def siteNameChange():File={
for(line<-Source.fromFile("RecordedSimulation_0000_NewSiterequest2.txt").getLines())
if(line.contains("siteUrl"))
println(line)
return new File("RecordedSimulation_0000_NewSiterequest2.txt")
}
val scn = scenario("RecordedSimulation")
.exec(http("request_0")
.post(“/student/new”)
.body(RawFileBodyPart(session=>siteNameChange())).asJSON)
Hello I am a newbie to Gatling, using it for performance testing. I have a function named siteNameChange() which returns a file after doing some modifications on the file.
This function I am calling in the scenario body to send the data.
But when I am running the script I am getting scala:48:26: missing parameter type
.body(RawFileBodyPart(session=>siteNameChange())).asJSON)
Can some one please suggest whats the best thing to do this here, how to get the function return the modified file and pass the file data over the post request
body doesn't take a BodyPart (which is for multipart) parameter but a Body one.
You should be passing a RawFileBody.
Related
I have a test where after getting a response I would like to validate the entire schema of the response (not individual response node/value comparison).
Sample test:
[<Test>]
let howtoValidateSchema () =
let request = Request.createUrl Post "https://reqres.in/api/users"
|> Request.setHeader (Accept "application/json")
|> Request.bodyString """{"name": "morpheus",
"job": "leader"}"""
|> Request.responseAsString
|> run
Is there a way that I can save my expected Schema somewhere and once I get the response I do the comparison to check that response has same number of nodes (neither less nor more than expected schema)?
I am ok to opt for other libs like FSharp.Data if we there is no direct way in HttpFs.Client. I looked at FSharp.Data (https://fsharp.github.io/FSharp.Data/library/JsonProvider.html) but not able to seek how it meets the requirements where the schema comparison needs to be done with the savedExpectedSchemaJson=ResponseJson.
You can use Newtonsoft.Json.Schemato validate schemas:
open Newtonsoft.Json.Schema
open Newtonsoft.Json.Linq
let schema = JSchema.Parse expectedSchema
let json = JObject.Parse responeJson
let valid = json.IsValid schema
However this assumes you have a schema predefined somewhere. If you don't have such schema is best to use the JsonProvider who can infer it for you.
Run the call manually and save the result in a sample.json file and create a type using the JsonProvider:
type ResponseSchema = JsonProvider<"sample.json">
and you can use this type to parse any new content based on the sample (provided that the sample is a representative.
ResponseSchema.parse response
This won't validate the schema but will try to meet as best as it can given the input.
I am trying to change Xadow's baudrate of Uart and trying to do same thing on software PDF but everytime i get errors. I just need to know how should I write the syntax.
Here is the guide of the lua software on xadow's writer
config={}
config["bit"]=9
config["par"]=0
config["stop"]=1
config["bdr"]=9600
function uartData(uart_id,len,data)
print(data)
end
uart_id=uart.create(1,uartData(config))
uart_id = uart.create(port, cb_func [,param])
Param is an optional Lua table as described in the documentation.
You have to call:
uart_id = uart.create(1, uartData, config)
not
uart_id = uart.create(1, uartData(config))
uartData(config) would pass the return value of uartData (nil) to uart.create instead of the function variable uartData
You can simply wirte config.bit=9 instead of config["bit"]=9 btw.
I'm using Sysdig to capture some events and have a small chisel (LUA script) to capture and format the events as necessary. On the on_init() I'm requesting fields like so :
f_field = chisel.request_field("<field>")
My question is how can I check if a field exists before requesting it? I'm going to use a new field only just released on 0.24.1 but ideally I'd like my chisel to continue to work on older versions of sysdig without this field. I've tried wrapping the call to chisel.request_field in a pcall() like so :
ok, f_field = pcall(chisel.request_field("<field>"))
and even implementing my own "get_field" function :
function get_field(field)
ok, f = pcall(chisel.request_field(field))
if ok then return f else return nil end
end
f_field = get_field("<field>")
if f_field ~= nil then
-- do something
end
but the error ("chisel requesting nonexistent field <field>") persists.
I can't see a way to check if a field exists but I can't seem to handle the error either. I really don't want multiple versions of my scripts if possible.
Thanks
Steve H
You're almost there. Your issue is in how you're using pcall. Pcall takes a function value and any arguments you wish to call that function with. In your example you're passing the result of the request_field function call to pcall. Try this instead..
ok, f = pcall(chisel.request_field, "field")
pcall will call the chisel method with your args in a protected mode and catch any subsequent errors.
I have a RestXQ method:
declare
%rest:path("/doSomething")
%rest:POST
%rest:form-param("name","{$name}")
function page:doSomething($name as document-node())
{
(: Code... :)
};
I tried to send a POST request to this method via XForms. As response on the client I get [XPTY0004] Cannot convert empty-sequence() to document-node(): (). I tried to remove document-node() but then the parameter $name is just empty.
The request parameter looks like this:
<data xmlns=""><name>Test</name></data>
Any solutions?
The problem is that %rest:form-param("name","{$name}") is for key-value pairs, but your method indicates that you want $name as document-node(). Those two things together don't make sense.
Instead of the form-param you likely want the body of the POST request, for that you would use the following:
declare
%rest:path("/doSomething")
%rest:POST("{$body}")
function page:doSomething($body as document-node())
{
(: Code... :)
};
See http://www.adamretter.org.uk/papers/restful-xquery_january-2012.xhtml#media-example
I'm developing an app using Grails. I want to get length of array.
I got a wrong value. Here is my code,
def Medias = params.medias
println params.medias // I got [37, 40]
println params.medias.size() // I got 7 but it should be 2
What I did wrong ?
Thanks for help.
What is params.medias (where is it being set)?
If Grials is treating it as a string, then using size() will return the length of the string, rather than an array.
Does:
println params.medias.length
also return 7?
You can check what Grails thinks an object is by using the assert keyword.
If it is indeed a string, you can try the following code to convert it into an array:
def mediasArray = Eval.me(params.medias)
println mediasArray.size()
The downside of this is that Eval presents the possibility of unwanted code execution if the params.medias is provided by an end user, or can be maliciously modified outside of your compiled code.
A good snippet on the "evil (or lack thereof) of eval" is here if you're interested (not mine):
https://javascriptweblog.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/how-evil-is-eval/
I think 7 is result of length of the string : "[37,40]"
Seems your media variable is an array not a collection
Try : params.medias.length
Thanks to everyone. I've found my mistake
First of all, I sent an array from client and my params.medias returned null,so I converted it to string but it is a wrong way.
Finally, I sent and array from client as array and in the grails, I got a params by
params."medias[]"
List medias = params.list('medias')
Documentation: http://grails.github.io/grails-doc/latest/guide/single.html#typeConverters