I'm running Rails 5.x, with, Cucumber, Siteprism and Capybara through chromedriver. Most things work except..
I have a tiny bit of javascript that changes the class on an element in response to an event. But Capybara never sees the change. It only ever sees the class the element has when the page initially loaded.
Using Chrome, and debugging my Cucumber steps, I can see the element has the new class, but Capybara doesn't see it.
This must be an issue other people have encountered and solved, though I can't find the right subject title.
example coffeescript
$(document).on('focus', 'tbody#item-entry > tr > td > input', (e) ->
$(#).closest('tr').addClass('focused-row')
$(#).closest('td').addClass('focused-cell')
)
example html after the focus event has been triggered
<tr class="focused-row">
<td>ignore this </td>
</tr>
The purpose is to change the background colour of the row containing an input element that has focus. It works.
But Capybara, can't see the class, but it can see any classes added when the page is loaded. e.g.
expect(siteprism_stuff.root_element['class']).to match(/focused-row/)
Ignore the SitePrism stuff, that just gets the right element. root_element is the Capybara class for the dom node.
Now I know it's getting the right Capybara element because if I change my view to put stuff in the class for each row, then it sees that perfectly OK. What it can't see is the any new class added via Coffeescript. Although it's visible in the Chrome inspector, and changes the background color of the focused row as required.
You're specifying an "ends with" CSS attribute selector ($=)
input[class$='form-control']
which since the class attribute for the element you're interested in
<input type="search" class="form-control form-control-sm" placeholder="" aria-controls="universitiesTable">
doesn't end with 'form-control' is correctly not matching. You probably just want to use a normal CSS class selector input.form-control if continuing to do it the way you are. Any of the following options should find the search field and fill in the data you are trying to fill in.
fill_in 'Search:', with: string
fill_in type: 'search', with: string
find(:field, type: 'search').set(string)
find('input.form-control').set(string)
Note: Your question is still unclear as to whether you are seeing the class added in the inspector in test mode, and whether the line color is changing while the tests are running (or whether you're only seeing that in dev mode) - This answer assumes the JS is actually running in test mode and you're seeing the line color change while the tests are running.
You don't show how you're actually triggering the focus event but I'll assume you're clicking the element. The thing to understand when working with Capybara is that the browser works asynchronously, so when something like click has been done, the actions triggered by that click have not necessarily been done yet. Because of that, whenever doing any type of expectation with page elements you should always be using the matchers provided by Capybara rather than the basic matchers provided by RSpec. The Capybara provided matchers include waiting/retrying behavior to handle the asynchronous nature of dealing with the browser. In this case, assuming siteprism_stuff.root_element is the row element then you could be doing something like
expect(siteprism_stuff.root_element).to match_css('.focused-row')
or depending on exactly how your siteprism page objects are setup you could pass the class option to the siteprism existence checker
# `page_section` and `have_row` would need to be replaced with whatever is correct for your site prism page object
expect(page_section).to have_row(class: ['.focused-row'])
Related
I am experimenting with AppiumLibrary in RobotFramework and have a simple test for a requirement that states: "the Set button should exist on this page.". I am testing this by retrieving the button that has a specified ID and then checking if that button has the right text.
I am able to retrieve the button I want via ID however am having trouble getting the actual text on the button.
Here is how the button is defined on the web page:
<button id="button-set" class="button ng-binding" style="width: 20%">Set</button>
Very simple! Using Appium Desktop in web/hybrid app mode and clicking on the Set button it says the "text" attribute shows "Set". However I've learned that using the attributes in Appium Desktop arent valid when searching for elements on a webpage, for example searching by the Class attribute in Appium Desktop (android.widget.Button) is not correct because on the web page the class for the button is instead: "button ng-binding".
I have tried the following:
# this retrieves the button fine, by ID
PAGE SHOULD CONTAIN ELEMENT xpath=//button[#id="button-set"]
# these all return 'None'
${name}= GET ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE xpath=//button[#id="button-set"] name
${text}= GET ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE xpath=//button[#id="button-Set"] text
So, I am unsure which Attribute to use to retrieve the text when retrieving element by ID. Instead, I have tried to retrieve the element this way:
# this also passes fine - I feel like I should also make sure this button has the correct ID, to make the mapping
# between test procedures and cases easier, but if this is as good as it gets then
# this can be argued for
PAGE SHOULD CONTAIN ELEMENT xpath=//button[contains(text(),'set')]
# however, the following does not make sense, this returns "button" instead of "button-set", which makes me think the xpath query is not correct
${id2}= GET ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE xpath=//button[contains(text(),'set')] id
# again, both of these return 'None'
${name2}= GET ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE xpath=//button[contains(text(),'set')] name
${text2}= GET ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE xpath=//button[contains(text(),'set')] text
I have also tried the following:
${element}= GET WEBELEMENT xpath=//button[#id="button-set"]
# this returns "button-set" as you'd expect:
${id3}= GET ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE ${element} id
# these again return 'None'
${name3}= GET ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE ${element} name
${text3}= GET ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE ${element} text
I feel like this should be a very simple thing to do, and can see in other questions that you would use the Name attribute when using pure Appium. However, using the Robot Framework library instead, that these doesn't appear to be the right approach. I must be doing something pretty simple wrong here, can anyone point it out?
