Process owner of a docker program - docker

I have started an nginx container bound on the host network as follows:
docker run --rm -d --network host --name mynginx nginx
However, when querying process information with the ss command, this seems to be a pure nginx but not a docker process:
$ ss -tuap 'sport = :80'
Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
tcp LISTEN 0 128 0.0.0.0:http 0.0.0.0:* users:(("nginx",pid=16563,fd=6),("nginx",pid=16524,fd=6))
why is that?

You configured the nginx process to run in the host networking namespace --net host. In that mode you do not setup port forwarding from the host to the container network (e.g. -p 80:80). Had you done the port forwarding, you would see a docker process on the host which is forwarding to the same port in the container namespace for the nginx process.
Keep in mind that containers are a method to run an application with kernel options for things like namespacing, it is not a VM running under a separate OS, so you will see processes running and ports opened directly on the host.
Here's an example of what it would look like if you forwarded the port instead of using the host network namespace, and how you can also look at the network namespace inside the container:
$ docker run --rm -d -p 8000:80 --name mynginx nginx
d177bc43166ad59f5cdf578eca819737635c43b2204b2f75f2ba54dd5a9cffbb
$ sudo ss -tuap 'sport = :8000'
Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
tcp LISTEN 0 128 :::8000 :::* users:(("docker-proxy",pid=25229,fd=4))
$ docker run -it --rm --net container:mynginx --pid container:mynginx nicolaka/netshoot ss -tuap 'sport = :80'
Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
tcp LISTEN 0 128 *:http *:* users:(("nginx",pid=1,fd=6))
The docker-proxy process there is the default way that docker forwards a port to the container.

I am afraid there is some misunderstanding here about so-called docker process.
First of all, ss command doesn’t show what kind of process it is. It may show the application name(nginx here). But we could not say it’s so-called pure nginx process.
You could try pwdx nginx_pid. Otherwise, each running container is a process which we could check with ps -ef on its host machine.
Above all, you could use ps -ef|grep nginx and pwdx nginx_pid to find out what kind of process it is.

Related

Cant connect to docker container port of some images

Trying investigate my issue with docker container. I lost a day when I thought that issue is in nodejs code (it has server and I am trying to connect to this server).
After investigations I found interesting thing for me.
For example - Lets run some test docker image:
docker run -p 888:888 -it ubuntu:16 /bin/bash
After that, prepare and install "simple server to listen our port":
apt-get update
apt-get install -y netcat
nc -l 888
After that I going to try to telnet localhost 888 from my system and got telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused. The same with nodejs image.
But if you try to use, for example, nginx container -
docker run -p 888:888 -it nginx /bin/bash
I will be successfull:
$telnet 127.0.0.1 888
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
How it is possible, what I am missing? Why I can bind and use any port in nginx but not for other images?
When you run nc -l 888, you are creating a port that is listening explicitly for IPv4 connections. If we run ss -tln, we will see:
State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port Process
LISTEN 0 1 0.0.0.0:888 0.0.0.0:*
When you run telnet localhost 888 on your host, there's a good chance it's trying to connect to the IPv6 localhost address, ::1. This connection fails if you're trying to connect an IPv4-only socket.
If you explicitly use the IPv4 loopback address by typing telnet 127.0.0.1 888, it should work as expected.
If you enable IPv6 support in nc by adding the -6 parameter:
nc -6 -l 8888
Then you get a socket that listen for both IPv4 and IPv6 connections:
State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port Process
LISTEN 0 1 *:888 *:*
And if you attempt to connect to this socket using telnet localhost 888, it will work as expected (as will telnet 127.0.0.1 888).
Most programs (like nginx) open multi-protocol sockets by default, so this isn't normally an issue.

Port mapping problems with VScode OSS running inside a docker container

I would like to run the VSCode OSS Web Server within a Docker Container, as described here: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/wiki/How-to-Contribute#vs-code-for-the-web
The Container is running, but the port mapping doesn't work. I run my image with
docker run -it -p 9888:9888 -p 5877:5877 vscode-server
but I got nothing with curl -I http://localhost:9888 on my machine. The VScode server is running, but the mapping to the host will not work. I think the problem is the binding. It looks like the VScode Server will bind to 127.0.0.1 but should bind to 0.0.0.0
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9888 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 870/node
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5877 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 881/node
Can anybody help here?

