CanCanCan refuses to load collection for :create - ruby-on-rails

In my PromoCodesController I have this code:
load_and_authorize_resource :restaurant, find_by: :permalink
load_resource :discount, through: :restaurant
load_resource :promo_code, collection: [:create], through: :discount
It should be good since in #index, it loads the collection #promo_codes and in #create it loads #promo_code.
But it does not load the collection #promo_codes in #create. Where is the problem? In the documentation it says:
:collection argument: Specify which actions are resource collection actions in addition to :index.
Thank you

It's not working because Cancancan's method load_resource (controller_resource_loader.rb) assumes
only one resource variable to be set at a time: either resource_instance or collection_instance.
Your load_resource collection: [:create] can load #promo_codes in #create action via monkey patch to CanCan::ControllerResourceLoader:
# config/initializers/cancan.rb
module CanCan
module ControllerResourceLoader
def load_resource
return if skip?(:load)
# Original condition has been split into two separate conditions
if load_instance?
self.resource_instance ||= load_resource_instance
end
if load_collection?
self.collection_instance ||= load_collection
end
end
end
end
The common way in which this patch works is a create form integrated into index action:
class TicketsController < ActionController::Base
load_and_authorize_resource collection: [:create]
def index
#ticket = Ticket.new
end
def create
if #ticket.valid?
#ticket.create_for_user! params[:message]
redirect_to ticket_path(#ticket)
else
# #tickets are also defined here
render :index
end
end
end

Related

Rails: How to redirect to a specific controller (index) depending on condition

I have a Ruby on Rails application that can generate "roles" for actors in movies; the idea is that if a user looks at a movie detail page, they can click "add role", and the same if they look at an actor detail page.
Once the role is generated, I would like to redirect back to where they came from - the movie detail page or the actor detail page... so in the controller's "create" and "update" method, the redirect_to should either be movie_path(id) or actor_path(id). How do I keep the "origin" persistent, i. e. how do I remember whether the user came from movie detail or from actor detail (and the id, respectively)?
I would setup separate nested routes and just use inheritance, mixins and partials to avoid duplication:
resources :movies do
resources :roles, module: :movies, only: :create
end
resources :actors do
resources :roles, module: :actors, only: :create
end
class RolesController < ApplicationController
before_action :set_parent
def create
#role = #parent.roles.create(role_params)
if #role.save
redirect_to #parent
else
render :new
end
end
private
# guesses the name based on the module nesting
# assumes that you are using Rails 6+
# see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/133357/how-do-you-find-the-namespace-module-name-programmatically-in-ruby-on-rails
def parent_class
module_parent.name.singularize.constantize
end
def set_parent
parent_class.find(param_key)
end
def param_key
parent_class.model_name.param_key + "_id"
end
def role_params
params.require(:role)
.permit(:foo, :bar, :baz)
end
end
module Movies
class RolesController < ::RolesController
end
end
module Actors
class RolesController < ::RolesController
end
end
# roles/_form.html.erb
<%= form_with(model: [parent, role]) do |form| %>
# ...
<% end %>

Authorize nested controller

I have this setup:
routes.rb:
resources :orders, only: [] do
# many other member actions
# ...
namespace :confirm, module: :orders do
controller :confirm do
get :cash
end
end
end
orders/confirm_controller.rb:
class Orders::ConfirmController < ApplicationController
load_and_authorize_resource class: Order,
id_param: :order_id,
instance_name: :order
def cash
end
end
ability.rb:
can :cash, Order do |order|
order.buyer == user
end
The idea is: since OrdersController already overloaded with almost 20 actions, I want move new actions to nested controller. The code above is working but I feel that this part:
load_and_authorize_resource class: Order,
id_param: :order_id,
instance_name: :order
can be done easier. And ability that I have is for parent controller and not namespaced to nested controller, so if someone define cash method in OrdersController same ability will be used, what is not good. So is there any better way?

Rails 3 CanCan nested Resources

Have a nested resource as such
class Dealer < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :vehicles
end
and
class Vehicle < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :dealer
end
below are my routes.
resources :dealers do
resources :vehicles, :except => [:index]
end
resources :vehicles, :only => [:index]
looking at the wiki at the github page for cancan I did the following:
class VehiclesController < ApplicationController
load_and_authorize_resource :dealer
load_and_authorize_resource :vehicle, :through => :dealer
def index
#vehicles = Vehicle.all
respond_to do |format|
format.html # index.html.erb
format.json { render json: #vehicles }
end
end
end
but now when the admin tries to go to the index page with the abilities:
def initialize(user)
user ||= User.new # guest user (not logged in)
if user.has_role? :admin
can :manage, :all
end
end
I get
Couldn't find Dealer with id=
what do i need to change for admin to still be able to do all the actions and yet have others be checked before they can do any action.
The problem is not that he is not authorized to this action. The problem is that CanCan tries to fetch an instance of dealer to load all its vehicles and you have not provided a :dealer_id within params[:dealer_id]. Cancan assumes you would be loading only dealer's vehicles in this controller because you used an load_and_authorieze :through. This authorization should be used within Dealers::VehiclesController.
As long as you only loading vehicles just use load_and_authorize_resource :vehicle. And because load_and_authorize will set #vehicles for you within the before filter there is also no need to load the vehicles explicitly with Vehicle.all.
load_and_authorize is just a convenient method and it assumes some defaults. Once you will come to a point where you have some more complex use case. It will be time to throw away this method and just use CanCan's authorize!, can? and a properly configured Vehicle .accessible_by (for listing) methods.
When using load_and_authorize_resource :vehicle, through: :dealer it expects to receive a dealer_id in the request in order to authorize the dealer.
Since you use except: :index in your routes dealer_id will not be automatically included in the request.
If you don't want to authorize the dealer in the index action you can do something like this (taken from Can Can wiki)
class CommentsController < ApplicationController
load_and_authorize_resource :post
load_and_authorize_resource :through => :post
skip_authorize_resource :only => :show
skip_authorize_resource :post, :only => :show
end

Route concern and polymorphic model: how to share controller and views?

