I'm trying to update the network of a running docker container.
Note: I didn't attach any network while running the container.
[root#stagingrbt ~]# docker network connect host cdf8d6e3013d
Error response from daemon: container sharing network namespace with another container or host cannot be connected to any other network
[root#stagingrbt ~]# docker network connect docker_gwbridge cdf8d6e3013d
error during connect: Post http://%2Fvar%2Frun%2Fdocker.sock/v1.39/networks/docker_gwbridge/connect: EOF
[root#stagingrbt ~]# docker network create -d host my-host-network
Error response from daemon: only one instance of "host" network is allowed
[root#stagingrbt ~]# docker network ls
NETWORK ID NAME DRIVER SCOPE
495080cf93e3 bridge bridge local
cf0408d6f13f docker_gwbridge bridge local
2c5461835eaf host host local
87e9cohcbogh ingress overlay swarm
84dbd78101e3 none null local
774882ac9b09 sudhirnetwork bridge local
When you start a container, such as:
docker run -d --name alpine1 alpine
It is by default connected to the bridge network, check it with:
docker container inspect alpine1
If you try to connect it to host network with:
docker network connect host alpine1
you obtain an error:
Error response from daemon: container cannot be disconnected from host network or connected to host network
you have to delete the container and run it again on the host network:
docker stop alpine1
docker rm alpine1
docker run -d --network host --name alpine1 alpine
This limitation is not present on bridge networks. You can start a container:
docker run -d --name alpine2 alpine
disconnect it from the bridge network and reconnect it to another bridge network.
docker network disconnect bridge alpine2
docker network create --driver bridge alpine-net
docker network connect alpine-net alpine2
Note also that according to the documentation:
The host networking driver only works on Linux hosts, and is not supported on Docker Desktop for Mac, Docker Desktop for Windows, or Docker EE for Windows Server.
If you want to circumvent the command line and change the network of your docker container via portainer, you can do so. I'm not sure exactly which is the best way of doing this, but the steps below worked for me (changing a container that was running on the bridge network by default into the host network):
In the Container list, click on the container name (emby, in my case)
Stop the container
Click on Duplicate/Edit
Scroll down to Advanced container settings and select the Network tab
Change the Network to host (or whatever you want to set it to)
Click on Deploy the container right above.
Confirm that you want to replace the old container (or deploy it under a new name if you want to be on the save side and keep the old one).
Done!
Run or connect a container to a specific network: Note first of all, the network must exist already on the host. Either specify the network at container creation/startup time (docker create or docker run) with the --net option; or attach an existing container by using the docker network connect command. For example:
docker network connect my-network my-container
I am not sure if we can change the container network while running, however, assuming that the new docker network already exists, you can run the following commands to update your container network.
Executed on Version: 20.10.21 Community Edition
# docker stop <container-name>
# docker network disconnect <old-network-id> <container-name>
# docker network connect <new-network-id> <container-name>
# docker start <container-name>
Note: you won't be able to switch to host network from other network
Related
All examples I found online when demonstrating how to connect to another container through alias/name create their own network.
# create the network
$ docker network create my-network
# create the containers and connect them to the network
$ docker run --name service-one --network my-network ...
$ docker run --name service-two --network my-network ...
Now within the service-one container we can connect to service-two by
its by its container name service-two (instead of localhost)! The same
is true from service-two to service-one using the latter’s alias.
I wanted to do the same without creating my own network, using the default bridge network. Is it possible? If not, why?
I started a container with --net-alias and --name on the default bridge network:
docker run --rm --name=wa -dti -p 80:80 --net-alias=webapp docker/getting-started
Now from inside the other container I try to connect to it through the default bridge network that both containers are part of:
docker run --rm curlimages/curl https://webapp
curl: (6) Could not resolve host: webapp
docker run --rm curlimages/curl https://wa
curl: (6) Could not resolve host: wa
No luck. But it works perfectly fine when connecting through IP address.
I wanted to do the same without creating my own network, using the
default bridge network. Is it possible? If not, why?
Unfortunately, it is not possible quotting from the docker docs: https://docs.docker.com/network/bridge/#differences-between-user-defined-bridges-and-the-default-bridge
User-defined bridges provide automatic DNS resolution between containers.
Containers on the default bridge network can only access each other by IP addresses, unless you use the --link option, which is considered legacy. On a user-defined bridge network, containers can resolve each other by name or alias.
Also from: https://docs.docker.com/config/containers/container-networking/#dns-services
DNS Services
By default, a container inherits the DNS settings of the host, as defined in the /etc/resolv.conf configuration file. Containers that use the default bridge network get a copy of this file, whereas containers that use a custom network use Docker’s embedded DNS server
CentOS 7
Docker 20.10
I want to delete all networks.
docker container ls
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
As you can see no containers. I was removed it before.
I try this:
docker network ls
NETWORK ID NAME DRIVER SCOPE
1b6758d38df3 bridge bridge local
89dea066d590 host host local
8e235018309e none null local
And this:
docker network rm 1b6758d38df3
Error response from daemon: bridge is a pre-defined network and cannot be removed
P.S the folder /var/lib/docker is empty
Those are the system networks included in every Docker installation, they are not like user-defined networks and cannot be removed.
