I've read the Cloud Composer overview (https://cloud.google.com/composer/) and documentation (https://cloud.google.com/composer/docs/).
It doesn't seem to mention failover.
I'm guessing it does, since it runs on Kubernetes cluster. Does it?
By failover I mean if the airflow webserver or scheduler stops for some reason, does it get started automatically again?
Yes, since Cloud Composer is built on Google Kubernetes Engine, it benefits from all the fault tolerance of any other service running on Kubernetes Engine. Pod and machine failures are automatically healed.
Related
I am new to devops. I want to install jenkins. So out of all options available to install jenkins provided in official documentation which one should I use. I am zeroed on docker or kubernetes. So parameters I am looking for decision are below.
portability - can be installed on any major os or cloud provider.
minimal changes to move to production.
Kubernetes is a container orchestrator that may use Docker as its container runtime. So, they are quite different things—essentially, different levels of abstraction.
You could theoretically run an application at both of these abstraction levels. Here's a comparison:
Docker
You can run an application as a Docker container on any machine that has Docker installed (i.e. any OS or cloud provider instance that supports Docker). However, you would need to implement any operations-related features that are relevant for production, such as health checks, replication, load balancing, etc. yourself.
Kubernetes
Running an application on Kubernetes requires a Kubernetes cluster. You can run a Kubernetes cluster either on-premises, in the cloud, or use a managed Kubernetes service (such as Amazon EKS, Google GKE, or Azure AKS). The big advantage of Kubernetes is that it provides all the production-relevant features mentioned above (health checks, replication, load balancing, etc.) as part of the platform. So, you don't need to implement them yourself but just use the primitives that Kubernetes provides to you.
Regarding your two requirements, Kubernetes provides both of them, while using Docker alone does not provide easy production-readiness (requirement 2). So, if you're opting for production stability, setting up a Kubernetes cluster is certainly worth the effort.
My task is to warm up an ASP.Net Core app that run inside Docker containers deployed on ECS. It seem that with Kubernetes, we can define a readiness check path that Kubernetes will first send request to and only start sending real traffic once that request is completed.
Do we have a equivalent feature on ECS?
A reference regarding this issue but can be solved in Kubernetes:
https://blog.markvincze.com/running-asp-net-core-in-auto-scaling-containers-warm-up/
It is not supported yet.
There is an open ticket for that https://github.com/aws/containers-roadmap/issues/1670
I'm interested in getting started with Kubernetes, but my needs are simple and it does not look simple. I have a number of containerized applications that I deploy to container servers. I use nginx as a reverse proxy to expose these applications.
As far as I can tell, Kubernetes is meant to simplify management of setups like this. But I'm not sure the setup investment is worth it, given that I only realistically need one instance of each app running.
What is the simplest reasonable Kubernetes setup that I can deploy a few containerized applications to?
EDIT: If I start using Kubernetes, it will be using only on-site servers. The applications in question are ones I’ve developed for my employer, who requires that everything stays on-site.
On developers machine; you should use minikube.
On Azure / Google / Amazon ..etc; you should use managed kubernetes services
On Prem you should deploy kubernetes with on your own setup.
3.1. https://github.com/kelseyhightower/kubernetes-the-hard-way
3.2. with kubeadm
3.3 with ansible scripts like kubespray
If you choose kubeadm installation,while you are upgrading kubernetes cluster, again you should use kubeadm again. Best way to deploy on prem is using kubeadm, kube-spray or automating it with Pivotal's Bosh scripts
As you want to get started with Kubernetes, I assume that you want to set-up for your local development, I think that minikube is a best candidate for this purpose. You can also take a look at interactive tutorials from official Kubernetes website, I find it very helpful.
Take a look at this opinionated cluster setup k8s-snowflake and deploy it somewhere like Azure, or Google Compute.
