I want to display a nicely formatted integer value via the usual pluralization technology .stringsdict file. (Apple docs here.)
So if I have one thing, I want my output to read
1 thing
But if I have two thousand, three hundred sixty-four things, I want those commas:
2,364 things
but alas the string pluralization technology doesn't give them to me:
2364 things
I can achieve commas with an NSNumberFormatter. I can achieve pluralization with .stringsdict localization technology.
Can I easily achieve both?
Since you already have .stringsdict files setup with the properly plural strings, you don't actually need a number formatter. Simply use the localizedStringWithFormat method of String or NSString.
Assuming you have setup the localized key "%d things" in your Localizable.strings files and your .stringsdict files, your code would look something like:
Swift:
let things = 2364
let localizedString = String.localizedStringWithFormat(NSLocalizedString(#"%d things", #"Your comment"), things)
Objective-C:
int things = 2364;
NSString *localizedString = [NSString localizedStringWithFormat:NSLocalizedString(#"%d things", #"Your comment"), things];
Depending on your locale, the result will be something like:
2,364 things
2.364 things
2 364 things
Related
I've just come across this line in some legacy code I'm editing:
[UIImage imageNamed:#"data/visuals/interface/" #"backgroundViewController"];
^^^^
"Oops, what have I done here?"
I thought I must have accidentally just pasted something in the wrong place, but an undo didn't change that line. Out of curiosity, I built the program and it was successful!
Whaddyaknow? Obj-c has a more succinct way of concatenating string literals.
I added some more tests:
A simple log
NSLog(#"data/visuals/interface/" #"backgroundViewController");
data/visuals/interface/backgroundViewController
In parameters
NSURL *url = [NSURL URLWithString:#"http://" #"test.com" #"/path"];
NSLog(#"URL:%#", url);
URL:http://test.com/path
Using Variables
NSString *s = #"string1";
NSString *s2 = #"string2";
NSLog(#"%#", s s2);
Doesn't compile (not surprised by this one)
Other literals
NSNumber *number = #1 #2;
Doesn't compile
Some questions
Is this string concatenation documented anywhere?
How long has it been supported?
What is the underlying implementation? I expect it will be [s1 stringByAppendingString:s2]
Is it considered good practice by any authoritative body?
This method of concatenating static NSStrings is a compile-time compiler capability that has been available for over ten years. It is usually used to allow long constant strings to be split over several lines. Similar capabilities have been available in "C" for decades.
In the C Programming Language book, 1988 second edition, page 38 describes string concatenation so it has been around for a long time.
Excerpt from the book:
String constants can be concatenated at compile time:
"hello," " world" is equivalent to "hello, world"
This is useful for spitting long strings across several source lines.
Objective-C is a strict superset of "C" so it has always supported "C" string concatenation and my guess is that because of that static NSString concatenation has always been available.
It is considered good practice when used to split a static string across several lines for readability.
I have been having a lot of trouble with NSString's stringWithFormat: method as of late. I have written an object that allows you to align N lines of text (separated by new lines) either centered, right, or left. At the core of my logic is NSString's stringWithFormat. I use this function to pad my strings with spaces on the left or right of individual lines to produce the alignment I want. Here is an example:
NSString *str = #"$3.00" --> 3 dollars
[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%8s", [str cStringUsingEncoding:NSUnicodeStringEncoding]] --> returns --> " $3.00"
As you can see the above example works great, I padded 3 spaces on the left and the resulting text is right aligned/justified. Problems begin to arise when I start to pass in foreign currency symbols, the formatting just straight up does not work. It either adds extra symbols or just returns garbage.
NSString *str = #"Kč1.00" --> 3 Czech Koruna (Czech republic's currency)
[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%8s", [str cStringUsingEncoding:NSUnicodeStringEncoding]] --> returns --> " Kč1.00"
The above is just flat out wrong... Now I am not a string encoding expert but I do know NSString uses the international standardized unicode encoding for special characters well outside basic ASCII domain.
How can I fix my problem? What encoding should I use? I have tried so many different encoding enums I have lost count, everything from NSMACOSRomanEncoding to NSUTF32UnicodeBigEndian.. My last resort will be to just completely ditch using stringWithFormat all together, maybe it was only meant for simple UTF8Strings and basic symbols.
If you want to represent currency, is a lot better if you use a NSNumberFormatter with currency style (NSNumberFormatterCurrencyStyle). It reads the currentLocale and shows the currency based on it. You just need to ask its string representation and append to a string.
It will be a lot easier than managing unicode formats, check a tutorial here
This will give you the required result
NSString *str = #"Kč1.00";
str=[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%#%8#",[#" " stringByPaddingToLength:3 withString:#" " startingAtIndex:0],str];
Out Put : #" Kč1.00";
Just one more trick to achieve this -
If you like use it :)
[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%8s%#",[#"" cStringUsingEncoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding],str];
This will work too.
I'm simply trying to convert uppercased company names into proper names.
