I'd like to insert 2 column wide fields under each other. I tried with embedded arrays but was not successful.
So basically from:
a 1 e 5
b 2 f 6
c 3
I would like to get:
a 1
b 2
c 3
e 5
f 6
I tried with
={{A:A,B:B};{C:C,D:D}}
but could not get it working, however
={{A:A,B:B},{C:C,D:D}}
put the columns the same as they were so its intresting that with ; its not working.
The blocks are always 2 column wide but the rows are different length
Thanks for your help in advance!
Try:
=filter({A:B;C:D},{A:A;C:C}<>"")
This will return rows where Columns A or C are not blank.
Just under c assuming a is in A1:
=ArrayFormula(C1:D2)
You're not going to find a clean built-in formulaic solution to this one that doesn't utilize some sort of built-in magic auto expansion (like pnuts's answer). Here is my approach using OFFSET that will also work in Microsoft Excel.
In two columns, copy this formula.
=OFFSET($A$1,(ROW()-ROW($G$1))/2,IF(MOD(ROW()-ROW($G$1),2)=1,2,0))
In the second column, modify the formula, adding 1 to the column offset parameter:
=OFFSET($A$1,(ROW()-ROW($G$1))/2,1+IF(MOD(ROW()-ROW($G$1),2)=1,2,0))
where $A$1 is replaced with the address of the top left of your range and $G$1 is the starting location of your output range. This should be resistant to auto-update of formulas from range insertions and deletions (which I despise butchering my formulae and conditional formatting rules) by using only the bare number of references, which are all absolute.
This works by dividing the row offset from your starting position by 2 and rounding down (via an implicit cast to integer when used as a parameter to the OFFSET function) to get the row number of your input range. Then it shifts over 2 columns on every odd row to get data from the second column pair.
Note this is not a size-aware function, so it interweaves the second column pair:
a 1
e 5
b 2
f 6
c 3
Related
My intention is to convert a single line of data into rows consist of a specific number of columns in Google Sheets.
For example, starting with the raw data:
A
B
C
D
E
F
1
id1
attr1-1
attr2-1
id2
attr2-1
attr2-2
And the expected result is:
(by dividing columns by three)
A
B
C
1
id1
attr1-1
attr1-2
2
id2
attr2-1
attr2-2
I already know that it's possible a bit manually, like:
=ARRAYFORMULA({A1:C1;D1:F1})
But I have to start over with it every time the target range is moved OR the subset size needs to be changed (in the case above it was three)!
So I guess there will be a much more graceful way (i.e. formula does not require manual update) to do the same thing and suspect ARRAYFORMULA() is the key.
Any help will be appreciated!
I added a new sheet ("Erik Help") where I reduced your manually entered parameters from two to one (leaving only # of columns to be entered in A2).
The formula that reshapes the grid:
=ArrayFormula(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(SEQUENCE(ROUNDUP(COUNTA(7:7)/A2),A2),{SEQUENCE(COUNTA(7:7),1),FLATTEN(FILTER(7:7,7:7<>""))},2,FALSE)))
SEQUENCE is used to shape the grid according to whatever is entered in A2. Rows would be the count of items in Row 7 divided by the number in A2 (rounded to the nearest whole number); and the columns would just be whatever number is entered in A2.
Example: If there are 11 items in Row 7 and you want 4 columns, ROUNDUP(11/4)=3 rows to the SEQUENCE and your requested 4 columns.
Then, each of those numbers in the grid is VLOOKUP'ed in a virtual array consisting of a vertical SEQUENCE of ordered numbers matching the number of data pieces in Row 7 (in Column 1) and a FLATTENed (vertical) version of the Row-7 data pieces themselves (in Column 2). Matches are filled into the original SEQUENCE grid, while non-matches are left blank by IFERROR
Though it's a bit messy, managed to get it done thanks to SEQUENCE() function anyway.
It constructs a grid by accepting number of rows/columns input, and that was exactly I was looking for.
For reference set up a sheet with the sample data here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p972tYlsPvC6nM39qLNjYRZZWGZYsUnGaA7kXyfJ8F4/edit#gid=0
Use a custom formula
Although you already solved this. If you are doing this kind of thing a lot, it could be beneficial to look into Apps Script and custom formulas.
In this case you could use something like:
function transposeSingleRow(range, size) {
// initialize new range
let newRange = []
// initialize counter to keep track
let count = 0;
// start while loop to go through row (range[0])
while (count < range[0].length){
// add a slice of the original range to the new range
newRange.push(
range[0].slice(count, count + size)
);
// increment counter
count += size;
}
return newRange;
}
Which works like this:
The nice thing about the formula here is that you select the range, and then you put in a number to represent its throw, or how many elements make up a complete row. So if instead of 3 attributes you had 4, instead of calling:
=transposeSingleRow(A7:L7, 3)
you could do:
=transposeSingleRow(A7:L7, 4)
Additionally, if you want this conversion to be permanent and not dependent on formula recalculation. Making it in run fully in Apps Script without using formulas would be neccesary.
