I am trying to link to a Card (as in an instance of a Card Macro) in a Confluence page and I cannot get it to work. The advice I have seen around the web states that I need to make sure that both the Deck of Cards and the Card in question has IDs, and then to use a full web link to access it. The id for the deck of cards is "MyDeck", the id for the specific card is "MyCard", and the full link in the weblink is:
https://www.mydomain.tld/confluence/Page+Title#MyDeck-MyCard
(SO rejected the post with the real url, so I anonymized it some.)
When I hover over the link it seems to be correct, but when I click on it, it takes me to the top of the page with the first card open (not the card I have specified in the link).
What am I doing wrong?
Disclaimer: I work with ServiceRocket that maintains this addon macros that you've asked about.
I've managed to achieve your example without any problem. It wasn't clear whether you want to have your link in the same page (where the Deck of Cards are located) or in a different page. In any case, let me answer for both cases.
Before You Begin
Make sure you've given IDs to your Deck and all the cards (tabs) in your deck.
So, my final deck of cards will look like this:
Link to a specific tab in the same page
If you have a very long page, and your deck is in the bottom, and you wanted to place your links in the same page, you can use show-card macro. This is documented here with a tutorial example too.
Link to a specific tab but from a different Page
Show card macro will only work in the same page, so here, you will have to manually construct the URL in the other page, but its not that hard. Your approach actually seems correct, but I want you to double check your URL, and ID of the Deck and Card.
First, I copied the view URL of the page that has the deck.
http://localhost:8090/display/SPACEKEY/composition+example
Then I added the Deck ID and Card ID as you did:
http://localhost:8090/display/SPACEKEY/composition+example#Example-Third
This was working for me. I even added some long lorem ipsum paragraphs to make the deck at the very bottom of the page, and my link would open the page and scroll down to the correct tab at the end of the page.
If it still doesn't work for you, please try and make your IDs more unique (maybe there is some CSS that have the same Ids), otherwise don't hesitate to contact the plugin's support who will be able to help you.
Related
I have added necessary meta tags for twitter cards and Cardtype is 'summary'.
when I try to tweet any URL it does not follow CARD meta tags (OGP) for the link first Time. and it just shows as it is. now when I try same link again it works fine and shows expected result.
I tried this with another websites too.. It behaves the same?
Is there any reason behind this? Why I can't see the effect of Twitter CARD for the 1st time I try any link?
I recently decided to start to take advantage of rich snippets to improve my personal website's content for the search engines and, IMHO most importantly, the site readers – hi, Mam! ;-). One of these are Google Authorship. Personally, I think the idea behind Google Authorship is a sound one: it helps to brings a sense of identity, personality and – arguably, most importantly – credibility to what is still largely an anonymous web.
Normally, I would link my article to Google Authorship using the following line of HTML:
<A REL="author" HREF="https://plus.google.com/112431363835029530079?rel=author">Jordan Clark</A>
However, in the instance of a website that publishes articles that are written by multiple authors, manually entering each another’s Google+ UID string starts to become a tiresome process.
Is is valid to do the following:
(a) Link to the author like so, using the script "author.php" (or other type of server-side script).
<A REL="author" HREF="/author.php?by=Alice&rel=author/[UID]?rel=author">Alice</A>
(b) The file "author.php" scripts simply do a quick check for Alice's (or whoever) User ID string provided by Google, and then uses a simple HTTP redirect header to pass this data to Google.
What I would like to know is:
Is it okay to use a local script to redirect to your Google+ user profile? (i.e. will it affect the PageRank of already indexed page or have any other unforeseen negative effects on new and indexed pages?)
Why do I not see more people linking with Google’s “prettified” version:
http://profiles.google.com/clarky.y2k?rel=author
Are there any drawbacks to using the “prettified” version of this method?
Ideally, I would like to use the intermediate PHP script, as I have already described above (see part 1). However, any tips, suggestions or other ways you may have implemented on your websites are very welcome!
For item (1), you can maintain your own app's profiles (author.php in your case) for your authors. On your own app's profile page (author.php), you would add a link from that page to Google and specify the rel="me" attribute on that link. So Alice's profile page might say something like "Find Alice on Google+.
This indirect authorship linking is supported. You also will need the link from Alice's Google+ profile that lists her as a contributor to your site. Once the linking is setup in both directions, authorship can start to show up. Authorship won't always display in all cases and can take some time for it to start appearing as Google would need to reindex your pages.
