Anonymous controllers in Rails - ruby-on-rails

I am currently learning to test with rspec (ruby on rails) (it's safe to assume I know very little), and am a bit stuck when it comes to testing with anonymous controllers. I tried googling it, but I feel like it doesn't give me what I'm looking for. So basically, what is an anonymous controller and why (or when) do I want one?
Thanks in advance

The main reason you would want to use an anonymous controller is that you are developing reusable library code (a gem) thats meant to plug into any arbitrary controller.
For example this base controller class to dry the common CRUD boilerplate code:
module MyGem
class ResourcefulController < ::ActionController::Base
before_action :set_resource, only: [:show, :edit, :update, :destroy]
def show
end
private
def derive_resource_class_name
self.class.name.demodulize.chomp('Controller').singularize
end
def resource_class
derive_resource_class_name.constantize
end
def set_resource
#resource = resource_class.find(params[:id])
end
end
end
The normal way of testing this would require that we create a controller and a route just for the test itself.
By using an anonymous controller we can get around that:
require 'rails_helper'
RSpec.describe MyGem::ResourcefulController, type: :controller do
controller do
def show
render plain: #resource
end
end
before do
model = Class.new do
def self.find(id)
"You found me"
end
end
stub_const("Resourceful", model)
end
it "derives the resource class from the name of the controller" do
get :show, params: { id: 1 }
expect(response.body).to eq "You found me"
end
end
RSpec also cleverly creates stub routes for the normal CRUD actions.
But for normal Rails application code its not very useful at all - parent classes (or included modules) are better tested by creating a request or feature spec that covers the actual behaviour in the end product. This lets you create a failing spec, get to green and then refactor.

Related

Rails engine testing controller using helper method of main app in rspec

I have one main rails app, and I have an engine within it, now the engine has a different test, I need to test one controller which is using main app MailerHelper module. How can I access in my spec.
My engine's user controller
module ControlPanel
class UserController < ApplicationController
include MailerHelper
def index
#users = User.all
end
end
end
I am using MailerHelper have many other methods which sent mails. As this is controller is in my engine control panel, following is specification in my engine
require 'rails_helper'
describe ControlPanel::UsersController, type: :controller do
describe '#index' do
it 'should display all users' do
get :index
expect(response).to render_template('index')
end
end
end
The test case is just simple, but as in my engines User controller I am using my main application helper, so it can't take it, I have seen many replies but nothing working, like including in rails_spec and ::MailerHelper etc.

How to test the AdminController when it has no actions?

My AdminController looks like:
class AdminController < ApplicationController
before_action :check_admin
private
def check_admin
redirect_to 'home/error' unless current_user.admin?
end
end
In my rspec test, how can I test this if there are no route or views?
require 'rails_helper'
RSpec.describe AdminController, type: :controller do
context "with no render_views" do
it "redirects for non-admin users" do
#???expect do
end
end
end
I am assuming that you are using a before_action in your AdminController, even though this controller does not have any actions, so that any controllers that inherit from it will automatically by "admin only".
If so, there are two ways to approach testing this.
1) Don't write a test for check_admin.
Instead, write tests for any controller actions that you define later! For example, if you have the following controller in your application tomorrow:
UsersController < AdminController
def index
#users = User.all
end
end
then you can write the following specs for that controller.
describe UsersController
it 'redirects for non-admins' do
# insert the test you feel like writing here!
end
it 'renders the right template for admin users' do
magical_login_method
get :index
expect(response).to render_template(:index)
end
end
and so on!
2) Call the private method directly
This approach makes me feel a bit icky. Although this defeats the philosophy of public vs private methods, you can call a private method in ruby by using the .send method.
describe AdminController
it 'redirects for non-admins' do
# make an instance of your controller
controller = AdminController.new
# expect the controller to call `redirect_to`
expect(controller).to receive(:redirect_to).with('home/error')
# call the private `check_admin` method
controller.send(:check_admin)
end
end
Some, perhaps many, would argue that this sort of testing is highly intrusive, and may even limit the flexibility of your codebase in the future. I'd recommend approach 1, not because it's lazy, but because it tests things once there's something to test!

