I am unable to run repo non-interactively inside a container as part of a freestyle job.
It prompts for the user-name and email. I got round that by doing a git config --global inside the job.
But then it does the color test, and that hangs indefinitely.
Looking at the source code for repo I see this
if os.isatty(0) and os.isatty(1) and not self.manifest.IsMirror:
if opt.config_name or self._ShouldConfigureUser():
self._ConfigureUser()
self._ConfigureColor()
So, I ran the following inside the container:
python -C "import os; print os.isatty(0), os.isatty(1)"
and, sure enough, it printed out True True
Looking at the Jenkins log, it launches the container with --tty specified, and there seems no way to configure that option.
I can't find a bash option to force a script to be run in a non-interactive shell. If I put the above python line in a file and execute it with almost any combination of commands and options, it still prints out True True
The only way I see something different is if I use I/O redirection
bash <a.sh
which prints out False True - i.e. stdin is not a tty, and
bash <a.sh >a.log
which prints False False.
For a complex script, are there any problems using the bash <script approach?
Does anyone know any jenkins magic to prevent docker being launched using --tty?
I know that the --tty is the culprit. I built the container locally and ran the following
$ docker run repotest python -c "import os;print os.isatty(0), os.isatty(1)"
False False
$ docker run --tty repotest python -c "import os;print os.isatty(0), os.isatty(1)"
True True
Running Versions:
repo: 1.12.37 (per Ubuntu 16.04 apt-get)
Jenkins: 2.149
Cloudbees Docker Plugin: 1.7.3
Container base is ubuntu:xenial
I'm using the "Build inside a docker container" option.
To run bash script repo_script.sh "non-interactively", or more exactly speaking without having terminals associated with standard streams, you could run your script simply as
repo_script.sh < /dev/null 2>&1 | cat
assuming you want to see the output the way you would see it running simply as repo_script.sh. By piping the standard output and error to a different process the file descriptor appears as a pipe and not TTY to repo_script.sh. You could also direct output to a file, or even to /dev/null if you do not care about the output:
log_file=/dev/null
repo_script.sh < /dev/null > "${log_file}" 2>&1
Running the script as
bash < repo_script.sh | cat
might would work too, though it is very unorthodox and to my mind hackish way of running a script just to break the association of TTY to the standard input. From script engine point of view, it is different to read a script program from a file than from standard input (which typically, if it is a terminal, is not seekable), so there might be some subtle differences that could possibly bite you in unexpected ways. This way does not as clearly communicate your intention to the next person that need to understand your code, and may lead to partial hair loss in that person due to extraneous head scratching.
There is no need for any bash options, just using the output directions from within the interpreting shell as above described is an easy-to-comprehend, multi-platform compatible standard convention for changing the standard stream associations.
P.S. I think it should be enough for your repo script to just test if the standard input is a TTY. It looks to me like the author of that script did not think deeply enough there. There is simply no use waiting for input if you do not have terminal device associated with standard input, and you could determine that everything needs to run without user interaction from there or stop with an error if that is not possible.
Related
I would like to run a command inside a container to test that it works. It should be invoked by bazel test.
Something like this:
container_test(
image = "//:my_image"
test_command = "exit 1"
)
I noticed this: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_docker/blob/master/contrib/test.bzl#L125
However it isn't documented.
How should I approach this in Bazel?
Take a look at the sample test rule here
This is a test rule which creates a script (script) that can be invoked in the CLI
The script will then exit with a non-zero error-code to indicate that the test failed (or 0 for success)
The script is then written as an executable output (ctx.actions.write), declares the list of files it needs available at runtime (runfiles)
This python function is then wrapped as a bazel rule (see full guide here)
So, how would you proceed towards creating your container test rule?
The script we want to generate above is probably some usage of docker run --rm IMAGE [COMMAND] [ARG...] to create a container from an image, run a command, and remove the container when done
Don't forget to set the script exit status based on the exit status of the docker command (as done in the example, where they copy the exit status of grep as the exit status for the overall script)
Update the sample above to use the above docker command, and plant the path to the image accordingly
See f.path in the script above showing how they access the path of an individual source file
You will need to make sure docker is available when your bazel rules are evaluated
I haven't done this fully myself since I don't have a computer with both bazel and docker, but this should be enough to get you started :)
Good luck!