Given the routes:
Example::Application.routes.draw do
concern :commentable do
resources :comments
end
resources :articles, concerns: :commentable
resources :forums do
resources :forum_topics, concerns: :commentable
end
end
And the model:
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :commentable, polymorphic: true
end
When I edit or add a comment, I need to go back to the "commentable" object. I have the following issues, though:
1) The redirect_to in the comments_controller.rb would be different depending on the parent object
2) The references on the views would differ as well
= simple_form_for comment do |form|
Is there a practical way to share views and controllers for this comment resource?
In Rails 4 you can pass options to concerns. So if you do this:
# routes.rb
concern :commentable do |options|
resources :comments, options
end
resources :articles do
concerns :commentable, commentable_type: 'Article'
end
Then when you rake routes, you will see you get a route like
POST /articles/:id/comments, {commentable_type: 'Article'}
That will override anything the request tries to set to keep it secure. Then in your CommentsController:
# comments_controller.rb
class CommentsController < ApplicationController
before_filter :set_commentable, only: [:index, :create]
def create
#comment = Comment.create!(commentable: #commentable)
respond_with #comment
end
private
def set_commentable
commentable_id = params["#{params[:commentable_type].underscore}_id"]
#commentable = params[:commentable_type].constantize.find(commentable_id)
end
end
One way to test such a controller with rspec is:
require 'rails_helper'
describe CommentsController do
let(:article) { create(:article) }
[:article].each do |commentable|
it "creates comments for #{commentable.to_s.pluralize} " do
obj = send(commentable)
options = {}
options["#{commentable.to_s}_id"] = obj.id
options["commentable_type".to_sym] = commentable.to_s.camelize
options[:comment] = attributes_for(:comment)
post :create, options
expect(obj.comments).to eq [Comment.all.last]
end
end
end
You can find the parent in a before filter like this:
comments_controller.rb
before_filter: find_parent
def find_parent
params.each do |name, value|
if name =~ /(.+)_id$/
#parent = $1.classify.constantize.find(value)
end
end
end
Now you can redirect or do whatever you please depending on the parent type.
For example in a view:
= simple_form_for [#parent, comment] do |form|
Or in a controller
comments_controller.rb
redirect_to #parent # redirect to the show page of the commentable.

Nested (and Unested at-same-time) Resources better approach

I have two models like that
class Plan < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :profile
And
class Profile < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :plans
And routes like: (I need to)
resources :profiles do
resources :plans
end
resources :plans
So, following up ruby-on-rails - Problem with Nested Resources, I've made my PLANS index controller like this, to works NESTED and UNESTED at same time (the only way I've found for now):
def index
if params.has_key? :profile_id
#profile = Profile.find(params[:profile_id])
#plans = #profile.plans
else
#plans = Plan.all
end
There is a cleaner approach to this?
I have another models in this situation, and putting all actions, in all controllers to behave like this is cumbersome.
You gave me an idea:
models/user.rb:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :posts
attr_accessible :name
end
models/post.rb:
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
attr_accessible :title, :user_id
end
controllers/posts_controller.rb:
class PostsController < ApplicationController
belongs_to :user # creates belongs_to_user filter
# #posts = Post.all # managed by belongs_to_user filter
# GET /posts
# GET /posts.json
def index
respond_to do |format|
format.html # index.html.erb
format.json { render json: #posts }
end
end
end
And now the substance:
controllers/application_controller.rb:
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
protect_from_forgery
def self.belongs_to(model)
# Example: model == :user
filter_method_name = :"belongs_to_#{model}_index" # :belongs_to_user_index
foreign_key = "#{model}_id" # 'user_id'
model_class = model.to_s.classify # User
class_eval <<-EOV, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1
def #{filter_method_name} # def belongs_to_user_index
if params.has_key? :'#{foreign_key}' # if params.has_key? :user_id
instance_variable_set :"##{model}", # instance_variable_set :"#user",
#{model_class}.find(params[:'#{foreign_key}']) # User.find(params[:user_id])
instance_variable_set :"#\#{controller_name}", # instance_variable_set :"##{controller_name}",
##{model}.send(controller_name.pluralize) # #user.send(controller_name.pluralize)
else # else
instance_variable_set :"#\#{controller_name}", # instance_variable_set :"##{controller_name}",
controller_name.classify.constantize.all # controller_name.classify.constantize.all
end # end
end # end
EOV
before_filter filter_method_name, only: :index # before_filter :belongs_to_user_index, only: :index
end
end
The code is not complex to understand if you have notions of Ruby metaprogramming: it declares a before_filter which declares the instance variables inferring the names from the controller name and from the association. It is implemented just for the index actions, which is the only action using the plural instance variable version, but it should be easy to write a filter version for the other actions.

Resources