I want to show a list of artists in my app which the user will be able to search through. I'm not sure however how to save this in Firestore?
First I created a collection "searchLists" with a document for each DJ but that means a lot of document reads so that's out of the question.
Now I created a document called "artists" which has a field "artistsDictionary" which contains all the artists.
| searchLists (collection)
* artists (document)
- artistsArray (array)
0: (map)
name: "Artist 0" (string)
1: (map)
name: "Artist 1" (string)
2: (map)
name: "Artist 2" (string)
And I retrieve and parse the array as followed:
let docRef = db.collection("searchLists").document("artists")
docRef.getDocument { (document, error) in
if let document = document, document.exists {
guard let documentData = document.data() else { return }
let artistsDictionaryArray = documentData["artistsArray"] as? [[String: Any]] ?? []
let parsedArtists = artistsDictionaryArray.compactMap {
return SimpleArtist(dictionary: $0)
}
self.artistsArray = parsedArtists
} else {
print("Document does not exist")
}
}
(SimpleArtist is a struct containing a "name" field.)
And I mean, it works, but I'm still new to Firestore and this seems kinda off. Is it? Or is this how I should/could do it?
First I created a collection "searchLists" with a document for each DJ but that means a lot of document reads so that's out of the question.
This is the right approach, so you should go ahead with it.
Why do I say that?
According to the official documentation regarding modeling data in a Cloud Firestore database:
Cloud Firestore is optimized for storing large collections of small documents.
Storing data in an array is not a bad option but this is most likely used, let's say to store favorite djs. I say that because the documents have limits in Firestore. So there are some limits when it comes to how much data you can put into a document. According to the official documentation regarding usage and limits:
Maximum size for a document: 1 MiB (1,048,576 bytes)
As you can see, you are limited to 1 MiB total of data in a single document. When we are talking about storing text, you can store pretty much but as your array getts bigger, be careful about this limitation.
First off, Alexs' answer is 100% correct.
I want to add some additional data points that may help you in the long run.
The first item is arrays. Arrays are very challenging in NoSQL databases - while they provide a logical sequence data via the index, 0, 1, 2 they don't behave like an array in code - so for example; Suppose you wanted to insert an item at an index. Well - you can't (*you can but it's not just a simple 'insert' call). Also, you can't target array elements in queries which limits their usefulness. The smallest unit of change in a Firestore array field is the entire field - smaller changes to individual elements of a field can't be made. The fix is to not use arrays and to let FireStore create the documentID's for you data 'objects' on the fly e.g. the 'keys' to the node
The second issue - (which may not be an issue currently) is how the data is being handled. Suppose you release your app and a user has 2 million artists in their collection - with your code as is, all of that data is downloaded at one time which will probably not be the best UI experience but additionally, it could overwhelm the memory of the device. So working in 'chunks' of data it a lot easier on the device, and the user.
So I put together some sample code to help with that.
First a class to store your Artist data in. Just keeps track of the documentID and the artist name.
class ArtistClass {
var docId = ""
var name = ""
init(aDocId: String, aName: String) {
self.docId = aDocId
self.name = aName
}
}
and a class array to keep the artists in. This would be a potential dataSource for a tableView
var artistArray = [ArtistClass]()
This is to write an artist as a document instead of in an array. The documentID is a FireStore generated 'key' that's created for each artist.
func writeArtists() {
let artistsRef = self.db.collection("artists")
let floyd = [
"name": "Pink Floyd"
]
let zep = [
"name": "Led Zeppelin"
]
let who = [
"name": "The Who"
]
artistsRef.addDocument(data: floyd)
artistsRef.addDocument(data: zep)
artistsRef.addDocument(data: who)
}
and then function to read in all artists.
func readArtists() {
let artistsRef = self.db.collection("artists")
artistsRef.getDocuments() { (querySnapshot, err) in
if let err = err {
print("Error getting documents: \(err)")
} else {
for document in querySnapshot!.documents {
let docId = document.documentID
let name = document.get("name") as! String
let artist = ArtistClass(aDocId: docId, aName: name)
self.artistArray.append(artist)
}
for a in self.artistArray { //prints the artists to console
print(a.docId, a.name)
}
}
}
}
So your data in Firestore looks like this
artists (collection)
8lok0a0ksodPSSKS
name: "Let Zeppelin"
WKkookokopkdokas
name: "The Who"
uh99jkjekkkokoks
name: "Pink Floyd"
so then the cool part. Suppose you have a tableView that shows 10 artists at a time with a down button to see the next 10. Make this change
let artistsRef = self.db.collection("artists").order(by: "name").limit(to: 10)
Oh - and you'll notice the function of sorting now goes the server instead of the device - so if there's a million artists, it's sorted on the server before being delivered to the device which will be significantly faster.
