I want to present release data complexity which is associated with each node like at epic, userstory etc in grafana in form of charts but grafana do not support neo4j database.Is there any way Directly or indirectly to present neo4j database in grafana?
I'm having the same issues and found this question among others. From my research I cannot agree with this answer completely, so I felt I should point some things out, here.
Just to clarify: a graph database may seem structurally different from a relational or time series database, but it is possible to build Cypher queries that basically return graph data as tables with proper columns as it would be with any other supported data source. Therefore this sentence of the above mentioned answer:
So what you want to do is just not possible.
is not absolutely true, I'd say.
The actual problem is, there is no datasource plugin for Neo4j available at the moment. You would need to implement one on your own, which will be a lot of work (as far as I can see), but I suspect it to be possible. For me at least, this will be too much work to do, so I won't use any approach to read data directly from Neo4j into Grafana.
As a (possibly dirty) workaround (in my case), a service will regularly copy relevant portions of the Neo4j graph into a relational database (or a time series database, if the data model is sufficiently simple for that), which Grafana is aware of (see datasource plugins), so I can query it from there. This is basically the replication idea also given in the above mentioned answer. In this case you obviously end up with at least 2 different database systems and an additional service, which is not so insanely great, but at the moment it seems to be the quickest way to resolve the problem with the missing datasource plugin. Maybe this is applicable in your case, too.
Using neo4j's graphite metrics you can actually configure data to be sent to grafana, and from there build whichever dashboards you like.
Up until recently, graphite/grafana wasn't supported, but it is now (in the recent 3.4 series releases), along with prometheus and other options.
Update July 2021
There is a new plugin called Node Graph Panel (currently in beta) that can visualise graph structures in Grafana. A prerequisite for displaying your graph is to make sure that you have an API that exposes two data frames, one for nodes and one for edges, and that you set frame.meta.preferredVisualisationType = 'nodeGraph' on both data frames. See the Data API specification for more information.
So, one option would be to setup an API around your Neo4j instance that returns the nodes and edges according to the specifications above. Note that I haven't tried it myself (yet), but it seems like a viable solution to get Neo4j data into Grafana.
Grafana support those databases, but not Neo4j : Graphite, InfluxDB, OpenTSDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, CloudWatch
So what you want to do is just not possible.
You can replicate your Neo4j data inside of those database, but the datamodel is really different ... (timeseries vs graph).
If you just want to have some charts, you can use Apache Zeppeline for that.
Related
I have searched for it in many blogs, but it seems all the blogs present a biased view. I myself am having a little bias towards Prometheus now, However, i did not find any good article which explains a use case of Prometheus for sensor data.
In my case, we manufacture IoT devices and we have a lot of data coming in. Till now we have been using MongoDB for everything, but now I want to switch to a time-series database, but I am really confused, whether I can choose Prometheus or not.
I am comfortable writing my own metric converter which can convert my sensor data into Prometheus metrics format (If something doesn't exist already)
Don't feel bd, lots of folks start out trying MongoDB for IoT applications because Mongo claims it's great for IoT. Only problem is, it's terrible for IoT. :-)
What you need is a true Time Series Database (TSDB). If you want to be able to query your data with SQL, try out QuestDB. It's the fastest open source TSDB out there and it's small.
I think i found it. Its Victoria Metrics. Haven't seen something as amazing as VM. First thing, it supports both Prometheus and Influx DB Write protocol(not just these, it supports some other time series database protocols also) and supports query language similar to prometheus. It has Vm Agent whose multiple instances we can run easily. It has cluster support and performance-wise, nothing like it.
I have an interesting problem that I don't know how to solve.
I have collected a large dataset of 80 million graphs (they are CFG as in Control Flow Graph produced by programs I have analysed from Github) which I need to be able to search efficiently.
I looked into existing solutions like Neo4j but they are all designed to store a global single graph.
In my case this is the opposite all graphs are independent -like rows in a table - but I need to search through all of them efficiently.
For example I want to find all CFGs that has a particular IF condition or a WHILE loop with a particular condition.
What's the best database for this use case?
I don't think that there's a reason not to simply store all those graphs in a single graph, whether it's Neo4j or a different graph database. It's not a problem to have many disparate graphs in a single graph where the disparate graphs are disconnected from one another.
As for searching them efficiently, you would either (1) identify properties in your CFGs that you want to search on and convert them to some indexed value of the graph or (2) introduce some graph structure (additional vertices/edges) between the CFGs that will allow you to do the searches you want via graph traversal.
Depending on what you need to search on approach 1 may not be flexible enough for you especially, if what you intend to search on is not completely known at the time of loading the data. Also, it is important to note that with approach 2 you do not really lose the fact that you have 80 million distinct graphs just because you provided some connection between them. Those physical connections don't change that basic logical fact. You just need to consider those additional connections when you write traversals that you expect to occur only within a single CFG.