It's a great exercise to figure out how kubernetes clusters work at a low level, but when you're ready to go to production, take a look at Google's Container Engine or AWS Elastic Container Engine. These ease the management of clusters immensely and exposes all the other benefits of the cloud platform to your kubernetes workloads.
Well according to previous answers you should start with minikube on your machine.
Regarding the futher dev/test/staging/prod deployment it depends. There are a couple of solutions:
use clusters provided by Google, Azure or AWS (AWS EKS is not ready yet - https://aws.amazon.com/eks/)
the hard way - setup own cluster or EC2 machines or similar
use tools like Rancher - some additional abstration over k8s for easy start, from version 2.0 k8s will be default mechanism orchiestration for Rancher
Update 31-01-2018:
regarding the hard way - there are of course some tools which helps with that approach like helm
The Kubernetes docs provide an excellent page to choose between the different options to setup kubernetes. The page is found under Picking the Right Solution.
If you want a simple way for setting a kubernetes cluster on premise, check kubeadm.
Good day
We have a development environment that consists of 6 virtual machines. Currently we are using Vagrant and Ansible with VirtualBox.
As you can imagine, hosting this environment is a maintenance nightmare particularly as versions of software/OS change. Not too mention resource load for developer machines.
We have started migrating some virtual machines to docker. But this itself poses problems around orchestration, correct configurations, communication etc. This led me to Kubernetes.
Would someone be so kind as to provide some reasoning as to whether Kubernetes would or wouldn't be the right tool for the job? That is managing and orchestrating 'development' docker containers.
Thanks
This is quite complex topic and many things have to be considered if it's worth to use k8s as local dev environment. Especially I used it when I wanted to have my local developer environment very close to production one which was running on Kubernetes. This helped to avoid many configuration bugs.
In my opinion Kubernetes(k8s) will provide you all you need for a development environment.
It gives you much flexibility and does much configuration itself. Few examples:
An easy way to deploy new version into local kubernetes stack
You prepare k8s replication controller files for each of your application module (keep in mind that they need to be stateless modules)
In replication controller you specify the docker image and that's it.
Using this approach you can push new docker images to local docker_registry and then using kubectl control the lifecycle of your application.
Easy way to scale your application modules
For example:
kubectl scale rc your_application_service --replicas=3
This way k8s will check how many pods you have running for your service and if it recognises that the number is smaller then the replicas value it will create new to satisfy the replicas number.
It's endless topic and many other things come to my mind, but I would suggest you to try it out.
There is a https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/developer-guides/vagrant.md project for running the k8s cluster in vagrant.
Of course you have to remember that if you have many services all of them have to be pushed to local repository and run by k8s. This will require some time but if you automate local deploy with some custom scripts you won't regret.
As wsl mentioned before, it is a quite complex topic. But i'm doing this as well at the moment. So let me summaries some things for you:
With Kubernetes (k8s) you're going to orchestrate your SaaS Application. In best case, it is a Cloud-native Application. The properties/requirements for a Cloud-native Application are formulated by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), which basically were formed around k8s, after Google donates it to the Linux Foundation.
So the properties/requirements for a Cloud-native Application are: Container packaged, Dynamically managed and Micro-services oriented (cncf.io/about/charter). You will benefit mostly from k8s, if your applications are micro-service based and every service has a separate container.
With micro-service based applications, every service can be developed independently. The developer only needs to follow the 12Factor Method (12factor.net) for example (use env var instead of hard coded IP addresses, etc).
In the next step the developer build the container for a service and pushes it the a container registry. For a local develop environment, you may need to run a container registry inside the cluster as well, so the developer can push and test his code locally.
Then you're able to define your k8s replication-controllers, services, PetSets, etc. with Ports, Port-mapping, env vars, Container Images... and create and run it inside the cluster.
The k8s-documentation recommend Minikube for running k8s locally (kubernetes.io/docs/getting-started-guides/minikube/). With Minikube you got features like DNS, NodePorts, ConfigMaps and Secrets
Dashboards.