For item (2), I don't think the profiles URL will enable authorship. Some people use that URL as a vanity URL, but as far as I know it isn't supported for use with things like authorship, badges, etc.
You should test if your redirects are followed using the Rich Snippets Testing Tool: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets
rel="author" is no longer supported.
I have a website with a default home page of index.html, let's call the website: www.brianbauer.com ( that is my name BTW).
www.brianbauer.com operates something like a "treasure hunt". by clicking on various hot-spots on each HTML page access via brianbauer.com, you get redirected to the next html page. this continues for some period of user-clicks. One of the ideas is that on each visit, it is not obvious how the user reached a specific webpage. all they know is that they kept clicking and ended up at some final HTML page. but every click that brings up a new HTML page, still shows "http://www.brianbauer.com" in the Address bar. This is a game, nothing "wrong" going on here.
1. All of the HTML pages are owned by me, and I authored them all.
2. No illegal or unscruptulous activty of any kind going on.
3. all HTML pages in scope are under the root domain of brianbauer.com
the idea is that as users look at pictures and read a narrative, they make choices. a typical webpage might have 4 choices. depending on your choice, the next HTML page you see is determined.
I have created site maps that are basically decision trees.
think of it like a digital corn-maze. It's important that the full URL path to the current HTML page that they are looking at is masked, and should only show "www.brianbauer.com". it is true that someone more sophisticated could look at sourcecode, record their screen, keep notes, etc. but the mask will accomplish 90% of my goal.
as for being able to bookmark a certain webpage that they have "discovered"? the whole point is that they should not be able to....
I am NOT trying to mask my domain, that is easy. I am trying to simply maske what appears in the Address bar as users hit HTML pages which are children of that domain.
Thank you for the help.
Brian
There is something called CNAME cloak it might be one option.
Another option could be using ajax and replace content of the page.
I am having similar problem in my other pages and it’s driving me crazy. I have modified a “manufacturer” module to “series”
as well as the link too.
For example, I was able to change this link:
bishounenboutique.com/manufacturer
to this:
bishounenboutique.com/series
Click on the breadcrumbs, and
the they are fine in that page. However,
if you click on top image “Psycho pass” for example in that link, it will redirect to:
bishounenboutique.com/index.php?route=product/manufacturer/product&manufacturer_id=13
(which is not what i want. Ideally I want the link to be bishounenboutique.com/psycho-pass)
But set that aside, on that page if you click on the breadcrumb link “series”, it gives:
bishounenboutique.com/index.php?route=series
but it is supposed to be:
bishounenboutique.com/series
!!!
Can anyone please give me an idea of why this is happening?
I have already enabled SEO url and renamed the htaccess file. But I don't know why it works on some links but not others.
Thank you.
Products, Manufacturers, Information Pages and Categories all have SEO keyword fields, which you can find in their DATA tabs (except for Manufacturers which is in the GENERAL tab). These need to be set for all of the above to make them work. The reason the second link you've shown doesn't work is because it's product/manufacturer/product not just product/manufacturer
EDIT
product/manufacturer/product is actually a manufacturer link - it's just poorly named by OpenCart. OpenCart still knows it is a manufacturer link and you can see that by the id that's passed along with it (manufacturer_id not product_id)
Also, OC isn't meant to rewrite it's standard URL's, only product, category, manufacturer (individual manufacturer pages not the list of manufacturers) and info pages. This works on all versions that I'm aware of so if it's not with yours, the vQmod is likely at fault and you'll need to get the developer of that to fix it
I've written a route editor mod myself that doesn't require going in and hacking up a vQmod to get it to work so I understand the complications with it
When Facebook drives traffic to an application, it often append &ref=whatever to the query string. This is useful for figuring out which integration points are working or not. I've figured out what some of these mean. For example:
ref=bookmarks - the user clicked on a bookmark.
ref=game_my_recent - the user clicked on the upper portion of the games dashboard.
What does "ref=ts" mean? It accounts for a ton of traffic. I've viewed source on pages all over common Facebook pages and cannot find a match for ant piece of content generated by any of my applications.
Same question, posted by me on the Facebook developer forum:
http://forum.developers.facebook.com/viewtopic.php?id=54866
It means 'Top Search' (if you enter a query into the top, and then click on something, it will append ref=ts
As noted, ref=ts is appended to the url whenever a user makes a search in the Top Search input field.
Also note that people tend to copy/paste links in their website and blogs, without trimming useless GET strings.
So it is possible if you get a high number of referrers coming from the top search that they are in fact links that propagate outside of Facebook.