This question already has answers here:
Using codable with value that is sometimes an Int and other times a String
(5 answers)
Closed last year.
i am working with a service that have both a websocket for live data and a api for historical data
the JSON looks similar and i would like to decode it to the same object
the only difference is that in the live one variable is a number but as a string and with the historical data the number is an int.
and preferably i would like to not have to create 2 almost identical decodable objects.
have anyone tried something similar.
You have to define a single type (Int or String) for your data structure and use init with Decoder to make a custom parsing.
struct MyData: Decodable {
let value: Int // Could be Int or String from different services
}
extension MyData {
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case value
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
do {
value = try container.decode(Int.self, forKey: .value)
} catch {
let stringValue = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .value)
if let valueInt = Int(stringValue) {
value = valueInt
} else {
var codingPath = container.codingPath
codingPath.append(CodingKeys.value)
let debugDescription = "Could not create Int from String \(stringValue) of field \(CodingKeys.value.rawValue)"
let context = DecodingError.Context(codingPath: codingPath, debugDescription: debugDescription)
throw DecodingError.dataCorrupted(context)
}
}
}
}
I think you need a wrapper for that case of some sort. To make it as convenient as possible you could use a property wrapper for this
#propertyWrapper
struct NormalOrStringyInt: Decodable {
var wrappedValue: Int?
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
if let value = try? container.decode(Int.self) {
wrappedValue = value
} else if
let string = try? container.decode(String.self),
let value = Int(string)
{
wrappedValue = value
} else {
wrappedValue = nil // default value
}
}
}
struct Model: Codable {
#NormalOrStringyInt var id: Int?
var someInt: Int
var someString: String
...
}
let model = try! JSONDecoder().decode(Model, from: data)
let id: Int? = model.id.wrappedValue
I have lots of values in my codable struct. I have URLs coming in as ""(empty string) so I need custom Decoder to convert "" as nil. So I made a propertyWrapper to solve this.
For example, I have values like ["https://google.com", "", "https://google.com"] and I want to make it as [URL?]. This works well with my decoder. It's converted as [URL("https://google.com"), nil, URL("https://google.com")]
However, I found a problem that, when I use init(from decoder: Decoder) throws, I also have to initialize all other values in struct. Is there any way to use just courseImages and use other values in struct as set?
struct CabinetCourse: Codable {
let courseId: String
let title: String
let planStartDate: Date
let planEndDate: Date
let companionTypeCd: String
let courseCategory: String
let planId: String
let nickname: String?
let isCabinet: Bool
let isFavorite: Bool?
let course: String
let score: String
let shareCnt: Int
let favoriteCnt: Int
let cabinetCnt: Int
let placeCount: Int
let createDt: Date
let childPlaceCount: Int
let wheelChairPlaceCount: Int
let elderPlaceCount: Int
#OptionalObject
var courseImages: [URL?]
public init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
let emptyURLS = try values.decode([OptionalObject<URL>].self, forKey: .courseImages)
courseImages = emptyURLS.map { $0.wrappedValue }
// => these are the lines I don't want to write
courseId = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .courseId)
title = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .title)
planStartDate = try values.decode(Date.self, forKey: .planStartDate)
planEndDate = try values.decode(Date.self, forKey: .planEndDate)
companionTypeCd = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .companionTypeCd)
courseCategory = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .courseCategory)
planId = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .planId)
nickname = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .nickname)
isCabinet = try values.decode(Bool.self, forKey: .isCabinet)
isFavorite = try values.decode(Bool.self, forKey: .isCabinet)
course = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .isCabinet)
score = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .isCabinet)
}
#propertyWrapper
struct OptionalObject<Base: Decodable>: Decodable {
var wrappedValue: Base?
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
do {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
wrappedValue = try container.decode(Base.self)
} catch {
wrappedValue = nil
}
}
}
You are misunderstanding property wrappers. They "decorate" the entire property type - [URL?], not just the array element type URL?. [URL?] doesn't match the type of wrappedValue. [URL]? does (Base == [URL]), but that's not what you want.
One way to create a property wrapper that can be applied to an array of optionals is:
#propertyWrapper
struct OptionalArray<Base: Decodable>: Decodable {
var wrappedValue: [Base?]
...