You can also then more easily perform queries for specific artist data and you won't need to be as concerned about storage as each artist is their own document instead of all artists in one.
Hope that helps!
Related
Hey everybody this is my first time asking a question on here so if the posting is incorrect etc... i apologize in advance.
I'm working on a project where students at the university I go to will be able to request a Resident Advisor to unlock their rooms for them. I'm stuck on how to query the entire(root) collection to find a subcollection with a field that contains a value that matches my collection ID. I've seen a lot of resources on Stack, Firebase, and i've tried to implement them but I've had no succes.
Here's a picture:
Accessing the Subcollection
My code snippet is:
db.collectionGroup("Dorms").whereField("UID", isEqualTo: UID).getDocuments { (snapshot, error) in
// here is where i'd like to gather the fields subcollection/document and then store them as variables
Thank you in advance for any help and advice. It's greatly appreciated!
This is my first time posting an answer so I hope this is somewhat helpful, but in my experience when querying files in a collection I create a forloop then use if let statements to get variables from the document
var someVariable : Int
db.collectionGroup("Dorms").whereField("UID", isEqualTo: "UID").getDocuments { (snapshot, error) in
if let e = error {
//this is printing the error if there is one getting the documents
print("There was an error getting the documents \(e)")
} else {
if let dorms = snapshot?.documents { //accesses all the documents in the collection
for doc in dorms {
let data = doc.data() //Gets all the information in the document
//Here you would use an if let to create variables from the information in the data
//For example
if let dormRoomNumber = data["dormRoomNumber"]/*You'll put the name of your field in here, so whatever you have named it in firestore*/] as? Int //make sure the the data type here mathces the data type in your firestore database
{
someVariable = dormRoomNumber
}
}
}
}
}
My app has data that looks like this.
class ShelfCollection: Object {
let shelves: List<Shelf>
}
class Shelf: Object {
let items: List<Item>
}
class Item: Object {
var name: String
let infos: List<String>
}
I'm trying to get all shelves in a shelf collection where any items match the query either by name or by an element in their infos list. From my understanding this predicate should be correct, but it crashes.
let wildQuery = "*" + query + "*"
shelfResults = shelfCollection.shelves.filter(
"SUBQUERY(items, $item, $item.name LIKE[c] %# OR SUBQUERY($item.infos, $info, info LIKE[c] %#).#count > 0).#count > 0",
wildQuery, wildQuery
)
It complies as a NSPredicate, but crashes when Realm is attempting to parse it, throwing me
'RLMException', reason: 'Object type '(null)' not managed by the Realm'
I suspect the nested subquery might be what fails, but I don't know enough about NSPredicate to be sure. Is this an acceptable query, and how can I make it.. work?
This is an answer and a solution but there's going to be a number of issues with the way the objects are structured which may cause other problems. It was difficult to create a matching dataset since many objects appear within other objects.
The issue:
Realm cannot currently filter on a List of primitives
EDIT: Release 10.7 added support for filters/queries as well as aggregate functions on primitives so the below info is no longer completely valid. However, it's still something to be aware of.
so this Item property will not work for filtering:
let infos: List<String>
However, you can create another object that has a String property and filter on that object
class InfoClass: Object {
#objc dynamic var info_name = ""
}
and then the Item class looks like this
class Item: Object {
var name: String
let infos = List<InfoClass>()
}
and then you filter based on the InfoClass object, not it's string property. So you would have some objects
let info0 = InfoClass()
info0.info_name = "Info 0 name"
let info1 = InfoClass()
info1.info_name = "Info 1 name"
let info2 = InfoClass()
info2.info_name = "Info 2 name"
which are stored in the Item->infos list. Then the question
I'm trying to get all shelves in a shelf collection...
states you want to filter for a collection, c0 in this case, shelves whose items contain a particular info in their list. Lets say we want to get those shelves whose items have info2 in their list
//first get the info2 object that we want to filter for
guard let info2 = realm.objects(InfoClass.self).filter("info_name == 'Info 2 name'").first else {
print("info2 not found")
return
}
print("info2 found, continuing")
//get the c0 collection that we want to get the shelves for
if let c0 = realm.objects(ShelfCollection.self).filter("collection_name == 'c0'").first {
let shelfResults = c0.shelves.filter("ANY items.infoList == %#", info2)
for shelf in shelfResults {
print(shelf.shelf_name)
}
} else {
print("c0 not found")
}
I omitted filtering for the name property since you know how to do that already.
