I have a graph in which I would like to examine the effects of removing/adding nodes but not persist these changes and am wondering if this is possible?
For example, adding a node to the graph, running some aggregate functions to see how this would impact but not change the underlying data.
Is it possible to change the graph in a transaction, query the changed graph then rollback to the original state? Or would I potentially have to either copy the graph or keep a log of changes and revert manually?
Neo4j has transaction handling which allows you to make modifications and then commit the results, or roll them back. But all of your operations need to be done in the transaction context.
This is easiest to do in either a java stored procedure or from any client such as C#.
How do you query the graph?
I have been testing neo4j for graph projects for 1 or 2 month now and it has been really efficient, but I'm having a hard time finding how to solve one of my problem and I'm seeking for advice.
I'm using neo4j to store graph databases and check that they follow some structural requirements, for example, I have a db modeling dependency between items : the nodes are the items and the links are labeled "need" or "incompatible" to model the dependency and I want neo4j to check the coherence of the data.
I coded the checker in a server plugin and it works very well. But now I would like to allow users to connect to the database, modify the data (without saving the modification yet), check that the modifications are not breaking the coherence and then save the modifications.
I found the http endpoint which can keep a transaction open and it completely fits the "modifying the db without saving" need, but I can't find how to run my checker on the modified data : is there a way to run something else than Cypher query with the http endpoint or do I have to consider an other way to solve this ?
I now it would be possible to run my checker using the TransactionEventHandler beforeCommit, but it means the user couldn't know if his data are okay without starting a commit, and the fact that the data are split between the db without modification and the TransactionData which store the modification make the checker tricky to apply.
So, if someone knows how I could solve this, it would be great.
Thank you.
Your options is to use Unmanaged Extension and Transaction Event API.
You are able to handle incoming transaction and read all data which are in it. If transaction break your rules, then you can discard the transaction.
I recommend you to use GraphAware framework for that.
Here is the great article about that http://graphaware.com/neo4j/transactions/2014/07/11/neo4j-transaction-event-api.html
What is the method for removing inactive, unwanted node labels in a Neo4j database (community edition version 2.2.2)?
I've seen this question in the past but for whatever reason it gets many interpretations, such as clearing browser cache, etc.
I am referring here to labels actually contained in the database, such that the REST command
GET /db/data/labels
will produce them in its output. The labels have been removed from any nodes and there are not active constraints attached to them.
I am aware this question has been asked in the past and there is a cumbersome way of solving it, which is basically, dump and reload the database. The dump command doesn't even contain scattered commit statements and thus needs to be edited before executing it back. Of course this takes forever with big databases. There has to be a better way, or at least there is a feature in the queue of requirements waiting to be implemented. Can someone clarify?
If you delete the last node with a certain label - as you've observed - the label itself does not get deleted. As of today there is no way to delete a label.
However you can copy over the datastore in offline mode using e.g. Michael's store copy tool to achieve this.
The new store is then aware of only those labels which actually are used.
I need to insert 800000 records into an MS Access table. I am using Delphi 2007 and the TAdoXxxx components. The table contains some integer fields, one float field and one text field with only one character. There is a primary key on one of the integer fields (which is not autoinc) and two indexes on another integer and the float field.
Inserting the data using AdoTable.AppendRecord(...) takes > 10 Minutes which is not acceptable since this is done every time the user starts using a new database with the program. I cannot prefill the table because the data comes from another database (which is not accessible through ADO).
I managed to get down to around 1 minute by writing the records to a tab separated text file and using a tAdoCommand object to execute
insert into table (...) select * from [filename.txt] in "c:\somedir" "Text;HDR=Yes"
But I don't like the overhead of this.
There must be a better way, I think.
EDIT:
Some additional information:
MS Access was chosen because it does not need any additional installation on the target machine(s) and the whole database is contained in one file which can be easily copied.
This is a single user application.
The data will be inserted only once and will not change for the lifetime of the database. Though, the table contains one additional field that is used as a flag to indicate that the corresponding record in another database has been processed by the user.
