I am implementing autocomplete functionality by returning database values with the help of Json and Linq.I need to implement edit functionality. For edit functionality I need to return viewBag data to my view. But I couldn't access my viewBag while returning Json result.
public JsonResult Index(string Prefix,int id = 0)
{
SqlConnection sqcon2 = new SqlConnection(conn);
SqlCommand cmd2 = new SqlCommand();
SqlDataAdapter sd2 = new SqlDataAdapter(cmd2);
DataTable dt2 = new DataTable();
cmd2.Connection = sqcon2;
cmd2.CommandText = "sps_userLocationByID";
cmd2.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;
cmd2.Parameters.AddWithValue("#id", id);
sqcon2.Open();
sd2.Fill(dt2);
sqcon2.Close();
foreach (DataRow dr2 in dt2.Rows)
{
ViewBag.cityName = dr2["CityName"].ToString();
ViewBag.Name = dr2["Name"].ToString();
}
SqlConnection sqcon = new SqlConnection(conn);
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand();
SqlDataAdapter sd = new SqlDataAdapter(cmd);
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
cmd.Connection = sqcon;
cmd.CommandText = "sps_userCity";
cmd.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;
sqcon.Open();
sd.Fill(dt);
sqcon.Close();
List<CityModel> ObjList = new List<CityModel>();
foreach (DataRow dr in dt.Rows)
{
CityModel st = new CityModel();
st.CityName = dr["CityName"].ToString();
ObjList.Add(st);
}
var CityName = (from N in ObjList
where
N.CityName.ToLower().StartsWith(Prefix.ToLower())
select new { N.CityName });
return Json(CityName, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
you can use viewbag if you call another Actionresult method via Ajax.
ViewBag only exists in the context of a Razor view, which itself only exists if you're returning View(), PartialView(), etc. If you're returning JSON, that's all you get. You cannot utilize ViewBag.
That said, I think you're confused in general about how things work though. Initially your app is responding with an HTML document. Everything else, your action, view, etc. is all about getting to this HTML document that can finally be returned to the client, a web browser in this case.
Once that response has been sent. The server is done. Client-side, the web browser parses the document and creates various object models: the DOM, CSSOM, etc. It then uses these object models to render the page (the paint). During and after this process, your JavaScript is run. All of this is happening client-side, and the server doesn't know or care; it's already done its job.
Then, you're wanting some new information from the server. That requires a new request from the client, which will result in a new response from the server. That request could come in the form of navigation by the user within the browser (in which case the whole browser window/tab view will change) or in the form of an AJAX request, which leaves the current view in the browser window/tab as-is.
XMLHttpRequest, the actual JavaScript client class responsible for making AJAX requests, is what's referred to as a "thin client". It makes requests and receives responses, but it does not do anything with said response, in ontrast to a "thick client" like a web browser, which takes the response and does all the object model creation and rendering. Instead, a callback function is merely invoked. It is your responsibility to do something in that callback with the response you receive (update the DOM, etc.)
All this is to say that doing anything with ViewBag while returning a JSON response to an AJAX request makes absolutely zero sense, because the view is not changing. You seem to be imagining that change ViewBag would somehow automatically update something on the page that was previously added via ViewBag in your initial Razor view. That's not the case, and it's not how things work. If you want to alter something on the page, the new value needs to be returning as part of the JSON response from your AJAX request, and then you must use that new value to alter the DOM accordingly.
Related
I have Developed ASP.net Core Web API & Web APP Which are in the same solution but different projects.
in the API I have some validations/checking as you may call.
e.g: if user email already exists, the API returns 'Email alreday in use' like this
bool EmailExists = dbContext.Users.Any(u => u.Email == user.Email);
if (EmailExists)
{
return new JsonResult("Email Address already taken!, Try a differen Email");
}
and so on. in some cases I may need to check multiple columns one a time, (eg: UserName, Email, TellNum)
This is an example of calling the API in the MVC
using (var client = new HttpClient())
{
client.BaseAddress = new Uri(_baseAPIUrl);
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Clear();
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Add(
new MediaTypeWithQualityHeaderValue("application/json"));
HttpResponseMessage Res = await client.PostAsJsonAsync("Users", user);
if (Res.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{
//in here I want check the `Res` and if it contains the returned messages, I want to display them by assigning it to `TempData[infoMsg]`
// else some something(register user)
}
// Check the returned JsonResult messages here if statusCode is ultered eg: BadRequest
}
My Question is how can I display these types of response messages in razor view in the MVC(Web App). in PostMan its workin, returning the response messages in body.
I did a lot of research about this but couldn't come to conclusion. I also cantacted some Devs I know(not .NET) and they said use JavaScript to call your API, which means I have to change almost everything I have done so far.