Company names can include:
Dashes
Apostrophes
Roman Numerals
Text like LLC, LP, INC which should stay uppercase.
I thought I might be able to use acronyms like this:
ACRONYMS = %W( LP III IV VI VII VIII IX GI)
ActiveSupport::Inflector.inflections(:en) do |inflect|
ACRONYMS.each { |a| inflect.acronym(a) }
end
However, the conversion does not take into account word breaks, so having VI and VII does not work. For example, the conversion of "ADVISORS".titleize is "Ad VI Sors", as the VI becomes a whole word.
Dashes get removed.
It seems like there should be a generic gem for this generic problem, but I didn't find one. Is this problem really not that common? What's the best solution besides completely hacking the current inflection library?
Company names are a little odd, since a lot of times they're Marks (as in Service Mark) more than proper names. That means precise capitalization might actually matter, and trying to titleize might not be worth it.
In any case, here's a pattern that might work. Build your list of tokens to "keep", then manually split the string up and titleize the non-token parts.
# Make sure you put long strings before short (VII before VI)
word_tokens = %w{VII VI IX XI}
# Special characters need to be separate, since they never appear as "part" of another word
special_tokens = %w{-}
# Builds a regex like /(\bVII\b|\bVI\b|-|)/ that wraps "word tokens" in a word boundary check
token_regex = /(#{word_tokens.map{|t| /\b#{t}\b/}.join("|")}|#{special_tokens.join("|")})/
title = "ADVISORS-XI"
title.split(token_regex).map{|s| s =~ token_regex ? s : s.titleize}.join
I have some NSString like :
test = #"this is %25test%25 string";
I am trying to replace test with some arabic text , but it is not replacing exactly as it is :
[test stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:#"test" withString:#"اختبار"];
and the result is :
this is %25 اختبار %25 string
Some where I read there could be some problem with encoding or text alignment.Is there extra adjustment needed to be done for arabic string operations .
EDIT : I have used NSMutable string insert property but still the same result .
EDIT 2:
One other thing that occurs to me that is causing most of your trouble in this specific example. You have a partially percent-encoded string above. You have spaces, but you also have %25. You should avoid doing that. Either percent-encode a string or don't. Convert it all at once when required (using stringByAddingPercentEscapesUsingEncoding:). Don't try to "hard-code" percent-encoding. If you just used "this is a %اختبار% string" (and then percent-encoded the entire thing at the end), all your directional problems would go away (see how that renders just fine?). The rest of these answers address the more general question when you really need to deal with directionality.
EDIT:
The original answer after the line relates to human-readable strings, and is correct for human-readable strings, but your actual question (based on your followups) is about URLs. URLs are not human-readable strings, even if they occasionally look like them. They are a sequence of bytes that are independent of how they are rendered to humans. "اختبار" cannot be in the path or fragment parts of an URL. These characters are not part of the legal set of characters for those sections (اختبار is allowed to be part of the host, but you have to follow the IDN rules for that).
The correct URL encoding for this is a %25<arabic>%25 string is:
this%20is%20a%20%2525%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1%2525%20string
If you decode and render this string to the screen, it will appear like this:
this is a %25اختبار%25 string
But it is in fact exactly the string you mean (and it is the string you should pass to the browser). Follow the bytes (like the computer will):
this - this (ALPHA)
%20 - <space> (encoded)
is - is (ALPHA)
%20 - <space> (encoded)
a - a (ALPHA)
%20 - <space> (encoded)
%25 - % (encoded)
25 - 25 (DIGIT)
%D8%A7 - ا (encoded)
%D8%AE - خ (encoded)
%D8%AA - ت (encoded)
%D8%A8 - ب (encoded)
%D8%A7 - ا (encoded)
%D8%B1 - ر (encoded)
%25 - % (encoded)
25 - 25 (DIGIT)
%20 - <space> (encoded)
string - string (ALPHA)
The Unicode BIDI display algorithm is doing what it means to do; it just isn't what you expect. But those are the bytes and they're in the correct order. If you add any additional bytes (such as LRO) to this string, then you are modifying the URL and it means something different.
So the question you need to answer is, are you making an URL, or are you making a human-readable string? If you're making an URL, it should be URL-encoded, in which case you will not have this display problem (unless this is part of the host, which is a different set of rules, but I don't believe that's your problem). If this is a human-readable string, see below about how to provide hints and overrides to the BIDI algorithm.
It's possible that you really need both (a human-friendly string, and a correct URL that can be pasted). That's fine, you just need to handle the clipboard yourself. Show the string, but when the user goes to copy it, replace it with the fully encoded URL using UIPasteboard or by overriding copy:. See Copy, Cut, and Paste Operations. This is fairly common (note how in Safari, it displays just "stackoverflow.com" in the address bar but if you copy and paste it, it pastes "https://stackoverflow.com/" Same thing.
Original answer related to human-readable strings.