I’m running an Azuracast docker instance on Linode and want to try to find a way to automate my updates. Right now my routine is when I notice there are updates by accessing the Azuracast web panel, I usually run timeshift to create a backup using the following command
timeshift —-create —-comment “azuracast update ”
And then I use the following to update azuracast
cd /var/azuracast/
./docker.sh update-self
./docker.sh update
Then it asks me to ensure the azuracast installation is backed up before updating, to which i would usually just press enter.
After that is completed, it asks me if i want to clean up all stopped docker containers and images to save space, which i usually say no to.
What I’m wondering is if there is a way to create a bash script, or python or something to automate all of this, and then have it run on a schedule?
Sure, you can write a shell script to execute these commands and then run it on a schedule using crontab(5).
For example your script might look like:
#! /bin/sh
# Backup azuracast and restart docker container
timeshift --create --comment “azuracast update” && \
cd /var/azuracast/ && \
./docker.sh update-self && \
(yes | ./docker.sh update)
It sounds like this docker.sh program takes some user inputs. See if there are options you can pass to it that will allow you to run it non-interactively. (Seems there isn't, see edit.)
To setup your cron job, you can put the script in /etc/cron.hourly, /etc/cron.daily, /etc/cron.weekly, or /etc/cron.monthly. Or if you need more control, you can get started configuring a cron job with crontab -e. Better explanation.
EDIT: Assuming this is the script you're using, it doesn't seem to have a way to run update non-interactively. Fear not though, there's a program for this: yes(1). This will answer yes to both of the questions, but honestly running docker system prune -f is probably a good idea. If you really want to answer no to that, you could probably substitute yes for printf "y\nn" to answer yes to the first and no to the second.
Also note that there's at least one other y/n question it could ask you, which you probably want to answer yes to.
I use Java S2I image for a container running in Openshift (on premise). My problem is that the output of the image is page-buffered and oc logs ... does not show me the last logs.
I could probably spin up my docker image that would do stdbuf -oL -e0 java ... but I would prefer to stick to the 'official' image (just adding the jar to /deployments). Is there any way to reduce buffering (use line-buffering instead of page-buffering), or flush the output on demand?
EDIT: It seems that I could update deployment config and pass stdbuf in there, but that means that I'd have to compose all the args myself. Ideal solution would be passing --tty do Docker, but I can't see how a custom arguments could be passed that way in Openshift.
In your repo, try creating the file .s2i/bin/run. In it add:
#/bin/bash
exec stdbuf -oL -e0 /usr/local/s2i/run
I always forget where the S2I assemble and run scripts are in the Java S2I image, so you may need to replace /usr/local/s2i with the correct path.
What adding this file does is that it will be run as the startup command instead of the original run script. You can then run the original script with stdbuf. Ensure you use exec so that the sub process replaces the current one, else signals will not be propagated through properly.
Even though this might work, am surprised logging isn't working in an unbuffered mode already. I expect there would be a better way of controlling it through some Java config instead.
I'm trying to write (what I thought would be) a simple bash script that will:
run virtualenv to create a new environment at $1
activate the virtual environment
do some more stuff (install django, add django-admin.py to the virtualenv's path, etc.)
Step 1 works quite well, but I can't seem to activate the virtualenv. For those not familiar with virtualenv, it creates an activate file that activates the virtual environment. From the CLI, you run it using source
source $env_name/bin/activate
Where $env_name, obviously, is the name of the dir that the virtual env is installed in.
In my script, after creating the virtual environment, I store the path to the activate script like this:
activate="`pwd`/$ENV_NAME/bin/activate"
But when I call source "$activate", I get this:
/home/clawlor/bin/scripts/djangoenv: 20: source: not found
I know that $activate contains the correct path to the activate script, in fact I even test that a file is there before I call source. But source itself can't seem to find it. I've also tried running all of the steps manually in the CLI, where everything works fine.
In my research I found this script, which is similar to what I want but is also doing a lot of other things that I don't need, like storing all of the virtual environments in a ~/.virtualenv directory (or whatever is in $WORKON_HOME). But it seems to me that he is creating the path to activate, and calling source "$activate" in basically the same way I am.
