineItem.ids]
)
#payment_report = #search.result
.includes(:payments, :line_items, :variants)
.joins(:line_items, :payments, :variants).select('payments.response_code, orders.number, payments.number')
I don't have error when I remove the select part and I need to get that specific column. Is there a way?
You just have to make a join between the tables and then select the columns you want
Spree::Order.joins(:payments, :line_items).pluck("spree_orders.total, spree_orders.item_total, spree_payments.created_at, spree_payments.updated_at")
or
Spree::Order.joins(:payments, :line_items).select("spree_orders.total, spree_orders.item_total, spree_payments.created_at, spree_payments.updated_at")
That is equivalent to this query
SELECT spree_orders.total,
spree_orders.item_total,
spree_payments.created_at,
spree_payments.updated_at
FROM "spree_orders"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "spree_payments" ON "spree_payments"."order_id" = "spree_orders"."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "spree_line_items" ON "spree_line_items"."order_id" = "spree_orders"."id"
You can use select_all method.This method will return an instance of ActiveRecord::Result class and calling to_hash on this object would return you an array of hashes where each hash indicates a record.
Order.connection.select_all("SELECT
orders.item_total,
orders.total,
payments.created_at,
payments.updated_at
FROM
public.payments,
public.orders,
public.line_items,
public.variants
WHERE
payments.order_id = orders.id AND
orders.id = line_items.order_id").to_hash
Related
I have a small problem with grouping an ActiveRecord::Relation. I am trying to group a query by a joined table column without using raw SQL.
The code at the moment looks like that:
Sale::Product.joins(stock_product::supplier).group('core_suppliers.id').first
Result:
Sale::Product Load (42989.5ms) SELECT `sale_products`.* FROM `sale_products` INNER JOIN `stock_products` ON `stock_products`.`deleted_at` IS NULL AND `stock_products`.`id` = `sale_products`.`stock_product_id` INNER JOIN `core_suppliers` ON `core_suppliers`.`id` = `stock_products`.`core_supplier_id` GROUP BY core_suppliers.id ORDER BY `sale_products`.`id` ASC LIMIT 1
I tried to solve this problem by using merge:
Sale::Product.joins(stock_product: :supplier).merge(::Core::Supplier.group(:id)).first
Result:
Sale::Product Load (32428.4ms) SELECT `sale_products`.* FROM `sale_products` INNER JOIN `stock_products` ON `stock_products`.`deleted_at` IS NULL AND `stock_products`.`id` = `sale_products`.`stock_product_id` INNER JOIN `core_suppliers` ON `core_suppliers`.`id` = `stock_products`.`core_supplier_id` GROUP BY `sale_products`.`core_supplier_id` ORDER BY `sale_products`.`id` ASC LIMIT 1
I don't understand why Active::Record doesn't group my association by the column of the merged table. Especially since this way works with ```order()````.
Thanks for your help in advance
You can try Arel library that was introduced in Rails 3 for use in constructing SQL queries.
Just replace ::Core::Supplier.group(core_supplier: :id) to ::Core::Supplier.arel_table[:id] in your code:
Sale::Product.joins(stock_product::supplier).group(::Core::Supplier.arel_table[:id]).first
Update
If you don't want to use Arel directly in your queries you can hide Arel implementation in ApplicationRecord like this:
class ApplicationRecord < ActiveRecord::Base
def self.[](attribute)
arel_table[attribute]
end
end
And than your query can be rewritten like this:
Sale::Product.joins(stock_product::supplier).group(::Core::Supplier[:id]).first
I'm inside method that adds filter (user.type) to my query/relation.
Sometimes if grouping by the user (which needs INNER join to users table in another module) is selected before filtering I receive an error:
PostgreSQL: PG::DuplicateAlias: ERROR: table name "users" specified more than once
Before error happen JOIN is already in query -
$ pry> relation.to_sql
SELECT \"posts\".* FROM \"posts\"
INNER JOIN users ON users.id = posts.user_id
WHERE \"posts\".\"created_at\" BETWEEN '2019-05-01 00:00:00'
AND '2020-05-01 23:59:59' AND \"users\".\"type\" = 'Guest'"
I wanna fix it, by checking if the table is already joined inside my ActiveRecord::Relation object. I added:
def join_users
return relation if /JOIN users/.match? relation.to_sql
relation.joins('LEFT JOIN users ON users.id = posts.user_id')
end
This solution works, but I wonder - is there any better way to check if JOIN is inside relation?
