Upload image to firebase realtime Database or storage? - ios

I am trying to upload images to firebase along with other string and double data type.
I am think about 2 options now, one is uploading the imageUrl to firebase Realtime Database and when I retrieved it, I will retrieve a imageUrl and convert it to image.
Another way is to upload the image file to Firebase storage.
Which one is the preferred one to do? From the speed of loading image? or other factors that I haven't thought of.
Thank you for your help! I appreciate it.

Don't store large binary objects in Realtime Database. Use Cloud Storage instead.

Upload image urls is a better option.
Upload the image is a heavier task, hence it is better to upload urls with other data.

It depends on how big your app is going to scale. However, storing a large binary files in real time database is not a good practise. I would suggest you to use cloud storage, usually AWS buckets to store images and save the URL to firebase, to retrieve it later.

Storage is given from firebase to store all your large data and then fetch asynchronously. So using storage should be a better way rather than database.

For any kind of file you must have to use storage, and then store only file name in your realtime database to maintain good performance of your application. And that is the main reason firebase provide those functionalities in separate ways.

Related

Best Practices for saving images in swift (ios)

So I need to save pictures (made by the user) inside the app. I don't want to send them to a server and keep the link.
I am currently using Realm to save data, but I heard that it was not ideal to save images. What are the best practices for saving images locally?
(I will sometimes need to save hundreds of images.)
What kind of your data do you save ? ( link, data, image).
You should convert image to base64 then you save them into Realm. let write them in background task.
it will reduce volume and time to store them in Realm.

Should i save images to local storage in iOS App?

I am working on a project where i want to make the data, text, images available in offline mode as well.
I fetch data from a web-service which includes image urls and other data. I store the text data in core data entities, however i don't save images locally but fetch them in realtime.
To view images in offline mode i will have to save them to local storage. However i am wondering if it would be the right approach. Saving images to local may possibly eat up a lot of storage on user's device.
What is the best approach to address this problem?
Should i save images to local or should i fetch them on run time only?
Use NSCache. With NSCache you can set a limit to how many images and so on are cached. See Apple's documentation for more details: https://developer.apple.com/reference/foundation/nscache?language=objc
Edit:
Never mind NSCache, just save the images as files. NSCache can still save you network usage and allow your app to be more responsive, but it is not what you want.
Should i save images to local or should i fetch them on run time only?
This question for you , you should decide what you need or what is will be more suitable for your app . at any way if you want to cache images i suggest to use this library SDWebImage

Best practice for syncing Core Data database with images to Dropbox via ParcelKit

I have an iOS app that uses Core Data and ParcelKit to sync with Dropbox. However, the Dropbox Datastore API only allows records of 100K so it will not sync images that I store in the database. Any other workaround than storing images as separate files with filenames stored in the base? It is a little fragile when user can alter the content of the imagefile-folder thus braking the link to the database.
You should not store large images in the Core Data persistent store. Apple recommends that you should only store small images, such as thumbnails, perhaps 20K max. If you go beyond that, performance will eventually degrade significantly.
Thus, you cannot really avoid storing the images in separate files and storing their name/location in Core Data. This is the recommended pattern.
I do not see why you think this is fragile. Presumably you will store the images in the app sandbox there is no way the user can fiddle with them unless the iPhone is jailbroken.
The Dropbox sync should be managed independently from this setup.
FYI Dropbox just killed the Datastore API and will take it off line in 2016. :-(
You should monitor this ParcelKit Issue:
Dropbox Datastore is Deprecated #34
https://github.com/overcommitted/ParcelKit/issues/34

save image and videos within the app iOS

I want users to save the picked image and video within the app. So I wanted to know what is the best. Should i convert the picked images and videos to NSData and save in Core data? I search everywhere and everyone recommend to use Documents Folder to save images and videos because coredata is slower. I just started learning CoreData so I don't have much knowledge about it. Here is what I have come up.
Users pick the image or video -> App Saves it to documents folder -> Using coredata, application stores the filepath as string to access the image or video. (and User can backup anytime using icloud)
and Users can access those files in their other devices using iCloud. Please explain me if I'm incorrect or if you have better alternative or the question is wrong in any way. Thanks
I've done both ways and for me it's just a matter of how to use the database. If you'd like to to be able to backup the database and share with other, I would recommend storing files in CoreData as NSData. If it's just a local database it might be easier to store URL's to images stored on disk.
When you setup a Binery field in CoreData you can optionally select "Allows External Storage" which basically store the file on disk for you, but you can load it from the databas as if it was stored in the db. This is what I use most for images.
With this option, it is easy to create a zip file of the database and all binary files connected to it and also easy to unzip it to make a restore of the database.

Save images in phonegap and jquery mobile

Hi I have to develop an application that consists of the world cup fifa stamp album.
I have all the stamps in a png format, so in the first module i need to show the stamps that i own and the ones that not.
My original idea was to store in a database an entity called stamp that includes the image, the name of the player, the id of the stamp and the quantity that i own of each one. I don´t know which storage option to use i know that localstorage can´t store the images so I think my only option is web sql.
Is this the correct approach or the other one is to save the images like in a local folder and then using local storage save the path to the image, the id, name and number of the stamps?
Your life will be easier if you would store the images in the file system and their locations in the database.
Images must be served as static files so you will be able to access them directly
You don't need additional code to extract and stream the images
Images are easy to cache and store on the file system
The database also stores the data on the file system
For a web app you would could use multiple servers to improve performance
So yes, save the images in a local folder and use localstorage or web database to save the image paths.
For storing large amount of data you have to use SQLite for iOS and indexeddb for all other platforms.
There are two ways to access SQLite in phonegap. Either use native websql or sqliteplugin.
You can try out my library which abstract these storage mechanism. See here for example app https://github.com/yathit/cordova-sqliteplugin-todo
For storing image in the database, see here in "Storing File and Blob data" section.

Resources