I aslo tried ultereing the statuCode to something like BadRequest in the API(if Email exists) in which case it will be checked outside the if (Res.IsSuccessStatusCode) of the Httpclient.
any help or direction is highly appreciated.
You should return a http error and a body containing some data about it eg field and message to your mvc controller. That could be a 422 error or whatever you like really since it's effectively internal and just coming back to the mvc controller.
The controller can then add any such error to modelstate and you can use the razor model "client" validation mechanism to show the error associated with a field.
This is therefore using the same mechanism used for attribute validation in the controller where you'd do
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
This is air code but will hopefully give you the idea.
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult PostUpdate(User u)
{
// call service and await response
var response = await httpClient.PostAsJsonAsync(posturi, u);
var returnContent = await response.Content.ReadAsAsync<ReturnContent>();
if (response.Result != HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
ModelState.AddModelError(returnContent.FieldName,returnContent.Error);
return Page();
}
// etc
You will want a more sophisticated checking on errors of course and check you get the body you're expecting.
Maybe you just hard code the field and error message if there's only one possibility. Maybe work with an array of fields and errors if there could be numerous validation fails.
After saving data in WFFM Custom save Action,I want to redirect Success Page with some large amount of data
I am trying below line of code .
I Can use Cookies ,session or Query String and Response.Redirect(baseUrl)but i want to Cookies ,session or Query String .
class SaveAction : WffmSaveAction
{
public override void Execute(ID formId, AdaptedResultList adaptedFields, ActionCallContext actionCallContext, params object[] data)
{
//Save Data in Service ,, Redirect to success page with below code with some data like ID
string baseUrl = HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.Scheme + "://" + HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.Authority +
HttpContext.Current.Request.ApplicationPath.TrimEnd('/') + "/success-page";
HttpContext.Current.Response.Clear(); //
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.Append("<html>");
sb.AppendFormat(#"<body onload='document.forms[""form""].submit()'>");
sb.AppendFormat("<form name='form' action='{0}' method='post'>", baseUrl);
sb.AppendFormat("<input type='hidden' name='id' value='{0}'>", "123456");
// Other params go here
sb.Append("</form>");
sb.Append("</body>");
sb.Append("</html>");
HttpContext.Current.Response.Write(sb.ToString());
HttpContext.Current.Response.End();
// HttpContext.Current.Response.Redirect(baseUrl);
}
}
Above code reload the same page with no body in Html.
Am i missing something in given code ?
The answer might depend on whether you have an mvc form or not.
In case of mvc forms, you might want to read this: http://ggullentops.blogspot.be/2016/07/sitecore-wffm-act-on-success.html. It describes hooking into the success pipeline <wffm.success> and passing data towards the success page (how exactly - querystring, session, .. is up to you(r code)). Fairly easy once you know the correct pipeline.
There is also a great post here describing what you are trying to do - i.e. saving the data for later use in the saveaction. It's too much code to copy here but it comes down to saving the data (in session) during the save action and creating a rendering (to read and handle the data again) that you will place on the success page.
Creating a rendering to place on your success page is something you will have to do anyway.. Don't try to redirect yourself, Sitecore does that for you.
I am working on an application which has a registration form and I have to display to the user whether the username exists or not.
I am using asp.net mvc3 and planned to use AJAX to achieve this.
I have a form
<tr>
<td>User Name*</td>
<td><input id="UserName" name="UserName" type="text" onblur="check(this.value);"/></td>
<td id= "UName"></td>
</tr>
which calls a .js file that has the folling contents
function check(User) {
...
var url = "/UserNameCheck/Index";
url += "?User=" + User;
xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = state_Change;
xmlHttp.open("GET", url, true);
xmlHttp.send(null);
}
function state_Change() {
if (xmlhttp.readyState == 4) {// 4 = "Response loaded"
if (xmlhttp.status == 200) {// 200 = Response Error Free
document.getElementById("UName").innerHTML = xmlHttp.responseText
}
else {
alert("Problem retrieving XML data");
}
}
}
I alerted the username and I am getting the correct value that i had entered. Now, the URL is /UserNameCheck/Index where UserNameCheck is a controller and Index is a method in that.
The controller has this code.
public ActionResult Index(string User)
{
string UserName;
try
{
Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.NoCache);
UserName = Request.QueryString["User"];
ConnectionPackage.ConnectionClass cc = new ConnectionPackage.ConnectionClass();
conn = cc.con;
string sql = "Select UserName FROM UserDetails where UserName = '" + UserName + "'";
conn.Open();
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(sql, conn);
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
object p = cmd.ExecuteScalar();
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
string u = (string)p;
if (u.Length==0 || u.Equals("NULL") || u.Equals("null")||u.Equals("Null"))
{
return View();
}
return null;
}
catch (Exception ex){
}
and the view has
String buffer = " <table><tr><td id = 'UName' >" This user name already exists. Please select some other unser name.
buffer = buffer + "</td></tr></table>";
response.getWriter().println(buffer);
I also tried writing
Response.Clear();
Response.Write("UserName already exists. Please select another UserName");
Response.End();
instead of returning View.
