When I am making a transaction with the JS sdk to my docker sawtooth node, I am getting a response which contains only a link which shows this data:
{
"data": [
{
"id": "87be1095b29372fff3b46d4f0eb0f354514208d8ef612877bae0216e70d4931f302e2b2f3741d52e22acf92c7e3f3935775b503a43f45a7297d1ce5ad76b9bb2",
"invalid_transactions": [],
"status": "COMMITTED"
}
],
"link": "http://localhost:8008/batch_statuses?id=87be1095b29372fff3b46d4f0eb0f354514208d8ef612877bae0216e70d4931f302e2b2f3741d52e22acf92c7e3f3935775b503a43f45a7297d1ce5ad76b9bb2"
}
Now this id appears to be the batch-id. How can I get the transaction id e.g. to make a query to get this transaction only?
Related
So I've been trying to get email addresses of people that have access to certain files in a Sharepoint document library of a site through the use of the Microsoft Graph API. Below is an example of how my permission object looks like, which is retrieved from https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/sites/<site id>/drives/<drive id>/items/<item id>/permissions.
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/$metadata#sites('...')/drives('...')/items('...')/permissions",
"value": [
{
"id": "...",
"roles": ["owner"],
"grantedTo": { "user": { "displayName": "testsite - Eigenaars" } },
"inheritedFrom": {}
},
{
"id": "...",
"roles": ["read"],
"grantedTo": { "user": {"displayName": "testsite - Bezoekers"} },
"inheritedFrom": {}
},
{
"id": "...",
"roles": ["write"],
"grantedTo": { "user": { "displayName": "testsite - Leden" } },
"inheritedFrom": {}
},
{
"id": "...",
"roles": [
"write"
],
"grantedToV2": {
"siteGroup": {
"displayName": "Developers",
"id": "120",
"loginName": "Developers"
}
},
"grantedTo": {
"user": {
"displayName": "Developers"
}
},
"inheritedFrom": {}
},
{
"id": "...",
"roles": ["owner"],
"grantedTo": {
"user": {
"email": "testsite#mysharepoint",
"id": "uuid",
"displayName": "testsite - Eigenaars"
}
},
"inheritedFrom": {}
}
]
}
I assume the testsite in the displayName property is a group name (probably the group that belongs to the site the file resides in), but I have seen cases where I can't find this group name in the groups retrieved from the /groups endpoint in the Graph API.
You can also see the group Developers, which I haven't managed to find in the full group list retrieved from /groups.
The documentation around this is quite vague and unclear to me. Somewhere I read that this lack of data could be due to authentication scopes, but I have "god mode" administrator rights in this Sharepoint environment, so that would seem strange to me.
My main goal is to be able to get all users that have access to a specific file.
Thanks in advance!
1. I assume the testsite in the displayName property is a group name, but I have seen cases where I can't find this group name in the groups retrieved from the /groups endpoint in the Graph API.
This is because as per Drive Item Permission >> Identity Set >> Identity resource type Quoting
The identity's display name. Note that this may not always be available or up to date. For example, if a user changes their display name, the API may show the new value in a future response, but the items associated with the user won't show up as having changed when using
This can explain why sometimes you don't see the group name in your groups.
I suggest you use the id.
2. My main goal is to be able to get all users that have access to a specific file.
Do you have any users that appear on the Has Access section of the drive item on sharepoint? For users you should be able to get permissions and use the ids to Get directoryObject using the id values from grantedToIdentitiesV2 or grantedToV2 which will return odate type.
GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/directoryObjects/{id}?$select=id
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/$metadata#directoryObjects(id)/$entity",
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.group or user or application",
"id": "id"
}
For groups, the users would be the members of the group.
On-prem server Bitbucket 6.10.
Referring to the API for adding default reviewers for a project.
POST Request:
https://git.company.net/rest/default-reviewers/1.0/projects/test-project/condition
Body:
{"sourceMatcher":{"id":"any","type":{"id":"ANY_REF"}}, "targetMatcher":{"id":"any","type":{"id":"ANY_REF"}}, "reviewers":[{"name": "p950a", "slug": "p950a", "id": 56111},{"name": "p950h", "slug": "p950h", "id": 45222}], "requiredApprovals":"0"}
It seems it's mandatory to pass "id" for each reviewer - "slug", "name" don't seem to work. I get the following error if "id" is excluded.
{
"errors": [
{
"context": null,
"message": "No user exists for identifier -1.",
"exceptionName": "com.atlassian.bitbucket.validation.ArgumentValidationException"
}
]
}
It's quite inefficient and tedious to retrieve IDs for several users, store them and then again iterate over that list to pass here. Is there a better way to do this or am I missing something?
