I was expecting this 2 invocations to produce the same result, however I'm getting different results.
expectBody("", is(2)) // empty path
expectBody(is(2)) // no path
My context is too big to copy here, but I got this example from the documenation. I'm using expectBody as shown here. However without a "" path, my test is not passing.
I suppose there's a difference between these, but I can't find it in the documentation.
I'm using v.3.1
ResponseSpecBuilder builder = new ResponseSpecBuilder();
builder.expectStatusCode(200);
builder.expectBody("", is(2));
ResponseSpecification responseSpec = builder.build();
when().
get("/something").
then().
spec(responseSpec).
Related
we are trying to add parameters to a transformation at the runtime. The only possible way to do so, is to set every single parameter and not a node. We don't know yet how to create a node for the setParameter.
Current setParameter:
QName TEST XdmAtomicValue 24
Expected setParameter:
<TempNode> <local>Value1</local> </TempNode>
We searched and tried to create a XdmNode and XdmItem.
If you want to create an XdmNode by parsing XML, the best way to do it is:
DocumentBuilder db = processor.newDocumentBuilder();
XdmNode node = db.build(new StreamSource(
new StringReader("<doc><elem/></doc>")));
You could also pass a string containing lexical XML as the parameter value, and then convert it to a tree by calling the XPath parse-xml() function.
If you want to construct the XdmNode programmatically, there are a number of options:
DocumentBuilder.newBuildingStreamWriter() gives you an instance of BuildingStreamWriter which extends XmlStreamWriter, and you can create the document by writing events to it using methods such as writeStartElement, writeCharacters, writeEndElement; at the end call getDocumentNode() on the BuildingStreamWriter, which gives you an XdmNode. This has the advantage that XmlStreamWriter is a standard API, though it's not actually a very nice one, because the documentation isn't very good and as a result implementations vary in their behaviour.
Another event-based API is Saxon's Push class; this differs from most push-based event APIs in that rather than having a flat sequence of methods like:
builder.startElement('x');
builder.characters('abc');
builder.endElement();
you have a nested sequence:
Element x = Document.elem('x');
x.text('abc');
x.close();
As mentioned by Martin, there is the "sapling" API: Saplings.doc().withChild(elem(...).withChild(elem(...)) etc. This API is rather radically different from anything you might be familiar with (though it's influenced by the LINQ API for tree construction on .NET) but once you've got used to it, it reads very well. The Sapling API constructs a very light-weight tree in memory (hance the name), and converts it to a fully-fledged XDM tree with a final call of SaplingDocument.toXdmNode().
If you're familiar with DOM, JDOM2, or XOM, you can construct a tree using any of those libraries and then convert it for use by Saxon. That's a bit convoluted and only really intended for applications that are already using a third-party tree model heavily (or for users who love these APIs and prefer them to anything else).
In the Saxon Java s9api, you can construct temporary trees as SaplingNode/SaplingElement/SaplingDocument, see https://www.saxonica.com/html/documentation12/javadoc/net/sf/saxon/sapling/SaplingDocument.html and https://www.saxonica.com/html/documentation12/javadoc/net/sf/saxon/sapling/SaplingElement.html.
To give you a simple example constructing from a Map, as you seem to want to do:
Processor processor = new Processor();
Map<String, String> xsltParameters = new HashMap<>();
xsltParameters.put("foo", "value 1");
xsltParameters.put("bar", "value 2");
SaplingElement saplingElement = new SaplingElement("Test");
for (Map.Entry<String, String> param : xsltParameters.entrySet())
{
saplingElement = saplingElement.withChild(new SaplingElement(param.getKey()).withText(param.getValue()));
}
XdmNode paramNode = saplingElement.toXdmNode(processor);
System.out.println(paramNode);
outputs e.g. <Test><bar>value 2</bar><foo>value 1</foo></Test>.
So the key is to understand that withChild() returns a new SaplingElement.
The code can be compacted using streams e.g.
