I try to fill a treelist with remote data via a ajax proxy but the treelist shows only the first level and try to reload the sub levels even though the json response contain a complete tree structure. Fiddle link: https://fiddle.sencha.com/#view/editor&fiddle/33u9
When i try to expand the node 'SUB a' (or set the expanded property to true) the store trys to reload the node.
Why is the tree structure from the json response not honored?
Thanks in Advance.
The backend response looks like:
{
"data": {
"root": [
{
"leaf": true,
"text": "Server"
},
{
"leaf": true,
"text": "Storage"
},
{
"text": "SUB a"
"children": [
{
"leaf": true,
"text": "Modul A - 1"
},
{
"leaf": true,
"text": "Modul A - 2"
}
],
},
{
"leaf": true,
"text": "Modul B"
}
]
},
"success": true
}
The used reader config is
reader: {
type: 'json',
rootProperty: 'data.root',
successProperty: 'data.success',
},
After playing around i use the following workaround:
getNavigation: function() {
var me = this,
tree = me.getView().down('navigationtree'),
store = tree.getStore(),
node = store.getRoot();
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: '/getnav',
method: 'POST',
success: function(response) {
var obj = Ext.decode(response.responseText),
childs = obj.data.root;
tree.suspendEvents();
node.removeAll();
childs.forEach(function(item) {
node.appendChild(item);
});
tree.resumeEvents();
},
failure: function(response) {
//debugger;
console.log('server-side failure with status code ' + response.status);
}
}).then(function() {
//debugger;
}
);
}
The funny things is that only the first level of the tree has to be added all following sub-levels are added automaticaly.
The table is generated properly with the right number of rows and columns but the cells are empty. Source of data is an array of objects.
The code I used:
$('#myTable').DataTable( {
data:ar3,
"columns": [
{ title: "balance" },
{ title: "employeedetails" },
{ title: "position" },
{ title: "salaryamt" },
{ title: "startingdate" }
]
} );
`
I want to know what elements of a slide can be changed programmatically; one way to understand what's going on would be to look at the JSON behind slides. I have the slides ID but haven't figured out how to look at it in any way except the standard wysiwyg editor.
For the whole presentation, you can check this documentation.
JSON representation
{
"presentationId": string,
"pageSize": {
object(Size)
},
"slides": [
{
object(Page)
}
],
"title": string,
"masters": [
{
object(Page)
}
],
"layouts": [
{
object(Page)
}
],
"locale": string,
"revisionId": string,
"notesMaster": {
object(Page)
},
}
And for each page, you can refer to REST Resource: presentations.pages.
JSON representation
{
"objectId": string,
"pageType": enum(PageType),
"pageElements": [
{
object(PageElement)
}
],
"revisionId": string,
"pageProperties": {
object(PageProperties)
},
// Union field properties can be only one of the following:
"slideProperties": {
object(SlideProperties)
},
"layoutProperties": {
object(LayoutProperties)
},
"notesProperties": {
object(NotesProperties)
},
"masterProperties": {
object(MasterProperties)
},
// End of list of possible types for union field properties.
}
I need to get inline editing in datatable columns and following is my code.
Contact.DataTable = $('#otable').DataTable( {
"ajax": {
"url" : '/Contact/' + Contact.id,
"dataSrc": function(json) {
return json.data;
},
},
"responsive": true,
"columns": [
{ "data": "id"},
{ "data": "Course", "sClass": "course" },
{ "data": "Category", "sClass": "category" },
{ "data": "name" },
{
"render": function ( data, type, method, meta ) {
return Contact.saveContact(method);
}
},
]
} );
I need to get inline editing for the fields
Course - dropdown box showing as inline
Category - text field showing as inline
There will be a 'save' button each row - This will save the changes after editing dropdown and text.
Please help me to get inline editing and save without using editor plug-in.
I am building my search query for some listing data. As part of the search people can ask for multiple rooms which sleeps a min amount of people, ie two rooms which sleep 2 and 3 people.
