There is no error in the code. The build is also successful. This is a problem that happens when I try to debug.
My code
This is code I wrote in Visual Studio
The error
This is the problem I encountered
First, you should improve your questioning format. Use this guide https://stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask
On the right bottom of your code there is the call stack. You can see in penultimate line there is a call from line 10 of main function that triggers this error further down. This line you receive a string from line 8 which you receive as a argument.
So I assume you are not passing any argument (the image path) to this program when you try execute it as the error further down is related to the string length.
I hope this helps.
I'm using AKRhodesPiano() and AkTubularBells(). Both work alone. When I try to initialize both, I get the following error.
AKRhodesPiano.swift:init(frequency:amplitude:):88:Parameter Tree Failed
Notably, if I change the order of initialization, the error occurs for the last one of the two instantiated.
Adding the following line to the AKTubularBells playground right under the initialization of AKTubularBells is enough to trigger the error.
let tubularBells = AKTubularBells()
let temp = AKRhodesPiano() /// <- Add this line.
I saw in another post AKRhodesPiano error (crush) on AudioKit v4.2 that there was a recent error in the STK Physical models, so perhaps this is part of that. Any insight appreciated as always.
Thanks for noticing this, it only occurred when using those two nodes simultaneously, but it was basically just a cut-and-paste job gone bad. I fixed it on develop, so if you can rebuild the framework you'll be fine or else wait for the next release which should be soon.
Here's the fix:
https://github.com/AudioKit/AudioKit/commit/05651ff97a7ea7815a27de6a53eee0b5f7998920
I am using C++ Builder XE7 VCL.
Around August 11 2016 2:00pm UTC, I started receiving multiple complaints from my user base about printing problems. Most of these printing modules have proven stable for many years, and there were no updates to my project within the past 24 hours. I was able to reproduce similar problems on my development/test environment.
Without going into many details of my project, let me present a very simple printing program that is failing:
void __fastcall TForm1::PrintButtonClick(TObject *Sender)
{
// Test Print:
TPrinter *Prntr = Printer();
Prntr->Title = "Test_";
Prntr->BeginDoc();
Prntr->Canvas->Font->Size = 10;
Prntr->Canvas->TextOut(300,1050,"* * * Printing Test * * *");
if (Prntr->Printing) {
Prntr->EndDoc();
}
}
On the first attempt to print, everything works perfectly as expected. If I click the button a second time, TPrinter produces a small PDF, but the PDF file is actually corrupted and appears to have a file handle stuck to it.
If I click the button a third time, I get no printing and the following error message appears:
Printer is not currently printing.
My own test was done using a PDF printer driver, but the complaints I am receiving from users include a variety of local printers, network printers, PDF printers, etc.
In my actual project, I have try/catch exception handling, so the actual results are slightly different, but substantially similar to this result. The results show the hallmarks of instability and/or memory leaks without much in terms of error messages.
I suspect there may have been some Microsoft Windows updates that are tangling with Embarcadero DLLs, but I have not been able to verify this so far.
Is anyone else having similar problems?
The reason using a TPrintDialog or TPrinterSetupDialog "works" to fix the error is because they force the singleton TPrinter object (returned by the Vcl.Printers.Printer() function) to release its current handle to a printer if it has one, thus causing TPrinter.BeginDoc() to create a new handle. TPrinter releases its printer handle when:
it is being destroyed.
its NumCopies, Orientation, or PrinterIndex property is set.
its SetPrinter() method is called (internally by the PrinterIndex property setter and SetToDefaultPrinter() method, and by TPrintDialog and TPrinterSetupDialog).
Without doing that, calling TPrinter.BeginDoc() multiple times will just keep re-using the same printer handle. And apparently something about the recent Microsoft security update has now affected that handle reuse.
So, in short, (without uninstalling the Microsoft update) in between calls to BeginDoc() you need to do something that causes TPrinter to release and recreate its printer handle, and then the problem should go away. At least until Embarcadero can release a patch to TPrinter to address this issue. Maybe they could update TPrinter.EndDoc() or TPrinter.Refresh() to release the current printer handle (they currently do not).
Therefore, the following workaround resolves the printing issue without requiring any changes to the user interface:
void __fastcall TForm1::PrintButtonClick(TObject *Sender)
{
// Test Print:
TPrinter *Prntr = Printer();
Prntr->Title = "Test_";
Prntr->Copies = 1; // Here is the workaround
Prntr->BeginDoc();
if (Prntr->Printing) {
Prntr->Canvas->Font->Size = 10;
Prntr->Canvas->TextOut(300,1050,"* * * Printing Test * * *");
Prntr->EndDoc();
}
}
There are no Embarcadero DLLs involved in printing. TPrinter simply calls Win32 API GDI-based print functions directly.