Reference
Apps Script
Custom Functions
This may be far more simple than I think. What I'm trying to do is use the ArrayFormula to copy an existing formula to all the rows in a particular column.
To begin with, I have several columns along the lines of:
What I'm doing is adding the first three numbers and multiplying them by the fourth. I also have an IF condition in which, if the fourth column is blank, I leave the value in column 5 blank.
Now, I'm trying to convert this to an ArrayFormula to repeat this for all the rows in column 5.
So I went from:
=IF(ISBLANK(E2)=TRUE,,SUM((B2+C2+D2)*E2))
to this:
=ArrayFormula(IF(ISBLANK(E2:E)=TRUE,,SUM((B2+C2+D2)*E2)))
But what this does is, when I add a new row, ALL of the values in column 5 are set to the same value. Here is an example:
So, my first thought was to set the range on the SUM formula and change it to:
=ArrayFormula(IF(ISBLANK(E2:E)=TRUE,,SUM((B2:B+C2:C+D2:C)*E2:E)))
But that just makes all the values to sum of all of what the individual values should be...so, in my example, it works out to 435 (60 + 135 + 240).
What am I doing wrong here? The values in column 5 should be different in each row (e.g., row 2 should be 135 and row 3 should be 240).
Thanks!
use:
=ARRAYFORMULA(IF(ISBLANK(E2:E)=TRUE,, (B2:B+C2:C+D2:D)*E2:E))
SUM is not supported under AF
Here's my problem: I have 2 sheets in my document (lets call them Sheet 1 and Sheet 2). They contain similar stuff and both look like this (Names may differ, as well as values):
Column A, C, D and F contain times (in m:ss).
Column B and E both calculate the time-difference between NameX and NameY and add ">, < or ~ ~" depending on the actual difference (ignore the coloring).
Now here comes my problem: I want to find 3 minima (on Sheet 3).
Minimum 1 is easy, as I can just use this function (it automatically filters out column B and E):
MIN('Sheet 1'!A2:F2, 'Sheet 2'!A2:F2)
Minimum 2 and 3 are were I struggle.
Minimum 2: Using the example values, I want to find the minimum of (1:01+1:02), (1:02+1:05), (1:01+1:01) and (1:01+1:02) (+ whatever times are on sheet 2). Result should be 2:02.
Minimum 3: Again, using the example values, I want to find the minimum of (1:01+1:02+1:03), (1:02+1:05+0:30), (1:01+1:01+1:12) and (1:01+1:02+2:02) (+ whatever times are on sheet 2). Result should be 2:37.
I am currently using this formula (for minimum 3):
=MIN(
IFERROR(FILTER(IFERROR(ARRAYFORMULA({'Sheet 1'!A2:F2}+{'Sheet 1'!A3:F3}+{'Sheet 1'!A4:F4})),
IFERROR(ARRAYFORMULA({'Sheet 1'!A2:F2}+{'Sheet 1'!A3:F3}+{'Sheet 1'!A4:F4}))<>0)),
IFERROR(FILTER(IFERROR(ARRAYFORMULA({'Sheet 2'!A2:F2}+{'Sheet 2'!A3:F3}+{'Sheet 2'!A4:F4})),
IFERROR(ARRAYFORMULA({'Sheet 2'!A2:F2}+{'Sheet 2'!A3:F3}+{'Sheet 2'!A4:F4}))<>0))
)
Some notes: The inner IFERROR-function is needed to filter out errors that obviously occur when trying to add up column B and E. FILTER-function filters out columns that are empty (there's none in this example). The second IFERROR-function filters out FILTER-functions that return an error when they get no input at all (all columns in a sheet are empty). I want to filter of these since I don't want to get 0:00 as result
My problem is this: In my actual sheet I have 11 sheets with 16 rows to add up, but I don't want to use the formula above and create an insane monster of a formula that would x-times as long as the formula above.
So my question is: Is there an easier way to solve this problem for mimimum 3 (and therefore 4, 5, 6 ...) that I'm not seeing?