The issue here is the infos could appear in many items, and those items could appear in many shelf lists. So because of the depth of data, with my test data, it was hard to have the filter return discreet data - it would probably make more sense (to me) if I had example data to work with.
Either way, the answer works for this use case, but I am thinking another structure may be better but I don't know the full use case so hard to suggest that.
I want to update a field of an object that the object is into an array in firestore database with swift 4. These two function (arrayUnion() and arrayRemove() ) are not working for me.
here my Database schema:
enter image description here
I want to update "Status" field in The first array element.
Please help me.
first of all I want to thanks to #Doug Stevenson for his kindly response.
in my case, I must change the array of the objects to sub collections.
In a transaction, fetch the document, modify the field of the object as you see fit in memory on the client, then update that entire field back to the document.
I believe the question is:
how can I update a specific field that's stored within a document in
an array.
As long as you know the documentId to the document you want to update - here's the solution.
Assuming a structure similar to what's in the question
Friends (a collection)
0 (a document)
Name: "Simon"
Status: "Sent"
1
Name: "Garfunkle"
Status: "Unsent"
and say we want to change Garfunkle's status to Sent
I will include one function to read document 1, Garfunkle's and then a second fuction to update the Status to sent.
Read the document at index 1 and print it's fields - this function is just for testing to show the field's values before and after changing the status field.
func readFriendStatus() {
let docRef = self.db.collection("Friends").document("1")
docRef.getDocument(completion: { document, error in
if let document = document, document.exists {
let name = document.get("Name") ?? "no name"
let status = document.get("Status") ?? "no status"
print(name, status)
} else {
print("no document")
}
})
}
and the output
Garfunkle Unsent
then the code to update the Status field to Sent
func writeFriendStatus() {
let data = ["Status": "Sent"]
let docRef = self.db.collection("Friends").document("1")
docRef.setData(data, merge: true)
}
and the output
Garfunkle, Sent
First off, if you have a suggestion for a better title or actual question for this submission, please feel free to edit. I'm stuck as to how to succeed in asking this question.
So I've made gone through several Firebase chat (iMessage/ Facebook chat) tutorials for swift. I know how to send a message -
let ref = Database.database().reference().child("Message")
let childRef = ref.childByAutoId()
let toID = finalSelected.ContactID as Any
let fromID = Auth.auth().currentUser?.uid
let values = ["Message": messageTextField.text!, "toID": toID, "fromID": fromID!] as [String: Any]
childRef.updateChildValues(values) { (error, ref) in ...
and I know how to retrieve them -
let messagesOf = Auth.auth().currentUser?.uid
let messageDB = Database.database().reference().child("Message")
let userMessages = messageDB.queryOrdered(byChild: "toID").queryEqual(toValue: messagesOf)
userMessages.observeSingleEvent(of: .childAdded, with: { (snapshot) in
let values = snapshot.value as! Dictionary<String, String>
let message = values["Message"]
let from = values["fromID"]
let post = ChatMessages()
post.aMessage = message!
post.Interested = from!
self.messagesArray.append(post)
self.tableView.reloadData()
})
However, I'm having a difficult time finishing the logic. I don't understand how these two separate events combine into one identical end result - not two different transactions. Let me see if I can explain it further...
I send a message. I then receive this message as another user. But I do not understand how the to/from data is downloaded that references both simultaneously. Unless I'm looking overlooking some detail, doesn't the single or plural observation of an event only apply to one user? Or am I misunderstanding some concept here?
Help with this final concept would be fantastic. Thank You.
You now have a single list of chat messages, which is very similar to how you'd model this in a relations database. But Firebase is a NoSQL database, so you have better options for modeling chat.
The most common solution is to model chat rooms into your database. So if two users are chatting, then the messages between those two users will be in a "room node". And if two other users are also chatting, their messages will be in a separate room. The data model for this will look like:
chats: {
roomid1: {
messageid1: {
fromId: "UidOfSender1",
message: "Hello there user 2!"
},
messageid2: {
fromId: "UidOfSender2",
message: "Hey user 1. How are you?"
}
},
roomid2: {
messageid3: {
fromId: "UidOfSender2",
message: "Hi mom. Are you there?"
},
messageid4: {
fromId: "UidOfSender3",
message: "Hey there kiddo. Sup?"