Im not sure how I can perform that with a filter.
Here is a shortened search query so far.
{
"query":{
"filtered":{
"query":{
"match_all":{}
}
}
},
"filter":{
"and":
[
{
"term":{
"status":"live"
}
},
{
"geo_bounding_box":{
"location":{
"top_left":"60.856553, -8.64935719999994",
"bottom_right":"49.8669688, 1.76270959999999"
}
}
}
,{
"range":{
"bedrooms":{
"gte":"2"
}
}
}
]
}
,
"size":10
}
Test Data
{
"took":1,
"timed_out":false,
"_shards":{
"total":5,
"successful":5,
"failed":0
},
"hits":{
"total":3,
"max_score":1.0,
"hits":[
{
"_index":"listings",
"_type":"listing",
"_id":"1",
"_score":1.0,
"_source":{
"name:":"Listing One",
"address1":"Some Street",
"bedrooms":2,
"city":"A City",
"id":1,
"refno":"FI451",
"user_id":1,
"rooms":[
{
"bathroom":"Shared bathroom with bath",
"double_standard":null,
"id":5,
"single":2,
"sleeps":2,
"title":"Twinny",
},
{
"bathroom":"Ensuite with bath",
"double_king_size":1,
"double_standard":1,
"id":1,
"single":null,
"sleeps":2,
"title":"Double Ensuite Room",
}
]
}
},
{
"_index":"listings",
"_type":"listing",
"_id":"2",
"_score":1.0,
"_source":{
"name":"Listing Two",
"address1":"Some Street",
"bedrooms":2,
"city":"A City",
"id":2,
"refno":"BL932",
"user_id":1,
"rooms":[
{
"bathroom":"Ensuite with bath",
"double_standard":1,
"id":4,
"single":1,
"sleeps":3,
"title":"Family Room",
},
{
"bathroom":"Ensuite with shower",
"double_standard":1,
"id":2,
"single":null,
"sleeps":2,
"title":"Single Room",
}
]
}
},
{
"_index":"listings",
"_type":"listing",
"_id":"3",
"_score":1.0,
"_source":{
"name":"Listing Three",
"address1":"Another Address",
"bedrooms":1,
"city":"Your City",
"id":3,
"refno":"TE2116",
"user_id":1,
"rooms":[
{
"bathroom":"Ensuite with shower",
"double_king_size":null,
"double_standard":1,
"id":3,
"single":1,
"sleeps":3,
"title":"Family Room",
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
If you look at my data I have 3 listings, two of them have multiple rooms (Listing One & Two) but only Listing Two would match my search, Reason it has one room with that sleeps two and the other sleeps three.
Is it possible to perform this query with elasticsearch?
If what you want is "Find all listings where a bedroom sleeps 2 AND another bedroom sleeps 3", this query will work. It makes one big assumptions: that you are using inner objects, and not the Nested data type.
This query is using the fact that inner objects are collapsed into a single field, causing "rooms.sleeps" to equal [2,3] for the desired field. Since the field is collapsed into a single array, a simple Terms query will match them. When you change the execution mode to And, it forces both 2 and 3 to be matched.
The caveat is that a room that has [2,3,4] will also be matched.
I've omitted the geo and status portion since that data wasn't provided in the source documents.
{
"query": {
"filtered": {
"query": {
"match_all": {}
}
}
},
"filter": {
"and": [
{
"range": {
"bedrooms": {
"gte": "2"
}
}
},
{
"terms": {
"rooms.sleeps": [2,3],
"execution": "and"
}
}
]
},
"size": 10
}
As far as I know the filter has to be a sibling of the query inside the filtered element. See: http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/reference/query-dsl/filtered-query/
If you combine that with Zach's solution it should work.
{
"query":
{
"filtered":
{
"query":
{
"match_all":{}
},
"filter":
{
"put" : "your filter here"
}
}
}
}