The "Printer is not currently printing" error occurs when one of the following operations is performed on a TPrinter when its Printing property is false:
TPrinter::NewPage()
TPrinter::EndDoc()
TPrinter::Abort()
a TPrinter::Canvas subproperty is being changed.
the TPrinter::Canvas is being drawn on.
You are performing half of these operations in the test code you have shown, but you did not specify which line of code is actually throwing the error.
The Printing property simply returns the current value of the TPrinter::FPrinting data member, which is set to false only when:
the TPrinter object is initially created (the Printer() function returns a singleton object that is reused for the lifetime of the executable).
the Win32 API StartDoc() function fails inside of TPrinter::BeginDoc() (FPrinting is set to true before StartDoc() is called).
TPrinter::EndDoc() is called when Printing is true.
So, given the test code you have shown, there are two possibilities:
StartDoc() fails and you are not checking for that condition. BeginDoc() will not throw an error (VCL bug?!?), it will simply exit normally but Printing will be false. Add a check for that:
Prntr->BeginDoc();
if (Prntr->Printing) { // <-- here
Prntr->Canvas->Font->Size = 10;
Prntr->Canvas->TextOut(300,1050,"* * * Printing Test * * *");
Prntr->EndDoc();
}
the Printing property is getting set to false prematurely while you are in the process of printing something. The only ways that could happen in the code shown are if:
random memory is being corrupted, and TPrinter happens to be the victim.
multiple threads are manipulating the same TPrinter object at the same time. TPrinter is not thread-safe.
Since you can reproduce the problem in your development system, I suggest you enable Debug DCUs in the project options, then run your app in the debugger, and put a data breakpoint on the TPrinter::FPrinting data member. The breakpoint will be hit when FPrinting changes value, and you will be able to look at the call stack to see exactly which code is making that change.
Based on this information, I am going to go out on a limb and guess that the cause of your error is StartDoc() failing. Unfortunately, StartDoc() is not documented as returning why it fails. You certainly cannot use GetLastError() for that (most GDI errors are not reported by GetLastError()). You might be able to use the Win32 API Escape() or ExtEscape() function to retrieve an error code from the print driver itself (use TPrinter::Canvas::Handle as the HDC to query). But if that does not work, you won't be able to determine the reason of the failure, unless Windows is reporting an error message in its Event Log.
If StartDoc() really is failing, it is because of an Win32 API failure, not a VCL failure. Most likely the printer driver itself is failing internally (especially if a PDF print driver is leaving an open file handle to its PDF file), or Windows is failing to communicate with the driver correctly. Either way, it is outside of the VCL. This is consistent with the fact that the error started happening without you making any changes to your app. A Windows Update likely caused a breaking change in the print driver.
Try removing the following Windows update:
Security Update for Microsoft Windows (KB3177725)
MS16-098: Description of the security update for Windows kernel-mode drivers: August 9, 2016
This appears to resolve the issue for several test cases so far.
It started happening here today too. On my Windows 10 setup this would happen after calling TForm's Print() 3 times. I tried both the Microsoft Print to PDF and the Microsoft XPS Document Writer and both gave the same error.
I did some quick debugging and found that it's the call to StartDoc() that returns a value <= 0.
A temp fix until I can figure out what is really causing this is to re-create the Printer object in Printers by calling
Vcl.Printers.SetPrinter(TPrinter.Create).Free;
after calling anything that is using the Printer object. Might not be advisable to do that, but it solved my issue for now.
Looks like something is not released properly when calling EndDoc()
It seems that this is really a Microsoft problem and they should fix this buggy update. You can find more info at this on the company site.
Using a Printer Setup Dialog is only a workaround, not real solution, for this Microsoft bug. After confirmation, the printer setup dialog always creates a new handle for the printer. The next one or two print jobs will then succeed.
The patch should come from Microsoft, not from Embracadero. Thousands of programs are affected and it would be a massive waste of time and money to implement a workaround in all of them, if there is a bug in MS update.
I started experiencing the same weird behavior at more or less the same time, when running 32 bit Delphi applications built in XE7 on a Windows 10 64 bit system.
After uninstalling the latest security upgrade for Windows 10 (KB3176493), printing from these applications works normally again.
A rather surprising side effect of uninstalling this update seems to be that the file associations - which are the default programs for handling specific file types - are being reverted to Microsoft Windows default values...
