DirectX 11, exception thrown when updating constant buffer with UpdateSubresource - buffer

So I am very new to DirectX and are trying to learn the basics but I'm running into some problem with my constant buffer. I'm trying to send a struct with three matrices to the vertex shader, but when I try to update the buffer with UpdateSubresource I get "Exception is thrown at 0x710B5DF3 (d3d11.dll) in Demo.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x0000003C".
My struct:
struct Matracies
{
DirectX::XMMATRIX projection;
DirectX::XMMATRIX world;
DirectX::XMMATRIX view;
};
Matracies matracies;
Buffer creation:
ID3D11Buffer* ConstantBuffer = nullptr;
D3D11_BUFFER_DESC Buffer;
memset(&Buffer, 0, sizeof(Buffer));
Buffer.BindFlags = D3D11_BIND_CONSTANT_BUFFER;
Buffer.Usage = D3D11_USAGE_DEFAULT;
Buffer.ByteWidth = sizeof(Matracies);
Buffer.CPUAccessFlags = D3D11_CPU_ACCESS_WRITE;
D3D11_SUBRESOURCE_DATA data;
data.pSysMem = &matracies;
data.SysMemPitch = 0;
data.SysMemSlicePitch = 0;
Device->CreateBuffer(&Buffer, &data, &ConstantBuffer);
DeviceContext->VSSetConstantBuffers(0, 1, &ConstantBuffer);
Updating buffer:
DeviceContext->UpdateSubresource(ConstantBuffer, 0, 0, &matracies, 0, 0);
I am not sure what information is relevant to solve this so let me know if anything is missing.

Welcome to the wooly world of DirectX!
The first two steps in debugging any DirectX program are:
(1) Enable the Debug device. See this blog post. This will generate additional debug output at runtime which gives hints about problems like the one you have above.
(2) If a function returns an HRESULT, you must check that for success or failure at runtime. If it was safe to ignore the return value, it would return void. See this page.
If you had done either or both of the above, you would have caught the error returned from CreateBuffer above which resulted in ConstantBuffer still being a nullptr when you called UpdateSubresource.
The reason it failed is that you can't in general create a constant buffer that is both D3D11_USAGE_DEFAULT and D3D11_CPU_ACCESS_WRITE. DEFAULT usage memory is often in video memory that is not accessible to the CPU. Since you are using UpdateSubresource as opposed to Map, you should just use:
Buffer.CPUAccessFlags = 0;
You should take a look at DirectX Tool Kit and it's associated tutorials.

Related

Vulkan Ray Tracing - Any Hit Shader doesn't write to buffer

I set up a minimal ray tracing pipeline in vulkan, with any and closest hit shaders that write into buffers and ray payloads.
The problem is that buffer writes from the any hit shader seem not to take effect.
Here is the source code for the closest hit shader:
layout(set = 0, binding = 0, std430) writeonly buffer RayStatusBuffer {
uint items[];
} gRayStatus;
layout(location = 0) rayPayloadInEXT uint gRayPayload;
void main(void)
{
gRayStatus.items[0] = 1;
gRayPayload = 2;
}
The any hit shader code is identical, except for writing 3 and 4 for ray status buffer item and ray payload, respectively.
The buffer associated with gRayStatus is initialized to 0 and fed to the pipeline with:
VkDescriptorSetLayoutBinding statusLB{};
statusLB.binding = 0;
statusLB.descriptorType = VK_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_STORAGE_BUFFER;
statusLB.descriptorCount = 1;
statusLB.stageFlags = VK_SHADER_STAGE_ANY_HIT_BIT_KHR | VK_SHADER_STAGE_CLOSEST_HIT_BIT_KHR;
By calling traceRayEXT(..., flags = 0, ...) from the raygen shader, I can read back the values 1 and 2 for ray status buffer item and ray payload, respectively and as expected.
But when calling traceRayEXT(..., flags = gl_RayFlagsSkipClosestHitShaderEXT, ...) I would expect the output of the any hit shader (3 and 4) to be present, but I get 0 and 4, as if the buffer write would have been ignored.
Any idea on this?
sorry for the late response.
From what I know, there could be two causes:
1° Any hit shaders are not called because of the flag VkGeometryFlagBitsKHR in the struct VkAccelerationStructureGeometryKHR used during the creation of a BLAS.
2° The conditions in which the any hit shaders are called. Look at this image helped me a lot: https://www.google.com/search?q=DxT+rtx+pipeline&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwiTko-Gv-f8AhXCsEwKHUILD4IQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=DxT+rtx+pipeline&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoECCMQJzoFCAAQgAQ6BggAEAUQHjoGCAAQCBAeOgQIABAeOgcIABCABBAYUKEPWIg5YPc5aAlwAHgAgAFmiAGyD5IBBDE4LjSYAQCgAQGqAQtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ8ABAQ&sclient=img&ei=06DTY9PcIMLhsgLClryQCA&bih=1067&biw=1920&client=firefox-b-d#imgrc=38W16ovqUoCyRM
As you can see from the picture an any shader shader is called only if the hit geometry is the closest and is not opaque