Perhaps you can use joins_values, which isn't documented, but is an ActiveRecord_Relation public method that returns an array containing the name of the table the current query (object) is constructed with:
Post.joins(:user).joins_values # [:user]
Post.all.joins_values # []
if simple join
Post.joins(:user)
you can find via joins_values
so it will look like Post.joins(:user).joins_values # [:user]
if post has left joins
Post.left_joins(:user)
you can find via left_outer_joins_values
So in this case if you write Post.joins(:user).joins_values # []
so you can fix it by writing Post.joins(:user).left_outer_joins_values # [:user]
I have a query with a lot of joins and I'm eager_loading some of associations at the time. And I need to compute some value as attribute of one of models.
So, I'm trying this code:
ServiceObject
.joins([{service_days: :ou}, :address])
.eager_load(:address, :service_days)
.where(ous: {id: OU.where(sector_code: 5)})
.select('SDO_CONTAINS(ous.service_area_shape, SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, sdo_point_type(addresses.lat, addresses.lng, NULL), NULL, NULL) ) AS in_zone')
Where SQL function call in select operates data from associated addresses and ous tables.
I'm getting next SQL (so my in_zone column getting calculated and returned as first column before other columns for all eager_loaded models):
SELECT SDO_CONTAINS(ous.service_area_shape, SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, sdo_point_type(addresses.lat, addresses.lng, NULL), NULL, NULL) ) AS in_zone, "SERVICE_OBJECTS"."ID" AS t0_r0, "SERVICE_OBJECTS"."TYPE" AS t0_r1, <omitted for brevity> AS t2_r36 FROM "SERVICE_OBJECTS" INNER JOIN "SERVICE_DAYS" ON "SERVICE_DAYS"."SERVICE_OBJECT_ID" = "SERVICE_OBJECTS"."ID" INNER JOIN "OUS" ON "OUS"."ID" = "SERVICE_DAYS"."OU_ID" INNER JOIN "ADDRESSES" ON "ADDRESSES"."ID" = "SERVICE_OBJECTS"."ADDRESS_ID" WHERE "OUS"."ID" IN (SELECT "OUS"."ID" FROM "OUS" WHERE "OUS"."SECTOR_CODE" = :a1) [["sector_code", "5"]]
But it seems like that in_zone isn't accessible from either model used in query.
I need to have calculated in_zone as attribute of ServiceObject model object, how I can accomplish that?
Ruby on Rails 4.2.6, Ruby 2.3.0, oracle_enhanced adapter 1.6.7, Oracle 12.1
I have successfully replicated your issue and it turns out that this is a known issue in Rails. The problem is that when using eager_load, Rails maps the columns of all eager-loaded tables into table and column aliases in the form of t0_r0, t0_r1, etc... (you can see these in the SQL that you pasted in the question). And while doing that, it simply ignores the custom columns in the select, probably because it cannot determine which eager-loaded table it should attribute the custom column to. It is sad that this issue is open for more than 2 years now...
Nevertheless I think I found a workaround. It seems that if you don't eager load the tables but manually join them (with joins), you can as well include them (with includes) and the custom columns will be returned as there will be no column aliasing taking place. The point is that you must not use associations in the joins clauses but you have to specify the joins yourself. Also note that you must specify all columns from the main table in the select manually too (see the service_objects.* in the select).
Try the following approach:
ServiceObject
.joins('INNER JOIN "SERVICE_DAYS" ON "SERVICE_DAYS"."SERVICE_OBJECT_ID" = "SERVICE_OBJECTS"."ID"')
.joins('INNER JOIN "OUS" ON "OUS"."ID" = "SERVICE_DAYS"."OU_ID"')
.joins('INNER JOIN "ADDRESSES" ON "ADDRESSES"."ID" = "SERVICE_OBJECTS"."ADDRESS_ID"')
.includes(:service_days, :address)
.where(ous: {id: OU.where(sector_code: 5)})
.select('service_objects.*, SDO_CONTAINS(ous.service_area_shape, SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, sdo_point_type(addresses.lat, addresses.lng, NULL), NULL, NULL) ) AS in_zone')
The computation in the select should still work as the related tables are joined together but there should be no column aliasing present.