It's a little monstrous, but this might work:
=MIN(FILTER({
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet1!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet1!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet2!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet2!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet3!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet3!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet4!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet4!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet5!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet5!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet6!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet6!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet7!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet7!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet8!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet8!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet9!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet9!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet10!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet10!A2:F));
MMULT(SEQUENCE(1,ROWS(Sheet11!A2:F),1,0),N(Sheet11!A2:F))},
{1,0,1,1,0,1}))
I'm trying to find the inverse rank within categories using an ArrayFormula. Let's suppose a sheet containing
A B C
---------- -----
1 0.14 2
1 0.26 3
1 0.12 1
2 0.62 2
2 0.43 1
2 0.99 3
Columns A:B are input data, with an unknown number of useful rows filled-in manually. A is the classifier categories, B is the actual measurements.
Column C is the inverse ranking of B values, grouped by A. This can be computed for a single cell, and copied to the rest, with e.g.:
=1+COUNTIFS($B$2:$B,"<" & $B2, $A$2:$A, "=" & $A2)
However, if I try to use ArrayFormula:
=ARRAYFORMULA(1+COUNTIFS($B$2:$B,"<" & $B2:$B, $A$2:$A, "=" & $A2:$A))
It only computes one row, instead of filling all the data range.
A solution using COUNT(FILTER(...)) instead of COUNTIFS fails likewise.
I want to avoid copy/pasting the formula since the rows may grow in the future and forgetting to copy again could cause obscure miscalculations. Hence I would be glad for help with a solution using ArrayFormula.
Thanks.
I don't see a solution with array formulas available in Sheets. Here is an array solution with a custom function, =inverserank(A:B). The function, given below, should be entered in Script Editor (Tools > Script Editor). See Custom Functions in Google Sheets.
function inverserank(arr) {
arr = arr.filter(function(r) {
return r[0] != "";
});
return arr.map(function(r1) {
return arr.reduce(function(rank, r2) {
return rank += (r2[0] == r1[0] && r2[1] < r1[1]);
}, 1);
});
}
Explanation: the double array of values in A:B is
filtered, to get rid of empty rows (where A entry is blank)
mapped, by the function that takes every row r1 and then
reduces the array, counting each row (r2) only if it has the same category and smaller value than r1. It returns the count plus 1, so the smallest element gets rank 1.
No tie-breaking is implemented: for example, if there are two smallest elements, they both get rank 1, and there is no rank 2; the next smallest element gets rank 3.
Well this does give an answer, but I had to go through a fairly complicated manoeuvre to find it:
=ArrayFormula(iferror(VLOOKUP(row(A2:A),{sort({row(A2:A),A2:B},2,1,3,1),row(A2:A)},4,false)-rank(A2:A,A2:A,true),""))
So
Sort cols A and B with their row numbers.
Use a lookup to find where those sorted row numbers now are: their position gives the rank of that row in the original data plus 1 (3,4,2,6,5,7).
Return the new row number.
Subtract the rank obtained just by ranking on column A (1,1,1,4,4,4) to get the rank within each group.
In the particular case where the classifiers (col A) are whole numbers and the measurements (col B) are fractions, you could just add the two columns and use rank:
=ArrayFormula(iferror(rank(A2:A+B2:B,if(A2:A<>"",A2:A+B2:B),true)-rank(A2:A,A2:A,true)+1,""))
My version of an array formula, it works when column A contains text:
=ARRAYFORMULA(RANK(ARRAY_CONSTRAIN(VLOOKUP(A1:A,{UNIQUE(FILTER(A1:A,A1:A<>"")),ROW(INDIRECT("a1:a"&COUNTUNIQUE(A1:A)))},2,)*1000+B1:B,COUNTA(A1:A),1),ARRAY_CONSTRAIN(VLOOKUP(A1:A,{UNIQUE(FILTER(A1:A,A1:A<>"")),ROW(INDIRECT("a1:a"&COUNTUNIQUE(A1:A)))},2,)*1000+B1:B,COUNTA(A1:A),1),1) - COUNTIF(A1:A,"<"&OFFSET(A1,,,COUNTA(A1:A))))
I'm new to Sheets and I don't know any terminology yet so I wasn't sure how to look this up.
If I have:
A1[=SUM(B1:1)]
How do I automatically copy that to A2 so that:
A2[=SUM(B2:2)]
And the same thing continues either indefinitely or until I declare a stopping point?
First of all, if you simply copy-paste the formula from A1 to A2 (or several cells below), it will automatically change as you want. This is how relative references work.
But it's also possible to get all the sums with one formula.
The following formula, entered in A1, will create sums of the first seven row in column A. To change the number of rows summed, replace 7 in B1:7 with another number.
=arrayformula(mmult(B1:7 + 0, transpose(B1:1 * 0 + 1)))
Explanation:
B1:7 + 0 coerces the entries to numbers (so that blank cells become 0).
transpose(B1:1 * 0 + 1) creates a column vector of 1s of suitable size.
matrix multiplication mmult by a column of 1s amounts to summing each row.
the wrapper arrayformula indicates that the operations are to be done on arrays.