But I choose the multi node CoreOS Kubernetes with Vagrant Cluster for my Development Environment as Puja Abbassi mentioned in the Blog "Finding The Right Local Kubernetes Development Environment" (https://deis.com/blog/2016/local-kubernetes-development-environment/), it is closer to the my production environment (12Factor: 10 - Dev/prod parity).
With the Vagrant Environment you got features like:
Networking with flannel
Service Discovery with etcd
DNS names for a set of containers with SkyDNS
internal load balancing
If you want to know, how everything works look inside this Github repo github.com/coreos/coreos-kubernetes/tree/master/multi-node (vagrant and generic folder).
So you have to ask yourself, if you or your developers really need to run a complete "cloud environment" locally. In many cases a developer can develop a service (based on micro-services and containers) independently.
But sometimes it is necessary to have multiple or all services run on your local machine as a dev-environment.
I know that GKE is driven by kubernetes underneath. But I don't seem to still get is that what part is taken care by GKE and what by k8s in the layering? The main purpose of both, as it appears to me is to manage containers in a cluster. Basically, I am looking for a simpler explanation with an example.
GKE is a managed/hosted Kubernetes (i.e. it is managed for you so you can concentrate on running your pods/containers applications)
Kubernetes does handle:
Running pods, scheduling them on nodes, guarantee no of replicas per Replication Controller settings (i.e. relaunch pods if they fail, relocate them if the node fails)
Services: proxy traffic to the right pod wherever it is located.
Jobs
In addition, there are several 'add-ons' to Kubernetes, some of which are part of what makes GKE:
DNS (you can't really live without it, even thought it's an add-on)
Metrics monitoring: with influxdb, grafana
Dashboard
None of these are out-of-the-box, although they are fairly easy to setup, but you need to maintain them.
There is no real 'logging' add-on, but there are various projects to do this (using Logspout, logstash, elasticsearch etc...)
In short Kubernetes does the orchestration, the rest are services that would run on top of Kubernetes.
GKE brings you all these components out-of-the-box, and you don't have to maintain them. They're setup for you, and they're more 'integrated' with the Google portal.
One important thing that everyone needs is the LoadBalancer part:
- Since Pods are ephemeral containers, that can be rescheduled anywhere and at any time, they are not static, so ingress traffic needs to be managed separately.
This can be done within Kubernetes by using a DaemonSet to fix a Pod on a specific node, and use a hostPort for that Pod to bind to the node's IP.
Obviously this lacks fault tolerance, so you could use multiple and do DNS round robin load balancing.
GKE takes care of all this too with external Load Balancing.
(On AWS, it's similar, with ALB taking care of load balancing in Kubernetes)
GKE (Google Container Engine) is only container platform, which Kubernetes can manage. It is not a kubernetes-like with "differences".
As mentioned in "Docker and Kubernetes and AppC " (May 2015, that can change):
Docker is currently the only supported runtime in GKE (Google Container Engine) our commercial containers product, and in GAE (Google App Engine), our Platform-as-a-Service product.
You can see Kubernetes used on GKE in this example: "Spinning Up Your First Kubernetes Cluster on GKE" from Rimantas Mocevicius.
The gcloud API will still make kubernetes commands behind the scene.
GKE will organize its platform through Kubernetes master
Every container cluster has a single master endpoint, which is managed by Container Engine.
The master provides a unified view into the cluster and, through its publicly-accessible endpoint, is the doorway for interacting with the cluster.
The managed master also runs the Kubernetes API server, which services REST requests, schedules pod creation and deletion on worker nodes, and synchronizes pod information (such as open ports and location) with service information.
In short, without getting into technical details,
GKE is managed Kubernetes, similar to how Google's Cloud Composer is managed Apache Airflow and Cloud Dataflow is managed Apache Beam.
So, some of Google Cloud Platform's services (GKE, Cloud Composer, Cloud Dataflow) are managed implementations of various open source technologies (Kubernetes, Airflow, Beam).