I have generated 999 acknowledgement file from a claim (837) file. In the 999,AK9 segment says "~AK9*A*1*2*2~". I am using a third-party tool to generate the 999 file. In the claim file, we have two transaction set. But AK902 says "1". can somebody help me to understand the value of AK902. If I generate with another tool that is generating "~AK9*A*2*2*2~"
I found the answer to my question here. This says ~AK9*A*2*2*2~ is right.
Related
My constraints
A mandatory section
An optional section
A single-level section
Only one identical option by section
Text values that can look like this:
Electric= yes6batteries
Electric= yes4battery
Electric= yes8solar_panel
Electric= yes
Thermal= no
Conditional options, for example:
Electric should not exist (or should be no) if Thermal= yes but must be if Thermal= no
Need to get the number or the content of the error/conflict lines
I looked ConfigObj but I soon abandoned because not validated for Python3.
I started working with ConfigParser but I'm not sure to reach what I want.
So I ask you what you would do in my place or if there is a library best suited to my need.
TOML isn't exactly the INI format, but it looks almost like it.
There's a python library for TOML, and it works with Python 3.
I am new to SQLWindows IDE and I need to edit a number of SQLWindows applications. I am using Version 3.0.0 of the IDE. I am facing trouble finding the line number of a particular line of code. Is there any setting or way to know the line number of the code? Generally IDEs provide the line number, but I am not able to see any line number details in the [Outline] mode. Kindly help!
SQLWindows doesn't use line numbers at all.
If you want to change similar code lines in several files, I suggest getting acquainted with the CDK, which lets you write applications that alter .app/apt/apl files. Unfortunately wasn't able to find a "Starter Guide" on Google.
Im guessing you have corruption in a apl file ? If so save the file as 'text' , ( never save as Binary i.e. 'Compiled' or 'App' always save using the 'Text' option ) then re-open it. 9 out of 10 any line number errors fix automatically this way . Once you have saved as Text , you can open it and edit it ( carefully ) in Notepad++ .
Its very unusual to need to know a line number....why would you possibly want to know it ? If you explain more , there may be a better workaround ( there always is )
I was wondering if anyone knows how to add comments to a fasta file. I tried using the # character but it doesn't sit well with alignment algorithms/software.
Thanks,
What I usually found is that there are no comments. But in the wikipedia article it says that you could add comments after the > line if starting with ;. But I have never found anyone with this notation.
But I have never found any fasta file with comments. Usually the header or the name get this attribution so > E.coli can be converted to > E.coli X43 methanol as you can see here
But usually, as seen here, and here is added as a description as said.
You are not allowed to adds comment IN the sequence. But you could add a comment within an alternative format like one of the XML-based ones published by the NCBI.
I'm writing the Custom Activities of build process template. I got the below issue when build the activity.
>XamlBuildTask : error XC1043: Extension 'Microsoft.Activities.Build.BeforeInitializeComponentExtension' threw an exception of type 'System.IO.PathTooLongException' : 'The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters.'.
Do you have any ideas? Please help!
I find one tip here. Hope it might be helpful to you.
Currently there are a two workarounds:
Reduce the namespace in workflow x:Class property. This makes the
generated file have a shorter name.
Use the subst or mklink command to
create mapping so that the path the solution is located in becomes a
lot smaller. In team build, the workspace mapping needs to be modified
equally.
This still happens in 2015 TFS
This is the best answer I got changing build agent properties
Properties to save path space
The build agent properties dialog defines the "Working directory” for the build agent, defaulting to
“$(SystemDrive)\Builds\$(BuildAgentId)\$(BuildDefinitionPath)”. Based
on the above link, I’m going to go with
“$(SystemDrive)\B\$(BuildDefinitionId)” – that should take the
'”uilds” off the base directory, the TFS project name (19 characters),
a backslash, and the build name (7 characters) out, and replace them
with just a 32-bit number (which should be at most 10 digits, but
since it starts from 1, it’s much more likely to be 3-4 digits),
saving me 23 characters minimum
I may not have been able to shorten $(SourceDir), but it’s just “$(BuildDir)\Sources”, right? I can just configure the build to pull
the code to “$(BuildDir)\S” instead of “$(SourceDir)”, and I
should save another 6 characters, getting me to 29 characters saved,
which should be enough
I just caught myself doing something I do a lot, and wanted to generalize it, express it, share it and see who else is following this general practice, to find some other example situations where it might be relevant.
The general practice is getting something wrong first, on purpose, to establish that everything else is right before undertaking the current task.
What I was trying to do, specifically, was to find examples in our code base where the dojo TextArea widget was used. I knew (because I had it in front of me - existence proof) that the TextBox widget was present in at least one file. So I looked first for what I knew was there:
grep -r digit.form.TextBox | grep -v
svn
This wasn't right - I had made a common (for me) mistake of leaving off the star, so I fixed that:
grep -r digit.form.TextBox * | grep
-v svn
which found no results! Quick comparison with the file I was looking at showed me I had misspelled "dijit":
grep -r dijit.form.TextBox * | grep
-v svn
And now I got results. Cool; doing it wrong first on purpose meant my query was correct except for looking for the wrong thing, so now I could construct the right query:
grep -r dijit.form.TextArea * | grep
-v svn
and be confident that when it gave me no results, it was because there are no such files, and not because I had malformed the query.
I'll add three other examples as answers; please add any others you're aware of.
TDD
The red-green-refactor cycle of test-driven development may be the archetype of this practice. With red, demonstrate that the functionality doesn't exist; then make it exist and demonstrate that you've done so by witnessing the green bar.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/275085
This VBA routine turns off the "subdatasheets" property for every table in your MS Access database. The user is instructed to make sure error-handling is set to "Break only on unhandled errors." The routine identifies tables needing the fix by the error that is thrown. I'm not sure this precisely fits your question, but it's always interesting to me that the error is being used in a non-error way.
Here's an example from VBA:
I also use camel case when I Dim my variables. ThisIsAnExampleOfCamelCase. As soon as I exit the VBA code line if Access doesn't change the lower case variable to camel case then I know I've got a typo. [OR, Option Explicit isn't set, which is the post topic.]
I also use this trick, several times an hour at least.
arrange - assert - act - assert
I sometimes like, in my tests, to add a counter-assertion before the action to show that the action is actually responsible for producing the desired outcome demonstrated by the concluding assertion.
When in doubt of my spelling, and of my editor's spell-checking
We use many editors. Many of them highlight misspelled words as I type them - some do not. I rely on automatic spell checking, but I can't always remember whether the editor of the moment has that feature. So I'll enter, say, "circuitx" and hit space. If it highlights, I'll back up over the space and the "x" and type another space - and learn that I spelled circuit correctly - but if it doesn't, I'll copy the word and paste it into a known spell-checker to see whether I did.
I'm not sure it's the best way to act, as it does not prevent you from mispelling the final command, for example typing "TestArea" or something like that instead of "TextArea" (your finger just have to slip a little for such a mistake).
IMHO the best way is to run your "final" command, but on two sample files first : one containing the requested text, another that doesn't.
In other words, instead of running a "similar" command, run the real one, but over "similar" data.
(Not sure if this would be a good idea to try for real!)
For example, you might give the system to the users for testing and tell them the password to get started is "Apple".
You know the users are fully up and ready to test (everything is installed and connections to databases working) when they contact you and say the password doesn't work (it's actually "Orange").