I know the first 6 characters of a domain name. I also know that the domain is about palmistry!
I need a search engine that can search all valid domain names that starts with "karath", so it should search all valid domain names on the web with search expression of "karath*"
I is better that it shoes some description about each domain.
Is there any such search engine?
If this question is not related to this community (off-topic) please tell me which community is related to my question.
You can download the complete list of all registered domains from whoisxmlapi at:
https://www.whoisxmlapi.com/whois-database-download.php
Please note that it’s a paid service, but you do not have any other option. After download the list, you can apply your desired logic (search if domain contain the string“karath”).
Keep in mind that this list is updating every day, so then you can only scan all the daily registered domains from here (free service):
https://whoisds.com/newly-registered-domains
And keep track only the delta’s.
Related
I want to update my web applications to use JSON-LD so that they get better on the search engines.
I read a lot on the JSON-LD website and the Google documentation about it but all of it deals with using a single entity.
What if on a single page -like my home page- I want to output TWO entities? For example the ORGANIZATION entity and the WEBSITE entity so that I can indicate the name of the site (and its alternate name) as well as the social site links that are also "same as" the web site?
When I tried appending them with a comma and tried it on the testing tool, it only "received" the first entity in the list
UPDATE
This is not a duplicate. For those who read carefully they will see that I am talking about TWO different entities being specified. The suggested duplicate is about a single entity with multiple (array) sub-attributes. That is not my case, mine is about multiple top level entities (Organization and Person for example).
After a much deeper search with variations on the search words I managed to get my answer here: enter link description here
So basically, if the entities/types are DIFFERENT as in my question (and unlike what the reviewer thought), then you must use separate script tags for each JSON+LD entity/type.
How to get the list of Expiring or dropping domains ? Just like Park.io
Thanks in advance.
First of all, you need to specify which extensions you're interested in. The possibilities will vary a lot depending on the extension.
Some registries provide so-called droplists (list of expiring domains). Others may provide zone files, from which it is possible to spot expiring domain names.
For a few extensions, the whole zone file can be obtained using the zone transfer (AXFR) mechanism supported by name servers. By comparing two versions of the zone files at different dates, you can see which names are added/removed. Removed names are usually expired/pending deletion.
Out of the few extensions listed on park.io, .to (Tonga) is the only one that currently allows AXFR.
Most of the time the registries will give you nothing. You have to compile your own lists, then check once a year if the domains get renewed or not. That can involve lots of whois scraping.
Without cooperation from the registry, or a good source, it is hard to build a complete list. In .com it's no problem. Country code domain names (ccTLDs) tend to be more protective but practice varies from one country to another.
As an example: Sweden is very open.
Expiring names in .se can be seen here:
.se-domains to be released. The zone file can be downloaded too, for data mining or other purposes: Access to zonefiles for .se and .nu
But this is the exception, not the rule.
You going to need to create your own by querying the expire WHOIS info from an API service like domaintools. An example of how to do this via URL is below:
https://www.domaintools.com/resources/api-documentation/whois-lookup/
example:
http://api.domaintools.com/v1/$myWebsite/whois/
This issue may have a bearing on whether we use Umbraco for a given company or use something else.
The company has both an intranet and web site(s) running on an old bespoke system which is scheduled to be replaced.
Having tested Umbraco extensively and built mock-up sites, I am very impressed with its flexibility, and I strongly suspect it would work for the web estate.
However,the intranet is first to be replaced and, as per an earlier post, the issue is here that that are a number of document types that comprise the intranet, and any one of the employees (and there are thousands) can create, publish and edit their own documents, but can't edit documents created by other users.
Also, they will have logged in to Windows and don't wan't to log in to again to edit documents in the intanet CMS.
The questions are
Can users be automatically logged into Umbraco back-office by intergrating with Active Directory?
If so, can this handle thousands of such users?
Is there any way of preventing users from editing each others' documents (as far as I can see, if we allow users to create, update and publish, they can edit documents created by other users as long as the documents are under their starting node). I suppose we could make a staring node for each user and all their documents go under that - but then this would make the node structure massive, unmanageable, and, I suspect, slow.
Admins should be able to edit anything.
Reading the above back it looks very much to me that Umbraco just isn't suitable for an intranet (and to be fair, it's not promoted as such), but its user access system is it's big failing. and I think it might make it a non-starter....
about Active Directory I answered your question in your 2nd thread here: Umbraco - members creating back-end content.
Regarding your concerns about Tree structure and blocking content, you can restrict permissions for each user to allow or dissalow specific actions for specific node (with / without children nodes).
Of course, it depends from requirements and desired solution. If you want to have shared three, but block some actions for specific users - this is the way. If you don't want to allow other users to even see structure of trees managed by other users - it will be better to create different parent nodes for them and restrict access only to those one.
The same options are visible when you right click on node and choose "Permissions".
I need to create a web app that would be different for each country (and not only different language). Let's say the website lists insurance solutions in the country.
For example, users in France typing example.com would need to be sent to http://france.example.com and American users would go to http://us.example.com
All websites would have the same display/layout but the content in the pages would vary as insurance and companies are not the same in each country.
What I'd like is:
in my backend: Manage multiple "country versions" on which I can work to improve features, layout, etc. in a single time without having to update the code on each version. All country versions would stay in similar stat this way.
in the backend: create a filter that "sends" the insurance item I input in my backoffice into the right country-wesbite.
it means for example that the page describing an insurance ALpha in France would only exist in the france version (http://france.example.com/alpha_insurance_description) and not in other country versions.
What kind of architecture must I implement? Are there Rails gems that answer this kind of problematic? (if not maybe some websites describing how to create this kind of multi-country website)
"multi-tenancy" is what you want. The following two railscasts explains two different approches to achieve the same.
http://railscasts.com/episodes/389-multitenancy-with-postgresql
http://railscasts.com/episodes/388-multitenancy-with-scopes
Also you can use subdomain-fu, for subdomain handling and route validation.
I would just use the geoIP data (or user preferences) to find out which country to show and have the content stored in the DB (e.g. insurance companies) with a country code. Seeing as an insurance company will have an address and postcode anyway, this should be pretty simple. That way, both the content and the site language can be set dynamically.
As for the subdomains, you can CNAME all of them to your main site and use a little piece of Rack middleware (hand rolled) to redirect requests to the right subdomain if necessary. After that, the site ignores the subdomain itself and just server content dynamically. Alternatively, you could have some code in the application config that reads the subdomain from the Rack request, extracts the country code, and sets it as a config variable that you then use to flag what country code to use when showing the dynamica content, setting the language, etc.
I have a multiple site Sitecore solution. All the sites share a product range which is stored inside a 'Shared data' node that sits at the same level as the root nodes of the sites. The individual product pages on a site use a wildcard item to lookup the product based on the last part of the URL.
This means that we can't use internal links in the rich text editor to point to the product page on any of the sites because the product item does not have a specific site URL.
Does anyone know of a way to overcome this, or perhaps know of a way to augment the default behavior of interal links?
Have you considered using cloned items, see here for details.
This would allow you to share the content whilst having the appearance to the end user of the Products being inside the content tree allowing you to use the RTE and internal link look ups?
For extra information about clones, see here and here
You'd also need to do some work in the link provider to link to the cloned version of a product if you wanted. See this question.