Now Base == URL matches [URL?], and in init, you have to decode a [Base?]:
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
var arr = [Base?]()
var container = try decoder.unkeyedContainer()
for _ in 0..<(container.count ?? 0) {
if let element = try? container.decode(Base.self) {
arr.append(element)
} else {
arr.append(nil)
_ = try container.decode(String.self) // advances the decoder to the next position
}
}
wrappedValue = arr
}
Once you have the property wrapper, you don't need the custom decoding code at all. Swift figures it out.
struct CabinetCourse: Decodable {
let courseId: String
let title: String
let planStartDate: Date
let planEndDate: Date
let companionTypeCd: String
let courseCategory: String
let planId: String
let nickname: String?
let isCabinet: Bool
let isFavorite: Bool?
let course: String
let score: String
let shareCnt: Int
let favoriteCnt: Int
let cabinetCnt: Int
let placeCount: Int
let createDt: Date
let childPlaceCount: Int
let wheelChairPlaceCount: Int
let elderPlaceCount: Int
#OptionalArray
var courseImages: [URL?]
}
// That's it!
For the encoding part, it depends on how you want to encode the nils. But either way, the code is very similar to the decoding code.
Consider the following JSON: I'm trying to decode the "teams" object.
let jsonString = """
{
"Superheroes":{
"Marvel":"107",
"DC":"106"
},
"teams":{
"106":{
"name":"Marvel",
"Superheroes":{
"890":{
"name":"Batman"
}
}
},
"107":{
"name":"DC",
"Superheroes":{
"891":{
"name":"Wonder Woman"
}
}
}
}
}
"""
I have tried something like this:
struct SuperheroResponse: Decodable {
let teams: [Team]
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case teams = "teams"
}
private struct DynamicCodingKeys: CodingKey {
var stringValue: String
init?(stringValue: String) {
self.stringValue = stringValue
}
var intValue: Int?
init?(intValue: Int) {
return nil
}
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
let teamContainer = try container.nestedContainer(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self, forKey: CodingKeys.teams)
print(teamContainer.allKeys.count)
let tempArray: [Team] = []
for key in teamContainer.allKeys {
let decodedObject = try teamContainer.decode(Team.self, forKey: DynamicCodingKeys(stringValue: key.stringValue)!)
tempArray.append(decodedObject)
}
teams = tempArray
}
}
struct Team: Decodable {
let name: String
}
I thought that first I would get the teams container, map over the keys and go on from there. Problem is teamContainer.allKeys.count is always zero.
Also the following line, results in following error: Cannot convert value of type 'SuperheroResponse.DynamicCodingKeys' to expected argument type 'SuperheroResponse.CodingKeys'
let decodedObject = try teamContainer.decode(Team.self, forKey: DynamicCodingKeys(stringValue: key.stringValue)!)
Finally I decode it as follows:
let jsonData = Data(jsonString.utf8)
let decodedResult = try! JSONDecoder().decode(SuperheroResponse.self, from: jsonData)
dump(decodedResult)
Any help would be appreciated. Ideally I would like something like SuperheroResponse -> [Team],
Team -> name, [Superhero], Superhero -> name
You just have a couple of minor mistakes. You're almost there.
The team container is keyed by DynamicCodingKeys:
let teamContainer = try container.nestedContainer(keyedBy: DynamicCodingKeys.self, // <=
forKey: .teams)
And the Teams can be decoded as using the key you're given:
let decodedObject = try teamContainer.decode(Team.self, forKey: key)
Also, tempArray needs to be var:
var tempArray: [Team] = []
Or replace that loop with a map:
teams = try teamContainer.allKeys.map {
try teamContainer.decode(Team.self, forKey: $0)
}
All together:
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
let teamContainer = try container.nestedContainer(keyedBy: DynamicCodingKeys.self, forKey: .teams)
teams = try teamContainer.allKeys.map {
try teamContainer.decode(Team.self, forKey: $0)
}
}
Here is the code I am using,
struct CreatePostResponseModel : Codable{
var transcodeId:String?
var id:String = ""
enum TopLevelCodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case _transcode = "_transcode"
case _transcoder = "_transcoder"
}
enum CodingKeys:String, CodingKey{
case id = "_id"
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: TopLevelCodingKeys.self)
if let transcodeId = try container.decodeIfPresent(String.self, forKey: ._transcode) {
self.transcodeId = transcodeId
}else if let transcodeId = try container.decodeIfPresent(String.self, forKey: ._transcoder) {
self.transcodeId = transcodeId
}
}
}
Here, transcodeId is decided by either _transcode or _transcoder.