XdmNode paramNode2 = Saplings.elem("root").withChild(
xsltParameters
.entrySet()
.stream()
.map(p -> Saplings.elem(p.getKey()).withText(p.getValue()))
.collect(Collectors.toList())
.toArray(SaplingElement[]::new))
.toXdmNode(processor);
System.out.println(paramNode2);
When running my bundle, I get this error:
can't access property "call", Readable$1 is undefined
So I looked in the bundled code, and noticed this on line 71481:
function Duplex$2(options) {
if (!(this instanceof Duplex$2)) return new Duplex$2(options);
Readable$1.call(this, options);
The on line 71463 (correctly before usage):
var Readable$1 = _stream_readable;
But then on line 72148 (so Readable$1 is actually undefined at this point, which links to the above error):
var _stream_readable = Readable;
/*<replacement>*/
If I manually move this definition to before var Readable$1 = _stream_readable; then it works. My question is, how do I fix rollup mixing up the order?
Ok so it's a known issue with rollup, and readable-stream, as pointed out here: https://github.com/rollup/rollup/issues/4231 and documented in the various issues listed: https://github.com/rollup/rollup/issues/4231#issuecomment-937772340
I managed to solve the issue this way: https://github.com/nodejs/readable-stream/issues/348#issuecomment-937971694, basically:
npm i readable-stream#npm:vite-compatible-readable-stream
The relevant concept is detailed here: https://github.com/nodejs/readable-stream/issues/348#issuecomment-473804926
My problem will probably be explained better with code.
Consider the snippet below:
// First read
OntModel m1 = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel();
RDFDataMgr.read(m1,uri0);
m1.loadImports();
// Second read (from the same URI)
OntModel m2 = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel();
RDFDataMgr.read(m2,uri0);
m2.loadImports();
where uri0 points to a valid RDF file describing an ontology model with n imports.
and the following custom ReadHook (which has been set in advance):
#Override
public String beforeRead(Model model, String source, OntDocumentManager odm) {
System.out.println("BEFORE READ CALLED: " + source);
}
Global FileManager and OntDocumentManager are used with the following settings:
processImports = true;
caching = true;
If I run the snippet above, the model will be read from uri0 and beforeRead will be invoked exactly n times (once for each import).
However, in the second read, beforeRead won't be invoked even once.
How, and what should I reset in order for Jena to invoke beforeRead in the second read as well?
What I have tried so far:
At first I thought it was due to caching being on, but turning it off or clearing it between the first and second read didn't do anything.
I have also tried removing all ignoredImport records from m1. Nothing changed.
Finally got to solve this. The problem was in ModelFactory.createOntologyModel(). Ultimately, this gets translated to ModelFactory.createOntologyModel(OntModelSpec.OWL_MEM_RDFS_INF,null).
All ontology models created with the static OntModelSpec.OWL_MEM_RDFS_INF will have their ImportsModelMaker and some of its other objects shared, which results in a shared state. Apparently, this state has blocked the reading hook to be invoked twice for the same imports.
This can be prevented by creating a custom, independent and non-static OntModelSpec instance and using it when creating an OntModel, for example:
new OntModelSpec( ModelFactory.createMemModelMaker(), new OntDocumentManager(), RDFSRuleReasonerFactory.theInstance(), ProfileRegistry.OWL_LANG );
I have trouble understanding Nix overlays and the override pattern. What I want to do is add something to "patches" of gdb without copy/pasting
the whole derivation.
From Nix Pills I kind of see that override just mimics OOP, in reality it is just another attribute of the set. But how does it work then? Override is a function from the original attribute set to a transformed one that again has a predefined override function?
And as Nix is a functional language you also don't have variables only bindings which you can shadow in a different scope. But that still doesn't explain how overlays achieve their "magic".
Through ~/.config/nixpkgs I have configured a test overlay approximately like this:
self: super:
{
test1 = super.gdb // { name = "test1"; buildInputs = [ super.curl ]; };
test2 = super.gdb // { name = "test2"; buildInputs = [ super.coreutils ]; };
test3 = super.gdb.override { pythonSupport = false; };
};
And I get:
nix-repl> "${test1}"
"/nix/store/ib55xzrp60fmbf5dcswxy6v8hjjl0s34-gdb-8.3"
nix-repl> "${test2}"
"/nix/store/ib55xzrp60fmbf5dcswxy6v8hjjl0s34-gdb-8.3"
nix-repl> "${test3}"
"/nix/store/vqlrphs3a2jfw69v8kwk60vhdsadv3k5-gdb-8.3"
But then
$ nix-env -iA nixpkgs.test1
replacing old 'test1'
installing 'test1'
Can you explain me those results please? Am I correct that override can just alter the "defined interface" - that is all parameters of the function and as "patches" isn't a parameter of gdb I won't be able to change it? What is the best alternative then?