One minute is acceptable (up to 3 minutes would be too) and my solution works, but it seems too complicated to me, so I thought there should be an easier way to do this.
Once the data has been inserted, the performance of the table is quite good.
When I started planning/implementing the feature of the program working with the Access database the table was not required. It only became necessary later on, when another feature was requested by the customer. (Isn't that always the case?)
EDIT:
From all the answers I got so far, it seems that I already got the fastest method for inserting that much data into an Access table. Thanks to everybody, I appreciate your help.
Since you've said that the 800K records data won't change for the life of the database, I'd suggest linking to the text file as a table, and skip the insert altogether.
If you insist on pulling it into the database, then 800,000 records in 1 minute is over 13,000 / second. I don't think you're gonna beat that in MS Access.
If you want it to be more responsive for the user, then you might want to consider loading some minimal set of data, and setting up a background thread to load the rest while they work.
It would be quicker without the indexes. Can you add them after the import?
There are a number of suggestions that may be of interest in this thread Slow MSAccess disk writing
What about skipping the text file and using ODBC or OLEDB to import directly from the source table? That would mean altering your FROM clause to use the source table name and an appropriate connect string as the IN '' part of the FROM clause.
EDIT:
Actually I see you say the original format is xBase, so it should be possible to use the xBase ISAM that is part of Jet instead of needing ODBC or OLEDB. That would look something like this:
INSERT INTO table (...)
SELECT *
FROM tablename IN 'c:\somedir\'[dBase 5.0;HDR=NO;IMEX=2;];
You might have to tweak that -- I just grabbed the connect string for a linked table pointing at a DBF file, so the parameters might be slightly different.
Your text based solution seems the fastest, but you can get it quicker if you could get an preallocated MS Access in a size near the end one. You can do that by filling an typical user database, closing the application (so the buffers are flushed) and doing a manual deletion of all records of that big table - but not shrinking/compacting it.
So, use that file to start the real filling - Access will not request any (or very few) additional disk space. Don't remeber if MS Access have a way to automate this, but it can help much...
How about an alternate arrangement...
Would it be an option to make a copy of an existing Access database file that has this table you need and then just delete all the other data in there besides this one large table (don't know if Access has an equivalent to something like "truncate table" in SQL server)?
I would replace MS Access with another database, and for your situation I see Sqlite is the best choice, it doesn't require any installation into client machine, and it's very fast database and one of the best embedded database solution.
You can use it in Delphi in two ways:
You can download the Database engine Dll from Sqlite website and use Free Delphi component to access it like Delphi SQLite components or SQLite4Delphi
Use DISQLite3 which have the engine built in, and you don't have to distribute the dll with your application, they have a free version ;-)
if you still need to use MS Access, try to use TAdoCommand with SQL Insert statment directly instead of using TADOTable, that should be faster than using TADOTable.Append;
You won't be importing 800,000 records in less than a minute, as someone mentioned; that's really fast already.
You can skip the annoying translate-to-text-file step however if you use the right method (DAO recordsets) for doing the inserts. See a previous question I asked and had answered on StackOverflow: MS Access: Why is ADODB.Recordset.BatchUpdate so much slower than Application.ImportXML?
Don't use INSERT INTO even with DAO; it's slow. Don't use ADO either; it's slow. But DAO + Delphi + Recordsets + instantiating the DbEngine COM object directly (instead of via the Access.Application object) will give you lots of speed.
You're looking in the right direction in one way. Using a single statement to bulk insert will be faster than trying to iterate through the data and insert it row by row. Access, being a file-based database will be exceedingly slow in iterative writes.
The problem is that Access is handling how it optimizes writes internally and there's not really any way to control it. You've probably reached the maximum efficiency of an INSERT statement. For additional speed, you should probably evaluate if there's any way around writing 800,000 records to the database every time you start the application.
Get SQL Server Express (free) and connect to it from Access an external table. SQL express is much faster than MS Access.
