I have a horizontal UICollectionView in which I display images that are loaded asynchronously. The cells are supposed to have their width fit the image.
In viewDidLoad of my view controller, I set the estimated cell size:
(collectionView.collectionViewLayout as? UICollectionViewFlowLayout)?.estimatedItemSize = CGSize(width: 400, height: 400)
In cellForItem, I start the download task using Kingfisher:
cell.imageView.kf.setImage(with: url) { (_, _, _, _) in
cell.layoutSubviews()
}
Inside my cell, I have the following code inside the layoutSubviews method:
// 326 is the image view's height
// .aspectRatio is a custom extension that returns: size.width / size.height
imageViewWidthConstraint.constant = 326 * image.aspectRatio
layoutIfNeeded()
In the storyboard, I have properly setup the layout constraints so that imageViewWidthConstraint is respected for the cell's width.
The following is the result when running my app:
As you can see, the cells have a width of 400, although the image was loaded and the layout updated. And, as result, the images are stretched to fill the image view.
When I scroll to the right & then back, the cells are removed from the collection view and loaded back in, and are now properly laid out:
While scrolling, the cells adjust their width, sometimes to the correct width, sometimes to the wrong one.
What am I doing wrong here?
Since your images come in asynchronously it may take some time to be loaded. Only once they are loaded you can actually know the size or ratio of the image. That means for every image that is loaded you need to "reload" your layout. From a short search this looks promising.
At least this way you may get some animations, otherwise your cells will just keep jumping when images start to be loaded.
In any case I would advise you to avoid this. If I may assume; you are getting some data from server from which you use delivered URLs to download the images and show them on the collection view. The best approach (if possible) is to request that the API is extended so that you receive dimensions of images as well. So instead of
{
id: 1,
image: "https://..."
}
You could have
{
id: 1,
image: {
url: "https://...",
width: 100,
height: 100
}
}
You can now use these values to generate aspect ratio width/height before you download the images.
Next to that I don't really see any good solution for the whole thing to look nice (without jumping around).
Related
I have recently moved a bunch of UIImageViews into nested Stack Views (Horizontal and Vertical). Whenever the user presses the play button it animates, then starts a timer. Once the timer reaches 0 it is supposed to flip each card consecutively and hide the image itself. This was working until I added them to a Stack View. I've read that the stack views are buggy when it comes to this sort of thing, but any attempt at fixing it hasn't worked thus far. I'm at an impasse, can anyone point me in the right direction?
Issue Occurs In Here I Think
//INFO: Disable cards while viewing.
for card in cardsPhone
{
card.isUserInteractionEnabled = false
flipCard(sender: card)
}
DispatchQueue.global(qos: .default).asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 5) {
for card in self.cardsPhone
{
DispatchQueue.main.async {
//THIS IS THE ANIMATION CALL THAT MAKES VIEWS DISAPPEAR.
self.flipCard(sender: card)
}
usleep(20000)
}
DispatchQueue.main.async{
//INFO: Enable cards after hidden.
for card in self.cardsPhone
{
card.isUserInteractionEnabled = true
}
//INFO: Enable play button after cards are hidden to prevent crashing layout.
self.playButtonView.isUserInteractionEnabled = true
}
}
Flip Animation Controller
func flipCard(sender: UIImageView)
{
playButtonView.isUserInteractionEnabled = false
//INFO: If there is no UIImage, assign the appropriate image from the array.
if sender.image == nil
{
sender.image = cardsImages[sender.tag]
UIView.transition(with: sender, duration: 0.3, options: .transitionFlipFromLeft, animations: nil, completion: nil)
}
//INFO: If there is an image, remove it and replace with no Image.
else
{
sender.image = nil
UIView.transition(with: sender, duration: 0.3, options: .transitionFlipFromRight, animations: nil, completion: nil)
}
}
Update
I've discovered that if I replace the image on the UIImageView then that is actually what is causing it to disappear. So the issue is related to the code above in the else statement where sender.image = UIImage(). It doesn't matter if I replace with a different image or not, the moment the image is changed it disappears.