Here is the script in its entirety:
#!/bin/sh
PYTHON_PATH=~/bin/python-2.6.1/bin/python
if [ $# = 1 ]
then
ENV_NAME="$1"
virtualenv -p $PYTHON_PATH --no-site-packages $ENV_NAME
activate="`pwd`/$ENV_NAME/bin/activate"
if [ ! -f "$activate" ]
then
echo "ERROR: activate not found at $activate"
return 1
fi
source "$activate"
else
echo 'Usage: djangoenv ENV_NAME'
fi
DISCLAIMER: My bash script-fu is pretty weak. I'm fairly comfortable at the CLI, but there may well be some extremely stupid reason this isn't working.
If you're writing a bash script, call it by name:
#!/bin/bash
/bin/sh is not guaranteed to be bash. This caused a ton of broken scripts in Ubuntu some years ago (IIRC).
The source builtin works just fine in bash; but you might as well just use dot like Norman suggested.
In the POSIX standard, which /bin/sh is supposed to respect, the command is . (a single dot), not source. The source command is a csh-ism that has been pulled into bash.
Try
. $env_name/bin/activate
Or if you must have non-POSIX bash-isms in your code, use #!/bin/bash.
In Ubuntu if you execute the script with sh scriptname.sh you get this problem.
Try executing the script with ./scriptname.sh instead.
best to add the full path of the file you intend to source.
eg
source ./.env instead of source .env
or source /var/www/html/site1/.env
I'm having a weird issue with a start-up script which runs a Sinatra script using the shell's "daemon" function. The problem is that when I run the command at the command line, I get output to STDOUT. If I run the command at the command line exactly as it is in the script -- less the daemon part -- the output is correctly redirected to the output file. However, when the startup script runs it (see below), I get stuff to the STDERR log but not to the STDOUT log.
The relevant lines of the script:
#!/bin/sh
# (which is and has been a symlink to /bin/bash
# Source function library.
. /etc/init.d/functions
# Set Some Variables
RUNAS="joeuser"
PID=/var/run/myapp.pid
LOG="/var/log/myapp/app-out.log"
ERR_LOG="/var/log/myapp/app-err.log"
APPLICATION_COMMAND="RAILS_ENV=production ruby /opt/myapp/lib/daemons/my-sinatra-app.rb -p 8002 2>>${ERR_LOG} >>${LOG} &"
# Snip a bunch. This is the applicable line from the "start" case:
daemon --user $RUNAS --pidfile $PID $APPLICATION_COMMAND &> /dev/null
Now, the funky parts:
The error log is written to correctly via the redirect of STDERR.
If I reverse the order of the >> and the 2>> (I'm grasping at straws, here!), the behavior does not change: I still get STDERR logged correctly and STDOUT is empty.
If the output log doesn't exist, the STDOUT redirect creates the file. But, the file remains 0-length.
This used to work. The log directory is maintained by log-rotate. All of the more-recent 'out' logs are 0-length. The older ones are not. It seems like it stopped working some time in April. The ruby code didn't change at any time near then; neither did the startup script.
We're running three different services in this way. Two of them are ruby daemons (one uses sinatra, one does not) and the other is a background java process. This is occurring for BOTH of the ruby processes but is not happening on the java process. Maybe something changed in Ruby?
FTR, we've got ruby 1.8.5 and RHEL 5.4.
I've done some more probing. The daemon function does a bunch of stuff, but the meat of the matter is that it runs the program using runuser. The command essentially looks like this:
runuser -s /bin/bash - joeuser -c "ulimit -S -c 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 ; RAILS_ENV=production ruby /opt/myapp/lib/daemons/my-sinatra-app.rb -p 8002 '</dev/null' '>>/var/log/myapp/app-out.log' '2>>/var/log/myapp/app-err.log' '&'"
When I run exactly that at the command line (both with and without the single-ticks that got added somewhere along the line), I get the exact same screwy behavior w.r.t. the output log. So, it seems to me that this is an issue of how ruby (?) interacts with runuser?
Too long to put in a comment :-)
change the shebang to add #!/bin/sh -x and verify that everything is expanded according to your expectations. Also, when executing from terminal, your .bashrc file is sourced, when executing from script, it is not; might be something in you're environment that differ. One way to find out is to do env from terminal and from script and diff the output
env > env_terminal
env > env_script
diff env_terminal env_script
Happy hunting...