}
}
}
So in here we have two chat rooms, the first one between user 1 and 2, and the second between users 2 and 3. If you think of your favorite messaging application, you can probably see how the rooms very directly map to the conversations you see.
Also note that you only need to keep the sender ID. The recipient(s) are are simply everyone else who is in this chat room.
That will likely be your next question: how do I know what rooms a user is in. To determine that, you'll want to keep a separate list of room IDs for each user:
userRooms: {
UidOfSender1: {
room1: true,
room2: true
},
UidOfSender2: {
room1: true
},
UidOfSender3: {
room2: true
}
}
So now you can see for each user in what rooms they are a participant. You can probably again see how this maps to the list of conversations when you start your favorite messaging app. To efficiently show such a list, you may want to keep some extra information for each room, such as the timestamp when the last message was posted.
Generating the room IDs is another interesting aspect of this model. In the past I've recommended to use the UIDs of the participants to determine the room ID, since that leads to a consistent, repeatable room ID. For an example if this, see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33540479/best-way-to-manage-chat-channels-in-firebase.
If you're new to NoSQL database, I recommend reading NoSQL data modeling. If you come from a SQL background, I recommend watching Firebase for SQL developers.
var newthing = "\(CurrentChatUserId) & \(otherDude)"
Ref.child("posts").child(newthing).queryOrderedByKey().observe(.childAdded, with: {snapshot in
if let dict = snapshot.value as? [String: AnyObject]
{
let mediaType = dict["MediaType"] as! String
let senderId = dict["senderId"] as! String
let senderName = dict["senderName"] as! String
self.obsereveUsers(id: senderId)
let text = dict["text"] as! String
self.messages.append(JSQMessage(senderId: senderId, displayName: senderName , text: text))
self.collectionView.reloadData()
}
})
You could do something like this, so in the database you have different sections for each conversation and at the start get all past messages, and get new ones when a new one is added.
I want to search my user base from each users name value. From what I've seen online people often return all users then filter them in a table view but that doesn't seem practical nor viable. My thought was to query data and return an exponentially smaller array of values but I am having trouble using the query methods provided.
How do I query a specific aspect of my database?
How do I structure my code so that it's viable; not loading in EVERY user, something like 10 max at a time.
Any suggestions, resources, and links are greatly appreciated.
EDIT:
I did some researching and it looks like Firebase comes with some built in querying methods... So far this is what I'm attempting to test it out with the code below to print out users starting with I, but I can't get it to print any users in the console
ref.queryOrderedByKey().queryStarting(atValue: "I").queryEnding(atValue: "I\u{f8ff}")
.observe(.childAdded, with: { snapshot in
print(snapshot.key)
})
There are a number of solutions and often times loading ALL of the user data is too much data.
Here's a typical users node
users
uid_0
name: "Jean Luc"
uid_1
name: "Will"
uid_2
name: "Geordi"
One option is to iterate through each user node, one at a time, to retrieve the user name. This avoids an enormous data set entirely. We'll use the .childAdded event to load each and store in an array
let usersRef = self.ref.child("users")
var userNamesArray = [String]()
usersRef.observe(.childAdded, with: { snapshot in
let userDict = snapshot.value as! [String: Any]
let name = userDict["name"] as! String
userNamesArray.append(name)
})
A second option is to store the user name in an entirely different node, which significantly reduces the 'clutter' as the rest of the data remains in the main users node
user_names
uid_0: "Jean Luc"
uid_1: "Will"
uid_2: "Geordi"
As you can see with this structure, even with thousands of names it's just text with a very small footprint.
Another option is to load X number of users at a time using .startingAt and .endingAt and iterate over the returned users to get each name. In this case we want all users starting with A and ending with M... Sorry Worf.
let usersRef = self.ref.child("users")
var userNamesArray = [String]()
let nameQuery = usersRef.queryOrdered(byChild: "name")
.queryStarting(atValue: "A")
.queryEnding(atValue: "M\u{f8ff}")
nameQuery.observe(.value, with: { snapshot in
for child in snapshot.children {
let snap = child as! DataSnapshot
let userDict = snap.value as! [String: Any]
let name = userDict["name"] as! String
userNamesArray.append(name)
}
})
The last example started with users names starting with A and ended with user names ending with M + a very high unicode character, which makes it inclusive for all names starting with M
The \uf8ff character used in the query above is a very high code point
in the Unicode range. Because it is after most regular characters in
Unicode, the query matches all values that start with queryString.