But in both the cases, I didn't get any message that the username exists even though I typed a user name that was already present in the database.
The connection string work for inserting into the database, so I dont think there is a problem with that. Is there a problem with the URL that I have mentioned in the js file? Or is my entire approach wrong?
I am basically from java background so dont know much about asp.net. Please do help.
Thank you very much in advance.
I followed what was given in MSDN article How to: Implement Remote Validation in ASP.NET MVC
jQuery in Action is the most popular jQuery book
You're doing alright but you could make this a whole lot easier on yourself. If you are usinng MVC3 with Razor, your app already has jQuery installed.
Use the $.ajax() method to perform the calls to your controller action that checks names...
Bind the $.ajax() call "unobtrusively" which means instead of on your HTML control, bind the event to your control from the jquery/javascript.
Second, if you want a little fancy performance, you can bind it via the live() jquery function or keyup event, so that as you are typing the ajax call is made and you find out realtime.
Ultimately you will end up with a lot less javascript, and your JS stuff will be cleanly separated from your markup.
As far as your controller action is going, it looks fine for playing around and learning, but you'd want to think about either (a) putting your SQL statement as a stored procedure on the db server and calling that, or (b) writing a repository pattern class and then using LINQ to do your query work after the DB fetch.
Another possibility would be to use Entity Framework 4.1 via NuGet to eliminate both needs. It can have a bit of a learning curve, but there's lots of good stuff out there and your example would be fairly simple to get started with.
Let me know if you have any specific concerns with your code and I can provide a more detailed answer.
What's the easiest way to clone current request's HttpContext instance?
I'm developing an app in Asp.net MVC v1. I upgraded the regular PartialView capabilities to actually have sub-controllers that act very similar, but have their own context. When you use PartialViews you have to fill view data for the partial view in your main view's controller action. I created my own functionality that makes it possible to call controller actions from within a view. This way I get:
I don't have to provide sub-view's data in my main view's controller action
sub controller methods can manipulate data more encapsulated without any relation to other views/controllers
The problem is that each sub-controller request uses HttpContext. So when I set some HttpContext.Item in a sub-controller it actually populates HttpContext of the actual request.
That's why I want to clone HttpContext. I'm already using:
HttpContext subContext = new HttpContext(request, response);
// what happened to Session, User, Items etc. properties?
but this doesn't set anything else than request and response. But I would probably also need other properties and collections... Like Session, Items, User... etc.
While the "Not Possible" answer is correct, there is an alternative that is much cleaner than writing values into the current context and then rewriting back to its original state. The solution is to make a new HttpContext object entirely that is based on the URL of your choosing.
// A new request/response is constructed to using a new URL.
// The new response is using a StreamWriter with null stream as a backing stream
// which doesn't consume resources
using (var nullWriter = new StreamWriter(Stream.Null))
{
var newRequestUri = new Uri("http://www.somewhere.com/some-resource/");
var newRequest = new HttpRequest("", newRequestUri.ToString(), newRequestUri.Query);
var newResponse = new HttpResponse(nullWriter);
var newContext = new HttpContextWrapper(new HttpContext(newRequest, newResponse));
// Work with the new context here before it is disposed...
}
Reference: https://github.com/maartenba/MvcSiteMapProvider/issues/278#issuecomment-34905271
Not possible
I guess an actual deep cloning is not possible because of server session state. Cloning would also have to clone this value, which is web server specific internal resource that is intrinsically static and can not be cloned. In this case a web server would have multiple Session objects for instance.
Workaround
Anyway. The workaround was to set additional context values before instantiating sub-controller processing. After processing is finished I reverted values back to original. So I actually had context as it was before.
For ASP.Net Core/.Net 5 the following will work (based on the ASP.Net Core source code for SignalR, if you need more features just add them).
public static HttpContext Clone(this HttpContext httpContext, bool copyBody)
{
var existingRequestFeature = httpContext.Features.Get<IHttpRequestFeature>();
var requestHeaders = new Dictionary<string, StringValues>(existingRequestFeature.Headers.Count, StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
foreach (var header in existingRequestFeature.Headers)
{
requestHeaders[header.Key] = header.Value;
}
var requestFeature = new HttpRequestFeature
{
Protocol = existingRequestFeature.Protocol,
Method = existingRequestFeature.Method,
Scheme = existingRequestFeature.Scheme,
Path = existingRequestFeature.Path,
PathBase = existingRequestFeature.PathBase,
QueryString = existingRequestFeature.QueryString,
RawTarget = existingRequestFeature.RawTarget,
Headers = new HeaderDictionary(requestHeaders),
};
if(copyBody)
{
// We need to buffer first, otherwise the body won't be copied
// Won't work if the body stream was accessed already without calling EnableBuffering() first or without leaveOpen
httpContext.Request.EnableBuffering();
httpContext.Request.Body.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
requestFeature.Body = existingRequestFeature.Body;
}
var features = new FeatureCollection();
features.Set<IHttpRequestFeature>(requestFeature);
// Unless we need the response we can ignore it...