But I want id and rest of the keys (not included here) to be automatically decoded. How can I do it ?
You need to manually parse all the keys once you implement init(from:) in the Codable type.
struct CreatePostResponseModel: Decodable {
var transcodeId: String?
var id: String
enum CodingKeys:String, CodingKey{
case id, transcode, transcoder
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
id = try container.decodeIfPresent(String.self, forKey: .id) ?? ""
if let transcodeId = try container.decodeIfPresent(String.self, forKey: .transcode) {
self.transcodeId = transcodeId
} else if let transcodeId = try container.decodeIfPresent(String.self, forKey: .transcoder) {
self.transcodeId = transcodeId
}
}
}
In the above code,
In case you only want to decode the JSON, there is no need to use Codable. Using Decodable is enough.
Using multiple enums for CodingKey seems unnecessary here. You can use a single enum CodingKeys.
If the property name and the key name is an exact match, there is no need to explicitly specify the rawValue of that case in enum CodingKeys. So, there is no requirement of "_transcode" and "_transcoder" rawValues in TopLevelCodingKeys.
Apart from all that, you can use keyDecodingStrategy as .convertFromSnakeCase to handle underscore notation (snake case notation), i.e.
do {
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
decoder.keyDecodingStrategy = .convertFromSnakeCase //here.....
let model = try decoder.decode(CreatePostResponseModel.self, from: data)
print(model)
} catch {
print(error)
}
So, you don't need to explicitly handle all the snake-case keys. It'll be handled by the JSONDecoder on its own.
This can be one of the good solution for you wherever you want you can add multiple keys for one variable:
var transcodeId:String?
public init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
do {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
transcodeId = container.getValueFromAvailableKey(codingKeys: [CodingKeys._transcoder,CodingKeys._transcode])
} catch {
print("Error reading config file: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
}
extension KeyedDecodingContainerProtocol{
func getValueFromAvailableKey(codingKeys:[CodingKey])-> String?{
for key in codingKeys{
for keyPath in self.allKeys{
if key.stringValue == keyPath.stringValue{
do{
return try self.decodeIfPresent(String.self, forKey: keyPath)
} catch {
return nil
}
}
}
}
return nil
}
}
Hope it helps.
The compiler-generated init(from:) is all-or-nothing. You can’t have it decode some keys and “manually” decode others.
One way to use the compiler-generated init(from:) is by giving your struct both of the possible encoded properties, and make transcodeId a computed property:
struct CreatePostResponseModel: Codable {
var transcodeId: String? {
get { _transcode ?? _transcoder }
set { _transcode = newValue; _transcoder = nil }
}
var _transcode: String? = nil
var _transcoder: String? = nil
var id: String = “”
// other properties
}
enum PostType: Decodable {
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
// What do i put here?
}
case Image
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case image
}
}
What do i put to complete this?
Also, lets say i changed the case to this:
case image(value: Int)
How do I make this conform to Decodable?
Here is my full code (which does not work)
let jsonData = """
{
"count": 4
}
""".data(using: .utf8)!
do {
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
let response = try decoder.decode(PostType.self, from: jsonData)
print(response)
} catch {
print(error)
}
}
}
enum PostType: Int, Codable {
case count = 4
}
Also, how will it handle an enum like this?
enum PostType: Decodable {
case count(number: Int)
}
It's pretty easy, just use String or Int raw values which are implicitly assigned.
enum PostType: Int, Codable {
case image, blob
}
image is encoded to 0 and blob to 1
Or
enum PostType: String, Codable {
case image, blob
}
image is encoded to "image" and blob to "blob"
This is a simple example how to use it:
enum PostType : Int, Codable {
case count = 4
}
struct Post : Codable {
var type : PostType
}
let jsonString = "{\"type\": 4}"
let jsonData = Data(jsonString.utf8)
do {
let decoded = try JSONDecoder().decode(Post.self, from: jsonData)
print("decoded:", decoded.type)
} catch {
print(error)
}
Update
In iOS 13.3+ and macOS 15.1+ it's allowed to en-/decode fragments – single JSON values which are not wrapped in a collection type
let jsonString = "4"
let jsonData = Data(jsonString.utf8)
do {
let decoded = try JSONDecoder().decode(PostType.self, from: jsonData)
print("decoded:", decoded) // -> decoded: count
} catch {
print(error)
}
In Swift 5.5+ it's even possible to en-/decode enums with associated values without any extra code. The values are mapped to a dictionary and a parameter label must be specified for each associated value
enum Rotation: Codable {
case zAxis(angle: Double, speed: Int)
}
let jsonString = #"{"zAxis":{"angle":90,"speed":5}}"#
let jsonData = Data(jsonString.utf8)
do {
let decoded = try JSONDecoder().decode(Rotation.self, from: jsonData)
print("decoded:", decoded)
} catch {
print(error)
}
How to make enums with associated types conform to Codable
This answer is similar to #Howard Lovatt's but avoids creating a PostTypeCodableForm struct and instead uses the KeyedEncodingContainer type provided by Apple as a property on Encoder and Decoder, which reduces boilerplate.