I've read that the stack views are buggy when it comes to this sort of thing
Well, that's not so. They are in fact quite sophisticated and consistent, and their behavior is well defined.
What is a stack view? It's a builder of autolayout constraints. And that is all it is. Putting views inside a stack view means "Please configure these views with equal spacing" (or whatever your setting is for the stack view) "using autolayout constraints that you impose."
Okay, but how does the stack view do that? Autolayout requires four pieces of information, x and y position, and width and height. The stack view will supply the position, but what about the size (width and height) of its views? Well, one way to tell it is to give your views internal constraints (if they don't conflict with what else the stack view will do). But in the absence of that, it has to use the intrinsic size of its views. And the intrinsic size of an image view under autolayout is the size of the image it contains.
So everything was fine when you had image views with images that were the same size. They all had the same intrinsic size and now the stack view could space them out. But then you took away an image view's image. Now it has no image. So it has no intrinsic size. So the stack view just removes it from the row (or column or whatever it is).
Your workaround is actually quite a good one, namely, to make sure that the image view always has an image; if it is to look blank, you just give it a blank image. The image looks like the background, but it is still an image with an actual size, and so it gives the image view a size and the image view continues to hold its place.
However another solution would have been simply to give the image view a width constraint the same size as the card image's width.
Solution
I've discovered that changing an image on a UIImageView while it's inside of a stack causes it to completely disappear. This is a weird Xcode but but the solution I found was to create a custom background on the fly to get rid of the image and only have the background color. This was done with the following code snippet. It's a bit messy, but it gets the job done.
func setColorImage(viewToModify: UIImageView, colorToSet: UIColor)
{
let rect = CGRect(origin: .zero, size: viewToModify.layer.bounds.size)
UIGraphicsBeginImageContextWithOptions(rect.size, false, 0.0)
colorToSet.setFill()
UIRectFill(rect)
let image = UIGraphicsGetImageFromCurrentImageContext()
UIGraphicsEndImageContext()
guard (image?.cgImage) != nil else { return }
viewToModify.image = image
viewToModify.backgroundColor = colorToSet
viewToModify.isUserInteractionEnabled = false
}
Essentially this code creates a new cgRect, sets the color, creates a new image from that color, then applies it back to the UIImageView.
This is a hard one, I hope I can explain it properly.
All right, so the thing is that I have a UICollectionView where the height of the cell is dynamically changing using collectionView.collectionViewLayout.invalidateLayout() which guides into the sizeForItemAtIndexPath() method of UICollectionVieFlowLayout.
This works perfectly. There is new content, it resizes, moves the other cells according to it, etc. Now, my collection view's content size is probably pretty big, that means when I'm stopping at cell number, say, 23, and cell number 15 is not even displayed but is changing it's size, it is going to make my cell number 23 move up or down. Can I kind of throw an "anchor" to where I currently am? Here's the code that's resizing the cell, triggered by Firebase:
cell.resizeToText(text: text!)
let size = CGSize(width: self.view.frame.width, height: cell.mainView.frame.height + (cell.mainView.frame.origin.y*2.5))
let invalidationIndex = indexPath.row + 1
self.invalidationSizeDictionary[invalidationIndex] = size
let context = UICollectionViewLayoutInvalidationContext()
context.invalidateItems(at: [indexPath])
self.feedCollectionView.collectionViewLayout.invalidateLayout()
Question: is there a possibility to stay at my current offset position in the collectionView?
I'm creating an app that needs to show a tableview like below image
Similar colored circles are to be matched with a line.
Which view i can add the lines?
Or need to create a new view above tableview? But still my tableview needs to be scrolled.
How can i achieve this?
Update for Bounty
I want to implement the same with incliend lines between neighbouring circles. How to achieve the same?