How to create render target views on swap chain with multiple frame buffers in directx 11

I'm trying to implement a swap chain with more than 1 back buffer, but I'm having troubles creating render target views for any buffer after the zero-th.
I create my swap chain like so:
IDXGIFactory1* idxgiFactory;
// D3D_CALL is just a macro that throws exception with info on error
D3D_CALL(CreateDXGIFactory1(__uuidof(IDXGIFactory1), &idxgiFactory));
DXGI_SWAP_CHAIN_DESC sd;
ZeroMemory(&sd, sizeof(sd));
sd.BufferCount = BUFFER_COUNT; // currently 2
sd.BufferDesc.Format = DXGI_FORMAT_B8G8R8A8_UNORM;
sd.BufferDesc.RefreshRate.Numerator = 0;
sd.BufferDesc.RefreshRate.Denominator = 0;
sd.BufferUsage = DXGI_USAGE_RENDER_TARGET_OUTPUT | D3D11_BIND_RENDER_TARGET;
sd.OutputWindow = window.GetHandle(); // wrapper for my window
sd.SampleDesc.Count = 4;
sd.SampleDesc.Quality = 1;
sd.SwapEffect = DXGI_SWAP_EFFECT_SEQUENTIAL;
sd.Windowed = TRUE;
D3D_CALL(idxgiFactory->CreateSwapChain(
m_HWDevice, // ptr to ID3D11Device
&sd,
&m_HWSwapChain));
It was working till now with single frame buffer with swap effect DISCARD, which is outdated and performs poorly according to MSDN.
After I create the swap chain I get the backbuffers and create views like so:
// this is called with buffer index from 0 till BUFFER_COUNT - 1
// 'm_RenderTarget' is simply an array of ID3D11Texture2D, where the size matches BUFFER_COUNT
D3D_CALL(m_HWSwapChain->GetBuffer(bufferIndex, __uuidof(ID3D11Texture2D), (LPVOID*)&m_RenderTarget[bufferIndex]));
// I then attempt to create the RTV like so:
ID3D11RenderTargetView* rtv = NULL;
D3D_CALL(m_HWDevice->CreateRenderTargetView(m_RenderTarget[bufferIndex], NULL, &rtv));
The code about creating render target views works fine for 'bufferIndex' 0, but on index 1 I get following error:
D3D11 ERROR: ID3D11Device::CreateRenderTargetView: A render-target view cannot be made on a read-only resource. (Perhaps a DXGI_SWAP_CHAIN buffer other than buffer 0?) [ STATE_CREATION ERROR #135: CREATERENDERTARGETVIEW_INVALIDDESC]
I assume from this I have to use a D3D11_RENDER_TARGET_VIEW_DESC and fill the D3D11_BUFFER_RTV structure inside? No idea how to setup this though and could not find any examples.
I tried to create RTV with descriptor like so:
D3D11_RENDER_TARGET_VIEW_DESC rtvDesc;
ZeroMemory(&rtvDesc, sizeof(rtvDesc));
rtvDesc.Buffer.NumElements = BUFFER_COUNT;
rtvDesc.Buffer.FirstElement = 0;
rtvDesc.Buffer.ElementOffset = size.x * size.y * 4; // dimensions of my back buffer * 4 bytes per pixel
rtvDesc.Buffer.ElementWidth = 4; // 4 bytes per pixel in DXGI_FORMAT_B8G8R8A8_UNORM
This gives error:
D3D11 ERROR: ID3D11Device::CreateRenderTargetView: The ViewDimension in the View Desc incompatible with the type of the Resource. [ STATE_CREATION ERROR #129: CREATESHADERRESOURCEVIEW_INVALIDRESOURCE]
Not sure what I'm missing here.
I had a bit of a misunderstanding how this works. Some key pieces of information I was missing:
*
If the swap chain's swap effect is either DXGI_SWAP_EFFECT_SEQUENTIAL
or DXGI_SWAP_EFFECT_FLIP_SEQUENTIAL, only the swap chain's zero-index
buffer can be read from and written to. The swap chain's buffers with
indexes greater than zero can only be read from; so if you call the
IDXGIResource::GetUsage method for such buffers, they have the
DXGI_USAGE_READ_ONLY flag set.
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/dxgi/nf-dxgi-idxgiswapchain-getbuffer
Another key point is that dx11 manages frame buffers automatically. I was trying to get all frame buffers and write to them accordingly. Apperently I only ever need the 0th frame buffer once, create a view to it and only care about that. The rest will be managed automatically behind the scenes by dx11. That is not the case for dx12.
Related question: Does the backbuffer that a RenderTargetView points to automagically change after Present?