enum PostType: Codable {
case count(number: Int)
case title(String)
}
extension PostType {
private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case count
case title
}
enum PostTypeCodingError: Error {
case decoding(String)
}
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
if let value = try? values.decode(Int.self, forKey: .count) {
self = .count(number: value)
return
}
if let value = try? values.decode(String.self, forKey: .title) {
self = .title(value)
return
}
throw PostTypeCodingError.decoding("Whoops! \(dump(values))")
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
switch self {
case .count(let number):
try container.encode(number, forKey: .count)
case .title(let value):
try container.encode(value, forKey: .title)
}
}
}
This code works for me on Xcode 9b3.
import Foundation // Needed for JSONEncoder/JSONDecoder
let encoder = JSONEncoder()
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted
let decoder = JSONDecoder()
let count = PostType.count(number: 42)
let countData = try encoder.encode(count)
let countJSON = String.init(data: countData, encoding: .utf8)!
print(countJSON)
// {
// "count" : 42
// }
let decodedCount = try decoder.decode(PostType.self, from: countData)
let title = PostType.title("Hello, World!")
let titleData = try encoder.encode(title)
let titleJSON = String.init(data: titleData, encoding: .utf8)!
print(titleJSON)
// {
// "title": "Hello, World!"
// }
let decodedTitle = try decoder.decode(PostType.self, from: titleData)
Swift would throw a .dataCorrupted error if it encounters unknown enum value. If your data is coming from a server, it can send you an unknown enum value at any time (bug server side, new type added in an API version and you want the previous versions of your app to handle the case gracefully, etc), you'd better be prepared, and code "defensive style" to safely decode your enums.
Here is an example on how to do it, with or without associated value
enum MediaType: Decodable {
case audio
case multipleChoice
case other
// case other(String) -> we could also parametrise the enum like that
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let label = try decoder.singleValueContainer().decode(String.self)
switch label {
case "AUDIO": self = .audio
case "MULTIPLE_CHOICES": self = .multipleChoice
default: self = .other
// default: self = .other(label)
}
}
}
And how to use it in a enclosing struct:
struct Question {
[...]
let type: MediaType
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
[...]
case type = "type"
}
extension Question: Decodable {
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
[...]
type = try container.decode(MediaType.self, forKey: .type)
}
}
To extend on #Toka's answer, you may too add a raw representable value to the enum, and use the default optional constructor to build the enum without a switch:
enum MediaType: String, Decodable {
case audio = "AUDIO"
case multipleChoice = "MULTIPLE_CHOICES"
case other
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let label = try decoder.singleValueContainer().decode(String.self)
self = MediaType(rawValue: label) ?? .other
}
}
It may be extended using a custom protocol that allows to refactor the constructor:
protocol EnumDecodable: RawRepresentable, Decodable {
static var defaultDecoderValue: Self { get }
}
extension EnumDecodable where RawValue: Decodable {
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let value = try decoder.singleValueContainer().decode(RawValue.self)
self = Self(rawValue: value) ?? Self.defaultDecoderValue
}
}
enum MediaType: String, EnumDecodable {
static let defaultDecoderValue: MediaType = .other
case audio = "AUDIO"
case multipleChoices = "MULTIPLE_CHOICES"
case other
}
It can also be easily extended for throwing an error if an invalid enum value was specified, rather than defaulting on a value. Gist with this change is available here: https://gist.github.com/stephanecopin/4283175fabf6f0cdaf87fef2a00c8128.
The code was compiled and tested using Swift 4.1/Xcode 9.3.
