Why can 'self.method' not use a method in the same class? - ruby-on-rails

Why when I do self.method from a class, I get an undefined method `my_method' for MyModule::MyOtherModule::MyClass:Class
module MyModule
module OtherModule
class MyClass < Base
def my_method
end
def self.my_self_method
my_method
end
end
end
end
I call my_self_method with send from an herited [sic] class:
class Base
class << self
my_method(method_name)
send("my_self_#{method_name}")
end
end
end
I don't understand it.

In your code, you're defining one instance method (my_method), and one class method (my_self_method).
This means you can call:
MyClass.my_self_method
or
MyClass.new.my_method
If you want my_method to be callable from my_self_method, you could define it as:
def self.my_method
...
end
Then the following would be available:
def self.my_self_method
my_method
end
Here's another alternative. There's a comment that suggests it's bad practice to call new.my_method from within a class method, but I've seen a pattern that applies this that I find quite idiomatic, for example:
class MyClass
def self.run(the_variables)
new(the_variables).process
end
def initialize(the_variables)
# setup the_variables
end
def process
# do whatever's needed
end
end
This allows a simple entry point of MyClass.run(the_variables). If your use case seems suitable, a similar pattern for you would be:
module MyModule
module OtherModule
class MyClass < Base
def my_method
end
def self.my_self_method
new.my_method
end
end
end
end
I'm sure there's scope to disagree with this pattern, and would be interested to hear others' opinions in the comments.
Hope this helps clear a few things up #N.Safi.

Related

Is it okay to call a private method of a parent class's subclass from a module which is included in the parent class in rails?

Is it okay to call a private method of a parent class's subclass from a module which is included in the parent class especially when it concerns ApplicationController, Controllers and lib modules in Rails?
Consider if required to change the controller name the method name to reflect the model name(to Article) change.
I feel this is really bad coding and wanted to know what community thinks about this
Example from a Rails Application:
/lib/some_module.rb
module SomeModule
include SomeModuleResource
def filtering_method
calling_method
end
def calling_method
fetch_object
end
end
/lib/some_module_resource.rb
module SomeModuleResource
def fetch_object
note
end
end
/app/controllers/application_controller.rb
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
include SomeModule
before_action :filtering_method
end
/app/controllers/notes_controller.rb
class NotesController < ApplicationController
def show
end
private
def note
#note ||= Note.find(param[:id]))
end
end
I'm of the opinion that this is not necessary bad, although when you expect a certain interface (methods, variables, etc.) from the class that includes the module I would add the following:
module SomeModuleResource
def fetch_object
note
end
private
def note
raise NotImplementedError
end
end
This way, when #note is called without implementing it (because you forgot it was needed or whatever) a NotImplementedError is raised.
Another option is to work around it and create a more general solution. For example, if all controllers behave the same way you described above you can do the following:
module SomeModuleResource
def fetch_object
note
end
private
def note
klass = params[:controller].classify.constantize
instance = klass.find(params[:id])
var_name = "##{klass.underscore}"
instance_variable_set(var_name, instance) unless instance_variable_get(var_name)
end
end
You could also create a class helper method like before_action so that you can pass your own implementation.
module SomeModule
include SomeModuleResource
def self.included(base)
base.extend(ClassMethods)
end
def filtering_method
calling_method
end
def calling_method
fetch_object
end
module ClassMethods
def custom_before_action(&block)
define_method(:note, &block)
private :note
before_action :filtering_method
end
end
end
Now you can use custom_before_filter { #note ||= Note.find(params[:id]) } in every controller (after including).
The above is just to present you with ideas. I'm sure you could find better solution to the problem, but this hopefully points you in the right direction.
See: Alternatives to abstract classes in Ruby?. Or search for abstract classes in Ruby and you'll find more on this subject.

How to override class_method in rails model concern

How does one override a class method defined in a model concern?
This is a bit tricky since you’re not really overriding a class method right? Because it’s using the concern api of definining class methods in the class_methods block.
so say I have a concern that looks like this:
module MyConcern
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
class_methods do
def do_something
#some code
end
end
end
In model.. how would I override that method so that I could call it like we do with super when using inheritance? So in my model I’d like to go:
def self.do_something
#call module do_something
end
?
If you've included MyConcern in the model that defines self.do_something, you should just be able to use super:
module MyConcern
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
class_methods do
def do_something
puts "I'm do_something in the concern"
end
end
end
class UsesMyConcern < ActiveRecord::Base
include MyConcern
def self.do_something
super
end
end
UsesMyConcern.do_something
# => "I'm do_something in the concern"
If you haven't or don't want to include MyConcern in the model and you want to invoke do_something on the module without creating any intermediary objects, you can change your model to:
class UsesMyConcern < ActiveRecord::Base
def self.do_something
MyConcern::ClassMethods.instance_method(:do_something).bind(self).call
end
end
UsesMyConcern.do_something
# => "I'm do_something in the concern"
ActiveSupport::Concern.class_methods defines a ClassMethods module in the concern if there isn't one already, and that's where we can find the do_something method.
Why not simply call the module's method: MyConcern.do_something?
I'm not sure if there's an easy of doing super for modules (though I can see why that may be useful).
The next best solution could be doing something like calling #included_modules and manually iterating with #responds_to?:
def self.do_something
self.super_module(__method__)
end
def self.super_module(method)
self.included_modules.find { |m| m.responds_to? method }.public_send(method)
end
The old way using alias_method_chain: https://ernie.io/2011/02/03/when-to-use-alias_method_chain/
The new way (requires > ruby 2.0.0) you really should use this, as there will be a DEPRECATION WARNING when using it in rails 5.0:
http://paweljaniak.co.za/2014/09/30/understanding-ruby-module-prepend-and-include/