Demonstration below:
create design like this
Based on your requirement just hide upper line and lower line of circle
You need to create collection view in tableview cell. In collection view you create one cell. Design the same user interface like your design. Show and hide the view with matching of rule. It will not affect tableview scrolling. and with this approach you can also provide scroll in collection view cell. i can provide you coded solution if you able to provide me more information. Thanks
You can use this Third Party LIb
You need to use a combination of collection view and a table view to give support for all devices.
1.Create one collection view cell with following layout
Hide upper and lower lines as per your need
Add collection view in table view cell and managed a number of cells in collection view depending upon the current device width and item's in between spacing.
You can create a vertical label without text, set the background color with black and place it behind the circle in view hierarchy and set a width of the label as per your requirement. Then you can hide unhide the label whenever you want.
P.S.: Make sure to hide your cell separator.
I have created a demo project. You can find it here. I tried to match your requirements. You can update the collection view settings to handle the hide and show of labels.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Hope this help.
Thanks!
To connect any circle with any other circle in the cell above / below, it will be easier and cleaner to create the connection lines dynamically rather than building them into the asset as before. This part is simple. The question now is where to add them.
You could have the connection lines between every two cells be contained in the top or bottom cell of each pair, since views can show content beyond their bounds.
There's a problem with this though, regardless of which cell contains the lines. For example, if the top cell contains them, then as soon as it is scrolled up off screen, the lines will disappear when didEndDisplayingCell is called, even though the bottom cell is still completely on screen. And then scrolling slightly such that cellForRow is called, the lines will suddenly appear again.
If you want to avoid that problem, then here is one approach:
One Approach
Give your table view and cells a clear background color, and have another table view underneath to display a new cell which will contain the connection lines.
So you now have a background TVC, with a back cell, and a foreground TVC with a fore cell. You add these TVC's as children in a parent view controller (of which you can set whatever background color you like), disable user interaction on the background TVC, and peg the background TVC's content offset to the foreground TVC's content offset in an observation block, so they will stay in sync when scrolling. I've done this before; it works well. Use the same row height, and give the background TVC a top inset of half the row height.
We can make the connection lines in the back cell hug the top and bottom edges of the cell. This way circles will be connected at their centre.
Perhaps define a method in your model that calculates what connections there are, and returns them, making that a model concern.
extension Array where Element == MyModel {
/**
A connection is a (Int, Int).
(0, 0) means the 0th circle in element i is connected to the 0th circle in element j
For each pair of elements i, j, there is an array of such connections, called a mesh.
Returns n - 1 meshes.
*/
func getMeshes() -> [[(Int, Int)]] {
// Your code here
}
}
Then in your parent VC, do something like this:
class Parent_VC: UIViewController {
var observation: NSKeyValueObservation!
var b: Background_TVC!
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
let b = Background_TVC(model.getMeshes())
let f = Foreground_TVC(model)
for each in [b, f] {
self.addChild(each)
each.view.frame = self.view.bounds
self.view.addSubview(each.view)
each.didMove(toParent: self)
}
let insets = UIEdgeInsets(top: b.tableView.rowHeight / 2, left: 0, bottom: 0, right: 0)
b.tableView.isUserInteractionEnabled = false
b.tableView.contentInset = insets
self.b = b
self.observation = f.tableView.observe(\.contentOffset, options: [.new]) { (_, change) in
let y = change.newValue!.y
self.b.tableView.contentOffset.y = y // + or - half the row height
}
}
}
Then of course there's your drawing code. You could make it a method of your back cell class (a custom cell), which will take in a mesh data structure and then draw the lines that represent it. Something like this:
class Back_Cell: UITableViewCell {
/**
Returns an image with all the connection lines drawn for the given mesh.