A variant of #proxpero's response that is terser would be to formulate the decoder as:
public init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
guard let key = values.allKeys.first else { throw err("No valid keys in: \(values)") }
func dec<T: Decodable>() throws -> T { return try values.decode(T.self, forKey: key) }
switch key {
case .count: self = try .count(dec())
case .title: self = try .title(dec())
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
switch self {
case .count(let x): try container.encode(x, forKey: .count)
case .title(let x): try container.encode(x, forKey: .title)
}
}
This permits the compiler to exhaustively verify the cases, and also doesn't suppress the error message for the case where the encoded value doesn't match the key's expected value.
Actually the answers above are really great, but they are missing some details for what many people need in a continuously developed client/server project. We develop an app while our backend continually evolves over time, which means some enum cases will change that evolution. So we need an enum decoding strategy that is able to decode arrays of enums that contain unknown cases. Otherwise decoding the object that contains the array simply fails.
What I did is quite simple:
enum Direction: String, Decodable {
case north, south, east, west
}
struct DirectionList {
let directions: [Direction]
}
extension DirectionList: Decodable {
public init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
var container = try decoder.unkeyedContainer()
var directions: [Direction] = []
while !container.isAtEnd {
// Here we just decode the string from the JSON which always works as long as the array element is a string
let rawValue = try container.decode(String.self)
guard let direction = Direction(rawValue: rawValue) else {
// Unknown enum value found - ignore, print error to console or log error to analytics service so you'll always know that there are apps out which cannot decode enum cases!
continue
}
// Add all known enum cases to the list of directions
directions.append(direction)
}
self.directions = directions
}
}
Bonus: Hide implementation > Make it a Collection
To hide implementation detail is always a good idea. For this you'll need just a little bit more code. The trick is to conform DirectionsList to Collection and make your internal list array private:
struct DirectionList {
typealias ArrayType = [Direction]
private let directions: ArrayType
}
extension DirectionList: Collection {
typealias Index = ArrayType.Index
typealias Element = ArrayType.Element
// The upper and lower bounds of the collection, used in iterations
var startIndex: Index { return directions.startIndex }
var endIndex: Index { return directions.endIndex }
// Required subscript, based on a dictionary index
subscript(index: Index) -> Element {
get { return directions[index] }
}
// Method that returns the next index when iterating
func index(after i: Index) -> Index {
return directions.index(after: i)
}
}
You can read more about conforming to custom collections in this blog post by John Sundell: https://medium.com/#johnsundell/creating-custom-collections-in-swift-a344e25d0bb0
You can do what you want, but it is a bit involved :(
import Foundation
enum PostType: Codable {
case count(number: Int)
case comment(text: String)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
self = try PostTypeCodableForm(from: decoder).enumForm()
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
try PostTypeCodableForm(self).encode(to: encoder)
}
}
struct PostTypeCodableForm: Codable {
// All fields must be optional!
var countNumber: Int?
var commentText: String?
init(_ enumForm: PostType) {
switch enumForm {
case .count(let number):
countNumber = number
case .comment(let text):
commentText = text
}
}
func enumForm() throws -> PostType {
if let number = countNumber {
guard commentText == nil else {
throw DecodeError.moreThanOneEnumCase
}
return .count(number: number)
}
if let text = commentText {
guard countNumber == nil else {
throw DecodeError.moreThanOneEnumCase
}
return .comment(text: text)
}
throw DecodeError.noRecognizedContent
}
enum DecodeError: Error {
case noRecognizedContent
case moreThanOneEnumCase
}
}
let test = PostType.count(number: 3)
let data = try JSONEncoder().encode(test)
let string = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8)!