From the docs for thedocker network prune command:
Note that system networks such as bridge, host, and none will never be pruned
From the Network containers tutorial page:
Every installation of the Docker Engine automatically includes three default networks.
[...]
The network named bridge is a special network. Unless you tell it otherwise, Docker always launches your containers in this network.
This would mean that removing those networks would break some of Docker's networking features.
For what purpose do you want to remove/delete default network provided by Docker... Please share your use case so some one from community can guide you accordingly...
Bridge, Host & None are default & pre defined network... These networks are created during installation of docker....
Bridge - All containers without --network options get created within
bridge network only
To verify this you can run following commands -
docker run -it --rm --name=default-bridge-container1 busybox
As above command does not have --network option then it will be create container default-bridge-container1 under bridge network. To verify this, Run
docker network inspect bridge
Under containers section of inspect command, you will see container name default-bridge-container1 with IP assigned to it from bridge subnet.
Host - this option tells to use underlying host network
None - Container with --network=none means container is running in
isolation & it has no access to inward or outward network.
I have a network 10.0.0.0/24 with 1 Oracle db-host01 ip address 10.0.0.100 and 2 docker hosts Docker01 10.0.0.15 and Docker02 10.0.0.16 and swarm is configured. I have configured a overlay network "overnet" with network address 192.168.6.0/24.
I have executed the below cmd to run a web container on overlay network.
docker run -i -t -d -p 9090:6000 --name portal --network overnet portal:1.0
but the web container is ip address 192.168.6.2 is not communicating with Oracale DB 10.0.0.100.
I can ping DB ip 10.0.0.100 from web container.
how I can make communication possible and can run this container as service as well.
regards
Sohail
Overlay networks are not attachable by default, which means that standalone containers cannot use them.
You can specify that a network should be attachable using the --attachable flag, such as
$ docker network create -d overlay --attachable overnet
If you are unable to modify the network, create a service for your container using
docker service create --network overnet --publish 9090:6000 --name portal portal:1.0
at which point it will be able to use the overlay network.
I'm trying to setup some very simple networking between a pair of Docker containers and so far all the documentation I've seen is far more complex than for what I am trying to do.
My use case is simple:
Container 1 is already running and is listening on port 28016
Container 2 will start after container 1 and needs to connect to container 1 on port 28016.
I am aware I can set this up via Docker-Compose with ease, however Container 1 is long-lived and for this use case, I do not want to shut it down. Container 2 needs to start and automatically connect to container 1 via port 28016. Also, both containers are running on the same machine. I cannot figure out how to do this.
I've exposed 28016 in Container 1's dockerfile, and I'm running it with -p 28016:28016. What do I need to do for Container 2 to connect to Container 1?
There are a few ways of solving this. Most don't require you to publish the ports.
Using a user defined network
If you start your long-running container in a user-defined network, because then docker will handle
docker network create service-network
docker run --net=service-network --name Container1 service-image
If you then start your ephemeral container in the same network, it will be able to refer to the long-running container by name. E.g:
docker run --name Container2 --net=service-network ephemeral-image
Using the existing container network namespace
You can just run the ephemeral container inside the network namespace of the long running container:
docker run --name Container2 --net=container:Container1 ephemeral-image
In this case, the service would be available via localhost:28016.
Accessing the service on the host
Since you've published the service on the host with -p 28016:28016, you can refer to that access using the address of the host, which from inside the container is going to be the default gateway. You can get that with something like:
address=$(ip route | awk '$1 == "default" {print $3}')
And your service would be available on ${address}:28016.
Here are the steps to perform:
Create a network: docker network create my-net
Attach the network to the already running container: docker container attach <container-name> my-net
Start the new container with the --network my-net or with docker-compose add a network property:
...
networks:
- my-net
networks:
my-net:
external: true
The container should now be able to communicate using the container-name as a DNS host name
I create an overlay network successfully, but when I create a docker container using this network it fails:
docker run --net my_overlay --name test -it centos6 bash
docker: Error response from daemon: could not add veth pair inside the network sandbox: could not find an appropriate master "ov-000100-00d00" for "vethdee0c9b".
The node's ip address is 10.16.26.118 and the original start daemon command is:
/usr/bin/docker daemon \
--insecure-registry dockerhub.xxx.com \
--cluster-store=etcd://10.16.24.153:2379,10.16.24.152:2379,10.16.25.54:2379 \
--cluster-advertise=10.16.26.118:2379
The output from docker network ls is:
[root#sa-docker-test1.db01:~]# docker network ls
NETWORK ID NAME DRIVER SCOPE
30244c91aa3a bridge bridge local
1bbaecaa70af host host local
00d00c478d12 my_overlay overlay global
a112d2eb8504 net1 calico global
32a81070bb49 none null local
without use docker machine,I can't use the overlay network.
So,I turn to use calico network,this is easy to configure and easy to understand.