Establish conversation between hello-world apps in Docker containers

I'm trying to run my hello-world apps inside Docker: frontend need to consume REST from backend.
I run
docker run -p 1337:1337 --net=bridge me/p-dockerfile-advanced-backend:latest
docker run -p 1338:1338 --net=bridge me/p-dockerfile-advanced-frontend:latest http://127.0.0.1:1337
I am able to connect to both of them using a browser from the host OS (My desktop Windows 10 x64) :
The http://127.0.0.1:1337 parameter needed for the frontend application to know where the restful services reside. But the app cannot connect to them. I cannot connect too.
Windows PowerShell
Copyright (C) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
PS C:\Users\user1> docker ps
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
4b0852253b8a me/p-dockerfile-advanced-frontend:latest "/usr/bin/java -ja..." 24 minutes ago Up 24 minutes 0.0.0.0:1338->1338/tcp laughing_noyce
e73f8a6efa24 me/p-dockerfile-advanced-backend:latest "/usr/bin/java -ja..." 26 minutes ago Up 26 minutes youthful_chandrasekhar
PS C:\Users\user1> docker exec -it 4b0852253b8a bash
root#4b0852253b8a:/# apt-get install telnet
<...>
root#4b0852253b8a:/# telnet localhost 1337
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Trying ::1...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Cannot assign requested address
root#4b0852253b8a:/#
Unable to connect, but it should because I specified --net=bridge on both containers and backend listen the port 1337 :
root#e73f8a6efa24:/# netstat -lntu
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:1337 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
root#e73f8a6efa24:/#
PS: I spent almost all day trying to make it work before asking here.
The problem is the 127.0.0.1 address.
Each container is assigned, by default, 2 interfaces: eth0 and lo (the loopback interface with the 127.0.0.1 address).
You need to specify the name or address of the previous container. For this simple application you may use the --link option.
docker run -p 1337:1337 --name backend me/p-dockerfile-advanced-backend:latest
docker run -p 1338:1338 --link backend:backend me/p-dockerfile-advanced-frontend:latest http://backend:1337
Note that the --link option is deprecated as stated in:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/networking/default_network/dockerlinks/
Since these are different containers, you have to expose ports on both of them. Run the first with:
docker run -p 1337:1337 --net=bridge me/p-dockerfile-advanced-backend:latest
Note that bridge is the default network so you it is extra. Both containers will be on the same bridge network by default anyway.

Find open sockets in docker container

I have attached to a docker container and need to find out the number of sockets being open by java application . Unfortunately there is no lsof or netstat available in the container . There is no data in /proc/PID/net/tcp. Is there any way I can find this data?
I like netshoot for this. You can run a container in the same networking and even pid namespace, and use the tools in netshoot to analyze the other container's network:
$ docker run -d -p 8888:80 --name nginx-test nginx
d8a90f5c7d1744483ae6d26cc97dad222ed237b5c4211f711c9f15f88252897f
$ docker run --net container:nginx-test --pid container:nginx-test -it --rm nicolaka/netshoot
/ # netstat -lntp
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1/nginx: master pro
/ # ps -ef
PID USER TIME COMMAND
1 root 0:00 nginx: master process nginx -g daemon off;
7 104 0:00 nginx: worker process
8 root 0:00 sh
15 root 0:00 ps -ef
Alternatively, you can see this: /proc/PID/net/tcp in the host machine as long as you are in the same box as the docker daemon. This is less elegant than #BMitch's answer.
What you need to do is find out the PID of your process outside the container (in the main pid namespace, technically speaking, your host).
ps aux | grep java
Inside your container, your java has a pid; but outside it has another pid that you can use to access to the information that you have requested: /proc/PID/net/tcp

Can't ping docker IPv6 container

I ran docker daemon for using it with global IPv6 for containers:
docker daemon --ipv6 --fixed-cidr-v6="xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::/64"
After it I ran docker container:
docker run -d --name my-container some-image
It successfully got Global IPv6 address( I checked by docker inspect my-container). But I can't to ping my container by this ip:
Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
But I can successfully ping docker0 bridge by it's IPv6 address.
Output of route -n -6 contains next lines:
Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref Use If
xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::/64 :: U 256 0 0 docker0
xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::/64 :: U 1024 0 0 docker0
fe80::/64 :: U 256 0 0 docker0
docker0 interface has global IPv6 address:
inet6 addr: xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::1/64 Scope:Global
xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:: everywhere is the same, and it's global IPv6 address of my eth0 interface
Does docker required something additional configs for accessing my containers via IPv6?
Assuming IPv6 in your guest OS is properly configured probably you are pinging the container not from host OS, but outside and network discovery protocol is not configured. Other hosts does not know if your container is behind of your host. I'm doing this after start of container with IPv6 (in host OS) (in ExecStartPost clauses of Systemd .service file)
/usr/sbin/sysctl net.ipv6.conf.interface_name.proxy_ndp=1
/usr/bin/ip -6 neigh add proxy $(docker inspect --format {{.NetworkSettings.GlobalIPv6Address}} container_name) dev interface_name"
Beware of IPv6: docker developers say in replies to bug reports they do not have enough time to make IPv6 production-ready in version 1.10 and say nothing about 1.11.
Mb you use wrong ping command. For ipv6 is ping6.
$ ping6 2607:f0d0:1002:51::4

Resources