*/
func createMeshImage(for mesh: [(Int, Int)]) -> UIImage {
let canvasSize = self.contentView.bounds.size
// Create a new canvas
UIGraphicsBeginImageContextWithOptions(canvasSize, false, 0)
// Grab that canvas
let canvas = UIGraphicsGetCurrentContext()!
let spacing: CGFloat = 10.0 // whatever the spacing between your circles is
// Draw the lines
for each in mesh {
canvas.move(to: CGPoint(x: CGFloat(each.0) * spacing, y: 0))
canvas.addLine(to: CGPoint(x: CGFloat(each.1) * spacing, y: self.contentView.bounds.height))
}
canvas.setStrokeColor(UIColor.black.cgColor)
canvas.setLineWidth(3)
canvas.strokePath()
let image = UIGraphicsGetImageFromCurrentImageContext()!
UIGraphicsEndImageContext()
return image
}
}
You'd probably want to create a Mesh class and store the images in that model, to avoid redrawing.
I want to create an UI in a UITableView, t's kind like the Facebook Home Page, on the top, there is a image act like a cover image, on the surface of the this "cover image" there is a "user image".
Facebook Home Page
I did this by adding a ImageView first, set the auto layout constrains. and then drag another ImageView on top of previous ImageView, and then add the constrains. the "cover image" has a size of 200 * 600(constrains to the cell with top: 0, left:0, right:0, height: 200), the "user profile image" has a size of 50 * 50(constrains to the cell with bottom:0, left:275, right: 275, hight: 50, width: 50). and the TableView I set as static cell with a hight of 300 and width 600
however, when I set the ImageView mode to "Aspect Fill" the "cover image" will fill the whole cell, even though I set it height as 200. and there is no "user profile image" showing.
anybody know is there anything I did wrong? thanks
updated: in my TableView, I have 2 static cell, the first used to put cover image and profile image, the second one is used to put text content. for the second cell, I want it to be dynamic with the text length, so I use this code:
override func tableView(tableView: UITableView, heightForRowAtIndexPath indexPath: NSIndexPath) -> CGFloat {
if indexPath.row == 0 {
return 300
}
return tableView.contentSize.height
}
I am not sure if this has anything to do with the problem.
I have tried to only set the cover image first, I add the constrains with(top:0, left:0, right:0, bottom: 100) so the cover image should have a size : 600*200 (the cell is 600* 300). but when I set the image view mode to "aspect fill", it will still fill the whole cell, even thought I set the constrains with bottom: 100.
It has something to do with your constraints. Check the priority level on your height constraint. It should be set to 1000.
If you can't figure it out, another option is to put another view under the cover photo with a size of 100 to act as a spacer then constrain the other images to this spacer view. Then you can put the rest of your elements in this view.
I am implementing a scroll view picker I have implemented most of the part but I'm stuck at changing the size when it scrolls.
I'm trying to do this :
I have got till here and i don't know how to change size using scroll offset i tried many things but failed i need help
I'm using SwipeView to get the scroll
func swipeViewDidScroll(swipeView: SwipeView!) {
//USE swipeView.currentItemView to access current view
//USE swipeView.itemViewAtIndex(swipeView.currentItemIndex - 1) to access previous view
//USE swipeView.itemViewAtIndex(swipeView.currentItemIndex + 1) to access next View
swipeView.currentItemView.frame = CGRect(x: swipeView.currentItemView.bounds.origin.x, y: swipeView.currentItemView.bounds.origin.y , width: (swipeView.currentItemView.bounds.width + swipeView.scrollOffset) - CGFloat((280 * swipeView.currentItemIndex)), height: swipeView.currentItemView.bounds.height)
}
I have attached the project to make your work easier understanding my work
LINK TO PROJECT
What about this:
create a special class for the cells in the slider
when the cell is created, add NSLayoutContraints of width and aspect ratio to the view
create a method to expand the cell using the constraint inside the class, like
-(void)expandCell {
self.widthConstraint.constant = normalWidth * 1.05f;
}
-(void)normalizeCell {
self.widthConstraint.constant = normalWidth;
}
when the view is at the center you call the method expandCell to expand it 5% and when the cell is out you call the normalizeCell. To make things prettier you just animate that.