I will write an answer in case anyone else stumbles on this.
Edit 21.8.2019:
what I actually wanted is described in https://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#sec-overrides
overrideDerivation and overrideAttrs
overrideDerivation is basically "derivation (drv.drvAttrs // (f drv))" and overrideAttrs is defined as part of mkDerivation in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/stdenv/generic/make-derivation.nix
And my code then looks like:
gdb = super.gdb.overrideAttrs (oldAttrs: rec {
patches = oldAttrs.patches ++ [
(super.fetchpatch {
name = "...";
url = "...";
sha256 = "...";
})
];
});
The question title is misleading and comes from my fundamental misunderstanding of derivations. Overlays work exactly as advertised. And they are probably also not that magic. Just some recursion where endresult is result of previous step // output of last overlay function.
What is the purpose of nix-instantiate? What is a store-derivation?
Correct me please wherever I am wrong.
But basically when you evaluate Nix code the "derivation function" turns a descriptive attribute set (name, system, builder) into an "actual derivation". That "actual derivation" is again an attribute set, but the trick is that it is backed by a .drv file in the store. So in some sense derivation has side-effects. The drv encodes how the building is supposed to take place and what dependencies are required. The hash of this file also determines the directory name for the artefacts (despite nothing was built yet). So implicitly the name in the nix store also depends on all build inputs.
When I was creating a new derivation sort of like Frankenstein based on tying together existing derivations all I did was create multiple references to the same .drv file. As if I was copying a pointer with the result of getting two pointers pointing to the same value on the heap. I was able to change some metadata but in the end the build procedure was still the same. Infact as Nix is pure I bet there is no way to even write to the filesystem (to change the .drv file) - except again with something that wraps the derivation function.
Override on the other hand allows you to create a "new instance". Due to "inputs pattern" every package in Nix is a function from a dependencies attribute set to the actual code that in the end invokes the "derivation function". With override you are able to call that function again which makes "derivation function" get different parameters.
I want to read the error messages from messages file but I am unable to. What mistake am I making?
The code where I want to read the string from messages file is
Future { Ok(Json.toJson(JsonResultError(messagesApi("error.incorrectBodyType")(langs.availables(0))))) }
The messages file error.incorrectBodyType=Incorrect body type. Body type must be JSON
The messagesApi("error.incorrectBodyType") should return Incorrect body type. Body type must be JSON but it returns error.incorrectBodyType.
If I remove double quotes in messagesApi(error.incorrectBodyType) then the code doesn't compile
Update
I added a couple of debug prints and notice that the keys I am using in MessagesApi are not defined. I don't know why though as I have created them in messages file.
println("langs array"+langs.availables)
println("app.title"+messagesApi.isDefinedAt("app.title")(langs.availables(0)))
println("error"+messagesApi.isDefinedAt("error.incorrectBodyType")(langs.availables(0)))
prints
langs arrayList(Lang(en_GB))
app.titlefalse
errorfalse
Update 2
I might have found the issue but I don't know how to resolve it. Basically, I am running my test case without an instance of the Application. I am mocking messagesApi by calling stubMessagesApi() defined in Helpers.stubControllerComponents, If I run the same code using an Application eg class UserControllerFunctionalSpec extends PlaySpec with OneAppPerSuiteWithComponents then app.title and error are defined. It seems without an instance of Application, MessagesApi is not using the messages file.
I was able to solve the issue by creating a new instance of MessagesApi using DefaultMessagesApi
val messagesApi = new DefaultMessagesApi( //takes map of maps. the first is the language file, the 2nd is the map between message title and description
Map("en" -> //the language file
Map("error.incorrectBodyType" -> "Incorrect body type. Body type must be JSON") //map between message title and description
)
)
val controller = new UserController(mockUserRepository,mockControllerComponents,mockSilhouette,messagesApi,stubLangs())