Thank you!
Stumbling across the same issue when trying to fetch element's attributes via Get Element Attribute keyword. It seems that when fetching for the element's text, your best bet is to use Get Text keyword. Switching to Get Text keyword solved the problem on my case. Please see the links below for further details. Spoiler: there aren't any real explanations as to why the Get Element Attribute is flaky.
https://serhatbolsu.github.io/robotframework-appiumlibrary/AppiumLibrary.html#Get%20Text
https://github.com/serhatbolsu/robotframework-appiumlibrary/issues/98
Currently I have a checkbox wrapped by a label.
<label for="exercise_form_division_ids_34">
<input class="check_boxes optional division-checkboxes" type="checkbox" value="34" name="form[division_ids][]" id="exercise_form_division_ids_34"> Technology
</label>
In my integration test I tried to use
within '.organizations' do
find("label[for='exercise_form_division_ids_34").click
end
OR
check "exercise_form_division_ids_#{department.id}", allow_label_click: true
But I still get this nable to find visible checkbox "calltree_exercise_form_division_ids_2" that is not disabled
Unable to find visible checkbox "exercise_form_division_ids_" that is not disabled
With the limited info provided you have a few potential possibilities.
The label/checkbox aren't actually inside an element with the class of the organizations on the page.
The error Unable to find visible checkbox "exercise_form_division_ids_" that is not disabled shows that no id is actually getting inserted into your selector which would tend to indicate that department isn't actually persisted in your test.
You may be assuming 34 is the correct id based on what it is in your dev environment but that may not be what it is in your test environment.
To narrow down the possibilities the first thing to do would be to grab a screenshot in your with test with page.save_and_open_screenshot (assuming you're using a driver which supports screenshots) and make sure there is actually a visible checkbox on the page. If not, you're probably not creating the required objects in the DB prior to your test starting.
Secondly look at the page in your browser and make sure the elements visible on the screen are actually the checkbox and/or the label. If both label & checkbox are being hidden and replaced with some JS widget then you'd need to interact with whatever elements the widget creates in the page (just like a user would). If only the checkbox is being hidden via JS/CSS but the label is visible then
check('Technology', allow_label_click: true) # check matching on label text
should work.
I have an element I'd like to use this on node.trigger("click") but I'm not sure how to find the element. it is a link_to and I'm relatively new to integration tests os I'm trying to find a answer to this question.
Here is the element
<%= link_to '✚ Invite Another Team Member', "#email", data: { invitation_modal_add: "" } %>
Here is my test I'd like to change.
click_link "✚ Invite Another Team Member"
Id like to replace that with something like this
link.trigger("click")
Because that is what capybara is telling me to try at the moment because I'm getting this error
Capybara::Poltergeist::MouseEventFailed:
Firing a click at co-ordinates [0, 0] failed. Poltergeist detected another element with CSS selector 'html.no-mobile.wf-loading.js.touch-events body.accounts.users.index div.jquery-modal.blocker' at this position. It may be overlapping the element you are trying to interact with. If you don't care about overlapping elements, try using node.trigger('click').
To find the element you can just do
link = find(:link, "✚ Invite Another Team Member")
However before you start using trigger you should read the part of the error message before that - "if you don't care about overlapping elements". If you're actually testing your app you probably do care about overlapping elements since they can prevent your user from actually being able to click the link, and the fact that it's trying to click the link at 0,0 may indicate an issue with your page layout. You should probably try setting a larger window size (window_size option when registering your driver - https://github.com/teampoltergeist/poltergeist#customization) so the link is not overlapped, make sure the link isn't fully hidden/collapsed in some way, or use execute_script with JS to scroll the page so the element becomes interactable. If you really don't care about a user actually being able to click the link then feel free to use #trigger
I have a file field that has opacity: 0 and is overlaping a fake button. Its a common css technic to fake a sort of "Upload button" that displays consistently across different browsers.
Capybara doesn't allows me to call attach_file on that input. The error is Selenium::WebDriver::Error::ElementNotVisibleError: Element is not currently visible and so may not be interacted with.
Anybody knows any way to force capybara to interact with invisible elements?
The answer is still unanswered, but I've found a work around. Nothing intelligent, just make visible the element with a simple script
page.execute_script %Q{
$('#photos').css({opacity: 1, transform: 'none'});
}
I post it for the record.