I would prefill the database, and hand them the file itself, rather than filling an existing (but empty) database.
If the data you have to fill changes, then keep an ODBC access database (MDB file) synchronized on the server using a bit of code to see changes in the main database and copy them to the access database.
When the user requests a new database zip up the MDB, transfer it to them, and open it.
Alternately, you may be able to find code that opens and inserts data into databases directly.
Alternately, alternately, you may be able to find another format (other than csv) which access can import that is faster.
-Adam
Also check to see how long it takes to copy the file. That will be the lower bound of how fast you can write data. In db's like SQL, it usually takes a bulk load utility to get close to that speed. As far as I know, MS never created a tool to write directly to MS Access tables the way bcp does. Specialized ETL tools will also optimize some of the steps surrounding the insert, such as the way SSIS does transformations in memory, DTS likewise has some optimizations.
Perhaps you could open a ADO Recordset to the table with lock mode adLockBatchOptimistic and CursorLocation adUseClient, write all the data to the recordset, then do a batch update (rs.UpdateBatch).
If it's coming from dbase, can you just copy the data and index files and attach directly without loading? Should be pretty efficient (from the people who bring you FoxPro.) I imagine it would use the existing indexes too.
At the least, it should be a pretty efficient single-command Import.
how much do the 800,000 records change from one creation to the next? Would it be possible to pre populate the records and then just update the ones that have changed in the external database when creating the new database?
This may allow you to create the new database file quicker.
How fast is your disk turning? If it's 7200RPM, then 800,000 rows in 3 minutes is still 37 rows per disk revolution. I don't think you're going to do much better than that.
Meanwhile, if the goal is to streamline the process, how about a table link?
You say you can't access the source database via ADO. Can you set up a table link in MS Access to a table or view in the source database? Then a simple append query from the table link would copy the data over from the source database to the target database for you. I'm not sure, but I think this would be pretty fast.
If you can't set up a table link until runtime, maybe you could build the table link programatically via ADO, then build the append query programatically, then invoke the append query.
HI
The best way is Bulk Insert from txt File as they said
you should insert your record's in txt file then bulk insert the txt file into table
that time should be less than 3 second.
I'm having an issue with an umbraco site of mine: For some reason some of the nodes are timing out when I try to click on them in the back-end of the site.
The front-end works fine and there aren't any slowdown issues there, however I'm unable to edit these same nodes in the back-end as the system seems to just hang. This is making it incredibly difficult to debug as I have no idea what properties are actually causing the problems here. What's strange is I can create a node of the same document type and enter in some dummy values and that works fine, yet I can't seem to edit the existing nodes.
I've tried republishing the entire site, republishing the individual nodes, deleting the umbraco.config file and nothing has worked up to this point.
What's also interesting is that if I close down the browser the system seems to stop hanging and I can log in and try again.
Has anyone encountered this before or know where to begin?
Thanks
I have encountered something similar. The longer you work with Umbraco the slower it becomes and if you check the memory usage in Chrome's task manager, you can see that certain actions upon nodes bump the memory usage up a little further. The answer is just to close down the tab and open a new one.
I have reported this and Umbraco cannot replicate this. However, I do think that this is possibly due to maybe a package installed into Umbraco, maybe uComponents. It's very difficult to pin point.
Update:
If you can access some nodes but not others, then this is actually slightly easier to debug. I would check what similarities the nodes that timeout have.
Are they all of the same document type?
Do they all use the same data type?
I would guess that the nodes in question are using a data type that is performing an operation when the node is loading, and that operation is timing out. For example, do you have any data types that load data from the database, like enums? Do you have any datatypes that load data from a web service?
Do you have any usercontrol data types wrapped in the UserControlWrapper data type? These would be somewhere to check.
Finally, check:
The databases [umbracoLog] table. Any Umbraco-specific errors will be listed there.
Check the computer's event viewer. This will show any unhandled errors.
My money's on a database timeout.