How to know the size of one AVPacket in ffmpeg?

I am using ffmpeg library. I want to know how much memory one packet can take.
I debug to check the members in on AVPacket, and none of them seem reasonable, such as AVPacket.size, ec.
If you provide your own data buffer, it needs to have a size of mininum FF_MIN_BUFFER_SIZE. You would then set the AVPacket.size to the allocated size, and AVPacket.data to the memory you've allocated.
Note that all FFmpeg decoding routine will simply fail if you provide your own buffer and it's too small.
The other possibility, is let FFmpeg calculates the optimal size for you.
Then do something like:
AVPacket pkt;
pkt.size = 0;
pkt.data = NULL; // <-- the critical part is there
int got_output = 0;
ret = avcodec_encode_audio2(ctx, &pkt, NULL, &got_output);
and provide this AVPacket to the encoding codec. Memory will be allocated automatically.
You will have to call av_free_packet upon return from the encoder and if got_output is set to 1.
FFmpeg will automatically free the AVPacket content in case of error.
AVPacket::size holds the size of the referenced data. Because it is a generic container for data, there can be no definite answer to the question
how much memory one packet can take
It can actually take from zero to a lot. Everything depends on data type, codec and other related parameters.
From FFmpeg examples:
static void audio_encode_example(const char *filename)
{
// ...
AVPacket pkt;
// ...
ret = avcodec_encode_audio2(c, &pkt, NULL, &got_output);
// ...
if (got_output) {
fwrite(pkt.data, 1, pkt.size, f); // <<--- AVPacket.size
av_free_packet(&pkt);
}

How to convert an FFMPEG AVFrame in YUVJ420P to AVFoundation cVPixelBufferRef?

I have an FFMPEG AVFrame in YUVJ420P and I want to convert it to a CVPixelBufferRef with CVPixelBufferCreateWithBytes. The reason I want to do this is to use AVFoundation to show/encode the frames.
I selected kCVPixelFormatType_420YpCbCr8BiPlanarVideoRange and tried converting it since the AVFrame has the data in three planes
Y480 Cb240 Cr240. And according to what I've researched this matches the selected kCVPixelFormatType. By being biplanar I need to convert it into a buffer that contains Y480 and CbCr480 Interleaved.
I tried to create a buffer with 2 planes:
frame->data[0] on the first plane,
frame->data[1] and frame->data[2] interleaved on the second plane.
However, I'm getting return error -6661 (invalid a) from CVPixelBufferCreateWithBytes:
"Invalid function parameter. For example, out of range or the wrong type."
I don't have expertise on image processing at all, so any pointers to documentation that can get me started in the right approach to this problem are appreciated. My C skills aren't top of the line either so maybe I'm making a basic mistake here.
uint8_t **buffer = malloc(2*sizeof(int *));
buffer[0] = frame->data[0];
buffer[1] = malloc(frame->linesize[0]*sizeof(int));
for(int i = 0; i<frame->linesize[0]; i++){
if(i%2){
buffer[1][i]=frame->data[1][i/2];
}else{
buffer[1][i]=frame->data[2][i/2];
}
}
int ret = CVPixelBufferCreateWithBytes(NULL, frame->width, frame->height, kCVPixelFormatType_420YpCbCr8BiPlanarVideoRange, buffer, frame->linesize[0], NULL, 0, NULL, cvPixelBufferSample)
The frame is the AVFrame with the rawData from FFMPEG Decoding.
My C skills aren't top of the line either so maybe im making a basic mistake here.
You're making several:
You should be using CVPixelBufferCreateWithPlanarBytes(). I do not know if CVPixelBufferCreateWithBytes() can be used to create a planar video frame; if so, it will require a pointer to a "plane descriptor block" (I can't seem to find the struct in the docs).
frame->linesize[0] is the bytes per row, not the size of the whole image. The docs are unclear, but the usage is fairly unambiguous.
frame->linesize[0] refers to the Y plane; you care about the UV planes.
Where is sizeof(int) from?
You're passing in cvPixelBufferSample; you might mean &cvPixelBufferSample.
You're not passing in a release callback. The documentation does not say that you can pass NULL.
Try something like this:
size_t srcPlaneSize = frame->linesize[1]*frame->height;
size_t dstPlaneSize = srcPlaneSize *2;
uint8_t *dstPlane = malloc(dstPlaneSize);
void *planeBaseAddress[2] = { frame->data[0], dstPlane };
// This loop is very naive and assumes that the line sizes are the same.
// It also copies padding bytes.
assert(frame->linesize[1] == frame->linesize[2]);
for(size_t i = 0; i<srcPlaneSize; i++){
// These might be the wrong way round.
dstPlane[2*i ]=frame->data[2][i];
dstPlane[2*i+1]=frame->data[1][i];
}
// This assumes the width and height are even (it's 420 after all).
assert(!frame->width%2 && !frame->height%2);
size_t planeWidth[2] = {frame->width, frame->width/2};
size_t planeHeight[2] = {frame->height, frame->height/2};
// I'm not sure where you'd get this.
size_t planeBytesPerRow[2] = {frame->linesize[0], frame->linesize[1]*2};
int ret = CVPixelBufferCreateWithPlanarBytes(
NULL,
frame->width,
frame->height,
kCVPixelFormatType_420YpCbCr8BiPlanarVideoRange,
NULL,
0,
2,
planeBaseAddress,
planeWidth,
planeHeight,
planeBytesPerRow,
YOUR_RELEASE_CALLBACK,
YOUR_RELEASE_CALLBACK_CONTEXT,
NULL,
&cvPixelBufferSample);
Memory management is left as an exercise to the reader, but for test code you might get away with passing in NULL instead of a release callback.