Rails: how to write an anonymous spec controller to test authorisation

I have a controller, AdminController, which sets the various authorisation levels for the rest of the CMS. Because there are no controller actions, just methods, I began to research ways to test these against controllers.
The conclusion I came to was that they needed to be tested independently of the controllers they are used in (I want to to steer clear of integration testing if possible, like capybara etc).
I found some articles like this one to help me along.
So far I have written this spec which is failing with the errors below. I am not sure about it to be honest and wanted to here what SO community had to say on what I am trying to achieve.
describe AdminController do
controller do
before_filter :authorize_fixture_uploader!
def index
render text: 'Hello World'
end
end
let(:admin){FactoryGirl.create(:admin)}
describe "authentication" do
before do
sign_in admin
allow(controller).to receive(:current_admin).and_return(admin)
end
describe "authorize_fixture_uploader! helper" do
context "signed in" do
before do
allow(:admin).to receive(:authorize_fixture_uploader!).and_return(false)
get :index
end
it "redirects do admin_home_path" do
expect(response).to redirect_to admin_home_path
end
end
end
end
end
and here is the controller
class AdminController < ApplicationController
before_filter :authenticate_admin!
def authorize_fixture_uploader!
unless current_admin.fixture_uploader?
return redirect_to(admin_home_path)
end
end
end
This test is giving me the error
1) AdminController authentication authorize_fixture_uploader! helper signed in redirects do admin_home_path
Failure/Error: allow(:admin).to receive(:authorize_fixture_uploader?).and_return(false)
TypeError:
can't define singleton
I am worried its because my whole approach to this is wrong. Help would most certainly be appreciated.
Updated thanks to #blelump's answer.
I had a type which was causing the first issue. But Now I am getting error
undefined method `authorize_fixture_uploader?' for #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_1::Nested_1::Nested_1::Nested_1:0x007f9357857108>
The logic behind this i throwing me a bit. How am I to test these methods independent of the controllers they are used?
You have a typo:
allow(:admin).to receive(:authorize_fixture_uploader!).and_return(false)
Now you're trying to add authorize_fixture_uploader! to Symbol. Just start with controller variable:
allow(controller).to receive(:authorize_fixture_uploader!).and_return(false)
Aside from the poor attention detail highlight by blelump above, the real flaw in my approach was the lack of routes. I found a very useful article from pivotal labs http://pivotallabs.com/adding-routes-for-tests-specs-with-rails-3/ which saved the day.
Read the article, but it essentially boils down to this.
require 'spec_helper'
class InheritsFromAdminController < AdminController
def show
render :text => "foo"
end
end
describe InheritsFromAdminController do
before do
Rails.application.routes.draw do
# add the route that you need in order to test
match '/foo' => "inherits_from_admin#show"
# re-drawing routes means that you lose any routes you defined in routes.rb
# so you have to add those back here if your controller references them
match '/login' => "sessions/new", :as => login
end
end
after do
# be sure to reload routes after the tests run, otherwise all your
# other controller specs will fail
Rails.application.reload_routes!
end
it "requires logged-in users" do
get :show
response.should redirect_to("/login")
end
end