I'm not sure what Neo4j supports in this area, but with Apache TinkerPop (an open source graph processing framework that lets you write vendor agnostic code over different graph databases, including Neo4j), you might consider doing some form of graph partitioning to help with approach 2. Or you might subgraph() the larger graph to only contain the CFG and then operate with that purely in memory when querying. Both of these approaches will help you to blind your query to just the individual CFG you want to traverse.
Ultimately, however, I see this issue as a modelling problem. You will just need to make some choices on how to best establish the schema for your use case and virtually any graph database should be able to support that.
I have a Neo4j application that uses the legacy Lucene indexes on certain relationship properties. Whenever I query these I am looking for exact matches, and all of them. While doing some profiling I discovered that the application is spending a highly disproportionate amount of time retrieving these results as it is pulling them in chunks from a prioritized queue. Given that I do not care about the ordering and want all of the results, what can I do to change the underlying behavior?
From my own searching, I came across Lucene's Collector implementations and it seems like a custom one that collects everything and never bothers scoring could be the answer, but I do not know how I can inject one into Neo4j. I am not opposed to using reflection or other means if it is not actually supported by Neo4j.
The application accesses Neo4j via the embedded Java methods.
We're working on some of that as part of our upgrade to Lucene5, there custom collectors for some of these use-case will be implemented. Hopefully we can make something available in the next weeks.
I'm currently doing some R and D regarding moving some business functionality from an Oracle RDBMS to Neo4j to reduce join complexity in the application queries. Due to the maintenance and visibility requirements for the data, I believe the stand alone server is the best option.
My thought is that within a java program I would pull the relevant data out of the Oracle tables, map it to a node object and persist it to neo4j (creating the appropriate relationships in the process).
I'm curious, with SDN over REST not being an optimal solution, what options are available for persistence. Are server plugins or unmanaged extensions the preferred method or am I overcomplicating the issue as tends to happen from time to time.
Thank you!
REST refers to a way to query the data over a network, not a way to store the data. Typically, you're going to store the data on some machine; you then have the option of either making it accessible via RESTful services with the neo4j server, or just using java applications to access the data.
I assume by SDN you're referring to spring data neo4j. Spring is a framework used for java applications, and SDN then refers to a plugin if you will for spring that allows java programmers to store models in neo4j. One could indeed use spring-data-neo4j to read data in, and then store it in Neo4J - but again this is a method of how the data gets into neo4j, it's not storage by itself.
The storage model in most cases is pretty much always the same. This link describes aspects of how storage actually happens.
Now -- to your larger business objective. In order to do this with neo4j, you're going to need to take a look at your oracle data and decide how it is best modeled as a graph. There's a big difference between an oracle RDBMS and Neo4J in terms of how the data is represented. Once you've settled on a graph design, you can then load your data into neo4j (many different options for doing that).
Will all of this "reduce join complexity in the application queries"? Well, yes, in the sense that Neo4j doesn't do joins. Will it improve the speed/performance of your application? There's just no way to tell. The answer to that depends on what your app is, what the queries are, how you model the data as a graph, and how you express the resulting queries over that graph.
I´ve been looking for a triple store for my project. In this project i want to store my data according to certain ontologies (OWL).
From my research i ended up with two tecnologies Neo4J and BigData that seems to fit well in this case.
I want to know if any of this two is more apropriated to use with RDF, RDFS, OWL and SPARQL Queries.
Neo4j can be used to store as entity-relationship-entity form. In case of Bigdata, you should not be upload your whole data into Neo4j because it will become very heavy and process will be very much slow. You should use complimentary db for storing actual data and store ids and some params into Neo4j for Graph traversal to perform sort of Graph Analytics. Neo4j is mainly build up for Graph Analytics that its power or you have to use Graph engine e.g GraphX (Spark).
Thanks,
You might want to try out the SparQL plugin for Neo4j, see here for a HTTP based test, and this Berlin Dataset Test for embedded usage.
Neo4J is a specific technology, while big data is more a generic term. I think what you're asking about OLAP and OLTP. As data gets bigger, there are differences between use cases for RDF style graph databases, which are often used for OLAP (On-line Analytical Processing) style analytics. In short, OLAP is designed for analytics that look across an big data set, while OLTP is more aimed at INSERT/DELETEs (on potentially big data).
OLAP-based traversals tend to process the entire graph, while OLTP based traversals tend to process smaller data sets by starting with one or a handful of vertices and traversing from there.
For example, let’s say you wanted to calculate the average age of friends of one particular user. Great use case for OLTP, since the query data set is small. However, if you wanted to calculate the average age of everyone on the database, OLAP is the preferred technology.
OLAP is optimal for deep analysis of a lot of data, while OLTP is better suited for fast running queries and a lot of INSERTs. If you’re trying to achieve a SLA where the analytics must complete within a certain timeframe, consider the type of analytics and which one is better suited. Or maybe you need both.