View GPU Memory / View Texture2D memory space for debugging

I've got a question about a PixelShader I am trying to implement, and what I currently do (this is just for debugging, and trying to figure stuff out):
int3 loc;
loc.x = (int)(In.TextureUV.x * resolution_XY.x);
loc.y = (int)(In.TextureUV.x * resolution_XY.x);
loc.z = 0;
float4 r = g_txDiffuse.Load(loc);
return float4(r.x, r.y, r.z, 1);
The point is, this is always 0,0,0,1
The texture buffer is created:
D3D11_TEXTURE2D_DESC tDesc;
tDesc.Height = 480;
tDesc.Width = 640;
tDesc.Usage = D3D11_USAGE_DYNAMIC;
tDesc.MipLevels = 1;
tDesc.ArraySize = 1;
tDesc.SampleDesc.Count = 1;
tDesc.SampleDesc.Quality = 0;
tDesc.Format = DXGI_FORMAT_R8_UINT;
tDesc.CPUAccessFlags = D3D11_CPU_ACCESS_WRITE;
tDesc.BindFlags = D3D11_BIND_SHADER_RESOURCE;
tDesc.MiscFlags = 0;
V_RETURN(pd3dDevice->CreateTexture2D(&tDesc, NULL, &g_pCurrentImage));
I upload the texture (which should be a live display at the end) via:
D3D11_MAPPED_SUBRESOURCE resource;
pd3dImmediateContext->Map(g_pCurrentImage, 0, D3D11_MAP_WRITE_DISCARD, 0, &resource);
memcpy( resource.pData, g_Images.GetData(), g_Images.GetDataSize() );
pd3dImmediateContext->Unmap( g_pCurrentImage, 0 );
I've checked the resource.pData, the data in there is a valid 8bit monochrome image. I made sure the data coming from the camera is 8bit monochrome 640x480.
There's a few things I don't fully understand:
if I run the Map / memcpy / Unmap routine in every frame, the driver will ultimately crash, the system will be unresponsive. Is there a different way to update a complete texture every frame which should be done?
the texture I uploaded is 8bit, why is the Texture2D.load() a float4 return? Do I have to use a different method to access the texture data? I tried to .sample it, but that didn't work either. Would I have to use a int buffer or something instead?
is there a way to debug the GPU memory, to check if the memcpy worked in the first place?
The Map, memcpy, Unmap really ought not to crash unless2 you are trying to copy too much data into the texture. It would be interesting to know what "GetDataSize()" returns. Does it equal 307,200? If its more than that then there lies your problem.
Texture2D returns a float4 because thats what you've asked for. If you write float r = g_txDiffuse.Load( ... ). The 8-bits get extended to a normalised float as part of the load process. Are you sure, btw, that your calculation of "loc" is correct because as you have it now loc.x and loc.y will always be the same.
You can debug whats going on with DirectX using PIX. Its a great tool and I highly recommend you familiarise yourself with it.

Resources