Rails Testing controller methods with instance variables set in before filters

Ok, so my main issue is I have implemented Mailboxer into our project to handle messaging and I am trying to write tests for it. However, I keep stumbling over and over again. I have attempted several different stub/mocks but have made no progress.
We have a conversations_controller.rb that relies on before_filters for setting all the instance variables necessary for doing each action. Then in the controller actions, the instance variables are referenced directly to do any sort of action or to return specific data.
Here is an example of our index action which returns all conversations in the "box" that is specified in the before_filter, of the mailbox also specified in another before_filter:
class ConversationsController < ::ApplicationController
before_filter :get_user_mailbox, only: [:index, :new_message, :show_message, :mark_as_read, :mark_as_unread, :create_message, :reply_message, :update, :destroy_message, :untrash]
before_filter :get_box
def index
if #box.eql? "inbox"
#conversations = #mailbox.inbox
elsif #box.eql? "sentbox"
#conversations = #mailbox.sentbox
else
#conversations = #mailbox.trash
end
end
And before filters:
private
def get_user_mailbox
#user = User.where(:user_name => user.user_name.downcase).where(:email => user.email.downcase).first_or_create
#mailbox = #user.mailbox if #user
end
def get_box
if params[:box].blank? or !["inbox","sentbox","trash"].include?params[:box]
params[:box] = 'inbox'
end
#box = params[:box]
end
So I guess I have 2 questions in one. First, how to I get my tests to generate the correct data #mailbox, #user, and #box that is needed for the index action. Next, how do I pass the fake parameter to set #box to different "inbox/sentbox/trash". I have tried controller.index({box: "inbox"}) but always get "wrong arguments 1 for 0" messages.
I have tried the following in various different ways, but always get nil:class errors which means that my instance variables are definitely not being set properly.
describe "GET 'index' returns correct mailbox box" do
before :each do
#user = User.where(:user_name => 'test').where(:email => 'test#test.com').first_or_create
#mailbox = #user.mailbox
end
it "#index returns inbox when box = 'inbox'" do
mock_model User
User.stub_chain(:where, :where).and_return(#user)
controller.index.should == #mailbox.inbox
end
end
Filters and callbacks are hard to test and debug. Avoid them when possible.
In this case I don't think your before_filter is necessary, thus no need to test it. The better home for the methods is model.
Check my refacoring:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
delegate :inbox, :sentbox, :trash, to: :mailbox
end
class ConversationsController < ::ApplicationController
def index
#conversations = current_user.send get_box
end
private
def get_box
# your code
end
end
That's all. Should be enough.
You can then test regularly.
First of all, read the oficial documentation for rails testing: using data for testing and passing parameters to controlers is explained there.
To generate data for your tests you can:
fill your test database with some mailbox and users using rails fixtures or use something like factory girl
use mock objects to fake data. I personally use the mocha gem but there are others
I tend to use a combination of both, prefering mock objects when possible and falling back to factory girl when mocking needs too much code.

How to test application controller before filter methods in Rails 3?

I have a before_filter on my ApplicationController class and I want to write a test for it? Where should I write this test into? I do not want to go into every subclass controller test file and repeat the test about this filter.
Hence, what is the recommended way to test ApplicationController before_filters?
Note that I am using Rails 3.2.1 with minitest.
My case is slightly different than yours, but I needed to do something similar to test authentication across the site (with Devise). Here's how I did it:
# application_controller.rb
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
before_filter :authenticate_user!
end
# application_controller_test.rb
require 'test_helper'
class TestableController < ApplicationController
def show
render :text => 'rendered content here', :status => 200
end
end
class ApplicationControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
tests TestableController
context "anonymous user" do
setup do
get :show
end
should redirect_to '/users/sign_in'
end
end
If there's specific controllers that need to skip the before filter I'll have a test to make sure they skip it in the specific controller's tests. This isn't quite your situation as I'm interested in the effect of the method, not just knowing it was invoked, but I thought I'd share in case you found it useful.
Improving on #bmaddy answser, you do need to setup routing for the specs to run.
Here is a rails 5 working example:
require 'test_helper'
class BaseController < ApplicationController
def index
render nothing: true
end
end
class BaseControllerTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
test 'redirects if user is not logedin' do
Rails.application.routes.draw do
get 'base' => 'base#index'
end
get '/base'
assert_equal 302, status
assert_redirected_to 'http://somewhere.com'
Rails.application.routes_reloader.reload!
end
test 'returns success if user is loggedin' do
Rails.application.routes.draw do
get 'base' => 'base#index'
end
mock_auth!
get '/base'
assert_equal 200, status
Rails.application.routes_reloader.reload!
end
end
I now believe that I have to have all my controllers tests test about the before_filter existence and that this filter works as expected. This is because, I cannot know whether a controller uses a skip_before_filter when it shouldn't.
Hence, I decided to use mock (#controller.expects(:before_filter_method)) to make sure that the filter is called. So, for example, in a index action I write in my test:
test "get index calls the before filter method" do
#controller.expects(:before_filter_method)
# fire
get :index
end
This will make sure that my controller calls before_filter_method on the particular action. I have to do this on all my actions tests.
If anyone else has a better solution, let me know.
Usually when I want something like this I just test the expected behaviour without taking into account that this particular behaviour may be implemented in a filter and not in a method per se. So for the following simple scenario :
class Controller < ApplicationController
before_filter :load_resource, :only => [:show, :edit]
def show
end
def edit
end
def index
end
#########
protected
#########
def load_resource
#resource = Model.find(params[:id])
end
end
I would simple test that #show and #edit assign the #resource thing. This works for simple scenarios pretty much ok. If the filter is applied to a lot of actions/controllers then you can extract the testing code and reuse it amongst the tests.

Resources