Believe it or not, stringByReplacingOccuranceOfString: is doing the right thing. It's just not displaying the way you expect. If you walk through characterAtIndex:, you'll find that it's:
% 2 5 ا ...
The problem is that the layout engine gets very confused around all the "neutral direction" characters. The engine doesn't understand whether you meant "%25" to be attached to the left to right part or right to left part. You have to help it out here by giving it some explicit directional characters to work with.
There are a few ways to go about this. First, you can do it the Unicode 6.3 tr9-29 way with Explicit Directional Isolates. This is exactly the kind of problem that Isolates are meant to solve. You have some piece of text whose direction you want to be considered completely independently of all other text. Unicode 6.3 isn't actually supported by iOS or OS X as best I can tell, but for many (though not all) uses, it "works."
You want to surround your Arabic with FSI (FIRST STRONG ISOLATE U+2068) and PDI (POP DIRECTIONAL ISOLATE U+2069). You could also use RLI (RIGHT-TO-LEFT ISOLATE) to be explicit. FSI means "treat this text as being in the direction of the first strong character you find."
So you could ideally do this:
NSString *test = #"this is a %25\u2068test\u2069%25 string";
NSString *arabic = #"اختبار";
NSString *result = [test stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:#"test" withString:arabic];
That works if you know what you're going to substitute before hand (so you know where to put the FSI and PDI). If you don't, you can do it the other way and make it part of the substitution:
NSString * const FSI = #"\u2068";
NSString * const PDI = #"\u2069";
NSString *test = #"this is %25test%25 string";
NSString *arabic = #"اختبار";
NSString *replaceString = [#[FSI, arabic, PDI] componentsJoinedByString:#""];
NSString *result = [test stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:#"test" withString:replaceString];
I said this "mostly" works. It's fine for UILabel, and it probably is fine for anything using Core Text. But in NSLog output, you'll get these extra "placeholder" characters:
You might get this other places, too. I haven't checked UIWebView for instance.
So there are some other options. You can use directional marks. It's a little awkward, though. LRM and RLM are zero-width strongly directional characters. So you can bracket the arabic with LRM (left to right mark) so that the arabic doesn't disturb the surrounding text. This is a little ugly since it means the substitution has to be aware of what it's substituting into (which is why isolates were invented).
NSString * const LRM = #"\u200e";
NSString *test = #"this is a %25test%25 string";
NSString *replaceString = [#[LRM, arabic, LRM] componentsJoinedByString:#""];
NSString *result = [test stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:#"test" withString:replaceString];
BTW, Directional Marks are usually the right answer. They should always be the first thing you try. This particular problem is just a little too tricky.
One more way is to use Explicit Directional Overrides. These are the giant "do what I tell you to do" hammer of the Unicode world. You should avoid them whenever possible. There are some security concerns with them that make them forbidden in certain places (<RLO>elgoog<PDF>.com would display as google.com for instance). But they will work here.
You bracket the whole string with LRO/PDF to force it to be left-to-right. You then bracket the substitution with RLO/PDF to force it to the right-to-left. Again, this is a last resort, but it lets you take complete control over the layout:
NSString * const LRO = #"\u202d";
NSString * const RLO = #"\u202e";
NSString * const PDF = #"\u202c";
NSString *test = [#[LRO, #"this is a %25test%25 string", PDF] componentsJoinedByString:#""];
NSString *arabic = #"اختبار";
NSString *replaceString = [#[RLO, arabic, PDF] componentsJoinedByString:#""];
NSString *result = [test stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:#"test" withString:replaceString];
I would think you could solve this problem with the Explicit Directional Embedding characters, but I haven't really found a way to do it without at least one override (for instance, you could use RLE instead of RLO above, but you still need the LRO).
Those should give you the tools you need to figure all of this out. See the Unicode TR9 for the gory details. And if you want a deeper introduction to the problem and solutions, see Cal Henderson's excellent Understanding Bidirectional (BIDI) Text in Unicode.
You should try like this:
NSString *test = #"this is %25test%25 string";
NSString *test2 = [[[test stringByReplacingPercentEscapesUsingEncoding:NSStringEncodingConversionAllowLossy] componentsSeparatedByString:#"test"] componentsJoinedByString:#"اختبار"];
Similar to comma separated thousand NSString stringWithFormat but with a specific use case.
How do I insert a comma (,) after every third digit?
Some cases:
9999999 → 9,999,999
1234 → 1,234
3432423455435435 → 3,432,423,455,435,435
The results are expected regardless of locale or any other circumstance.
You're looking for an NSNumberFormatter. The easiest way to use it is like this:
NSString *formatted = [NSNumberFormatter localizedStringFromNumber:#(1234) numberStyle:NSNumberFormatterDecimalStyle];
NSLog(#"%#", formatted); // probably logs "1,234", depending on your locale.
What I needed was not something that would care for the locale of a user, and with that it was just easier to do some string juggling. If someone cares I could dig up that code...
If you however DO care for locales, go with the other answer of Dave DeLong. Technically however it does not answer the question.