I need to know how to query the following invoke(AC(123456A)or (user_type1_c19a5f0b7e) when i have init this:
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "deploy",
"params": {
"type": 1,
"chaincodeID": {
"path": "https://github.com/johndoe/learn-chaincode/finished"
},
"ctorMsg": {
"function": "init",
"args": [
"hi there"
]
},
"secureContext": "user_type1_191b8c2993"
},
"id": 1
}
Here is my (successful) invoke:
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "invoke",
"params": {
"type": 1,
"chaincodeID": {
"name": "b42b506c13fg1157520d585841a691f4b598d9aac53adc95277ed710c7f1f5aaa59a89a8dca8ddf3e46d5241562f3316956a04ad8a33181d30cb01b1c4c9adb2f"
},
"ctorMsg": {
"function": "AC(123456A)",
"args": [
"AcctId:949392949233 ","Year2015 Sem1 ", "IT1234:A ", " IT2345:B+ ", "IT3456:A ", "Year 2015 Sem2 ", "IT4567:B ", "IT5678: B", "IT5678:A ","Year 2016 Sem1 ", "IT6789:C ", "IT7890:C ", "Cumulative GPA: 3"
]
},
"secureContext": "user_type1_c19a5f0b7e"
},
"id": 4
}
Here is the query that I am trying and I can't get the results that I want:
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "query",
"params": {
"type": 1,
"chaincodeID": {
"name": "b42b506c13fg1157520d585841a691f4b598d9aac53adc95277ed710c7f1f5aaa59a89a8dca8ddf3e46d5241562f3316956a04ad8a33181d30cb01b1c4c9adb2f"
},
"ctorMsg": {
"function": "AC(123456A)",
"args": [
"AcctId:949392949233 "
]
},
"secureContext": "user_type1_c19a5f0b7e"
},
"id": 2
}
Here's the response for the query.
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"error": {
"code": -32003,
"message": "Query failure",
"data": "Error when querying chaincode: Error:Transaction or query returned with failure: Received unknown function query"
},
"id": 2
}
Right now, I am trying out this tutorial, which is provided by IBM Bluemix:
https://github.com/IBM-Blockchain/learn-chaincode.
I have tried an init using their example and do invoke(successful) to suit my needs. I tried the Bluemix tutorial, which I mentioned earlier, and I am able to achieve what is stated in the documentation. Therefore, I decided to invoke something to suit my own needs. However, i am unable to query the person AC(123456A) or user_type1_c19a5f0b7e with showing of items such as "Year2015 Sem1", "IT1234:A", "IT3456:B+ " and etc . How can I query (the invoke) to suit my own needs?
Our understanding is that you are using an IBM Blockchain Starter Developer Network on IBM Bluemix. Using this environment, the "Learn Chaincode" tutorial (https://github.com/IBM-Blockchain/learn-chaincode) has been followed. We would like to confirm our understanding of your results when following the tutorial. Our understanding is that when following the tutorial, the Init, Invoke, and Query chaincode functions all operated as expected. Is the understanding correct that the tutorial as written could be followed successfully?
Then we understand that the example chaincode was modified to apply different logic. The Invoke for this modified chaincode that uses the AC(123456A) function with a user of user_type1_c19a5f0b7e appears to have been successful. However, a query that also used the AC(123456A) function was not successful. Is this understanding correct?
Could some additional details be provided so this can be considered further?
Did you write your own customized chaincode? If so, could this chaincode (including the AC(123456A) function definition) be provided?
Is the AC(123456A) function located in the same Go source file as the rest of the chaincode?
We imagine that the user named user_type1_c19a5f0b7e was registered since the Invoke did work. Were steps to register this user followed as noted in the "Secure Enrollment" section of the "Learn Chaincode" tutorial?
Can the AC(123456A) function both write values to the ledger (through the Invoke) and read values from the ledger (as is being attempted through the Query)?
I have retrieved a json object using typhoeus gem.
url = 'www.example.com' <br>
request = ::Typhoeus::Request.get(url,userpwd: username + ":" + pass)<br>
content = JSON.parse(request.body)
I would like to count the occurence of "Priority":"high" including the quotes inside the json response. How do I go about doing this?
Edit:
"priority":"high" is a key value pair. It is deeply nested inside the json tree.(Don't how deeply it is nested). All I need is count of occurence of "priority":"high"
Any and all suggestion is welcome.