Of course this approach means that you'll get three queries instead of just one but unless you return a huge amount of records, the following two queries run by the includes clause should be very fast as they simply load the relevant records using foreign keys.
That monkey patch helped #Envek:
module ActiveRecord
Base.send :attr_accessor, :_row_
module Associations
class JoinDependency
JoinBase && class JoinPart
def instantiate_with_row(row, *args)
instantiate_without_row(row, *args).tap { |i| i._row_ = row }
end; alias_method_chain :instantiate, :row
end
end
end
end
then it is possible to do:
ServiceObject
.joins([{service_days: :ou}, :address])
.eager_load(:address, :service_days)
.where(ous: {id: OU.where(sector_code: 5)})
.select('SDO_CONTAINS(ous.service_area_shape, SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, sdo_point_type(addresses.lat, addresses.lng, NULL), NULL, NULL) ) AS in_zone')
.first
._row_['in_zone']
I have a many-to-many relationship between a model User and Picture. These are linked by a join table called Picturization.
If I obtain a list of users of a single picture, i.e. picture.users -> how can I ensure that the result obtained is sorted by either creation of the Picturization row (i.e. the order at which a picture was associated to a user). How would this change if I wanted to obtain this in order of modification?
Thanks!
Edit
Maybe something like
picture.users.where(:order => "created_at")
but this created_at refers to the created_at in picturization
Have an additional column something like sequence in picturization table and define sort order as default scope in your Picturization
default_scope :order => 'sequence ASC'
If you want default sort order based on modified_at then use following default scope
default_scope :order => 'modified_at DESC'
You can specify the table name in the order method/clause:
picture.users.order("picturizations.created_at DESC")
Well, in my case, I need to sort many-to-many relation by a column named weight in the middle-table. After hours of trying, I figured out two solutions to sort many-to-many relation.
Solution1: In Rails Way
picture.users.where(:order => "created_at")
cannot return a ActiveRecord::Relation sorted by Picturization's created_at column.
I have tried to rewrite a default_scope method in Picturization, but it does not work:
def self.default_scope
return Picturization.all.order(weight: :desc)
end
Instead, first, you need to get the ids of sorted Picturization:
ids = Picturization.where(user_id:user.id).order(created_at: :desc).ids
Then, you can get the sorted objects by using MySQL field functin
picture.users.order("field(picturizations.id, #{ids.join(",")})")
which generates SQL looks like this:
SELECT `users`.*
FROM `pictures` INNER JOIN `picturizations`
ON `pictures`.`id` = `picturizations`.`picture_id`
WHERE `picturizations`.`user_id = 1#for instance
ORDER BY field(picturizations.id, 9,18,6,8,7)#for instance
Solution2: In raw SQL Way
you can get the answer directly by using an order by function:
SELECT `users`.*
FROM `pictures` INNER JOIN `picturizations`
ON `pictures`.`id` = `picturizations`.`picture_id`
WHERE `picturizations`.`user_id = 1
order by picturizations.created_at desc
I'm using rails and am trying to figure out how to use ActiveRecord within the method to combine the following into one query:
def children_active(segment)
parent_id = Category.select('id').where('segment' => segment)
Category.where('parent_id'=>parent_id, 'active' => true)
end
Basically, I'm trying to get sub categories of a category that is designated by a unique column called segment. Right now, I'm getting the id of the category in the first query, and then using that value for the parent_id in the second query. I've been trying to figure out how to use AR to do a join so that it can be accomplished in just one query.
You can use self join with a alias table name:
Category.joins("LEFT OUTER JOIN categories AS segment_categories on segment_categories.id = categories.parent_id").where("segment_categories.segment = ?", segment).where("categories.active = ?", true)
This may looks not so cool, but it can implement the query in one line, and there will be much less performance loss than your solution when data collection is big, because "INCLUDE IN" is much more slower than "JOIN".