Access variables outside a class method

How do I access things outside of a class method in rails? I get an error like undefined method do_something_else
module Thing
def self.do_something
do_something_else
end
def do_something_else
end
end
Here's a good reference that shows the difference between class_methods/singleton_methods and instance_methods.
In your case, you cannot access the instance method(do_something_else) without an instance.
To solve this, you have to include the module in a class and use an instance of that class.
module Thing
def self.do_something
Logic.new.do_something_else
end
def do_something_else
#perform the logic and actions here
end
end
class Logic
include Thing
end
If you would like to think of it differently though, here's what I'd propose:
module Thing
def self.do_something_else
# perform your logic and actions here
end
def do_something
# this is possible because do_something_else is defined on the module Thing
Thing.do_something_else
end
end
Try this
def self.do_something
Thing.new.do_something_else
end

Can a module class method be called from a class nested in that module?

Is it possible to call a module's class method from a nested class method? For instance, if I had:
module A
def self.foo
'hello'
end
end
module A
class B
def self.bar
foo # Fails since A is not in B's ancestor chain
end
end
end
I know that I can call foo directly on A by using
def self.bar
A.foo
end
But ideally I would like a way to have A be part of B's ancestor chain if possible. Any tips would be appreciated.
I'm not aware of a straightforward way to do exactly what you're asking. But you can move A's self methods to instance methods in another module and have B extend that module:
module A
module ClassMethods
def foo
'hello'
end
end
extend ClassMethods
end
module A
class B
extend A::ClassMethods
def self.bar
foo
end
end
end
With ActiveSupport (you already have it if you use Rails) you can do something like this:
def self.bar
self.to_s.deconstantize.constantize.foo
end
More about inflectors:
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveSupport/Inflector.html

Creating a module for raising class-specific errors

In my rails projects, I often use this sort of behavior in my classes and models:
class Whatever
class WhateverError < StandardError; end
def initialize(params={})
raise WhateverError.new("Bad params: #{params}") if condition
# actual class code to follow
end
end
The trouble is, this is both hugely repetitive and fairly verbose. I'd love it if I could just do this whenever I need to raise a class-specific error:
class ErrorRaiser
include ClassErrors
def initialize(params={})
error("Bad params: #{params}") if condition
error if other_condition # has default message
# actual class code to follow
end
def self.class_method
error if third_condition # class method, behaves identically
end
end
I'm having major trouble creating such a module. My sad early attempts have tended to look something like the below, but I'm pretty confused about what's available within the scope of the module, how to dynamically create classes (within methods?) or whether I have straightforward access to the "calling" class at all.
My basic requirements are that error be both a class method and an instance method, that it be "namespaced" to the class calling it, and that it have a default message. Any thoughts/help? Is this even possible?
module ClassErrorable
# This and the "extend" bit (theoretically) allow error to be a class method as well
module ClassMethods
def self.error(string=nil)
ClassErrorable.new(string).error
end
end
def self.included(base)
set_error_class(base)
base.extend ClassMethods
end
def self.set_error_class(base)
# I'm shaky on the scoping. Do I refer to this with # in a class method
# but ## in an instance method? Should I define it here with # then?
##error_class = "##{base.class}Error".constantize
end
def self.actual_error
# This obviously doesn't work, and in fact,
# it raises a syntax error. How can I make my
# constant a class inheriting from StandardError?
##actual_error = ##error_class < StandardError; end
end
def initialize(string)
#string = string || "There's been an error!"
end
def error(string=nil)
raise ##actual_error.new(string)
end
end
How about something like this (written in pure Ruby; it could be refactored to use some Rails-specific features like .constantize):
module ClassErrorable
module ClassMethods
def error(message = nil)
klass = Object::const_get(exception_class_name)
raise klass.new(message || "There's been an error!")
end
def exception_class_name
name + 'Error'
end
end
def self.included(base)
base.extend ClassMethods
Object::const_set(base.exception_class_name, Class.new(Exception))
end
def error(message = nil)
self.class.error(message)
end
end

Resources