Sample data:
"tickets": [{
"url": "https://.zendesk.com/api/v2/tickets/xxxx.json",
"id": xxxxx,
"external_id": null,
"via": {
"channel": "email",
"source": {
"from": {
"address": "#compli.com",
"name": ""
},
"to": {
"name": "organization Global Support",
"address": "support#organization.zendesk.com"
},
"rel": null
}
},
"created_at": "2016-08-04T16:23:13Z",
"updated_at": "2016-08-08T20:26:01Z",
"type": "problem",
"subject": "Problems with abc Connect",
"raw_subject": "Problems with abc Connect",
"description": "Hi – our Tenet ID is 5675.\n\n \n\nThe abc report is not providing the full data when I run the billing preview. I am running it using Chrome. Attached are snapshots of what I’m doing plus the report generated.\n\n \n\nA perfect example of the problem is shown at the bottom of the report generated. Garber Automotive Group, account number A00000490 does not display the data for all of their products. Their data is shown on rows 5658 thru 5712 on the excel file BillingPreviewResult_201620 report run 08.04.16.\n\n \n\nHowever the EXACT same report (all the parameters are the same) run on 07/01/16 included all of Garber’s information. The excel file abc report run 07.01.16 10.13 AM has the data for Garber on rows 6099 – 6182.\n\n \n\nThe report is cutting off a lot of data for some reason. As you can see by comparing the amount of data between the two excel reports there are much fewer lines on the report run on today as opposed to the one run on 07/01, 6182 rows vs 5712 rows.\n\n \n\nThis is a business critical report for us. It is used for cash forecasting, monthly financial reporting, rolling budgeting and ad hoc reporting.\n\n \n\nWe need this problem identified and fixed immediately. It is already causing a problem with finalizing our July results.\n\n \n\nLet me know if you have any questions or need any additional data.\n\n \n\n \n\nRegards,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n| Controller\ndesk: 503.963-4239 | fax: 503.294.1200 | \n\nCompli - Cool, Calm and Compliant. TM\n\nVisit() to learn more.\n\n \n\nFollow us on LinkedIn () and Twitter",
"priority": "normal",
"status": "open",
"recipient": "support#organization.zendesk.com",
"requester_id": 1336424406,
"submitter_id": 1336424406,
"assignee_id": null,
"organization_id": 224504969,
"group_id": 21606503,
"collaborator_ids": [560973773, 786229209, 421597631, 539566717, 707192615, 1336424406, 31365392, 719608577, 1817633993],
"forum_topic_id": null,
"problem_id": null,
"has_incidents": false,
"due_at": null,
"tags": ["1_price", "best_practice_advise", "engage_global_services__email_", "escalate", "hard", "internal_escalation", "p0", "yes_escalated", "xxxxx", "zhub"],
"custom_fields": [{
"id": 22024091,
"value": "p0"
}, {
"id": 24212576,
"value": "best_practice_advise"
}, {
"id": 22035048,
"value": "xxx and so on.....
I have the following cURL cmd running which returns all tasks for a specific userID within a specific workspaceID, but the "completed=false" part of the cmd doesn't influence the data returned. I am trying to exclude all "completed" tasks. Everything else is working as I expected. Below is the current cmd string and a snippet of the data returned back. As you can see one of the returned tasks indicates "completed" is true while the other indicates false.
Anyone see what I may be missing? Thanks in advance for your help.
cURL cmd:
curl -u <api-key>: "https://app.asana.com/api/1.0/tasks?workspace=<workspace>&assignee=<teamMemberId>&completed=false&opt_fields=name,assignee,assignee_status,notes,created_at,modified_at,completed_at,due_on,completed&opt_pretty"
output (partial)
{
"data": [
{
"id": <ID>,
"created_at": "2014-03-11T03:34:52.002Z",
"modified_at": "2014-03-11T23:33:07.544Z",
"name": "<nameoftask>",
"notes": "",
"assignee": {
"id": <ID>
},
"completed": true,
"assignee_status": "upcoming",
"completed_at": "2014-03-11T23:33:06.729Z",
"due_on": "2014-03-11"
},
{
"id": <ID>,
"created_at": "2014-03-11T23:33:07.196Z",
"modified_at": "2014-03-11T23:33:07.196Z",
"name": "<nameoftask>",
"notes": "",
"assignee": {
"id": ID>
},
"completed": false,
"assignee_status": "upcoming",
"completed_at": null,
"due_on": "2014-03-14"
},
TL;DR: You want completed_since=now, not completed=false.
The GET /tasks endpoint doesn't take a parameter completed - it does however take completed_since, which can take a timestamp (as provided by JS's .toISOString()) or the string "now". It always includes incomplete tasks. This is documented in the API Docs on Tasks (specifically the section on "Querying for tasks").
We're looking to improve the way you can filter tasks, but for right now what's documented there is all there is.