The following variation of the code in the question will resolve the problem, but requires a TPrinterSetupDialog component added to the form:
void __fastcall TForm1::PrintButtonClick(TObject *Sender)
{
// Test Print:
TPrinter *Prntr = Printer();
Prntr->Title = "Test_";
PrinterSetupDialog1->Execute();
Prntr->BeginDoc();
if (Prntr->Printing) {
Prntr->Canvas->Font->Size = 10;
Prntr->Canvas->TextOut(300,1050,"* * * Printing Test * * *");
Prntr->EndDoc();
}
}
For program usage, the user will be presented with the printer setup dialog before proceeding to printing.
As to "why", my best guess at this point is that TPrinter used alone does not have all necessary permissions to access all necessary resources from Windows after the Security Update for Microsoft Windows (KB3177725) was implemented on Aug 10, 2016. Somehow a call to TPrinterSetupDialog (or TPrintDialog) before calling BeginDoc() sets up the necessary conditions for TPrinter to perform successfully.
XCode 7.2.1
iPad Retina iOS 9.2 Simulator
I have several breakpoints set in a particular class in an XCode project.
Everything I discuss below takes place in this one class file.
I set the breakpoints on -(int16_t)areaNbr by clicking in the gutter, and set no conditions or anything on them. I confirmed they existed as far as LLDB is concerned by running breakpoint list from the LLDB prompt.
The project scheme is set to build for debugging, not release.
I run the project in the simulator, and stop at a breakpoint in a different method than the one in question, at which time I want to go to the LLDB prompt and call po [self areaNbr] and step through areaNbr.
Please note, as this may be quite relevant, I have NO code in the project itself that calls
-(int16_t)areaNbr
Now, I CAN get this to stop at my breakpoints on -(int16_t)areaNbr if I add some code to the project that calls the method.
For example, if I add something like NSLog(#"... %d", [self areaNbr])
I know the issue has nothing to do with compiling away the method simply because nothing calls it, because if that were true, then my call to po [self areaNbr] wouldn't be spitting out the result to the debugger window as pictured below. So the method is being compiled, and certainly recognized as existing by the debugger for execution purposes... just not for stepping purposes.
FYI, [self area] is returning "Area01"
Calling breakpoint list in LLDB returns the following
By default, lldb does not stop at breakpoints in hand-called code. The majority of folks use expr & expr -O -- i.e. po to print values & objects and were annoyed if they stopped at breakpoints they had set for other purposes.
However, it is easy to control this behavior, just use:
(lldb) expr -i 0 -- [self areaNbr]
Then you will stop at your breakpoint.
In this example, I left out the -O which is the object printing part, since if you just want to call this method, you likely don't care about calling description on the result after the expression is evaluated.
You can see all the options for expression evaluation by doing:
(lldb) help expr
Have a system build using C++ Builder 2010 that after running for about 20 hours it starts firing of assertion failures.
Assertion failed: xdrPtr && xdrPtr == *xdrLPP, file xx.cpp, line 2349
Tried google on it like crazy but not much info. Some people seem to refer a bunch of different assertions in xx.cpp to shortcomings in the exception handling in C++ Builder. But I haven't found anything referencing this particular line in the file.
We have integrated madExcept and it seems like somewhere along the way this catches an out of memory exception, but not sure if it's connected. No matter what an assertion triggering doesn't seem correct.
Edit:
I found an instance of a if-statement that as part of it's statement used a function that could throw an exception. I wonder if this could be the culprit somehow messing up the flow of the exception handling or something?
Consider
if(foo() == 0) {
...
}
wrapped in a try catch block.
If an exception is thrown from within foo() so that no int is returned here how will the if statement react? I'm thinking it still might try to finish executing that line and this performing the if check on the return of the function which will barf since no int was returned. Is this well defined or is this undefined behaviour?
Wouldn't
int fooStatus = foo();
if(fooStatus == 0) {
...
}
be better (or should I say safer)?
Edit 2:
I just managed to get the assertion on my dev machine (the application just standing idle) without any exception about memory popping up and the app only consuming around 100 mb. So they were probably not connected.
Will try to see if I can catch it again and see around where it barfs.
Edit 3:
Managed to catch it. First comes an assertion failure notice like explained. Then the debugger shows me this exception notification.
If I break it takes me here in the code
It actually highlights the first code line after
pConnection->Open();
But it seems I can change this to anything and that line is still highlighted. So my guess is that the error is in the code above it somehow. I have seen more reports about people getting this type of assertion failure when working with databases in RAD Studio... hmmmm.
Update:
I found a thread that recursively called it's own Execute function if it wasn't able to reach the DB server. I think this is at least part of the issue. This will just keep on trying and as more and more worker threads spawn and also keep trying it can only end in disaster.
If madExcept is hinting that you have an out of memory condition, the assert could fail if the pointers are NULL (i.e. the allocation failed). What are the values of xdrPtr and xdrLPP when the assert occurs? Can you trace back to where they are allocated?
I would start looking for memory leaks.