You can interact with hidden elements using the visible: false property in Capybara.
If you want to click on hidden element use:
find("#photos", visible: false).click
Don't use click_button('#photo') directly
The author of Capybara recommends setting Capybara.ignore_hidden_elements immediately prior to needing to see the invisible element, and resetting it afterwards:
Capybara.ignore_hidden_elements = false
click_button 'my invisible button'
Capybara.ignore_hidden_elements = true
In general interacting with non-visible elements should not be possible when using Capybara (you can find them using the visible: false/hidden option in most finders but not actually do anything to them). However, the file input is a special case because of how common it is to hide the element and, due to security restrictions, no other way to actually add a file by interacting with the pages visible elements. Because of this attach_file has a make_visible option which can be used to have Capybara make the element visible, attach the file, and then reset the CSS to the original setting.
attach_file('photos', file_path, make_visible: true)
I ended up resolving it a different route.
execute_script() was giving me a hard time (it would freeze test execution on FireFox), so this is what I did:
I already had an appropriate javascript file. I appended the following
<% if ENV["RAILS_ENV"] == "test" %>
$('#photos').show()
<% end %>
I also had to append .erb to my javascript file for proper Rails asset handling.
And in my test file, I was already setting ENV["RAILS_ENV"] = "test"
This way I could just dumb down the UI for test, and yet maintain the look and feel for production.
Miquel, thanks for workaraund.
I have similar issue for interacting with hidden file input on C# binding for Selenium Webdriver 2.35 and Firefox 24. To make file selection working did similar trick:
((IJavaScriptExecutor)webdriver).ExecuteScript("$('#fileUploadInput').css({opacity: 1, transform: 'none'});");
IWebElement e = webdriver.FindElement(By.CssSelector("input#fileUploadInput")));
e.SendKeys("c:\\temp\\inputfile.txt");
I've done it this way with elements that has the CSS style display:none; set:
page.execute_script("$('.all-hidden-elements').show();");
all('.all-hidden-elements').first.click
If the hidden element is nested in a visible parent element (e.g. a hidden input inside a visible label), you can click on the parent instead. If you still want to find the input by ID, you can traverse to the parent like so:
find('#hidden_input').find(:xpath, '..').click
Select boxes converted to Select2, do not automatically integrate with unobtrusive validation mechanism in ASP.NET MVC framework.
For example, on a form which contains a regular select box (marked as required in model definition), submitting the form while no options have been selected in the select box, will cause the border and background of the select box to take a reddish color, and by using #Html.ValidationMessageFor, error messages, if any, can be displayed beside the box. However if the select box is converted to a Select2 component, then none of the mentioned features work any more. Even the validation error message will not show up.
It seems that the reason for even the validation error message not showing, is because Select2 changes the display CSS property of the original select box to none (display:none), and I guess the unobtrusive validation script does not bother generating error messages for invisible fields.
Any ideas / solutions?
This issue isn't really specific to Select2, but rather to the jQuery unobtrusive validator.
You can turn on validation for hidden fields as highlighted in this answer.
$.validator.setDefaults({
ignore: ''
});
As the comments noted, it didn't work inside an anonymous callback function within $(document).ready(). I had to put it at the top level.
I've run into similar issues with the select2 plugin. I don't know exactly which features you're using specifically, but in my experience, when you set an element as a select2 in the document.ready event, the plugin will change some of the element's attributes on the fly (inspect one of the elements after your page has finished loading - oftentimes you'll see the id and class properties are different than what you're seeing when you view source).
It's difficult to offer more without actually seeing the code, but here's a few ideas to get you started:
First off, obviously make sure you have the a link to your select2.css stylesheet in the header.
Then, since you're talking about form submissions, I'd recommend you examine whether or not you're getting a full postback or submitting via AJAX (if you're using jQueryMobile, you're using AJAX unless you override it in the jquerymobile.js file or set a data-ajax="false" in your form attributes). You can just look at the value returned by Request.IsAjaxRequest() for this. Obviously if you're submitting via ajax, you won't hit the document.ready event and the select2 won't initialize properly and you'd need to figure out a way around that. Try refreshing the page after the submit and see if it renders the select2 component.
Then I'd suggest examining the elements and see if they're not behaving like you'd expect because you're actually trying to work with classes that the plugin has reassigned at runtime. You can either just adjust your logic, or you can dig into the select2 code itself and change the behavior - it's actually fairly well-documented what the code is doing, and if you hop on the Google group for select2, Igor is usually pretty quick to follow up with questions.
like this
$('select').on('select2:select', function (evt){
$(this).blur();
});
$('body').on('change', 'select.m-select2', function () {
$(this).blur();
})