print(string) // {"countNumber":3}
let result = try JSONDecoder().decode(PostType.self, from: data)
print(result) // count(3)
Features
Simple use. One line in Decodable instance: line eg let enum: DecodableEnum<AnyEnum>
Is decoded with standard mapping mechanism: JSONDecoder().decode(Model.self, from: data)
covered case of receiving unknown data (for example, mapping a Decodable object will not fail if you receive unexpected data)
handle/deliver mapping or decoding errors
Details
Xcode 12.0.1 (12A7300)
Swift 5.3
Solution
import Foundation
enum DecodableEnum<Enum: RawRepresentable> where Enum.RawValue == String {
case value(Enum)
case error(DecodingError)
var value: Enum? {
switch self {
case .value(let value): return value
case .error: return nil
}
}
var error: DecodingError? {
switch self {
case .value: return nil
case .error(let error): return error
}
}
enum DecodingError: Error {
case notDefined(rawValue: String)
case decoding(error: Error)
}
}
extension DecodableEnum: Decodable {
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
do {
let rawValue = try decoder.singleValueContainer().decode(String.self)
guard let layout = Enum(rawValue: rawValue) else {
self = .error(.notDefined(rawValue: rawValue))
return
}
self = .value(layout)
} catch let err {
self = .error(.decoding(error: err))
}
}
}
Usage sample
enum SimpleEnum: String, Codable {
case a, b, c, d
}
struct Model: Decodable {
let num: Int
let str: String
let enum1: DecodableEnum<SimpleEnum>
let enum2: DecodableEnum<SimpleEnum>
let enum3: DecodableEnum<SimpleEnum>
let enum4: DecodableEnum<SimpleEnum>?
}
let dictionary: [String : Any] = ["num": 1, "str": "blablabla", "enum1": "b", "enum2": "_", "enum3": 1]
let data = try! JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: dictionary)
let object = try JSONDecoder().decode(Model.self, from: data)
print("1. \(object.enum1.value)")
print("2. \(object.enum2.error)")
print("3. \(object.enum3.error)")
print("4. \(object.enum4)")
A lot of good approaches here, but I have not seen one discussing enums with more than one value, although it can be deduced from examples - maybe someone can find a use for this one:
import Foundation
enum Tup {
case frist(String, next: Int)
case second(Int, former: String)
enum TupType: String, Codable {
case first
case second
}
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case type
case first
case firstNext
case second
case secondFormer
}
}
extension Tup: Codable {
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
let type = try values.decode(TupType.self, forKey: .type)
switch type {
case .first:
let str = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .first)
let next = try values.decode(Int.self, forKey: .firstNext)
self = .frist(str, next: next)
case .second:
let int = try values.decode(Int.self, forKey: .second)
let former = try values.decode(String.self, forKey: .secondFormer)
self = .second(int, former: former)
}
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
switch self {
case .frist(let str, next: let next):
try container.encode(TupType.first, forKey: .type)
try container.encode(str, forKey: .first)
try container.encode(next, forKey: .firstNext)
case .second(let int, former: let former):
try container.encode(TupType.second, forKey: .type)
try container.encode(int, forKey: .second)
try container.encode(former, forKey: .secondFormer)
}
}
}
let example1 = Tup.frist("123", next: 90)
do {
let encoded = try JSONEncoder().encode(example1)
print(encoded)
let decoded = try JSONDecoder().decode(Tup.self, from: encoded)
print("decoded 1 = \(decoded)")
}
catch {
print("errpr = \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
let example2 = Tup.second(10, former: "dantheman")
do {
let encoded = try JSONEncoder().encode(example2)
print(encoded)
let decoded = try JSONDecoder().decode(Tup.self, from: encoded)
print("decoded 2 = \(decoded)")
}
catch {
print("errpr = \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
Here is a simple example of how to make an enum decodable in Swift.
Sample JSON:
[
{
"title": "1904",
"artist": "The Tallest Man on Earth",
"year": "2012",
"type": "hindi"
},
{
"title": "#40",
"artist": "Dave Matthews",
"year": "1999",
"type": "english"
},
{
"title": "40oz to Freedom",
"artist": "Sublime",
"year": "1996",
"type": "english"
},
{
"title": "#41",
"artist": "Dave Matthews",
"year": "1996",
"type": "punjabi"
}
]
Model struct:
struct Song: Codable {
public enum SongType: String, Codable {
case hindi = "hindi"
case english = "english"
case punjabi = "punjabi"
case tamil = "tamil"
case none = "none"
}
let title: String
let artist: String
let year: String
let type: SongType?
}
Now, you can parse the JSON file and parse the data into an array of songs like below:
func decodeJSON() {
do {
// creating path from main bundle and get data object from the path
if let bundlePath = Bundle.main.path(forResource: "sample", ofType: "json"),
let jsonData = try String(contentsOfFile: bundlePath).data(using: .utf8) {
// decoding an array of songs
let songs = try JSONDecoder().decode([Song].self, from: jsonData)
// printing the type of song
songs.forEach { song in
print("Song type: \(song.type?.rawValue ?? "")")
}
}
} catch {
print(error)
}
}
Comment below in case of any queries.