features.Set<IHttpResponseFeature>(new HttpResponseFeature());
features.Set<IHttpResponseBodyFeature>(new StreamResponseBodyFeature(Stream.Null));
var newContext = new DefaultHttpContext(features);
if (copyBody)
{
// Rewind for any future use...
httpContext.Request.Body.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
}
// Can happen if the body was not copied
if(httpContext.Request.HasFormContentType && httpContext.Request.Form.Count != newContext.Request.Form.Count)
{
newContext.Request.Form = new Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.FormCollection(httpContext.Request.Form.ToDictionary(f => f.Key, f => f.Value));
}
return newContext;
}
The ASP.NET MVC framework intentionally makes dependencies to abstract classes with all members virtual. That simply says - extensibility.
Controllers depend on HttpContextBase, not HttpContext. Perhaps you can make your sub-controllers depend on HttpContextBase too so you can wrap it.
Just my 2 cents.
I've used
<% Html.RenderAction("Action", "Controller"); %>
to great effect, allowing me to create completely isolated/escapsulated actions without resorting to complex code. This would seem to offer the same functionality without the same complexity.
The rendered views are standard partial views and the controller actions just like any other.
So here's the issue: I'm building e-mails to be sent by my application by rendering full view pages to strings and sending them. This works without any problem so long as I'm not redirecting to another URL on the site afterwards. Whenever I try, I get "System.Web.HttpException: Cannot redirect after HTTP headers have been sent."
I believe the problem comes from the fact I'm reusing the context from the controller action where the call for creating the e-mail comes from. More specifically, the HttpResponse from the context. Unfortunately, I can't create a new HttpResponse that makes use of HttpWriter because the constructor of that class is unreachable, and using any other class derived from TextWriter causes response.Flush() to throw an exception, itself.
Does anyone have a solution for this?
public static string RenderViewToString(
ControllerContext controllerContext,
string viewPath,
string masterPath,
ViewDataDictionary viewData,
TempDataDictionary tempData)
{
Stream filter = null;
ViewPage viewPage = new ViewPage();
//Right, create our view
viewPage.ViewContext = new ViewContext(controllerContext,
new WebFormView(viewPath, masterPath), viewData, tempData);
//Get the response context, flush it and get the response filter.
var response = viewPage.ViewContext.HttpContext.Response;
//var response = new HttpResponseWrapper(new HttpResponse
// (**TextWriter Goes Here**));
response.Flush();
var oldFilter = response.Filter;
try
{
//Put a new filter into the response
filter = new MemoryStream();
response.Filter = filter;
//Now render the view into the memorystream and flush the response
viewPage.ViewContext.View.Render(viewPage.ViewContext,
viewPage.ViewContext.HttpContext.Response.Output);
response.Flush();
//Now read the rendered view.
filter.Position = 0;
var reader = new StreamReader(filter, response.ContentEncoding);
return reader.ReadToEnd();
}
finally
{
//Clean up.
if (filter != null)
filter.Dispose();
//Now replace the response filter
response.Filter = oldFilter;
}
}
You'd have to initiate a new request.
Bit, do you really want to send emails synchronously this way? If the mail server is down, the user could be waiting a good while.
I always put emails in an offline queue and have a service mail them. You might consider using the Spark template engine for this.
One other approach is to not redirect but write out a page with a meta redirect tag
Here is an alternative method for rendering a view to a string that never results in data being output to the response (therefore it should avoid your problem): http://craftycodeblog.com/2010/05/15/asp-net-mvc-render-partial-view-to-string/
To render a regular view instead of a partial view, you'll need to change "ViewEngines.Engines.FindPartialView" to "ViewEngines.Engines.FindView".
Have a look at the MVC Contrib EmailTemplateService which does exactly what you are after.
http://mvccontrib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/MVCContrib/Services/EmailTemplateService.cs
Sorry Chris, not quite sure what I was thinking but I obviously didn't read the question. While I cannot give you a way around this, I can tell you why you are getting the error - HttpResponse.Flush() sends the headers before flushing the content to your filter. This sets a flag inside the response so that when you try to redirect you get the exception.
Using reflector to look at the code inside Flush, I can't see any clean way for you to get around this without a lot of reflection and other nastiness.